Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer offers clarity in requirements, reducing post-implementation clarifications. It features an intuitive UI, seamless requirement navigation, and robust model-based testing, efficiently connecting requirements to test cases.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer | 16.6% |
| ConformIQ Creator | 22.0% |
| OpenText Silk Central | 20.9% |
| Other | 40.5% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jira | 4.1 | N/A | 91% | 281 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Application Quality Management | 4.0 | N/A | 89% | 208 interviewsAdd to research |
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer user impressions indicate strong satisfaction with customer service and support. Many experienced quick, knowledgeable, and responsive assistance, praising the helpfulness of forums and pre-sales engineering. Several noted improvement post-acquisition, highlighting stability and increased R&D. However, a few pointed out gaps in first-line knowledge, needing R&D involvement for some issues, and delayed solutions. Tech support is frequently rated highly, yet not universally, with some expressing lesser satisfaction.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 36 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer automates the creation of test cases directly from requirements, streamlining quality assurance processes. Its intuitive design and seamless navigation meet users' needs while simplifying the transition from script-based to model-based testing. With strong integration capabilities, it supports continuous development, efficiently managing test data and automating workflows. Despite some usability challenges with large models and a need for better security features, the tool's ability to enhance test coverage while minimizing test cases delivers compelling value. It also offers integration with tools like Jira and ALM, ensuring smooth alignment with existing systems, though improvements in integration with testing engines and comprehensive documentation for automation frameworks would be beneficial.
What are the key features of Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer?In industries like software development and IT, Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer is implemented to enhance the transition from script-based to model-based testing, optimizing requirements validation and simplifying manual test design. By integrating with existing development tools, it supports continuous development cycles effectively.
Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer was previously known as Grid Tools Agile Designer, CA ARD, CA Agile Requirements Designer .
Williams, Rabobank
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Solution Architect at Vodafone | 4.0 | I've used Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for four years; it's stable, well-integrated, and saves time in testing, though it's expensive, hard to deploy manually, lacks scalability, and needs better AI integration and first-line support. |
| Senior Presales Engineer at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I use Broadcom Agile Requirements Designer for DevOps, finding it beneficial for its ease of use, time-saving capabilities, and visibility of test cases. However, the UI could be enhanced with a modern framework for a better experience. |
| Senior Technology Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I rate Broadcom ARD 8/10. I like its stable, scalable test case insertion, but virtual database connectivity, parameter creation, and customer service need improvement. Setup is easy, though better tools exist. |
| Data Insights & Analytics Solution Architect at BT - British Telecom | 3.5 | We use Broadcom ARD for QA requirement validation. Its user-friendly UI, scalability, and stability are excellent, with good support. Though initial setup was challenging, we desire enhanced security/authentication, but are very happy overall. |
| Senior Leader in Software Testing and Process Improvement at a tech company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I found this solution excellent for multi-level test modeling, improving requirements alignment and test coverage. Its strong integration with TDM and automation reduced development cycles and issues, although model alignment and saving test subsets need improvement. |
| Test Engineer Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I use CA ARD for designing test cases and QC, valuing its unique flow restriction feature. However, I rate it 6/10 because it lacks integration with essential end-to-end automation tools like Tosca, which limits its overall effectiveness. |
| Assistant Director at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use this solution for user stories and traceability, finding it stable, scalable, and productive, delivering good ROI. I wish its user interface were more friendly, particularly with icon-based attachments, despite valuable defect tracking. |
| Front Line Manager at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find the product's optimization for minimum test cases and maximum coverage very valuable, and its visual diagrams are helpful. However, I need more data flexibility for multiple test sets and better, more automated integration with App Test to reduce manual effort. |