Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Adobe Web Experience Management vs Qualtrics XM Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 4, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Web Experience Manage...
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Qualtrics XM Platform
Ranking in Customer Experience Management
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
Social CRM (3rd), Survey Software (1st), Customer Feedback Management (1st), Product Management Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Customer Experience Management category, the mindshare of Adobe Web Experience Management is 2.1%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualtrics XM Platform is 3.0%, down from 6.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Experience Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qualtrics XM Platform3.0%
Adobe Web Experience Management2.1%
Other94.9%
Customer Experience Management
 

Featured Reviews

Somnath-Shelke - PeerSpot reviewer
Tech Architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
User-friendly experience has supported static sites and personalization for multiple channels
Regarding AI-driven analytics in Adobe Web Experience Management, AI analytics is not yet used; however, since recently there was a push at a global market level to move to AI part, Adobe also introduced certain things, but currently, I have not used it. From an integration point of view, as I said, for Adobe suite products, Adobe provided it. However, mainly for the cloud one, Adobe Web Experience Management on-premises has certain restrictions from a compliance point of view. Adobe has hosted it in their environment, and now I think most clients are moving to AMS as well. However, when it comes to third-party integrations, there are certain restrictions, especially in finance organizations. For the retail sector, support provided by Adobe is pretty good but clients are still restricting themselves from moving to the cloud due to compliance issues, which I believe is not because of Adobe Web Experience Management but rather because of the cloud structure itself. Improvement-wise, I think Adobe Web Experience Management site-wise is fine, but mainly for the cloud one, it is growing. However, I have observed that certain forms need improvement, and if Adobe has any offering for clients needing private cloud solutions, that would be great. I have seen clients restricting themselves from moving to the cloud, and it depends on Adobe's awareness of this issue through surveys they may have conducted. I don't think I would suggest any additional features for Adobe Web Experience Management because case by case, the requirements may vary. Adobe has tried to provide the vanilla features that are required.
VinayakMishra - PeerSpot reviewer
Technology Consultant at Zill Consulting
Workflows are very good, integrate with a lot of things and effective real-time feedback mechanism
There is a lot to improve in Qualtrics. 1. The dashboard is quite slow compared to other dashboards like Power BI and Tableau. The attractiveness of the dashboard also needs work. For example, if I want to move widgets from one page to another, I have to do it one by one. If there are many widgets, I cannot multi-select and move them. 2. In workflows, they can be categorized into folders. Currently, there is no folder structure. So, Qualtrics should introduce folders where you can put multiple workflows in one place. 3. Qualtrics can also introduce AI features to suggest how to build a survey. For example, if I make a grammatical error or if I input a query that a client is looking for a particular kind of survey with a specific use case, it should automatically suggest some templates for building a survey. There are a lot of things they can improve on. These are just a few.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Good content and digital management capabilities."
"The templates and components that come out of the box are very helpful, especially in terms of the content fragments and experience fragments. Every client would like to have some templates and components, and they would like to cut down the effort of having to create every component that's customized. So, they try to use them out of the box. Other than that, the user roles and permissions workflows, third-party integrations, and system integration are the features that are very important."
"The user interface of Adobe Web Experience Management is user-friendly, and that is the main reason most clients are moving to Adobe from other vendors."
"The most valuable feature of Qualtrics Customer XM is the survey, which is very user-friendly and designed as a drag-and-drop item."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its simplicity and standardization. The consistent look and feel across surveys make it easy to use and provide a sense of simplicity. Once I've navigated through it for one survey, I feel confident I can efficiently handle the next hundred surveys. The intuitive interface contributes to the overall ease of use."
"We can integrate data and run an algorithm."
"The solution has other extra features, like Stats iQ, Text iQ, and Predict iQ."
"The solution allows the development of multiple surveys based on the lifecycle"
"The solution is very simple to use."
"The tool's most valuable feature is its setup process. I find it intuitive, especially regarding tasks like randomization and survey logic. Delighted by Qualtrics is intuitive compared to many competitors, which justifies its price."
"Workflows are very powerful. There are a lot of good things, but I feel workflows are the best."
 

Cons

"From a technical support point of view for Adobe Web Experience Management, I would rate them a five. They attempt to resolve issues promptly, but response times can vary, and sometimes clients need to wait at least a month for more complex queries related to product parts as the support team has to consult with the core product team, which can take time."
"Unable to handle very large video files."
"It would be better if it also supports some styling. Currently, whenever we have to do design for a particular client according to their brand strategy, it takes a good amount of effort. Adobe never focuses on this area. They say that you design your pages, templates, etc. If they can define common components or a common section of the style sheet so that if you want to have a button by default, you can go and just mention the specifications, such as the color code, and those specifications are automatically followed across the whole site or multiple sites according to the brand strategy. Such functionality will be helpful because currently, it takes a lot of effort to manage them separately."
"The solution is expensive. It needs to improve the server builder, which can help it do impressive research. When I mention that the server builder can improve, I'm referring to the ease of performing tasks like implicit association testing. While it's possible to do these tasks in Delighted by Qualtrics, it's not as straightforward to create them. Additionally, there are different tiers of features based on the payment plan. As a collaborator, I may not completely oversee all the features available."
"I suggest to the Delighted by Qualtrics development or R & D team to consider incorporating advanced AI capabilities into their platform. In the current trend where AI is being integrated into various tools, introducing features that enable users to generate surveys efficiently through conversational interfaces or minimal instructions would be a significant advancement."
"It is not easy to implement."
"Sometimes, a lot of emails bounce back during email distribution."
"The solution should add more visual-type elements or image-based question approaches."
"Most of the improvements made constantly cause some friction in the platform."
"It needs to focus more on broader CX programs and customer experience."
"Certain limitations could be addressed in the product. For example, when implementing surveys for diverse product ranges or categories, the platform needs help to adjust questions based on user responses dynamically."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's definitely an expensive solution, but it comes with a lot of features and scalability. As compared to other content management systems that we have in the market, AEM is the costliest one. There is no hidden or additional fee."
"We need to pay a yearly licensing fee for Qualtrics Customer XM, which is expensive."
"The product is not cheap."
"The solution is fairly expensive, but it would be money well spent."
"Pricing depends upon the different kinds of use cases."
"Some clients felt that this product was expensive when the sales team tried to sell it to them."
"Delighted by Qualtrics is more expensive than the competitor solutions"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Experience Management solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
University
13%
Computer Software Company
10%
Educational Organization
8%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Delighted by Qualtrics?
The tool's most valuable feature is its setup process. I find it intuitive, especially regarding tasks like randomization and survey logic. Delighted by Qualtrics is intuitive compared to many comp...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Delighted by Qualtrics?
Delighted by Qualtrics is more expensive than the competitor solutions. In my personal experience, even if I imagine that we have a partner running the solution on our behalf, internal resources wi...
What needs improvement with Delighted by Qualtrics?
The process of creating, updating, and importing participants needs to be more flexible in Delighted by Qualtrics. When a new user needs to be added into the system, for instance, if someone joined...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Delighted by Qualtrics, Qualtrics Customer XM, Qualtrics Core XM,
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Rundfunk Berlin-Brandenburg, University of Georgia, The University of Auckland, Dalhousie University, KfW Bankengruppe, IG Group, National Australia Bank, Investec, New Mexico Department of Transportation (NMDOT), Swiss Federal Railways (SBB), Singapore Tourism Board, European Southern Observatory (ESO)
Aetna, 1 800 Contacts, GE
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Web Experience Management vs. Qualtrics XM Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.