We are using the solution to upgrade clients using old legacy security to the cloud.
Senior IT Manager at a tech services company with 501-1,000 employees
Easy configuration, intuitive dashboard, but reports need improvement
Pros and Cons
- "We have found some of the valuable features to be how easy the solution is to configure, the graphic support, and the intuitive dashboard."
- "There are limited administration controls that should be improved."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
We have found some of the valuable features to be how easy the solution is to configure, the graphic support, and the intuitive dashboard.
What needs improvement?
There are limited administration controls that should be improved. Additionally, the reports available currently are not enough.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using the solution for eight months.
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Email Security Gateway
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Email Security Gateway. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The resolution has been reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
There has not been any problem with the scalability of the solution. We have approximately 600 users using the solution in my organization. We have plans to increase usage in the future by 100.
How are customer service and support?
The technical support has been good and responsive they have always called us back.
How was the initial setup?
The installation is complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution requires a license and we pay annually.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend this solution to others. In a few years, I think this solution is going to be a global leader.
I rate Barracuda Email Security Gateway a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Head Information Technology Infrastructure at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Stable, with good antispam capabilities and technical support, but it's not scalable
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the Antispam services, which are the basic services of spam device"
- "The most valuable feature is the Antispam services, which are the basic services of a spam device."
- "The scalability needs improvement, it's the only feature that is required."
- "It's not a scalable product. If we want to scale it then we have to change the device, because it is on-premises."
What is our primary use case?
It is useful for a medium-sized business. It is not useful for large enterprise solutions. It's made for small networks with fewer mailboxes.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the Antispam services, which are the basic services of spam device.
What needs improvement?
The scalability needs improvement, it's the only feature that is required.
I would like to see all of the latest security details available on the device, and it should only be cloud-based, not on-premises.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for more than five years.
We are using the latest version of it.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's a stable device.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's not a scalable product. If we want to scale it then we have to change the device, because it is on-premises. It is not a cloud-based solution.
We have 2400 users in our organization.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. We have no issues with support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Previously, we did not use another solution.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not complicated.
I cannot remember the installation time, as it was a while ago.
We have a team of administrators to maintain this solution.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing cost is competitive, it's not too high and not too low.
What other advice do I have?
We have a standalone device that is not scalable, so we are considering a cloud-based solution.
I would recommend using the cloud-based solution, and not as an on-premises deployment.
I would rate this solution a seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Barracuda Email Security Gateway
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about Barracuda Email Security Gateway. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Technical Manager at Sarkar Group
Scalable with good stability and very good anti-spam features
Pros and Cons
- "The solution's anti-spam features are its most valuable aspect."
- "The solution's anti-spam features are its most valuable aspect."
- "The deep scanning feature needs to be improved."
- "The deep scanning feature needs to be improved."
What is most valuable?
The solution's anti-spam features are its most valuable aspect. It's quite effective. It stops a lot of junk from getting through.
What needs improvement?
The solution requires better API integration. It's really lacking right now. If there was API access that allowed us to integrate some of our own technology or features in there that would be ideal.
The deep scanning feature needs to be improved. It's not as effective as we need it to be. We need to understand a bit more about how it's scanning and blocking and how, if it's possible, to tweak the settings.
The solution has quite a few outdated videos. When you watch them and try to follow them for doing certain tasks, you quickly realize they are out of date. They need to update their video documentation for their user base.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for over two years at this point. It's been a while, but not too long. It may actually even be up to three years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is quite stable. We don't have any issues with that aspect of the product. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's reliable. It's good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is quite good. If a company needs to scale it out, they can do so. It's not too hard to expand it. We haven't had any issues with scalability so far.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is great. Technical support is actually very good. We will send them an email and they will call us. Once, we had an issue that took a full six hours to solve. The support team actually helped us for the whole six hours. They didn't abandon us at all. It's a great service that they provide. We're quite satisfied with them.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We didn't really use any other solution previous to this product.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is not overly complex. We found it pretty straightforward. It's not too hard to execute.
The deployment is pretty fast as well. It's a good process. We've done it a few times at this point.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is fine. It's somewhere in the middle if you look at the market. There are certainly other products with higher and lower price points. We don't find their pricing unreasonable, however. We're willing to pay for it.
What other advice do I have?
We're resellers of the product.
Overall, we've been pretty happy with the solution.
I'd rate it at a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. reseller
Insolvency Practitioner and Director at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees
Simple to whitelist addresses, but it could always be more secure
Pros and Cons
- "It is very simple to whitelist addresses."
- "We are using this product to protect us against spam and viruses."
- "This product can always be made more secure."
- "This product can always be made more secure."
What is our primary use case?
We are using this product to protect us against spam and viruses.
What is most valuable?
It is very simple to whitelist addresses.
What needs improvement?
This product can always be made more secure.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the Barracuda Email Security Gateway for a few years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We use this product on a daily basis.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have 18 of us who are using this product.
How are customer service and technical support?
Our support is outsourced.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were using a different solution prior to Barracuda and we switched because our IT support company suggested it.
What about the implementation team?
Our department was not responsible for the deployment.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The licensing fees are part of a bundled support package that we pay for.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
This security product is part of an IT support package that we bought, and we didn't select it or purchase it for a specific reason. I don't know who the competitors are.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, I am satisfied with this product, although I don't have the expertise to meaningfully recommend it, or not.
I would rate this solution a five out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
CIO at a government with 51-200 employees
Rock solid and great at blocking spam
Pros and Cons
- "Great at blocking spam."
- "If you have raw spam, this solution is going to catch it."
- "Solution requires regular checking to ensure it's 'keeping up' with spam."
- "I had some difficulty in the past with the system getting swamped and overwhelmed trying to process all incoming traffic."
What is our primary use case?
This solution is my spam filter and it's tied to my exchange server. All SMTP traffic goes through Barracuda. I've just started using their cloud service and I'm looking possibly at their firewall solutions also because I can tie all these things together in the cloud. We are customers of Barracuda and I work as CIO at a municipality in the States.
How has it helped my organization?
If you have raw spam, this solution is going to catch it. They are consistent and they're good. Spam itself is not getting through, although email with links that deliver spam can bring it in if users are not being diligent. My biggest concern is educating my end users that just because an email looks like it is from someone you know, doesn't mean you should open it. My mantra is: If you weren't expecting it, delete it.
What is most valuable?
I like the frontend blocking of spam which is what it is designed to do. I like the Dashboard view, it gives me a great overview of everything. Also, it is rich in configuration options which allow for some very fine tuning. Overall, It's been very beneficial.
What needs improvement?
In the past, I would have said that the reporting could be improved, but they've gotten better at that in recent versions. Although I don't use reporting routinely, it's something I do when I need to check something or pull some kind of statistical report. Also, I had some difficulty in the past with the system getting swamped and overwhelmed trying to process all incoming traffic. The appliance didn't have the resources to keep up. Obviously the network is getting more and more spam and virus traffic which adds to the problem. Since I had a service contract with Barracuda, they were able to resolve the issue by shipping me newer replacement hardware with significantly more computing resources. This was all at no cost.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using this solution for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is rock solid.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It scales quite well as far as I can tell. I've got a box that is more than adequate for my environment. I've have about 250 end users so I'm not huge environment. We're a municipality, and all end user email routes through Barracuda regardless of which department they are in.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is excellent. Response time is great.
How was the initial setup?
I think the initial setup was pretty straightforward. As I mentioned previously, we recently upgraded to the current version, and in the process our hardware was upgraded because we were running on older Pentium processors. It all went quite smoothly with support from Barracuda.
What other advice do I have?
I think it's a good product, it's rated fairly highly when I look at reviews.
I would rate this solution a nine out of 10, no reason for not giving a 10 than, nothing is perfect.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Founder CEO at Waterdog Computer Works
Get rid of your spam concerns and be more productive with the help of this product
Pros and Cons
- "Eliminating inbox clutter creates an opportunity to be more productive instead of wasting time manually sorting through spam."
- "The time it saves in eliminating inbox clutter and the focus that creates allows staff to be more productive instead of absolutely wasting time manually filtering spam."
- "The spam filtering is a little too aggressive. You can not get granular enough to back off on what is considered spam and what is not."
- "Sometimes the spam filtering is a little too aggressive. You can not get granular enough to back off what is considered spam and what is not."
What is our primary use case?
We are an MSP (Managed Service Provider) so, basically, all of our business clients who want email security are using this product.
How has it helped my organization?
Barracuda has made things easier simply by making it so all of us do not have to go through the mounds of spam that would be coming in otherwise. It has made our lives a lot simpler in letting us see what is valuable in our inboxes rather than a blob of emails users have to hunt through.
What is most valuable?
It is really hard to pinpoint any one feature that is more valuable than the others. I mean, the features are all valuable. If I had to choose, I guess the spam filtering part of the product stands out as phenomenal. The time it saves in eliminating inbox clutter and the focus that creates allows staff to be more productive instead of absolutely wasting time manually filtering spam.
What needs improvement?
An improvement I would encourage is that sometimes the spam filtering is a little too aggressive. You can not get granular enough to back off what is considered spam and what is not. So it is fine that they have predefined settings for spam, but not so good that it can not be modified. If we could go in and modify the settings or affect the way it is treating spam, I think that would allow for more versatility and better results.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Barracuda Email Security Gateway for probably a little over two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Email Security is fine. We have had no real issues with it.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is very, very easy. We have over 40 clients with multiple end-users currently using it, so it has already proven to be very scalable.
Primarily the people using the product are actually the end-users. They could be CFOs, CEOs, company presidents, office managers — the whole gamut of employees use the product if they use the network. We are an MSP, so we are literally servicing the whole range of different companies and different end-user needs with pretty high volume capability.
How are customer service and technical support?
I would say their technical support is a ten. They are really good. They support you right from the beginning with training and make you comfortable adopting the product.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Barracuda was actually the first product like this that we utilized. We were looking for a product to take care of spam and email security. In our comparison, we found this product to be the solution for us at the time.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is pretty straight forward as long as you pay attention when you get the training. Record that training session.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for the product is fine. It matches what we can budget to the functionality we expect.
What other advice do I have?
Security Gateway is simple to implement. Make sure that multiple people on staff are trained in setting it up. In other words, you do not want to just be relying on one individual in the organization to be the only one who is able to set it up. Always have a backup, or even two. That is especially important to us as an MSP.
One more thing would be to pay attention when you first onboard with the solution. Barracuda puts you through some training with one of their technicians. I think it is important that you record those training sessions to keep for your reference. What will happen if you do not take advantage of recording it is that after the first two or three installs, you will be on your own. If you make sure you make a copy of your training session with them, then you can always refer back to it.
On a scale from one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product overall as a nine-of-ten. The reason I would give it a nine is just that one area where we do not have the ability to manually go in and modify some of the settings. Until we can do that, it is still a great product but it is not quite a ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
General Manager at Gemakom
Link protection checks links and alerts us to phishing attacks
Pros and Cons
- "The link protection and anti-phishing features are great."
- "Their support is very good; you get German and from Austria, but they also have English support world-wide, with very good service and short response time."
- "False positives have given us issues."
- "We had a case where right before a link was redirected and there was no chance to ignore it."
What is our primary use case?
We use it ourselves as well as our customers. Our deployment is on-premise and also combined with cloud control. Cloud control is second-tier. The first tier is cloud control, the Barracuda and Barracuda cloud and then the email is passed to our Barracuda box which is on-premise. It's a gateway appliance, not a hardware box. It is normally used with Microsoft Exchange server but is also supported with Microsoft Office 365. We have 20 users but our customers have from 200 to 500 users.
What is most valuable?
They combined the cloud control and they have anti-phishing. There is link protection, which means when a link is in the email and it is similar to PayPal, for example, it gets flagged. The link protection checks the link and checks that it has been faked because it's not the original PayPal link. So when a link is not original then it's passed to Barracuda and checked in the sent box and when it's okay then it's opened. Otherwise, if it's malware then there's an alert which says, "That's a phishing attack and this is what you need to do."
What needs improvement?
We had a case where right before a link was redirected and there was no chance to ignore it. A few days ago there was a feature request to clean and redirect a link because it was a false positive. Let us say false positive in the link protection and there's no easy way to correct it.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Barracuda Email Security Gateway for five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It's stable. The only issue is when you do an email campaign with large file attachments, PDF and then email, the system slows down. That is a problem because the queue gets full and you have to correct it and delete those emails manually.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability is pretty granular. For example, 80p protection and cloud protection, link protection, anti-phishing, you can buy it all separately. You buy the original box and then you can buy afterward the additional security features.
How are customer service and technical support?
Their support is very good. You get German and from Austria, but they also have English support world-wide. It is very good. With less response time. Short response time.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used another solution. The complexity of the user interface was very complex and if you tried to make a configuration change, you end up searching for the feature and where you can edit. Also, security is a very good feature of the Barracuda Email Security Gateway. It has a per-user quarantine. It's very comfortable for the user to make his own white list or blacklist.
How was the initial setup?
The setup is straightforward, it's very easy. For example, I want to change a feature but I didn't find it easily. There's a search option and you find the manual entry and you can make a conflict change.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is yearly licensing. They recently increased the price but the price-performance relation is still very good. Compared to Cisco IronPort, Barracuda is less expensive and the configuration is much simpler.
What other advice do I have?
Try the Barracuda Email Essential Security Cloud Service. It's not expensive and implemented in half an hour.
I would rate it an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. partner
Presales Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
A user-friendly solution that is easy to deploy and configure
Pros and Cons
- "The security protection is the best and it's GUI is user-friendly."
- "The security protection is the best and it's GUI is user-friendly."
- "We would like to have a local support center in India so that they are operating in the same time zone and speak the same language."
- "We would like to have a local support center in India so that they are operating in the same time zone and speak the same language."
What is our primary use case?
We are a system integrator and this is one of the products that we provide to our clients.
This solution is used for email security. It provides security when using Office 365, for Google Suite, in-house email servers, and other devices.
We generally deploy it as a hardware solution for our clients, but it depends on their environment and what their requirements are.
How has it helped my organization?
Better Protection and Overall Visibility
What is most valuable?
The security protection is the best and it's GUI is user-friendly.
It has a simple configuration where you can set up the protection.
The solution provides good information on various threats that can affect our customers.
What needs improvement?
For how long have I used the solution?
I have three and a half years of experience with the Barracuda Email Security Gateway.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution has been stable and we have not faced any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Our clients are enterprise-level businesses, government bodies, and other institutions. We have not received feedback on any major issues as they have tried to scale up or add on to their environment.
How are customer service and technical support?
Barracuda's support is very good and I would rate them four and a half out of five. Nobody is perfect.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy and user-friendly, and you can deploy it quickly.
What about the implementation team?
We deploy in-house
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Email Security Gateway Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Popular Comparisons
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
Proofpoint Email Protection
Mimecast Email and Collaboration Threat Protection
Abnormal Security
Trellix Collaboration Security
Fortinet FortiMail Cloud
Symantec Messaging Gateway
Kaspersky Security for Mail Server
MetaDefender Email Security Solutions
Webroot Advanced Email Encryption powered by Zix
Trustwave Secure Email Gateway
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Barracuda Email Security Gateway Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- Which Email Security enterprise solution would you choose: Cisco Secure Email vs Forcepoint Email Security vs Barracuda Email Security Gateway?
- When evaluating SEG (Secure Email Gateways), what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Why is SEG (Secure Email Gateways) important for companies?













