Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Azure Firewall Manager Logo

Top 10 Azure Firewall Manager Alternatives

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5
Start review

Top Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Azure Firewall Manager based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Azure Firewall Manager surpasses its competitors by providing centralized management and superior security features for network policies across multiple Azure subscriptions, offering seamless integration with services like Microsoft Sentinel and Azure Security Center for enhanced threat intelligence and security posture management.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
AlgoSec
4.5 out of 5
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
AlgoSec
4.5 out of 5
AlgoSec offers automated policy change management and risk analysis, appealing to those seeking compliance tools. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in integrated policy management and scalability, suitable for managing complex environments. AlgoSec provides cost-effective solutions, while Azure Firewall Manager ensures greater long-term ROI with seamless Azure integration.
Download AlgoSec vs. Azure Firewall Manager Report
AlgoSec offers an extensive setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager presents a more budget-friendly initial investment. This notable difference can significantly influence the overall financial planning for organizations considering these network security management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
AlgoSec offers an extensive setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager presents a more budget-friendly initial investment. This notable difference can significantly influence the overall financial planning for organizations considering these network security management solutions.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Tufin Orchestration Suite
4.0 out of 5
Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automated policy management and network visibility, supporting compliance and risk management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager shines with cloud-native integration and centralized oversight, offering advanced threat protection, making it ideal for robust cloud security needs.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report
Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.
View comparison
Pricing
Tufin Orchestration Suite has higher setup costs compared to Azure Firewall Manager, making Tufin a pricier option upfront while Azure offers a more budget-friendly initiation.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud appeals to security-conscious organizations with its threat intelligence and network optimization, offering easy deployment and strong ROI. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in integration with Azure services, centralized management, and extensive support, ideal for cloud-centric businesses.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Report
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud involves significant initial setup costs, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-effective setup. This difference highlights FortiGate's potential for higher initial investment compared to the budget-friendly Azure Firewall solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud involves significant initial setup costs, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-effective setup. This difference highlights FortiGate's potential for higher initial investment compared to the budget-friendly Azure Firewall solution.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
FireMon Security Manager
4.1 out of 5
FireMon Security Manager excels in policy automation and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager integrates seamlessly with Azure services and offers scalability. Buyers might choose FireMon for its affordability and insight or Azure for cloud-native features and integration.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. FireMon Security Manager Report
FireMon Security Manager has an upfront setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
FireMon Security Manager has an upfront setup cost, whereas Azure Firewall Manager offers a more cost-efficient initial setup.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Skybox Security Suite
3.8 out of 5
Skybox Security Suite excels with features like Network Path Analysis and Vulnerability Management, ideal for large networks requiring comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager offers centralized cloud-based security management with consistent policy creation, suitable for environments focusing on cloud deployments.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Skybox Security Suite Report
Skybox Security Suite has a higher setup cost with extensive configuration features, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup with fewer complexities.
View comparison
Pricing
Skybox Security Suite has a higher setup cost with extensive configuration features, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup with fewer complexities.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Palo Alto Networks Panorama
4.2 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers comprehensive security controls and flexibility, suiting those prioritizing robust management. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager excels in scalability and integration with Azure services, appealing to cloud-focused strategies with potential cost efficiency for Microsoft ecosystem users.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks Panorama typically involves higher setup costs due to its robust functionalities, while Azure Firewall Manager offers a more budget-friendly setup option that appeals to cost-conscious users seeking essential firewall management.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
AWS Firewall Manager
3.9 out of 5
AWS Firewall Manager excels in robust policy control and logging, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager offers seamless Azure integration and user-friendly setup, appealing to Azure-centric organizations. AWS provides competitive pricing, while Azure's cost-effectiveness suits users maximizing Azure services.
Download AWS Firewall Manager vs. Azure Firewall Manager Report
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
AWS Firewall Manager offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while Azure Firewall Manager requires a higher investment but includes integrated features that may offset the cost difference.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Cisco Security Cloud Control
4.1 out of 5
Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized operations, automation, and detailed security configuration for Cisco devices. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager offers integration with Azure's ecosystem, supporting hub and spoke architecture and consistent policy application. Buyers may value Cisco's device management or Azure's ecosystem integration.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report
Cisco Security Cloud Control incurs a moderate initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall Manager demands a higher upfront investment, spotlighting a significant pricing distinction between the two firewall management solutions.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Security Cloud Control incurs a moderate initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall Manager demands a higher upfront investment, spotlighting a significant pricing distinction between the two firewall management solutions.
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
Azure Firewall Manager Logo
FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF)
4.2 out of 5
Azure Firewall Manager features seamless Microsoft integration, enhancing user experience. In comparison, FortiGate CNF's advanced threat protection suits complex needs. Azure's simplified deployment and cost transparency benefit existing Azure users, whereas FortiGate appeals to those needing robust security for large-scale environments despite higher initial costs.
Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) Report
Azure Firewall Manager involves a moderately high initial setup cost while FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting the cost-effective nature of FortiGate CNF compared to Azure Firewall Manager.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Azure Firewall Manager involves a moderately high initial setup cost while FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting the cost-effective nature of FortiGate CNF compared to Azure Firewall Manager.

Related categories

Firewall Security Management
Microsoft Security Suite
Vulnerability Management