A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs Fidelis Elevate comparison

A10 Networks and Fidelis Security are both solutions in the SSL/TLS Decryption category. A10 Networks is ranked #2, while Fidelis Security is ranked #4. Additionally, 75% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Fidelis Security users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) and Fidelis Elevate based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two SSL/TLS Decryption solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Kenneth Murray

Data Center Network Engineer at BRIDGETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS

Enables our content filter to do its job without any noticeable delay

Its most valuable feature is its ability to do its job accurately, effectively, and very quickly. The amount of traffic that we have going through our system is astounding. We have 6,900 students and about 1,100 staff members. Most of our teachers and staff are connecting through our system. You add to that all the cell phones, the iPads, and all the computers, and then each individual website's connection, that's a lot of traffic in a period of one second. The delay with the SSL decryption turned on is almost unnoticeable. That is great because most SSL decryption solutions — a couple of competitors we did try — their devices crashed as soon as we turned decryption on.

Read full review

Mostafa Ameen

Information Security Engineer at ICT Misr

Advanced threat detection capabilities with comprehensive incident response features providing robust cybersecurity for organizations

The initial aspect concerns two engines. The first one mentioned is available for searching behaviors directly. The second engine involves the Google Ade tool, which operates on the machine. The challenge arises when attempting to rectify protection rules, causing confusion. It would be beneficial to enhance Rigixs Query. I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It can automatically correlate events and logs, which is very helpful for an IT administrator. It can correlate different kinds of malware activities over a network, agent, or host system. You do not need to do it manually. It is a good feature. It is also a user-friendly solution. We have deployed it on the cloud because our space does not provide any flexibility for on-premises deployment, but Palo Alto has added some flexibility to install it on-premises. It must be like the same Cortex XDR agent for all the VPN services, web filtering services, and everything else."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"One of the things that I enjoy the most is using policy extensions. It's like having host firewalls to control USB connections. I think it's a wonderful tool to restrict use when connecting to our computers. Another important tool is Home Insights. That is an add-on to the Cortex solution. I like that because we can see all the vulnerabilities in the environment and control what assets are connected to our network."

"Cortex covers everything I need. It's a perfect solution. Cortex provides a different level of visibility because it's an extended EDR, allowing you to grab logs from the network and firewalls. Palo Alto invented the concept of the extended EDR or XDR."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable."

"There has been a significant reduction of approximately 70% to 80% in our internal MTTR and MTTD metrics, now around five to eight minutes whereas previously it was hours, which has helped tremendously."

"After deploying Traps, we saw the performance of the network improve by 65 to 70 percent."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks has helped lighten the load of our security analysts because it was the major tool that we were using and the one we utilized most."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Its most valuable feature is its ability to do its job accurately, effectively, and very quickly. The amount of traffic that we have going through our system is astounding... The delay with the SSL decryption turned on is almost unnoticeable."

"By not renewing six proxy boxes, rather just three of them, it saved over $100,000."

"With the Thunder SSLi, we're better protected; we can stop use of VPN and proxies, are better protected against dirty traffic coming back to our schools, and having a secure decrypt zone with the equipment lowers the chances that our security infrastructure could possibly miss an attack."

"We have several proxies in our environment, so we localized internet traffic between these proxies. Instead of getting a really huge proxy box, according to our size, we can use three boxes and share the traffic with A10's load-balancer feature."

"This is one of those devices that, once you turn it on and it's functioning properly, you'll forget that you have it."

"The technical support is very helpful."

"The initial setup is very straightforward. The deployment of the server doesn't take so long; about a day or two max."

"It has also improved our hunt ability with quick search tools, to zone in on malware or other anomalies. It is able to link items to incidents from other consoles, and works natively with the SIEM."

"The solution's technical support is perfect, so I rate the technical support a ten out of ten"

"What I like the most about this solution is the complexity. It covers a lot of areas, unlike other solutions."

"After rack and stack, devices were up and running base configurations within two hours. As with any IPS, tuning is required to stop false positives. This is no different, but the ease of use of the interface allowed my team to start making adjustments within a few hours."

"It is used as our primary in-line IDS/IPS system, replacing FireEye NX, and it catches more, looks at more ports than FireEye NX, and is a scalable appliance, unlike our NX which was saturated and shut itself down."

"Compared to similar solutions, it's quite scalable. You just need to add more storage to scale-up."

More Fidelis Elevate pros

Cons

"If you compare it to SentinelOne, which has more functionalities and detection capabilities on an open platform, the pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks."

"The installation should be easier and the Palo Alto pre-sales and sales teams should have more information on the product because they don't know what they are selling."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"Whenever the tool releases a new version when deploying the product across the organization, I feel like there are some disturbances in the CPU usage after upgrading the tool to the latest version."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a strong tool, but it is true that digesting information sometimes makes the tool go a little bit slower."

"Basically, they don't provide customer support tools just to investigate the logs."

"The setup is quite easy. We had appropriate support from the manager. One thing that was missing was the integration part."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"It would be great if it supported SSL operations according to Active Directory users. For example, if we want to bypass one of the servers or a client's internet access for SSL interception, we have to do it according to the IP address. It would be better if we could do it according to the Active Directory username. A10 says they kind of support that but we haven't tested it."

"There is one thing I would like to see changed. In their features for setting things up, there is a templating system that would normally assist clients. However, we had a better time setting up the device either through the command line or through the interface and not using the templates that were pre-installed. So there is room for improvement to the templates for initial installation."

"SSLi is a very powerful device. It has many features and to get them configured is kind of tough."

"I would like them to have a better UI (better universal design)."

"I encounter difficulty removing certain entries in behavior or alerts; likewise, I am unable to add specific calls."

"The reports in the endpoint area of Elevate can be improved."

"We position the solution as an antivirus, but this part of the solution needs improvement. They need to generally enhance the features that they have, rather than adding anything new."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all. This has been the predominant issue with an otherwise stellar product. It reboots itself unscheduled, about once a month, due to a memory buffer flaw in the interface."

"The interface bug needs to be squashed once and for all."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product making it one of its shortcomings that needs improvement."

"There is room for improvement in email security. It's a security issue. If you're aiming for XDR, covering the entire threat landscape is crucial."

"Configuration, in terms of building the collector and communicating with endpoints, is complex."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It has reasonable pricing for the use cases it provides to the company."

"I did PoCs on products called Cylance and CrowdStrike. Although, I consider these products and they were also good, when it come to cost and budgetary factors, Traps has been proven to be better than the other two products. It is quite cost-effective and delivers all the entire solution which we require."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"It's about $55 per license on a yearly basis."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We always pay for support. Any organization of our size who doesn't is asking for problems."

"When you purchase the equipment, you purchase the licensing and warranty. It's all fairly standard. We haven't been caught with anything surprising."

"Our licensing costs, yearly, are just under $15,000. Your initial cost of acquisition is obviously going to be more than $15,000..."

"Fidelis Endpoint is an expensive product. My company makes yearly payments toward the licensing cost of the solution."

"It's quite expensive but we can customize it to reduce the price."

"It's somehow expensive. From one to ten, I would rate it a five. They need to improve the prices. It's very high."

"You license by the number of days of logs you need to maintain visibility for. Forty-five days is a good solid number for a company with around a 10k user base."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which SSL/TLS Decryption solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

10%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Fortinet FortiADC vs A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi)

Compared 25% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi)

Compared 23% of the time

GigaSMART vs A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi)

Compared 19% of the time

Symantec SSL Visibility Appliance vs A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi)

Compared 16% of the time

More A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 9% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Wayfinder Threat Detection and Response vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 4% of the time

VMware Carbon Black Cloud vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 3% of the time

Cynet vs Fidelis Elevate

Compared 2% of the time

More Fidelis Elevate Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi)

June 2026

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) report

Download A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) product report

Buyer's Guide

Fidelis Elevate

June 2026

Download Fidelis Elevate product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

Thunder SSLi

Fidelis Elevate Platform, Fidelis Enterprise, Fidelis Cloud, Fidelis Managed Detection and Response, Fidelis Deception, Fidelis Decryption, Fidelis Endpoint, Fidelis Network

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) enhances network visibility by decrypting SSL traffic, allowing enterprises to inspect encrypted data seamlessly.

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) is designed for businesses needing in-depth traffic inspection while maintaining security compliance. By decrypting SSL traffic, it ensures deeper visibility into encrypted data without compromising security. It integrates smoothly into existing infrastructures, offering comprehensive analytics and real-time threat detection capabilities, addressing the growing challenge of encrypted traffic in networks.

What are the key features of A10 Networks Thunder SSLi?

Advanced Traffic Decryption: Efficiently decrypts SSL traffic for seamless inspection.
Scalable Integration: Easily fits within existing network architectures.
Comprehensive Analytics: Delivers detailed insights into network traffic.

What benefits can users expect from A10 Networks Thunder SSLi?

Enhanced Security: Improves threat detection by exposing encrypted threats.
Increased Visibility: Provides a clearer understanding of network traffic patterns.
Improved Compliance: Helps ensure adherence to security regulations.

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) is widely implemented in finance and healthcare sectors, where data security and compliance are critical. It supports seamless integration that assists these industries in maintaining strict privacy standards while gaining comprehensive insight into network activities.

A10 Networks

Fidelis Elevate offers advanced network and endpoint detection with valuable features such as anomaly detection for reduced false positives, customizable alerts, and efficient reporting, providing comprehensive threat response capabilities across multiple platforms.

Fidelis Elevate is trusted for its robust network visibility and remote connection capabilities. It integrates data across network security platforms, supporting endpoint threat response. Businesses rely on it for in-line IDS/IPS systems that exceed competitors by examining more ports. Its use in anomaly detection and fast data searches is appreciated by those seeking complex solutions covering multiple areas, with endpoint script execution and tools for incident response enhancing its offering.

What important features does Fidelis Elevate offer?

NDR for network visibility: Enhances monitoring and threat detection with deep insights.
Live Connect: Facilitates secure remote connections for troubleshooting and support.
Tasks for information gathering: Streamlines endpoint data collection to support analysis.
Anomaly detection: Minimizes false positives, increasing detection accuracy.
Customizable alerts: Tailors notifications for specific threat scenarios.
Efficient reporting: Enables rapid and detailed data searches.

What benefits and ROI can Fidelis Elevate provide?

Comprehensive threat view: Integrates data for a holistic security perspective.
Enhanced endpoint security: Prevents fileless attacks and provides essential evidence.
Efficient incident response: Offers tools aiding quick response across environments.

Fidelis Elevate is implemented across industries for its comprehensive monitoring capabilities. Companies leverage its network visibility and remote connectivity in endpoint and network detection, effectively preventing threats within complex environments. Its holistic integration serves as an essential asset for security analysts focused on incident response.

Fidelis Security

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Klein Independent School District

First Midwest Bank

Buyer's Guide

A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate

June 2026

Free Report: A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Networks Thunder SSL Insight (SSLi) vs. Fidelis Elevate report.

See our list of best SSL/TLS Decryption vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.

We monitor all SSL/TLS Decryption reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.