Adlumin Security Operations vs Tenable Security Center comparison

N-able and Tenable are both solutions in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category. N-able is ranked #24, while Tenable is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.1. N-able holds a 1.8% mindshare in RBVM, compared to Tenable’s 8.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Tenable users are willing to recommend the solution.

Adlumin Security Operations

Read 1 Adlumin Security Operations review

3,345 Views
368 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Tenable Security Center

Read 56 Tenable Security Center reviews

7,756 Views
3,258 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Adlumin Security Operations

Tenable Security Center

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Tenable Security Center and Adlumin Security Operations are competing in the cybersecurity solutions category. Adlumin appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and better value proposition, despite Tenable's appeal in pricing and support.

Features: Tenable Security Center delivers comprehensive vulnerability management, continuous network monitoring, and extensive reporting capabilities. Adlumin Security Operations excels in automated threat detection, real-time risk analysis, and compliance management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable Security Center often requires a complex setup needing specialized expertise, whereas Adlumin Security Operations facilitates a straightforward cloud-based deployment, reducing installation time. While Tenable offers reliable support that can be resource-intensive, Adlumin is noted for its responsive and helpful customer service, enhancing the deployment experience.

Pricing and ROI: Tenable Security Center generally incurs higher initial costs, reflecting its wide functionality, yet it ensures solid ROI through enhanced security postures. Adlumin Security Operations, with a more competitive pricing strategy, focuses on cost-efficiency and operational benefits, suggesting a compelling value proposition in terms of ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adlumin Security Operations

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

24th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (53rd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (25th), Managed Detection and Response (MDR) (22nd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (40th)

Tenable Security Center

Ranking in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (6th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Risk-Based Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of Adlumin Security Operations is 1.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tenable Security Center is 8.9%, down from 16.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Tenable Security Center	8.9%
Adlumin Security Operations	1.8%
Other	89.3%

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

Featured Reviews

NickShmakov

Md at Res-Q

Strong security reporting has supported our consulting work and drives better integration choices

I rated Adlumin Security Operations probably the same as Huntress at eight. They are better at reporting and better integrations. The integrations in terms of the number of integrations you can run from them or connect to are not as many as available with Huntress, but they have easier implementation. Overall, I would say it is the same. I do not want to see any additional features in the next release of Adlumin Security Operations, but I would change the pricing a little bit for around SIEM integrations and SIEM data collection. That is probably the maximum I would do. I do not really have much to say because that is literally five percent of our deployments versus ninety-five percent being Huntress. My overall rating for this review is eight.

Read full review

reviewer1534134

Head of Information Security at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Centralized analytics have strengthened patch visibility and support efficient regulatory reporting

From my experience, I assess the product's analytics capabilities as successful. It helped us significantly with patching and managing the risk of the patching process across all our environments, including network devices with Windows and Unix systems. The product covered several environments and gave us exactly what we needed in our environment. Tenable Security Center's centralized platform helped with risk assessment and management across our IT environments. It covered the patching process, and we previously faced many issues regarding how to patch different environments, how to monitor the patching process, and whether it was successful or not. We obtained good reports showing when patches were closed and the details of each patch, including who executed it and everything related to the patching process until it was closed. This gave us good details about the process which helped us significantly in our reporting and even in audits, whether internal or external. We learned how to close audit issues safely and successfully. We used the dashboards for real-time threat insights and extracted several dashboards from Tenable Security Center. We use these dashboards in our cybersecurity dashboard and committees that we have. These dashboards are part of our committees, especially the cybersecurity committee and other committees that we attend.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We normally focus on Huntress."

"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."

"I like Tenable.sc's analytics and reporting. You can also configure your on-prem network monitors to talk to your Tenable.sc control panel."

"My advice for those considering Tenable Security Center is to note the benefit of upgrading vulnerable devices."

"The customer service and support team at Tenable were extremely helpful."

"The feature we've liked most recently was being able to take the YARA rules from FireEye and put them into Tenable's scan for the most recent SolarWinds exploit. That was really useful."

"The solution is completely stable and operation is user-friendly."

"Has a great advanced scanning feature."

"Overall, I rate the solution 9.8 out of 10."

More Tenable Security Center pros

Cons

"Adlumin Security Operations's functionality is probably slightly better, but implementation and integration with Office 365 was not as straightforward."

"We experienced some difficulties with the solution’s support."

"The web application is not very functional."

"It's important for Tenable to catch up on testing capabilities that are present in solutions like Qualys."

"Tenable has some problems with agents going offline during scanning and lag between agents and the security center."

"In terms of configuration, there is some level of flexibility that we are not able to achieve."

"There's a lot of information being streamed out of the reports. What would be nice, and maybe we just haven't found it, would be more of an executive-type view. We still expect it to collect all this information, but we would like a feature that would allow us to show it to an executive or a director or someone like that and give them some type of high-level overview but not get into the nitty-gritty."

"Its reporting can be improved. It is not easy to generate a scan report the way we want. The data is okay, but we can't easily change the template to make it look the way we want."

"We are facing some challenges related to our channel."

More Tenable Security Center cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"I use a local license to perform penetration testing and I'm pretty happy with everything when it comes to pricing and licensing."

"It is a bit expensive. Everything is included in the license."

"The price of Tenable SC is expensive, we pay approximately €70,000 for the license annually. We have to pay for each IP test. The cost of other solutions is far less, such as Nessus Professional, which is €3,000 annually."

"Tenable SC is priced per asset, with the basic solution starting around US$12,000 for 500 assets."

"Though reasonable, the main competitor of Tenable SC, Rapid7, offers a more aggressive and better priced product."

"We're a Fortune 500 company... our licensing costs [are] in the seven figures."

"I rate the solution's price as seven on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive. The tool is quite expensive."

"The tool provides competitive pricing."

More Tenable Security Center pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Risk-Based Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

Real Estate/Law Firm

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Adlumin Security Operations?

I see room for improvement. I would want to improve reporting.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Adlumin Security Operations?

I have hands-on experience with Huntress as a consultant and a reseller. I deal with some competitors as well, but I mainly focus on Huntress.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Adlumin Security Operations?

See all answers

What do you like most about Tenable SC?

The tool's dashboard and reporting capabilities match our company's needs since we are able to modify the basic view to create a new dashboard, and it works out very well for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Tenable SC?

The price of Tenable Security Center is not so high; it's relatively a cheaper solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Tenable SC?

We did conduct a long implementation which relates to what I think can be improved about Tenable Security Center. In some cases, we needed to refer back to Tenable itself, and in other cases, we ne...

See all answers

Comparisons

Huntress Managed EDR vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 7% of the time

Darktrace vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

Rapid7 InsightIDR vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 6% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Detection and Response vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 5% of the time

CompassOne by Blackpoint Cyber vs Adlumin Security Operations

Compared 5% of the time

More Adlumin Security Operations Competitors

Rapid7 InsightVM vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 10% of the time

Qualys VMDR vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Nessus vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 5% of the time

The NodeZero Platform by Horizon3.ai vs Tenable Security Center

Compared 4% of the time

More Tenable Security Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Managed Detection and Response (MDR)

February 2026

Download Adlumin Security Operations product report

Buyer's Guide

Tenable Security Center

February 2026

Download Tenable Security Center product report

Also Known As

Adlumin Cybersecurity Platform

Tenable.sc, Tenable Unified Security, Tenable SecurityCenter

Overview

Adlumin Security Operations offers comprehensive security management solutions designed for organizations seeking to enhance their cybersecurity infrastructure and detect threats effectively.

Adlumin Security Operations provides advanced cybersecurity capabilities that focus on improving threat detection and incident response. Its innovative technology addresses security challenges, helping organizations monitor, detect, and actively respond to potential threats in real-time. By leveraging machine learning and automated systems, it ensures scalability and adaptability to the ever-evolving cybersecurity landscape.

What Are the Key Features of Adlumin Security Operations?

Automated Threat Detection: Utilizes machine learning to identify threats swiftly.
Real-Time Visibility: Provides continuous monitoring across networks.
Incident Response: Streamlines processes for faster response to threats.
Compliance Management: Offers tools to ensure regulatory compliance.

What Benefits and ROI Should Users Expect?

Enhanced Security: Reduces risks by identifying threats promptly.
Cost Efficiency: Minimizes the cost of incident handling.
Scalability: Adapts to organization growth and increasing data volume.
Peace of Mind: Achieves compliance and regulatory standards effectively.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail, Adlumin Security Operations is implemented to ensure robust protection of sensitive data and to maintain regulatory compliance. Its adaptability makes it suitable for diverse business environments, offering tailored security measures that address specific industry requirements.

N-able

Get a risk-based view of your IT, security and compliance posture so you can quickly identify, investigate and prioritize your most critical assets and vulnerabilities.

Managed on-premises and powered by Nessus technology, the Tenable Security Center (formerly Tenable.sc) suite of products provides the industry’s most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your network. It’s your complete end-to-end vulnerability management solution.

Tenable

Sample Customers

Courthouse News Service, Maschoff Brennan, Sky Lakes Medical Center, Tooele County School District, Southern Oregon ESD, CNB Bank & Trust, Ogden City, Southeast Financial Credit Union (SEFCU), Utah State Bar, Financial Plus Credit Union, Kelly Community, United Southern Bank of Kentucky (USBKY)

IBM, Sempra Energy, Microsoft, Apple, Adidas, Union Pacific

Buyer's Guide

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Qualys, Tenable, Rapid7 and others in Risk-Based Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Risk-Based Vulnerability Management vendors.

We monitor all Risk-Based Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.