ActiveBatch by Redwood vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] comparison

Why PeerSpot?

ActiveBatch by Redwood and Broadcom are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Additionally, 100% of ActiveBatch by Redwood users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 5, 2025

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] and ActiveBatch by Redwood are competing products in automation solutions. ActiveBatch by Redwood has the upper hand with its robust features justifying its pricing and delivering added value.

Features: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is strong in analytics and forecasting, targeting a data-centric automation strategy. It emphasizes data analysis, predictive insights, and reporting capabilities. ActiveBatch by Redwood stands out with broad integrations, advanced workflow automation, and a versatile architecture, accommodating diverse IT infrastructures and ensuring adaptable automation solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers straightforward deployment and responsive support services. Its effective support and deployment model receive positive feedback for ease of execution. ActiveBatch by Redwood competes effectively with extensive documentation and resources, contributing to smooth implementation and adaptability, although both products maintain high service quality with minor differences in the availability of resources and support.

Pricing and ROI: Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is noted for its cost-effective setup, providing a satisfactory return on investment. Its budget-friendly pricing appeals to cost-sensitive users. ActiveBatch by Redwood, with a potentially higher initial cost, compensates with substantial ROI through its range of features and operational efficiencies. The higher upfront investment is often balanced by long-term benefits and functional offerings, creating compelling value over the solution's lifecycle.

To learn more, read our detailed Workload Automation Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JAMS Scheduler

Featured Reviews

Latha Viswanathan

Principal Data Base And Infrastructure Engineer at a outsourcing company with 501-1,000 employees

Automation has replaced nightly monitoring and delivers reliable, unified job scheduling

We have really enjoyed working with JAMS in terms of notifications, alerts, and streamlining. There used to be a process with Automate, which is another product from Fortra, but even before that, the other division of the company that we were merging with had a tool that was built in-house called a file handler or file distributor. It was an in-house developed tool, but it was not as streamlined or as efficient as JAMS is. We literally had to have a dedicated nighttime person monitoring. Although we are 24/7, the divisions of the company that we were using JAMS for have been small scale. While we have automated it, we have streamlined it in such a way that notifications go out and alerts go out, but if there is anything, then we get paged and alerted, and if anything needs to happen at midnight, we can wake up. On the other hand, with the tool I mentioned, the file handler and distributor, we used to have a dedicated nighttime person that had to be sitting and monitoring it to see when a file arrived, whether it met the conditions, and then execute the next particular job. By using JAMS, we have gained a lot more efficiencies in terms of all of those to streamline it, and there is no necessary need for having an overnight engineer just keeping an eye on all of this.

Read full review

Sai

Ai/Data Analyst at CSD

Automation has streamlined complex data workflows and now saves time on recurring reporting

To improve ActiveBatch by Redwood, the UI could be more modern and intuitive, and another thing that comes to mind is that it can feel overwhelming when workflows become large and complex. Troubleshooting can take extra time when there are multiple dependencies, jobs, and integrations running together. Better visualization of workflow relationships and easier debugging would really help. I would also appreciate seeing more simplified onboarding and documentation for newer users, as there is a learning curve at the beginning. Another improvement area could be smarter analytics or AI-driven recommendations, such as proactively identifying workflow bottlenecks, failed job patterns, or optimization suggestions instead of relying mostly on manual monitoring. From an operational perspective, faster configuration for integrations and cloud-based workflows would make implementation smoother, especially in environments working heavily with APIs and data pipelines. I have covered the main points regarding needed improvements. Overall, the platform is very capable and reliable for automation and workflow scheduling, especially in data-heavy environments. Most of the improvements I want are around making it easier for day-to-day use, such as a more intuitive UI, simpler troubleshooting for complex workflows, better onboarding for newer users, and more intelligent monitoring or optimization insights. The core functionality is strong, and the biggest opportunity is improving the overall user experience and simplifying operational management.

Read full review

Dalibor Sefcik

Personal Assistant at Centrum.sk

Saves time on manual processes and provides alerts on special scenarios

The installation process is quite straightforward, although some database knowledge is required for setting up the base. Alternatively, someone with the necessary capabilities can handle this step for you. Overall, the installation is especially easy for Windows platforms. Deployment can be completed in three days. The number of people required to manage the tool depends on the size of the environment. One person may suffice for smaller environments, while larger environments may require two or three individuals. The frequency of scheduling requests, additional responsibilities within the environment, and the company's specific needs all play a role in determining the necessary staffing. One or two individuals can handle the maintenance if the setup is stable with minimal changes. However, in the case of frequent changes, more staff may be needed to manage the tool.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can see all the batch execution status within the tool itself, which saves money, time, and cost, allowing us to handle everything in one single tool."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it's DR-ready. With respect to disaster recovery, it has the built-in capability for failover to our DR site. If all of the required ports are open, it can be done seamlessly."

"The most valuable aspect of JAMS is its robustness."

"This feature helps my team day-to-day by running hundreds and hundreds of jobs on JAMS in a timely fashion, which is extremely important and sensitive, providing a lot of reporting to the entire firm and beyond."

"The interface is good, and it's very easy to define and create jobs. If a job is not running or there is an error, the solution will send an email. That's all very good and very useful."

"Because we have gone from a lot of manual processes to automated processes with JAMS, we have been able to free up IT staff time, and for just the Technical Operations Center team that I manage, it has saved about 20 hours a week."

"I appreciate JAMS for its readily available templates that allow me to create and deliver stand-up presentations within minutes quickly."

"The user-friendly and adaptable scheduler allows us to manage various scheduling scenarios."

More JAMS Scheduler pros

"This is a very good tool and I'm really missing it in my new company because I don't have a robust enterprise-wide scheduling tool and a really good tool for automating end-to-end."

"The software offers real-time monitoring and reporting features that let IT teams keep tabs on the progress of their batch operations and workflows."

"Since I started using this product, I have been able to easily track everything as it mainly monitors, alerts, and looks after all the services - even across platform scheduling - which has helped me immensely."

"Using ActiveBatch I have learned that the potential for reducing costs using an automation tool is huge, and that when the business becomes aware of it they really embrace the product."

"ActiveBatch by Redwood has positively impacted my organization by efficiently managing a significant volume of data and workflow between our database and applications on the web browser."

"ActiveBatch provides summary reports and logs for further analysis and improvements in monitoring servers, which is very handy."

"The product offers a centralized platform for managing activities across many environments, applications, etc."

"We leverage the solution's native integrations regularly. We have to get files from a remote server outside the organization, and even send things outside the organization. We use a lot of its file manipulation and SFTP functionality for contacting remote servers."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood pros

"The Action Packs are a good feature."

"The most valuable feature of Automic Automation Intelligence is the ability to see all of the batches from one place. Additionally, there is a multiple scheduler that is useful."

"The tool's online manuals and documentation are good. Its user interface is user-friendly."

Cons

"The only thing that they could improve on is the fact that they don't have a browser version of JAMS. They've got all the bits and pieces there if you want to build your own web version of it. It does come with a web client, but it's pretty clunky. They could improve on that."

"To improve JAMS, it should resolve the issues with the JD Edwards application and the need for the SSH agent in the current version, which has been a problem for a while."

"JAMS doesn't allow us to implement SOC controls. We are a company that trades stocks on the New York Stock Exchange, so all our transactions are audited. It has a feature that saves the file for only a month but doesn't segregate the data between finance and SOC-related compliance."

"The JAMS automation code isn't so clean."

"The error messages from JAMS often need clarification, hindering our ability to resolve issues swiftly."

"JAMS has built-in reporting. I've never really used it. I tried using it a few years ago and I couldn't figure it out. It was wonky. It could be improved upon."

"The documentation is not super... It's not as quick and slick as I'd like it to be."

"With no programming experience, I find JAMS code-driven automation challenging due to the required PowerShell scripting."

More JAMS Scheduler cons

"A nice thing to have would be the ability to comfortably pass variables from one job to another. That was one of the things that I found difficult."

"We haven't explored the cloud aspect of the solution because it's very costly."

"The only thing is that it does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex."

"It does have a little bit of a learning curve because it is fairly complex. You have to learn how it does things. I don't know if it's any worse than any other tool would be, just because of the nature of what it does... the learning curve is the hardest part."

"It could be easier to provide dashboards on how many jobs are running at the same time; more monitoring."

"ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved with a more modern and intuitive user interface, faster performance for very large workflows, and expanded built-in integrations with newer cloud and DevOps platforms."

"There are very few documents that provide us with detailed information on the troubleshooting of errors that occur during integration with the existing environment."

"The interface is not that user-friendly and is a little tough to navigate."

More ActiveBatch by Redwood cons

"The solution could benefit by having more connectors and customized widgets. Additionally, a dashboard that people could use for videos would be helpful."

"Integration of the solution could be improved."

"The job reporting feature needs improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"In the end, you'll find that it's really worth the price. There is some sticker shock, but it's worth every dime."

"Take advantage of its scalability. You can start small. The initial cost is very reasonable. Once you have started picking up the tool and adopting it, then you can scale up from there and buy more agents."

"All licensing models are a little overpriced, but JAMS offers a good value, especially given their support response times and ability to handle unforeseen issues like the SFTP transfers. I hope to find more use cases to get a better bang for our buck."

"Definitely check how many single processes you want to run and count them as jobs. That is how you would work out your pricing on JAMS. For example, if you're running a number of commands and you can put them all into one script and run that script, you can count that as one job."

"It's expensive, to be honest, but it does the job."

"I haven't been involved in the financial side for several years, but we buy one host and unlimited agents, and we get a reasonable price for that. We're happy with the amount we pay and the scalability it provides."

"There are no additional costs other than the license for Fortra's JAMS which is affordable."

"It was $10,000 for the first year. Then, there is a maintenance cost for licensing every year that we get billed $5,000 for every year."

More JAMS Scheduler pricing and cost advice

"ActiveBatch is currently redesigning themselves. In the past, they were a low cost solution for automation. They had a nice tool that was very inexpensive. With their five-year plan, they will be more enhancement-driven, so they're trying to improve their software, customer service, and the way that their customers get information from them. In doing that, they're raising the price of their base system. They changed from one pricing model to another, which has caused some friction between ActiveBatch and us. We're working through that right now with them. That's one of the reasons why we're why we were evaluating other software packages."

"If you compare ActiveBatch licensing to Control-M, you're looking at $50,000 as opposed to millions."

"The price was fairly in line with other automation tools. I don't think it's exorbitantly expensive, relatively speaking."

"I don't think we've ever had a problem with the pricing or licensing. Even the maintenance fees are very much in line. They are not excessive. I think for the support that you get, you get a good value for your money. It's the best value on the market."

"The pricing was fair. There are additional costs for the plugins. We have the standard licensing fees for different pieces, then we have the plugins which were add-ons. However, we expected that."

"Currently, we are paying approximately $7,000 yearly, which includes support."

"I like ActiveBatch Workload Automation's licensing model because they're not holding you down on an agentless model or agent model, where every server needs to have an agent. That's the main selling point of the solution and I hope they stay that way."

"It allows for lower operational overhead."

"The price of Automic Automation Intelligence depends on the connectors used. For example, if you wanted to connect to Dell BMC, you would need a connector."

"Automic Automation Intelligence's licensing costs are expensive and can be yearly or monthly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Performing Arts

13%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	16
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	52

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

I was not really involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing at that level. I am more involved in the technica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

In terms of improvements, I believe JAMS can enhance its user interface for better user experiences. I would like to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for JAMS?

My primary use case for JAMS is enterprise workload automation and batch job orchestration. I use it to schedule and ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

I was not directly involved in the pricing, setup cost, and licensing decisions for ActiveBatch by Redwood, so my exp...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

ActiveBatch by Redwood could be improved with a more modern and intuitive user interface, faster performance for very...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ActiveBatch Workload Automation?

My main use case for ActiveBatch by Redwood is enterprise workload automation, job scheduling, and orchestrating busi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 8% of the time

Stonebranch vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 7% of the time

VisualCron vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 6% of the time

AppWorx Workload Automation vs JAMS Scheduler

Compared 3% of the time

More JAMS Scheduler Competitors

Control-M vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 10% of the time

VisualCron vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 9% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

Stonebranch vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 5% of the time

Spot by Flexera vs ActiveBatch by Redwood

Compared 3% of the time

More ActiveBatch by Redwood Competitors

Automic Automation vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

Control-M vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Stonebranch vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Tidal by Redwood vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 10% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL]

Compared 7% of the time

More Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS Scheduler

September 2026

Download JAMS Scheduler product report

Buyer's Guide

ActiveBatch by Redwood

September 2026

Download ActiveBatch by Redwood product report

Buyer's Guide

Workload Automation

August 2026

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] report

Download Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] product report

Also Known As

No data available

ActiveBatch

Terma Suite

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

Demo not available

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Demo not available

Broadcom

Overview

JAMS is an automation orchestration and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages critical IT processes from a single console, from simple batch jobs to complex, cross-platform workflows. JAMS automates jobs across Windows, Linux, UNIX, IBM i, z/OS, and OpenVMS, with native integrations for the databases, BI tools, and ERP systems already running your business, including SQL Server and SAP. Jobs run on any schedule or trigger off other events, and dependency management keeps multi-step workflows in the right order.

Every job is centrally monitored, with notifications on success or failure and an audit trail of every execution. Built-in conversion tools migrate existing jobs from Windows Task Scheduler, SQL Agent, or Cron without rebuilding them, and JAMS replaces homegrown, single-platform scripts with one centrally managed system.

JAMS includes two AI capabilities at no additional cost. JAX is an AI agent built into the JAMS Web Client. Ask it a question in plain language, and it finds a job, troubleshoots a failure, or looks up how to do something, grounded in JAMS documentation, not general AI guesswork. It acts only when asked, and every change waits for your approval. JAMS MCP brings JAMS into the AI coding tools teams already use, including Cursor, Claude Code, GitHub Copilot, and Claude Desktop.

Both run inside the customer's network with the signed-in user's permissions and no elevated AI account, and every action, AI-driven or not, lands in the same audit trail as everything else in JAMS.

For teams managing thousands of jobs across SQL Server, ADF, Airflow, SAP, JDE, and Banner, this cuts tribal knowledge and middle-of-the-night troubleshooting. Knowledge that once lived in one person's head becomes something any team member can ask about directly.

The AI lives in the product, not in the support queue. Support is staffed by humans JAMS will never outsource, based in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Australia. New tickets go to long-tenured engineers, and every JAMS customer has the CEO's cell phone number.

JAMS' mission is to reduce the operational burden of critical automation, so teams spend more time on the work automation was meant to free them for.

JAMS Software

ActiveBatch by Redwood enhances efficiency with features like job scheduling, integration, and real-time monitoring. It supports diverse platforms, automates tasks, and offers a single-pane view with robust security.

ActiveBatch streamlines automation by offering drag-and-drop functionality, pre-built job steps, and native integrations. Its customizable workflows and alert system aid in managing complex workloads like data processing and server monitoring across hybrid environments. While it effectively reduces manual errors and enhances productivity, areas like navigation and support for cloud platforms need enhancement. New users may face challenges due to its complexity and steep learning curve, and further improvements in reporting, mobile access, and training could provide additional support to users.

What important features does ActiveBatch offer?

Comprehensive Job Scheduling: Manages and automates complex workloads efficiently.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly connects with different platforms and applications.
Real-time Monitoring: Offers a single-pane view for quick issue identification.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational tasks.
Robust Alert System: Ensures timely notifications for critical events.
Data Protection: Incorporates strong security measures for secure operations.

What benefits should be considered when evaluating ActiveBatch?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automates repetitive tasks, reducing manual intervention.
Improved Productivity: Streamlines processes across hybrid environments.
Error Reduction: Decreases likelihood of manual errors.
Platform Support: Provides integration with diverse systems.

In finance, ActiveBatch is implemented for orchestrating batch processes and data management. The healthcare industry utilizes it for automating patient data updates and server monitoring, while the retail sector benefits from file transfers and inventory management automation.

ActiveBatch by Redwood

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] offers advanced workload automation and analytics, enabling users to optimize and manage complex IT environments efficiently. It handles large-scale job scheduling with ease, ensuring seamless operations in IT infrastructures.

Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] provides comprehensive workload automation capabilities designed to support complex IT landscapes. By enabling predictive analytics, it ensures accurate forecasting and capacity planning. It seamlessly integrates multiple scheduling tools, offering a unified perspective on job workflows. This capability helps organizations maintain operational efficiency, reduce downtime, and improve decision-making.

What are the standout features?

Predictive Analytics: Offers insights into future job performance, helping in proactive issue resolution.
Centralized Management: Streamlines multiple job scheduling tools into a single interface for better visibility.
Scalability: Efficiently manages large-scale job scheduling demands without compromising on performance.

Why should you consider the potential ROI?

Improved Efficiency: Automates routine tasks, freeing up resources for strategic activities.
Reduced Downtime: Anticipates and mitigates potential failures, ensuring uninterrupted operations.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Provides analytics-driven insights, assisting in informed decision-making.

In sectors such as finance and telecommunications, Automic Automation Intelligence [EOL] is implemented to manage complex workflows and ensure compliance. Its analytical features provide businesses with critical insights into workflows, helping them adapt to industry demands and regulatory changes efficiently.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

Informatica, D&H, ACES, PrimeSource, Sub-Zero Group, SThree, Lamar Advertising, Subway, Xcel Energy, Ignite Technologies, Whataburger, Jyske Bank, Omaha Children's Hospital

Information Not Available

Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, JAMS Software and others in Workload Automation. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.