Adobe Workfront vs CoreMedia comparison

"The solution is stable."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"Adobe Workfront has been stable in my experience, and I would rate its stability as an eight out of ten."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"Monitoring the progress of projects and tasks is very effective."

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"Instead of following everything on email, business users can track everything on Adobe Workfront when the other systems are integrated with it."

"Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful."

"CoreMedia is good for workflow management and user reviews."

"Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API."

"We were having some difficulties creating different kinds of reports and dashboards."

"The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement."

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

"It is difficult to scale the solution with respect to the costs and infrastructure."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Our customers pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."