Adobe Workfront vs Wrike comparison

Read 59 Wrike reviews

2,797 Views
1,512 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

Adobe Workfront and Wrike compete in the project management software category. Adobe Workfront appears to have an upper hand due to its comprehensive workflow automation suited for enterprises, whereas Wrike is preferred for its intuitive task management features.

Features: Adobe Workfront provides workflow automation, customizable reporting, and integration capabilities fitting for complex projects. Wrike offers task visualization, real-time collaboration, and flexibility with Gantt charts to accommodate diverse tasks and projects.

Room for Improvement: Adobe Workfront could enhance user interface intuitiveness, better manage smaller projects, and offer more flexible pricing tiers. Wrike can improve on integrating more third-party tools, providing advanced reporting features, and enhancing customization options for dashboards.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adobe Workfront integrates seamlessly with enterprise systems, supported by robust customer service for smooth transitions. Wrike offers quick deployment tailored for smaller teams, along with efficient customer support that aids in rapid implementations.

Pricing and ROI: Adobe Workfront involves a higher initial investment justified by its exhaustive features offering significant ROI for large enterprises. Wrike offers more accessible entry pricing with scalable options, ensuring quick returns for agile teams aiming at streamlined deployments.

To learn more, read our detailed Adobe Workfront vs. Wrike Report (Updated: March 2025).

Adobe Workfront vs. Wrike

Download the complete report

Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Ranking in Project Management Software

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Asset Management (1st)

Wrike

Ranking in Project Management Software

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Project Management Software category, the mindshare of Adobe Workfront is 3.6%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wrike is 4.5%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Project Management Software

Featured Reviews

Graham Sprague

Sr. Manager/Adobe Workfront Fusion Developer at Staples, Inc.

Centralized task management and simplified creative collaboration but interface is inconsistent

Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API. The current setup was not originally designed API-first, leading to some confusion and differences in available functions. Additionally, the low-code environment in Workfront Fusion is beneficial yet sometimes limiting, and it might be more powerful with enhancements.

Read full review

Awadhesh Singh

Project Manager at NebuFlow

Easy to tag people and has a form system to collect information but cannot work in multiple channels simultaneously

There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website. The tool should also improve coordination between external stakeholders and collaborators. It should also integrate financial features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application."

"Feature-wise, I would say that its overall ability to be infinitely customizable is valuable...My experience with the support team has been amazing."

"The intake feature is the most valuable in Workfront."

"Instead of following everything on email, business users can track everything on Adobe Workfront when the other systems are integrated with it."

"The tool is very user-friendly."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"The solution is stable."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"We utilize time tracking and reports most often."

"I find Wrike's form system very valuable. I can share forms with my collaborators, and they can fill them out, providing me with the necessary information. Another useful feature is the communication platform, which makes it easy to tag someone and communicate efficiently. Additionally, the integration with Microsoft Office is great. I can create a card on Wrike directly from my MS Teams chat, which is convenient."

"This is a good tool for project progress tracking and sharing tasks with internal and external parties."

"Visibility and organization are the most valuable features of Wrike."

"We can easily write down the tasks and reorganize them as well as have a progression index. Wrike offers several views including a kanban view and Gantt chart view."

"In our company, we heavily rely on Wrike. Wrike has helped in communication, managing all sorts of projects and tasks, and having a history of all our correspondence items."

"The solution is stable and reliable."

"The product is intuitive. It is easy to learn and update. You can follow the project from the beginning till the end with the help of the solution. The tool helps to update the project in seconds."

More Wrike pros

Cons

"Sometimes, new users find it a bit difficult to handle Adobe Workfront."

"Sometimes there are glitches when we are reviewing an interactive proof."

"The solution's visualization feature could be user-friendly."

"The interface can also be customized to fit and accept many tools for better performance and customer service improvement."

"I would say that the stability, honestly, has gone down since the Adobe acquisition, and the quality when they roll out their updates."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"Adobe Workfront could improve its interface, which may benefit from an overhaul for better consistency between the web interface and the API."

"Our product and graphic designers are working with various Adobe products, but Workfront has a no-frills interface. It's a useful tool with everything we need, but it could be a little more attractive and present information in a polished way. It's a web interface, so it's accessible, but the appearance could be a little slicker."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"Wrike needs to be more responsive to community requests for new features."

"What annoys me with Wrike and things that I would like to improve is that you need to have a very organized workflow that everyone in the company follows, and only then will Wrike work."

"It would be great if they could develop more reporting."

"We feel that the actual project reports and roll-ups could be a lot different. We are seeking something more for the dashboard. We would like a high-level dashboard that can be broken down into individual product roll-ups and tasks that are assigned. If you assign someone to a task, it assigns them all of the tasks under that. We want to be able to break those down so that a person doesn't have an 800 task list, for example. We want more separation with that and a higher-level dashboard experience."

"The product needs to send direct emails to customers updating the latest aspects since it is better to hear directly."

"We faced an issue with the Wrike outlook add-on; it is only available for Microsoft Office 365, and not the on-premise version."

"The response from the website is a little bit slow, and the tool is too expensive for a small team."

"There are several areas where Wrike could improve. First, it doesn't allow accessing multiple channels simultaneously, which would be useful. Transferring data from one project to another is also difficult. It would be easier to work on parallel tasks across different projects. I've noticed others facing similar issues when I check the chat on their website."

More Wrike cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"Wrike is very expensive, and its price is almost $1,400."

"Wrike is not so expensive, but I don't know exactly how it compares with other tools. Wrike might not be so cheap when we are using it for a lot of users."

"From a pricing perspective, I would rate Wrike a four out of five."

"Wrike is expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

64%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

85%

University

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Workfront?

I can say it is a powerful tool. We have everything in-house in that tool, like, creating reports, dashboards, creating various workflows, and everything we have inside one application.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

Workfront incurs around a hundred thousand plus dollars per year. Licensing is strict, particularly with free accounts, however, it offers flexibility in project access, which could be enhanced fur...

What needs improvement with Workfront?

What do you like most about Wrike?

The most valuable feature of Wrike is the tag functionality.

What needs improvement with Wrike?

What is your primary use case for Wrike?

I use the tool as a project management tool to track project timelines and communicate with the team.

Aprimo vs Adobe Workfront

Comparisons

Compared 18% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 15% of the time

Smartsheet vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 14% of the time

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 12% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

monday.com vs Wrike

Compared 21% of the time

Asana vs Wrike

Compared 20% of the time

ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management vs Wrike

Compared 10% of the time

Trello vs Wrike

Compared 8% of the time

Jira vs Wrike

Compared 7% of the time

More Wrike Competitors

Product Reports

Adobe Workfront

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Download Wrike product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

AtTask is a cloud-based Enterprise Work Management solution that helps marketing, IT, and other enterprise teams conquer the chaos of excessive email, redundant status meetings, and disconnected tools. Unlike other tools, AtTask Enterprise Work Cloud is a centralized, easy-to-adopt solution for managing and collaborating on all types of work through the entire work lifecycle, which improves team productivity and executive visibility. AtTask is trusted by thousands of global enterprises, like Adobe, Cisco, HBO, House of Blues, REI, Trek, Schneider Electric, and ATB Financial. To learn more, visit www.AtTask.com or follow us on Twitter @AtTask.

Adobe

Wrike is an online collaboration and project management software bringing together centralized task management and social collaboration features into one real-time workspace. It connects tasks, discussions, and emails to your actual project plan. You get an up-to-date picture of the project and can keep your team aligned with your strategy without boring status meetings. Challenges Wrike helps solve:

Data silos: Tasks, discussions and documents scattered across email, Skype, personal computers and spreadsheets
Poor visibility into work status
Missed deadlines and project failures

Main benefits:

Accelerating project delivery by using a platform your team will actually use and love
Keeping all team members on the same page even across borders without lengthy status meetings, long email threads and spreadsheet updates
Big picture of project progress with real-time updates and cross-project reports and newsfeed
Real-time team collaboration with discussions, files attached to tasks, and a built-in document editor

Why Wrike?

Wrike is a system your team will use. It helps them do their work, not just track it.
Wrike can be easily customized to your needs as each team can set up their own workflow.
Wrike scales as you grow, providing visibility and ease of use for teams of any size.

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Down Association, Clever Clicks, Sevenly, Palatov Motorsport, LLC, Koch Ink, Opportunity To Do, Quark Software Inc., Transamerican Auto Parts, PlumChoiceÂ, Inc., InScribe, Evisions, Giant Steps, TechRepublic

Adobe Workfront vs. Wrike