Adobe Experience Manager vs CoreMedia comparison

Read 1 CoreMedia review

662 Views
357 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Experience Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Experience Manager and CoreMedia based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe, Microsoft, Wordpress and others in Web Content Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Web Content Management Report (Updated: January 2026).

Download the complete report

Web Content Management

January 2026

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager

Ranking in Web Content Management

1st

Ranking in Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Content Management (4th), Enterprise Social Software (4th)

CoreMedia

Ranking in Web Content Management

8th

Ranking in Digital Experience Platforms (DXP)

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Web Content Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Experience Manager is 9.5%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CoreMedia is 2.0%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Web Content Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Adobe Experience Manager	9.5%
CoreMedia	2.0%
Other	88.5%

Web Content Management

Featured Reviews

Hilax Chamberlain

Digital Marketing Manager at Ford Motor Company

Centralized content management has unified our digital channels and delivers consistent experiences

Adobe Experience Manager offers enterprise-level digital assets management and very robust customization, brand value consistency, and omnichannel delivery. It saves development and maintenance time. The digital asset management and omnichannel delivery features have benefited my team by managing our digital assets, ensuring brand consistency, and enabling us to deliver customized content easily to our clients. Organizing and obtaining information from results is beneficial. Strengthening our online experience as a brand is valuable. Easy integration with other Adobe services improves productivity and provides a smooth experience. Adobe Experience Manager has positively impacted my organization by enabling component and page reuse, which reduces application size. It saves manual effort for maintaining all applications, improves traffic, and ensures consistency across all our applications. It provides better security, scalability, and makes our applications more robust.

Read full review

Vinceno Barone

CDO at Intellidio

Provides effective workflow management and catalog management

Around three to four engineers are needed for the solution's deployment and maintenance. The solution's e-commerce integration feature has impacted our marketing efforts and catalog management. CoreMedia is stable and strong in terms of editorial things. The solution has helped our organization manage translations for different languages. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a complete package. You don't need to look elsewhere for digital marketing."

"I like the native applications such as Adobe Target, Adobe Analytics, and Adobe Experience Platform. Because of these, it's very easy to connect and obtain reports on how my website is doing, how many have visited it, how frequently, etc. The multiple publisher concept is one of the best parts of this solution."

"If you want to use content in a mobile application and you want the content in some other application, you can simply expose it from the CMS to different clients or different systems. It's easy. On top of that, the technology underlying AEM is open-source and is very powerful like Apache Sling and JCR."

"I've used several CMS tools, but Adobe Experience Manager is feature-rich, especially for web security and content management. It's more efficient to manage content on Adobe Experience Manager, and you can do a lot with it, such as updating content at any time, and on any platform, even from mobile or tablet. Adobe Experience Manager is still getting updated daily, and it's the best CMS tool in the market for me. I like that you can manage assets in Adobe Experience Manager. I also like that the solution has an analytics dashboard that shows you where the traffic comes from, how many clicks come from a specific location, the number of clicks and impressions, etc. Adobe Experience Manager can be accessed by other teams, for example, the digital media department of my company, so the solution can be used and updated per each team's requirement. Adobe Experience Manager is more than just a web developer tool, as it also allows visibility tracking and has other uses. I also like that the GUI for Adobe Experience Manager is straightforward and catchy. It has separate folders and icons, so using Adobe Experience Manager isn't tough. The solution is straightforward to use and handle."

"I like the profiling and segmentation."

"Adobe Experience Manager is pretty stable."

"Adobe Experience Manager offers several best features, including user-friendliness and a more secure platform than any other content management systems I have worked with."

"The integration of customer behavior and website setup is impressive."

More Adobe Experience Manager pros

"CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."

Cons

"Bug troubleshooting is challenging and requires developer expertise."

"I haven't seen any areas for improvement in Adobe Experience Manager as it's a full-fledged CMS tool, and Adobe is already working on enhancements for the solution. Adobe is working to make Adobe Experience Manager more valuable and easier to use for any user, even non-technical ones, through multiple components and templates. Day by day, Adobe provides the latest update to Adobe Experience Manager, and if my team needs any particular change, it just needs to be reported to the Adobe team. As Adobe Experience Manager has a broad scope and a lot of use cases and features, it's a solution that requires some time and effort from you in terms of learning, especially if you're implementing it for different clients, which could be an area for improvement."

"Adobe Experience Manager needs more optimization. The frequency of components where we have vitals of a page or an app needs to be optimized because these are heavy Java codes along with some AEM developments."

"A little bit of background knowledge of coding and website structure is required."

"Tool-wise, the Adobe Experience Manager support team is not very responsive when the user face issues in AEM as a Cloud Service."

"The licensing plus implementation and maintenance cost is very expensive, making it not suitable for small organizations, and the setup is very complex."

"In comparison to other CMS products, Adobe Experience Manager is missing some capabilities such as proper versioning or a better versioning system and backend connectivity. If something is deleted in AEM, the user cannot recover it. You have to call technical support, and they will need to recover the whole instance. So, it's really difficult. For example, if you delete a page, you cannot recover it. There should be an option to recover it. In AEM, you have to go to the previous state of the instance itself or the virtual machine, and you have to restore everything, which is not good."

"There is a feature missing where if content is created on the UAT environment and needs to be transferred or synced to the production environment, there is no direct way of doing the sync."

More Adobe Experience Manager cons

"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's really costly."

"Users have to pay a yearly licensing fee to use the solution, which is highly-priced."

"There's a free trial for one month for Adobe Experience Manager, which you can use for learning purposes, then, after the trial period, you'll need to purchase the license. Adobe offers a few plans for Adobe Experience Manager, but I'm unaware of how much my company is paying."

"It's a costly solution. I would rate the price at two out of five on a scale from one to five, where one is the most expensive and five is the most competitive."

"Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Web Content Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	22

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Adobe Experience Manager?

It is easy to learn. You don't need to be an advanced Java developer.

What needs improvement with Adobe Experience Manager?

Adobe Experience Manager could be improved by making it more reliable for all developers to access, rather than restricting access to a certified pool of resources or developers. We also have anoth...

What is your primary use case for Adobe Experience Manager?

Adobe Experience Manager manages most of our websites, and content management is conducted exclusively through the AEM platform. Whenever we need to publish a new page, blog, or podcast, we access ...

What do you like most about CoreMedia?

CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CoreMedia?

Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.

What needs improvement with CoreMedia?

It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure. The solution's integration and multimedia could be improved.

SAP Extended Enterprise Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Comparisons

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

SharePoint vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 5% of the time

Drupal vs Adobe Experience Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Experience Manager Competitors

Drupal vs CoreMedia

Compared 24% of the time

Magnolia CMS vs CoreMedia

Compared 13% of the time

HCL Digital Experience vs CoreMedia

Compared 10% of the time

Adobe Workfront vs CoreMedia

Compared 10% of the time

Contentful vs CoreMedia

Compared 10% of the time

More CoreMedia Competitors

Product Reports

Download Adobe Experience Manager product report

Adobe Experience Manager

February 2026

Download CoreMedia product report

Web Content Management

January 2026

Also Known As

Adobe Day CQ5, Ektron Social Marketing, Episerver Content Cloud, Adobe CQ5

No data available

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Adobe

Overview

Adobe Communique 5 (Adobe CQ5), currently manifested as Adobe Experience Manager (AEM), is a web-based content management system which is developed to help businesses in offering high-end digital experience to their customers.

Adobe

CoreMedia is a composable Digital Experience Platform designed for enterprises to deliver personalized omnichannel customer experiences across websites, mobile apps, and messaging platforms.

CoreMedia leverages a hybrid headless CMS to integrate content, real-time data, and AI capabilities. This setup enhances personalization, marketing, and global delivery while supporting regional localization. It merges AI with human interactions, empowering businesses with relevant information and real-time support through the customer journey. CoreMedia also automates repetitive tasks, streamlining content operations and adjusting experiences in real time. Compatible with existing tech stacks, it offers flexible deployment options, including on-premise, private or public cloud, and SaaS.

What are the most important features of CoreMedia?

Composable DXP: Enables personalized customer experiences across multiple platforms.
Hybrid Headless CMS: Integrates content and AI for dynamic personalization.
Omnichannel Support: Ensures consistent experiences across web, mobile, and messaging.
AI-Driven Tools: Automates content operations and supports real-time interaction.
Flexible Deployment: Supports on-premise, cloud, and SaaS environments.

What key benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Automates and streamlines content and marketing tasks.
Versatility: Integrates with current technology infrastructures.
Scalability: Adapts to growth and changes in business demands.
Localization: Facilitates global reach with regional customization.

In retail, CoreMedia enhances customer engagement with personalized marketing strategies. Healthcare providers utilize its robust data integration for patient-centric communications. In the media industry, it enables agile content creation and distribution to keep audiences engaged. CoreMedia’s adaptability makes it a valuable choice for industries requiring customized, efficient digital experiences.

Sample Customers

Metra

Henkel, Deutsche Telekom and MASORANGE, Hoka, Ugg, Finnair, MaxMara, Emerson, The North Face, DMG Mori, Vans