Nolio Release Automation vs UrbanCode Deploy comparison

Broadcom and IBM are both solutions in the Release Automation category. Broadcom is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #6. Broadcom holds a 1.1% mindshare in RA, compared to IBM’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Broadcom users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Nolio Release Automation

Read 51 Nolio Release Automation reviews

565 Views
525 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

UrbanCode Deploy

Read 27 UrbanCode Deploy reviews

1,417 Views
1,346 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Nolio Release Automation

UrbanCode Deploy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 7, 2025

Nolio Release Automation and UrbanCode Deploy are competitive tools in software release management. UrbanCode Deploy tends to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set despite its higher cost and learning curve challenges.

Features: Nolio Release Automation is praised for its robust environment management, potent integration capabilities, and strong automation functions. UrbanCode Deploy offers versatile drag-and-drop functionality, a wide-ranging plugin ecosystem, and efficient complex deployment handling.

Room for Improvement: Nolio Release Automation could enhance its user interface for non-technical users, improve its error-reporting capabilities, and streamline its automation scripting processes. UrbanCode Deploy might benefit from a reduction in setup complexity, finer documentation clarity, and optimizing its learning curve for new users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nolio Release Automation is noted for ease of deployment and quick, responsive support, aiding fast implementation. UrbanCode Deploy presents a more involved deployment but offers detailed documentation and support for advanced deployment requirements.

Pricing and ROI: Nolio Release Automation appeals to budget-conscious firms with its attractive initial pricing structure that facilitates quicker ROI. UrbanCode Deploy, although higher in initial costs, provides significant ROI through its sophisticated features, attracting organizations focused on long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nolio Release Automation

Ranking in Release Automation

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UrbanCode Deploy

Ranking in Release Automation

6th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Release Automation category, the mindshare of Nolio Release Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UrbanCode Deploy is 6.0%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Release Automation

Featured Reviews

Akhilesh B N

DevOps Delivery Engineer at Barclays Capital

Real-time monitoring and seamless integration enhance deployment efficiency

The main disadvantage I see is the limited awareness of Nolio Release Automation in other organizations. It is a very nice tool, but its market presence is limited. I heard from the organization that the licensing cost was somewhat expensive. Perhaps focusing on marketing efforts would be beneficial. It is a really nice tool, and I am unsure why many organizations are not using Nolio Release Automation. It is one of the greatest tools for continuous deployment, yet its popularity remains limited. Some organizations are not aware of its existence. This might be an area worth researching and potentially developing new marketing strategies.

Read full review

AK13

DevOps Engineer at a insurance company with 5,001-10,000 employees

A handy interface that includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality

Our company uses the solution for standard, blue-green, and complex deployments. We have 250 users throughout our company. The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently. The user interface includes buttons or drag-and-drop options for all functionality. It is easy to create component…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The graphical view of when you're writing flow is the most valuable feature."

"The CA Application Insight feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames."

"The stability is good. I haven't experienced any issues."

"Stable solution that's good for automating the CI/CD pipeline: from development to production."

"The solution handles complex deployments very efficiently."

"The most valuable functionality is the ability to define the deployment process, schedule the deployment and automatically execute the deployments to different environments."

"The most valuable feature is the snapshot functionality, which allows us to access previous versions of the artifacts."

"It is very easy to make a software release. It used to take us at least a couple of hours to make a release, now we went to production with a new one last night. This new release took me five minutes."

Cons

"A concern with CA Release Automation is that Automic was acquired by CA recently. We're a bit concerned that CA strategy is going with Automic, that CA Release Automation is dead. They are not investing in it too much... They do say, that in the next two or three years we don't need to worry. They will still provide support for CA Release Automation. But we're not sure how CA Release Automation will evolve."

"In version 6.6, we faced numerous performance issues. This might be because it is a six-year-old version, and we are supporting nearly 1,500 applications and 15,000 to 16,000 agents."

"The configuration of the solution is a bit difficult to maneuver. They should work to make it easier."

"It could use better integration with development tools."

"In the next release, I would like to see more features to use active directory. And more rules to support more Python scripts and to work with Kubernetes and clouds, to have an easy solution for a lot of parameters."

"When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning."

"I certainly would like to have a better way to pass information between deployment steps using UrbanCode Deploy because that's really difficult to do."

"The scalability of this application needs improvement. Changes and variations in the application become bottlenecks as they need to be more seamless and comfortable."

"I would like to see more reporting for container architecture."

"The interface allows access in a number of ways but that can be confusing."

"The technical support of the solution could definitely be improved as PMRs take long to resolve."

"I would like to have the agent up and running at all times, as opposed to only while it is in the DevOps pipeline."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools."

"Considering COVID-19, the price is too high."

"The cost of the solution is high but it offers great ROI."

"The licensing fees for this solution are based on the number of servers that are being deployed and the number of agents that you have."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

63%

Government

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

44%

Insurance Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nolio Release Automation?

One standout aspect is its architecture. We can configure multiple instances on a single server using different system names or usernames.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nolio Release Automation?

Nolio is a pretty much good tool, though its pricing is relatively high in the market. It's more expensive than other tools. The pricing could be cheaper. In our organization, we've been using it f...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nolio Release Automation?

When I started using Nolio around eight months ago, a challenge was the lack of relevant information and related support for learning. There's also not many instructional materials and videos on pl...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

GitLab vs Nolio Release Automation

Compared 100% of the time

More Nolio Release Automation Competitors

GitLab vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 26% of the time

Microsoft Azure DevOps vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 23% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 20% of the time

Octopus Deploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 10% of the time

AWS CodeDeploy vs UrbanCode Deploy

Compared 7% of the time

More UrbanCode Deploy Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation

August 2025

Download Nolio Release Automation product report

Buyer's Guide

UrbanCode Deploy

July 2025

Download UrbanCode Deploy product report

Also Known As

CA Release Automation

uDeploy

Overview

CA Release Automation enables you to seamlessly connect the continuous delivery ecosystem to deliver high-quality applications faster than ever before. With this enterprise-ready solution, you can accelerate and stabilize application deployments from development to test to production. Its advanced capabilities can help you plan, manage and optimize the continuous delivery pipeline to improve release quality and efficiency. With CA Release Automation, get automated, agile release management that’s ready to work in your IT world.

Broadcom

IBM UrbanCode Deploy orchestrates and automates the deployment of applications, middleware configuration, and database changes into development, test, and production environments—local, dedicated or shared cloud environments—accelerating time to market and reducing cost by shrinking manual efforts from days to minutes with automation, while reducing risk by cutting deployment errors by up to 90 percent.

IBM

Sample Customers

CA Release Automation customers include Citrix, NIIT Technologies, ING Bank, Molina Healthcare, Swisscom, Bupa and Tesco. Read case studies from customers who are igniting and advancing their continuous delivery journey with CA Release Automation.

As policy, IBM does not release customer names on non-IBM web sites. However, public DevOps and UrbanCode Deploy case studies can be found here. IBM's UrbanCode Deploy customers span Small-Medium Businesses to Fortune 500 companies across all industries worldwide.

Buyer's Guide

Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy

July 2025

Free Report: Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy

Find out what your peers are saying about Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nolio Release Automation vs. UrbanCode Deploy report.

See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.