The solution has been really helpful with its flowchart-type interface; we can easily configure the deployments through drag and drop functionality, and we can define the process and components using the flowchart.
Tech Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
May 22, 2017
Deployments have been automated fully and now all the teams follow a single, error-free approach of deployment, which is time saving and seldom faults.
For my organization, in particular, it’s going to improve our throughput; we're not going to have delays in testing because we had some sort of manual entry error or transposition error, and we should be able to release our software to the customer in a much more efficient fashion.
In version 6.6, we faced numerous performance issues. This might be because it is a six-year-old version, and we are supporting nearly 1,500 applications and 15,000 to 16,000 agents.
Manager at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Aug 2, 2020
In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters.
Tech Lead at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
May 22, 2017
I would suggest that, rather than just concentrating on release automation and management, this tool could provide for more automation in different areas, such as database automation (we already have this but still can be improved further).
System Engineer at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
Feb 13, 2017
The UI and the design can sometimes be a little flaky, and that is a little frustrating at different points, but overall, it's definitely a solution, if you're looking for an enterprise product to do your releases for multiple types of deployments.
