Azure Firewall Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud comparison

Microsoft and Fortinet are both solutions in the Firewall Security Management category. Microsoft is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.3, while Fortinet is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 3.0% mindshare in Firewall Security Management, compared to Fortinet’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.

Azure Firewall Manager

Read 9 Azure Firewall Manager reviews

1,239 Views
669 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Read 80 Fortinet FortiGate Cloud reviews

5,075 Views
1,218 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Azure Firewall Manager

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and Azure Firewall Manager are products that compete in the cloud-based security management solutions category. Azure Firewall Manager seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive security features and robust scalability, appealing particularly to larger infrastructures.

Features: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers seamless integration with Fortinet's security ecosystem, advanced threat protection, and straightforward policy management. Azure Firewall Manager provides comprehensive threat intelligence, centralized management, and extensive scalability for large infrastructures.

Room for Improvement: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud could enhance its scalability options and provide more detailed documentation for complex deployment scenarios. It might also improve threat intelligence features to better compete with Azure Firewall Manager. Azure Firewall Manager could simplify its initial setup process and offer more cost-effective plans for smaller businesses. It might also provide more user-friendly interfaces to ease management tasks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is noted for its user-friendly setup and responsive customer service, ensuring an easy transition to the cloud. Azure Firewall Manager, while more complex to deploy due to advanced security configurations, offers robust customer support with detailed setup guidance for complex environments.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiGate Cloud generally requires a lower initial investment, making it attractive for smaller businesses with competitive ROI. Azure Firewall Manager involves higher setup costs but offers a stronger ROI in environments needing extensive security management and scalability, potentially justifying the additional expense with its advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Firewall Manager

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Microsoft Security Suite (26th)

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Ranking in Firewall Security Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Firewall Security Management category, the mindshare of Azure Firewall Manager is 3.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is 4.7%, down from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud	4.7%
Azure Firewall Manager	3.0%
Other	92.3%

Firewall Security Management

Featured Reviews

Sikkander Batcha

DevOps Engineer at CloudIQ

Has managed traffic effectively but lacks visibility and advanced control features

Azure Firewall is typically behind other vendor firewalls because we don't see what kind of traffic is traveling through it. That is one drawback. The main drawback is that we need log support from Azure Firewall, which can be quite costly. There is no login feature in Azure Firewall because only the IAM feature is available in the Azure site; we manage it only through the Azure portal, not through any other portal. Other vendors, such as Palo Alto, provide GUI or CLI interfaces to manage their firewalls, whereas we only manage Azure Firewall through the Azure portal. In the future, I would like to see additional features in Azure Firewall Manager to make it more competitive, such as technologies like App-ID and User-ID that Palo Alto has. Azure Firewall currently only allows traffic based on layer four and sometimes layer seven, so they need to improve in those areas compared to other vendors.

Read full review

Firman Sanjaya

Security Engineer at Exclusive Networks

Cloud logs have supported long-term auditing but security vulnerabilities still raise concerns

It depends on the user. When he needs maybe data retention for one year, for three months or more, I recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. If he doesn't want to set the log on FortiAnalyzer, I will recommend him with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. It depends. As I mentioned before, if they don't have a syslog server or any other SIEM, I will recommend it. If they need an audit for one year of data retention, I will recommend it because it's worth the money for one year of log retention. It's straightforward. If I enable Fortinet FortiGate Cloud feature on the FortiGate on-premise or VM, it will copy the configuration on the cloud. Depending on my license, I can configure it or have it as read-only with a limited license. That's one of the main purposes of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for me. The report doesn't have many templates, but the log retention is so good with one-year retention. If you compare it with the FortiAnalyzer or maybe with any other product such as a FortiSIEM template, with the limited license, you only get the 360 template, it's called. I think the security function, I mainly use it for configuration purposes and log retention purposes. The security is the same as the VM or the hardware, I think. The sandbox. I think it has it, but not a lot if you only have the default capability with only 10 files per minute. I think the user needs to be selective with the files that they want to send to the sandbox on the cloud.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Azure Firewall Manager is the testing and configuration."

"The most valuable feature is the web firewall, as it is easy to install and does not require any plugins for your browser."

"The tool's support is good."

"I would definitely recommend the solution to my clients, especially if one is using Azure Cloud."

"Azure Firewall Manager centralizes network security management with a hub and spoke architecture."

"The best feature of Azure Firewall Manager is that it is easy to maintain and configure."

"The solution is very easy to set up."

"It has helped us in multiple ways; for example, we don't require different spaces to manage it, we can do a lot of automation integrations into the code, we could integrate it into the DevOps pipeline, and it has helped us with our time-to-market for a very specific product when we are actually deploying or upgrading."

More Azure Firewall Manager pros

"The most valuable features are management and integration."

"I have found the SD-WAN, flexibility, and security the most valuable features."

"One firewall box can contain various top-of-the-line services that are packaged together for easy administration."

"The most valuable feature of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is the logs are stored longer on this cloud version."

"The stability is great, there are no bugs or glitches, it was reliable, and it doesn't crash or freeze."

"The solution is scalable because they have models that allow it to be right sized."

"We use the solution for routing and cloud security. We have multiple offices nationwide, all connected through the MPRS network, which is terminated at our FortiGate firewall. We consolidate our networks, filter packets, and segment our network through this firewall. My company has around three lakh firewalls."

"The ability to manage everything from the cloud is going to be the most valuable by far with this solution."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pros

Cons

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

"With Azure Firewall, the problem is that the NAT-ing still has to be improved."

"The cost is a significant concern because we are in a region where the dollar is not our default currency, and converting to dollars makes it very expensive."

"Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling deployment, and traffic management, which leads to higher costs."

"We could do only one-way NAT-ing, where the traffic comes from outside to internal, to Azure, which is fine. However, when we actually do NAT-ed traffic to hit the firewall, that way is not working."

"Microsoft was unable to fully solve the problem with email phishing and spamming."

"The configuration and settings require substantial time for learning, particularly for new users."

"The solution can improve the integration with open-source tools."

More Azure Firewall Manager cons

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud's customization is very limited."

"The command-line interface could definitely be improved in future iterations. It's lacking right now."

"Everything related to the graphical user interface should be improved."

"The solution should include a commit button that allows for review of changes and deployments before they are submitted."

"Lacks some security against external attacks."

"The solution should include a commit button that allows for review of changes and deployments before they are submitted."

"When it comes to technical support, the problem we have found is that if an issue comes, it takes a day to get everything resolved. It could be faster. They can be better at optimizing how they answer tickets in terms of response times. There must be ways to make the process more streamlined. It would make it easier for their clients."

"Having a built-in SOC solution like an XDR platform within the solution would be convenient for customers."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is reasonable but it is reasonable for the features."

"The solution is certainly expensive in comparison with other cloud services."

"The pricing is competitive."

"Unlike other firewalls, the cost of Fortinet FortiGate is low, and the functionality is nearly identical, which is why we chose it."

"If you purchase any Fortinet firewall, they will give you FortiCloud for 100 GB for free. You can access Fortinet FortiGate Cloud freely up to certain limits."

"The license does not include many of the features that are necessary, which means that you have to pay extra for them."

"All the consulting and deployment charges are included in the product's licenses. There are no additional costs."

"We pay around $19,000 a year and do not pay for extra technical support."

"The pricing is mid-ranged, it's not very expensive but it's not the cheapest or most affordable in the market."

"The price of the solution is high compare to competitors."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	22

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Firewall Manager?

The pricing for Azure Firewall Manager is expensive. In our project, we have used both Palo Alto Firewall and Azure Firewall. Azure charges for many aspects including scaling, automated scaling dep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Firewall Manager?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Firewall Manager?

My customers are using Azure Firewall Manager, so I'm learning from both documentation and practical knowledge. I usually recommend Azure Firewall Manager for projects such as an animal hospital pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am very satisfied with the price and licensing cost of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, rating it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

It needs to improve the vulnerability that I found recently regarding the single sign-on from Fortinet FortiGate Cloud account. That became a concern for my user. The CVE that was leaked recently a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am not a user at this time. I am a system integrator. Mostly firewall and network protection. Rarely with endpoint protection. I can say a partner and reseller, I think.

See all answers

Comparisons

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 17% of the time

Azure Firewall vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 16% of the time

AlgoSec vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 11% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Azure Firewall Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure Firewall Manager Competitors

Fortinet FortiManager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 53% of the time

AWS Firewall Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager

May 2026

Download Azure Firewall Manager product report

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

May 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

FortiCloud, FortiGate Cloud

Overview

Azure Firewall Manager offers easy configuration, centralized management, and automatic scalability. Its integration with Azure Entra ID provides secure access, while Power BI facilitates centralized monitoring, contributing to its cloud-native benefits and reliable network management.

Azure Firewall Manager is recognized for its efficient security policy management and the ability to configure and test firewall settings across multiple locations. Its integration with Azure Kubernetes supports cloud environment security and the seamless migration of on-premise components to the cloud. With its hub-and-spoke architecture, users can detect threats and orchestrate policies more effectively, although integration with open-source tools and technical support responsiveness could be enhanced. Improvements in NAT capabilities and an AI-driven phishing prevention system would enhance its offering.

What are Azure Firewall Manager's key features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies firewall setup without additional plugins.
Centralized Security Management: Streamlines policy management across locations.
Automatic Scalability: Adjusts resources to meet changing demands seamlessly.
Integration with Azure Entra ID: Provides secure user access control.
Hub and Spoke Architecture: Enables efficient threat detection and policy orchestration.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Cloud-Native Benefits: Offers stability and seamless integration with cloud environments.
Fair Pricing: Competitive cost structure, despite currency conversion challenges.
Simplified Monitoring: Uses Power BI for comprehensive security insights.
Enhanced Security: Protects against phishing and ransomware threats.

Azure Firewall Manager is widely implemented in industries like finance to secure applications and manage B2B interactions. This tool supports endpoint security, traffic management, and seamless orchestrations within cloud environments, ensuring robust protection against various threats.

Microsoft

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers centralized management with advanced security, scalability, and network management capabilities. It simplifies multi-site management with SD-WAN, real-time threat intelligence, and seamless integration, ensuring robust protection.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is known for delivering extensive network security features, specializing in robust firewall functions and SD-WAN capabilities. It offers real-time threat intelligence, intrusion prevention, and VPN features. Users appreciate the ease of deployment and integration capabilities, making it suitable for managing devices across multiple sites. However, areas such as support, VPN streamlining, and dashboard enhancements require attention to improve usability. Pricing and technical complexity can be challenging, and better third-party integrations are desired.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management with intuitive controls.
SD-WAN Capabilities: Ensures efficient and secure network performance.
Reliable VPN Features: Protects connections with advanced encryption.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control across multiple locations.
Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Provides up-to-date security insights.

What benefits are users finding in Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex network operations.
Effective Policy Control: Enhances security through detailed configurations.
Network Performance: Optimizes traffic management and routing.

Industries implement Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for network security management, serving as a firewall and enabling SD-WAN tunneling. Organizations use it to manage devices and secure cloud as well as on-premises environments. It assists with application filtering, identity management, and integrates with major cloud providers for comprehensive security. System integrators offer it as a managed security service, benefiting companies that need to secure network infrastructures across multiple sites.

Fortinet

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Buyer's Guide

Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Firewall Manager vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud report.

See our list of best Firewall Security Management vendors.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.