Adobe Captivate vs Litmos comparison

Read 11 Litmos reviews

2,869 Views
1,119 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Adobe Captivate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Adobe Captivate and Litmos compete in the e-learning solutions space. Adobe Captivate seems to have the upper hand for users focused on content creation due to its multimedia tools, while Litmos is preferred for training management capabilities.

Features: Adobe Captivate provides templates, recording capabilities, and a diverse content library. Litmos offers interactive content design, course scheduling, and automated training features. Both tools provide robust content creation functionalities, but Captivate is known for its advanced multimedia options.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Captivate could improve its user interface and reduce the complexity of navigating its advanced features. Users often seek better integration options with other software. Litmos may enhance its auto-assign features and ensure consistent functionality. Improving its third-party integration capabilities would similarly benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Captivate is desktop-centric, offering offline capabilities with structured technical support. In contrast, Litmos provides cloud deployment, praised for its intuitive setup and real-time support. Adobe's strong resources help users, while Litmos excels in streamlined cloud integration.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Captivate's pricing reflects its extensive features, offering long-term value for content creators. Litmos uses a subscription model with competitive pricing that appeals to organizations needing scalable solutions. Captivate represents a higher initial investment, whereas Litmos provides cost-effective scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Captivate vs. Litmos Report (Updated: September 2026).

Adobe Captivate vs. Litmos

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Captivate

Ranking in eLearning

10th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Publishing Software (1st)

Litmos

Ranking in eLearning

12th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Learning Management Systems (LMS) (9th), Virtual Training (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the eLearning category, the mindshare of Adobe Captivate is 2.4%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Litmos is 2.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eLearning Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Adobe Captivate	2.4%
Litmos	2.8%
Other	94.8%

eLearning

Featured Reviews

reviewer2814465

Enterprise Cloud Cost Over And Visibility Parts at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Interactive e-learning creation has transformed our training and now delivers measurable time savings

I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between team members when working on Adobe Captivate projects. We track learner progress and performance using Adobe Captivate through the reporting feature that Adobe Captivate provides to manage this information. We are using the latest version to manage version control for Adobe Captivate projects. There is a process we follow to handle content updates or revisions in Adobe Captivate once a course is published to keep the materials current. I am unaware of how to ensure content created in Adobe Captivate is accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities.

Read full review

reviewer1977519

Senior Manager II, Learning operations and multi media at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Its pricing is competitive, but the auto-assign feature that is most valuable for us hasn't been working for the last year and a half

We have a complex implementation because we have an outsourced population of over 50% of our user base. So, we have a lot of challenges. We have no HCM for user data. We have to create our own custom metadata to manage everything, and there are lots of logistical challenges in terms of implementation. If you have to go through and create a custom metadata system, as we did, and stand up all these other systems, it would take three to six months. If you have a human capital management system that's ready to go and you have all your data in the right segments and whatnot, it could be done in one to three months. In terms of maintenance, we recently re-scoped this to where we have one person that oversees the LMS as a whole, and then we have two administrators that carry out the tactical task, such as auto enrollments, user creations, and all other audit components. We also have a rotational employee that does audits on the LMS to make sure everything is working correctly.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Adobe Captivate 5.5 with Adobe Technical Communication Suite 3.5 to produce technical how-to videos."

"It helped us bring in-house what would have otherwise been extremely costly projects."

"The most valuable features are the templates that come with the package, the recording features, as well as the surveys and quizzes that you can create with it, and I also like the content library."

"Automatic responsive designs allow us to not have to code for any eLearning modules."

"Since using Adobe Captivate, I have noticed specific outcomes and improvements in my organization, including saving time and cost, and we have saved approximately 15 to 20% in time and cost after using Adobe Captivate."

"Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T"

"Litmos has an excellent user interface, it's well designed and intuitive, and it also has a great content engine."

"The pricing is really good; its pricing is probably the most competitive I've seen for an LMS."

"It incorporates the majority of the elements."

"Its user interface is quite good, the platform is quite user-friendly, and the UI/UX of the platform is very advanced, which helps in getting the users interested in the training."

"Litmos has an excellent user interface. It's well designed and intuitive. It also has a great content engine. I'm one of the admins, so I create content in the system and use that to produce courses. We make our own training content and credit records. They recently added a new feature called the Course Content Creator, and I'm a big fan. I also like that Litmos lets you record online and face-to-face training so you can create what they call Instructor-led Training Events (ILT)."

"From a learning management system admin perspective, it has a user-friendly interface, but the functionality is deep. So, you can automate people in and out of courses. It lowers the general admin of an LMS admin so that I can focus more on value-adding things for the organization I'm working with."

"Its pricing is good, and its performance is good when it works."

"Content Author removes the need for a third-party solution for content creation."

More Litmos pros

Cons

"The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old."

"I would love to see a "For Dummies" option. It gets pretty extensive in its level of intricacies and options offered."

"The voice sounds automated and I would like to have a more natural-sounding voice."

"I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects."

"The text to speech capability needs to be improved."

"Getting started with Captivate has been a struggle for two of us on our team."

"I would love a quick widget which walks novices through the process along with descriptive output options."

"The reporting function of SAP Litmos needs major improvements. The reports are not at par with other solutions on the market. It's not user-friendly or effective reporting which we can retrieve from other places."

"The solution lacks a variety of language options."

"The rules are not very flexible in terms of administration. They have a predefined system with three standard rules that cannot be customized, modified, added, or removed."

"They can really improve in the reporting area. While doing sessions, there are various types of reports, such as the attendance report or assessment report. We can export the Excel dump of the report, but it is not that neat and clean. You have to change it a lot. You can customize the Excel dump as per your requirement, but it is not that user-friendly in terms of the admin part. They can do much better. They have room for improvement in the reporting area."

"The auto-assign feature that auto assigns courses to learners and puts them into a different learning path has had a bug for the last year and a half. My team has spent numerous hours trying to troubleshoot and fix that, but it's still broken. Until they fix that, it's going to be a higher admin burden for people to manage."

"One feature that a few of my clients have been requesting is CPD. We should be able to capture CPD points for users within the system to be able to report on those."

"The dashboards for this solution could be improved as they are not of the same standard and detail as those seen in Power BI. The graphics for the reporting could also be improved."

"You cannot make a course optional, so if I assign a course to someone, the system assumes that they have to complete it."

More Litmos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."

"There are three different pricing models. One is only to use the platform and to add your own learning material. The second plan includes the learning management system plus 2000 plus pre built courses on different areas including leadership, software skills, HR and IT related training. The third package allows you to integrate the system with tools such Salesforce or other CRMs."

"When we first purchased our subscription, we underestimated how many people we would have within a billing period. We had to adjust that in the first six months. I can't remember the exact numbers, but they charge a per user rate for a certain number, and you get a discount as the number of users goes up. It scales, which is a fairly reasonable way to build a pricing model."

"The pricing is really good. Its pricing is probably the most competitive I've seen for an LMS. If you need help with doing any type of custom design or customization, such as code design or anything like that with the site, then you have to use their people services, which would be an extra cost."

"This solution comes at a high price point. We also paid $4500 for a migration specialist from Litmos to assist in moving our content over. You are billed every month based on the number of users who have logged in and completed training."

"It is priced per user license."

"The solution is priced per user which can get expensive."

"If I have a domain and I want to link my custom domain to SAP Litmos, and if I want to remove the branding of the SAP Litmos, then they charge a large amount for it. It's not included in your subscription plan which we have purchased from them. In the last two to three years, we have never bought the custom domain. We have never linked our custom domain to SAP Litmos. The barrier for us is the high pricing. It is not a reasonable price."

"I do not have any idea about the licensing, but I know that it is quite expensive."

More Litmos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eLearning solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Construction Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Adobe Captivate?

I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects.

What is your primary use case for Adobe Captivate?

My main use case for Adobe Captivate is to create interactive e-learning content including training courses, software simulations, and quizzes.

What advice do you have for others considering Adobe Captivate?

I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between...

Is SAP Litmos expensive for eLearning?

I have used this for eLearning before, and considering how useful it was, the price was fair. Of course, you have to think of what you will need for your own training and how much you want to pay ...

Is it better to use your own courses or SAP Litmos’ native ones?

Obviously this highly depends on what you want to provide to your learners. If you seek to give them very specific eLearning, like if your company wants to educate employees or partners on your new...

How does SAP Litmos make eLearning more effective?

I think SAP Litmos makes eLearning effective because it's specifically created to closely follow the learning process and the progress of students, all the while giving you many tools and helpful ...

Pluralsight vs Adobe Captivate

Comparisons

Compared 14% of the time

QuarkXPress vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 12% of the time

Nitro PDF vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 9% of the time

Udemy Business vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 8% of the time

iSpring Suite vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 6% of the time

More Adobe Captivate Competitors

SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs Litmos

Compared 7% of the time

Moodle vs Litmos

Compared 6% of the time

Cornerstone Learn vs Litmos

Compared 6% of the time

Minitab Education Hub vs Litmos

Compared 5% of the time

Pluralsight vs Litmos

Compared 4% of the time

More Litmos Competitors

Product Reports

Download Adobe Captivate product report

eLearning

October 2026

Download Litmos product report

October 2026

Also Known As

Captivate

SAP Litmos, CallidusCloud Litmos

Overview

Adobe Captivate provides tools for creating interactive e-learning materials, supporting software simulation and responsive design, making it ideal for training content development.

Adobe Captivate enables interactive course creation, leveraging features like software simulations and branching scenarios. Its design adapts content to various devices automatically, enhancing user experience. Captivate supports SCORM and xAPI standards for seamless LMS integration. Templates, recording features, and quizzes are part of its extensive content library. Captivate 2023 offers an intuitive interface for efficient e-learning development across different skill levels.

What are the key features of Adobe Captivate?

Interactive Course Creation: Develop engaging training materials.
Software Simulation: Replicate real software scenarios for practical learning.
Responsive Design: Automatically adjust content for any device size.
Branching Scenarios: Create complex, decision-based learning paths.
SCORM and xAPI Support: Ensure LMS compatibility.
Extensive Content Library: Access to templates, quizzes, and recording tools.

Why should users consider Adobe Captivate?

Intuitive Interface: Simplifies the course creation process.
Cost-effective Content Creation: Reduces need for professional production services.
Enhanced E-Learning Experience: Delivers engaging training content.
Flexible Design Capabilities: Supports diverse training needs.

In healthcare, Adobe Captivate is employed to educate medical professionals through simulations and interactive modules. Financial corporations use it for compliance training and scenario-based learning, while educational institutions create dynamic courses for various subjects. Many organizations find it a suitable tool for producing engaging training videos meant for immediate deployment without extensive production overhead.

Adobe

Litmos provides an accessible platform for online training with tools for content creation, scheduling, and seamless HR integration, enhancing learning experiences across sectors.

Litmos delivers effective onboarding, compliance, and education through versatile tools enabling smooth deployment and engaging user experiences. The customizable dashboard allows for alignment with brand identity, while the extensive library and gamification features enhance course delivery. API integration facilitates connection with crucial HR systems, although auto-enrollment isn't always reliable. Regular updates contribute to adaptable and efficient administration. Users appreciate the intuitive design, streamlining course management and creation.

What are the key features of Litmos?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies course management and navigation.
Customizable Dashboard: Supports brand consistency through personalization.
Extensive Content Library: Offers varied materials to enrich training.
Gamification Elements: Engages participants through interactive content.
API for Integration: Ensures compatibility with HR systems and more.
Regular Updates: Enhances functionality and flexibility for administrators.

Why should users consider Litmos for their training needs?

Efficient Onboarding: Streamlines integration for new hires.
Engaging Learning Experience: Keeps users motivated through interactive features.
Enhanced Integration: Synchronizes with existing platforms like MS Teams and Zoom.
Consistent Branding: Maintains uniformity in training materials across the organization.
Certification & Compliance: Assists in meeting industry standards through easy certification processes.

Many industries implement Litmos for onboarding, compliance training, and ongoing education. Organizations use it to conduct online training, manage in-person sessions, and develop learning paths. Integration with tools like Articulate simplifies content creation, while platforms like MS Teams and Zoom aid in cohesive communication and training consistency. Companies ensure their training content maintains uniform branding and language, augmenting professional development and compliance.

Sample Customers

GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo

YouTube, Samsung, Coca Cola, Nowegian.com, Xero, Zumba, Sears, Build.com, UFC