Adobe Captivate vs Litmos comparison

Read 11 Litmos reviews

1,256 Views
490 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Adobe Captivate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 29, 2025

Adobe Captivate and Litmos compete in the e-learning solutions space. Adobe Captivate seems to have the upper hand for users focused on content creation due to its multimedia tools, while Litmos is preferred for training management capabilities.

Features: Adobe Captivate provides templates, recording capabilities, and a diverse content library. Litmos offers interactive content design, course scheduling, and automated training features. Both tools provide robust content creation functionalities, but Captivate is known for its advanced multimedia options.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Captivate could improve its user interface and reduce the complexity of navigating its advanced features. Users often seek better integration options with other software. Litmos may enhance its auto-assign features and ensure consistent functionality. Improving its third-party integration capabilities would similarly benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Captivate is desktop-centric, offering offline capabilities with structured technical support. In contrast, Litmos provides cloud deployment, praised for its intuitive setup and real-time support. Adobe's strong resources help users, while Litmos excels in streamlined cloud integration.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Captivate's pricing reflects its extensive features, offering long-term value for content creators. Litmos uses a subscription model with competitive pricing that appeals to organizations needing scalable solutions. Captivate represents a higher initial investment, whereas Litmos provides cost-effective scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Captivate vs. Litmos Report (Updated: March 2026).

Adobe Captivate vs. Litmos

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Captivate

Ranking in eLearning

14th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

4.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Publishing Software (4th)

Litmos

Ranking in eLearning

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Learning Management Systems (LMS) (8th), Virtual Training (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the eLearning category, the mindshare of Adobe Captivate is 2.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Litmos is 2.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

eLearning Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Litmos	2.3%
Adobe Captivate	2.1%
Other	95.6%

eLearning

Featured Reviews

Vishu Aggarwal

Freelance Corporate Trainer at Freelancer

Enables you to create many complex E-learnings

The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old. It needs to improve how it works. Also, new features are missing too. The latest version is very good and unique in terms of work, but the level of complexity you can achieve it limited.

Read full review

Ashish_Bhatnagar

IT Manager at Accounts NextGen

Useful training available, customizable, but security could improve

SAP Litmos need some improvement in the security functions. The security of the SAP Litmos is not up to the standard of the organizations because if you are hosting your content in SAP Litmos or any other LMS, then one of the major concerns for the company is to secure their training data to prevent the student from copying it. Additionally, we want to prevent students from sharing their logins with different users. In the last two to three years, there was not very much improvement in the security function of the SAP Litmos because students are easily able to copy the data from the online cloud to their desktop. They have to roll out some functions for which we can restrict, the copy-paste features in SAP Litmos itself. There must be some function through which we can restrict the number of views on the content. For example, if a student is accessing a post, then there should be some option to restrict the number of views on a post. If I want that student to have access to a specific topic a specific number of times, such as four or five times, then it would be a benefit for the administrators to secure their data. In this case, a student has a lesser possibility to share the login with multiple students if I restrict the number of views on a specific topic. They have to look at the copy and paste functions to secure them from being used in the data configuration. Restricting the number of views on a SCOM content or a video file. The overall integration could be improved, at this time they only support live webinars for Zoom and Go Webinar. Not every company uses these two applications, some companies use Zoho to deliver the training programs online. They should expand their integration with other applications. They can easily share the logins between multiple users. The security function is lacking. They have to work on the security functions of the SAP Litmos as a priority. The reporting function of SAP Litmos needs major improvements. The reports are not at par with other solutions on the market. It's not user-friendly or effective reporting which we can retrieve from other places.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automatic responsive designs allow us to not have to code for any eLearning modules."

"The most valuable features are the templates that come with the package, the recording features, as well as the surveys and quizzes that you can create with it."

"It helped us bring in-house what would have otherwise been extremely costly projects."

"Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T"

"Its pricing is good, and its performance is good when it works."

"Litmos has an excellent user interface. It's well designed and intuitive. It also has a great content engine. I'm one of the admins, so I create content in the system and use that to produce courses. We make our own training content and credit records. They recently added a new feature called the Course Content Creator, and I'm a big fan. I also like that Litmos lets you record online and face-to-face training so you can create what they call Instructor-led Training Events (ILT)."

"It incorporates the majority of the elements."

"Its user interface is quite good. The platform is quite user-friendly. The UI/UX of the platform is very advanced, which helps in getting the users interested in the training."

"This complete product is highly scalable. Licensing is not based on number of total users on the system but rather only on active users. Litmos only charge for the number of users engaged in training. This is what makes this solution ideal for scale."

"The plug-and-play format can be deployed immediately which is unlike its competitors that take three to four months."

"It's very easy to design content and create training models within the app, so you don't always have to use a third-party tool to develop your e-learning."

"There is a couple of good features available, you can customize the dashboard, CSA, and home page. You can customize the solution to your business standards. SAP Litmos offers a library of 2,500 plus courses to premium members. They have a good library of pre-built courses. It's a variety of soft skill courses including management, and marketing. You can offer these courses to your students, which is excellent."

More Litmos pros

Cons

"I would love a quick widget which walks novices through the process along with descriptive output options."

"The voice sounds automated and I would like to have a more natural-sounding voice."

"The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old."

"I would love to see a "For Dummies" option. It gets pretty extensive in its level of intricacies and options offered."

"The auto-assign feature that auto assigns courses to learners and puts them into a different learning path has had a bug for the last year and a half. My team has spent numerous hours trying to troubleshoot and fix that, but it's still broken. Until they fix that, it's going to be a higher admin burden for people to manage."

"They can really improve in the reporting area. While doing sessions, there are various types of reports, such as the attendance report or assessment report. We can export the Excel dump of the report, but it is not that neat and clean. You have to change it a lot. You can customize the Excel dump as per your requirement, but it is not that user-friendly in terms of the admin part. They can do much better. They have room for improvement in the reporting area."

"The dashboards for this solution could be improved as they are not of the same standard and detail as those seen in Power BI. The graphics for the reporting could also be improved."

"The rules are not very flexible in terms of administration. They have a predefined system with three standard rules that cannot be customized, modified, added, or removed."

"The solution lags in defined security parameters with only three predefined roles available."

"The reporting function of SAP Litmos needs major improvements. The reports are not at par with other solutions on the market. It's not user-friendly or effective reporting which we can retrieve from other places."

"You cannot make a course optional, so if I assign a course to someone, the system assumes that they have to complete it."

"Lacks a variety of language options."

More Litmos cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."

"If I have a domain and I want to link my custom domain to SAP Litmos, and if I want to remove the branding of the SAP Litmos, then they charge a large amount for it. It's not included in your subscription plan which we have purchased from them. In the last two to three years, we have never bought the custom domain. We have never linked our custom domain to SAP Litmos. The barrier for us is the high pricing. It is not a reasonable price."

"When we first purchased our subscription, we underestimated how many people we would have within a billing period. We had to adjust that in the first six months. I can't remember the exact numbers, but they charge a per user rate for a certain number, and you get a discount as the number of users goes up. It scales, which is a fairly reasonable way to build a pricing model."

"The pricing is really good. Its pricing is probably the most competitive I've seen for an LMS. If you need help with doing any type of custom design or customization, such as code design or anything like that with the site, then you have to use their people services, which would be an extra cost."

"I do not have any idea about the licensing, but I know that it is quite expensive."

"This solution comes at a high price point. We also paid $4500 for a migration specialist from Litmos to assist in moving our content over. You are billed every month based on the number of users who have logged in and completed training."

"There are three different pricing models. One is only to use the platform and to add your own learning material. The second plan includes the learning management system plus 2000 plus pre built courses on different areas including leadership, software skills, HR and IT related training. The third package allows you to integrate the system with tools such Salesforce or other CRMs."

"The solution is priced per user which can get expensive."

"I don't know what the pricing model is at this point in time. I'm a consultant. The organizations that have purchased Litmos engage me to help them implement it, or Litmos engage me to be their external learning management system administrator. So, I don't see the rates, but based on the general comments that I've heard, it seems cost-effective and competitive with its competitors."

More Litmos pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eLearning solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Is SAP Litmos expensive for eLearning?

I have used this for eLearning before, and considering how useful it was, the price was fair. Of course, you have to think of what you will need for your own training and how much you want to pay ...

See all answers

Is it better to use your own courses or SAP Litmos’ native ones?

Obviously this highly depends on what you want to provide to your learners. If you seek to give them very specific eLearning, like if your company wants to educate employees or partners on your new...

See all answers

How does SAP Litmos make eLearning more effective?

I think SAP Litmos makes eLearning effective because it's specifically created to closely follow the learning process and the progress of students, all the while giving you many tools and helpful ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Pluralsight vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 36% of the time

Udemy Business vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 12% of the time

iSpring Suite vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 11% of the time

Nitro Pro vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 10% of the time

Oracle Documaker vs Adobe Captivate

Compared 8% of the time

More Adobe Captivate Competitors

SAP SuccessFactors Learning vs Litmos

Compared 10% of the time

Minitab Education Hub vs Litmos

Compared 8% of the time

Moodle vs Litmos

Compared 8% of the time

Cornerstone Learn vs Litmos

Compared 7% of the time

NAVEXEngage vs Litmos

Compared 5% of the time

More Litmos Competitors

Product Reports

eLearning

Download Adobe Captivate product report

Download Litmos product report

Also Known As

Captivate

SAP Litmos, CallidusCloud Litmos

Overview

Adobe Captivate software reimagines the way interactive eLearning is created for a multi-device world. Develop any-screen mobile learning without programming using all-new responsive authoring.

Adobe

Litmos is a cloud-based learning management system (LMS) that offers a comprehensive solution for training and development needs. Its user-friendly interface and robust features enable organizations to deliver engaging and effective learning experiences to their employees, partners, and customers. The platform allows for easy creation and management of courses, assessments, and certifications, with the ability to track learner progress and performance. SA Litmos also provides various content options, including video-based learning, virtual classrooms, and gamification, to enhance learner engagement. Additionally, it offers robust reporting and analytics capabilities, allowing organizations to gain insights into learner behavior and training effectiveness. With its mobile app and responsive design, Litmos ensures learners can access training materials anytime, anywhere, and on any device. Litmos is a comprehensive and flexible LMS that empowers organizations to deliver impactful training and drive continuous learning and development.

Sample Customers

GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo

YouTube, Samsung, Coca Cola, Nowegian.com, Xero, Zumba, Sears, Build.com, UFC

Adobe Captivate vs. Litmos