Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] vs Nolio Release Automation comparison

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] and Nolio Release Automation are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Additionally, 80% of Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Nolio Release Automation users who would recommend it.

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Read 5 Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] reviews

80% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

2,693 Views
2,585 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Nolio Release Automation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] and Nolio Release Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation.

To learn more, read our detailed Release Automation Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automic Continuous Delivery...

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nolio Release Automation

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Release Automation (7th)

Featured Reviews

Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque

Group CEO at Flexsolutions

An automation solution to automate the entire release process but lacks development

Automic eliminates a lot of error mishandling. If implemented, it can save a significant amount of money. It requires a substantial investment upfront because it eliminates the need for manual intervention in each process or job. Essentially, an operator oversees the releases, ensuring they are ready for release without needing to understand the intricacies of the process. This streamlines the release process and allows for monitoring at every step, reducing manual errors and providing automation, as the name "Automic" suggests. Automic offers a wide range of out-of-the-box integrations, available through its marketplace. This includes monitoring tools, release processes, and various other tools, making it a comprehensive solution.

Read full review

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The second valuable aspect is its capability to drive external systems like deployment automation engines or to integrate with Agile Central."

"The most valuable features of Automic Continuous Delivery Director are the UI, release planning, and tracking, and you can do your soft and hard freeze through CDP."

"Its extensive range of available connectors eliminates the need for manual code writing when implementing solutions, thus reducing coding efforts."

"The most valuable feature is the thorough coordination of software delivery across multiple environments, where multiple actors (typically business stakeholders, devs and ops engineers, release engineers, testers, and change managers) can easily cooperate to ensure a proper and repeatable delivery by combining constant follow-up on manual and automated activities."

"The most valuable feature for me is the fact that you can easily design a pipeline to promote applications from a development environment up to a production environment, and the team can become autonomous in designing those pipelines."

"Its ability to automate release deployments, streamline release scope, and reduce the cost of and time for deployment."

"It's the simplicity; it's very simple to use and deploy and deliver, and it works."

"CDD is primarily used for showing end users (managers, business teams, project managers, and release managers) what is happening with each release. The status and reporting features are very important. Automation reduces time to deploy. It also allows us to do more with releases and testing prior to production, better guaranteeing a smooth deployment."

"The valuable features are: Ability to keep the map of different environments in a single tool, ability to design and manage DevOps activity from a graphical point of view, and ability to manage large installations with more than 5,000 servers due to its 100% scalable architecture."

"This product has become invaluable in terms of saving time and improving time to market."

"It’s an enterprise-class continuous delivery solution that takes release automation to the next level, providing an agile and collaborative application delivery chain."

"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames."

"It's a stable product."

"The solution has been really helpful with its flowchart-type interface; we can easily configure the deployments through drag and drop functionality, and we can define the process and components using the flowchart."

"Improve my team activity in 75%."

"We've integrated it with our ticketing system to automatically trigger deployments and update tickets accordingly, saving a lot of manual effort."

More Nolio Release Automation pros

Cons

"CDD and RA should be two modules in the same product. They do not automatically “talk” to each other. and they require endpoint definition."

"Unfortunately, today in CDD, we don't have that capacity to integrate the testing yet."

"We would like to have a more user-friendly interface. It is already very friendly, but as soon as you start to have many applications with many tasks, the applications should be easier to manipulate on the screen."

"The product's development has been stopped. It focuses on maintaining existing products."

"We have rolled out the SAFe model, but what we would like to have is better integration with Agile Central, for instance, or at least at the plugin level, where we would select only certain stories instead of many stories in the sprint."

"Automic Continuous Delivery Director can improve the integrations. We have 25 but would like more."

"Reporting and dashboarding could be improved. Release pipelines should be creatable via templates as well as easily integrable/chained together. Visual navigation could also be improved when the pipelines become too large."

"It was complex in the beginning, and now its quite straightforward."

"Mainframe automation is one of the biggest challenges for us and currently the product doesn’t address it."

"We couldn’t get the support, and we weren’t able to achieve our goals, and there were no other plug-ins available for JIRA or Jenkins."

"Some of the existing action packs still have bugs which need to be fixed."

"Initial setup cost is more expensive, but the day-to-day cost is only for maintenance, design and for people development."

"Technical Support: 7/10 because they can be more efficient to solve issues, and you always have to prove that the issues don’t come from your infrastructure but from the product."

"Well, I'm looking forward to seeing different kinds of scheduling options and being able to troubleshoot more real time if something does go wrong."

"This product lacks proper documentation with illustrated examples."

More Nolio Release Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is a free trial available that people can try. The solution has a subscription and it is based on the users that use the solution."

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

18%

Construction Company

16%

Marketing Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nolio Release Automation?

I am working for an organization where they have been using Nolio Release Automation since 2016-2017. We are currently using version 6.6, and due to dependencies and lack of support from Broadcom, ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nolio Release Automation?

The 6.9 version offers significant improvements over 6.6. The dashboard is very appealing, showing information about applications and offline agents. We can easily remove offline agents and upgrade...

See all answers

Comparisons

Digital.ai Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

Arcad DROPS vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 28% of the time

UrbanCode Deploy vs Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL]

Compared 23% of the time

More Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] Competitors

UrbanCode Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 17% of the time

Digital.ai Deploy vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 13% of the time

OpenText Release Control vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 13% of the time

Chef vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 9% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 9% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Release Automation

July 2026

Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] report

Download Automic Continuous Delivery Director [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

July 2026

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Also Known As

CA CDD, CA Continuous Delivery Director

CA Release Automation

Overview

CA Continuous Delivery Director is a powerful pipeline planning, orchestration and analytics solution that enables teams to eliminate spreadsheets, automate test processes and continually improve the delivery of revenue-generating features to end customers. The solution works with the most popular commercial and open source DevOps solutions to orchestrate the pipeline from planning through production. It is also the core of the continuous delivery ecosystem from CA, which includes development, testing and deployment solutions. CA Continuous Delivery Director enables effortless continuous delivery of high-quality, innovative applications from high-performance, collaborative teams.

Broadcom

Nolio Release Automation streamlines deployment processes with a versatile GUI supporting both technical and non-technical users. The platform integrates with tools such as Jenkins and ServiceNow, enhancing release management efficiency while supporting diverse operating systems.

Nolio Release Automation provides a flexible platform for workflow creation without programming. It offers pre-built action packs and zero-code deployment design to streamline deployments, reducing release times significantly. While the integration with modern tools could improve and the documentation lacks depth, Nolio nonetheless centralizes production deployment activities and provides critical infrastructure for DevOps teams. Despite needing better scalability and process version control, organizations continue using the platform for virtual services and to navigate dependencies due to Broadcom's support limitations.

What are the key features of Nolio Release Automation?

User-friendly GUI: Facilitates use by technical and non-technical staff.
Zero-code workflows: Allows creation of workflows without programming expertise.
Pre-built action packs: Offers ready-to-use solutions for deployment tasks.
Tool integration: Compatible with Jenkins and ServiceNow through plugins.
Cross-platform support: Operates on diverse operating systems seamlessly.
Enhanced visibility: Provides clear insights into release processes.

What benefits and ROI should be expected?

Efficiency boost: Streamlines deployment, reducing time and costs.
Team productivity: Improves release management and operational control.
Scalability: Supports a wide range of organizational needs and environments.
Cost reduction: Decreases reliance on external vendors and costly resources.
Flexibility: Adapts to various deployment scenarios and technologies.

Nolio Release Automation is implemented across industries to manage and deploy web applications and data systems efficiently. Companies leverage its capabilities for virtual service offerings, minimizing vendor dependency and associated costs. The platform serves as a central deployment tool for production environments, with updates from version 6.6 to 6.9 managed by DevOps teams despite limitations in support and scalability.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

United Airlines

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, GitLab, Red Hat and others in Release Automation. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.