ADOIT vs Planview Portfolios comparison

Why PeerSpot?

BOC Group and Planview are both solutions in the Enterprise Architecture Management category. BOC Group is ranked #18, while Planview is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.5. BOC Group holds a 2.0% mindshare in AM, compared to Planview’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Planview users who would recommend it.

ADOIT

Read 2 ADOIT reviews

1,525 Views
1,525 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Planview Portfolios

Read 71 Planview Portfolios reviews

9,492 Views
2,183 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

ADOIT

Planview Portfolios

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Planview Portfolios and ADOIT compete in the portfolio and enterprise architecture management domain, with Planview often favored for cost-effectiveness and support services, while ADOIT offers advanced features appealing to businesses prioritizing robust functionality.

Features: Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive project tracking, reporting tools, and enhanced project visibility, improving planning efficiency. ADOIT provides sophisticated enterprise architecture modeling, detailed structural analysis, and decision-making insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Planview Portfolios has a straightforward deployment process complemented by excellent customer support, ensuring smooth implementation. ADOIT provides a cloud-based deployment model simplifying integration into IT ecosystems, highlighting its flexible deployment options.

Pricing and ROI: Planview Portfolios is known for competitive pricing, emphasizing cost management and project efficiency, offering substantial ROI through optimized resource allocation. ADOIT, initially more expensive, delivers value through deep analysis capabilities, justifying investment for organizations focusing on architecture management.

To learn more, read our detailed ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADOIT

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

18th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Planview Portfolios

Ranking in Enterprise Architecture Management

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Enterprise Architecture Management category, the mindshare of ADOIT is 2.0%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Planview Portfolios is 2.8%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Planview Portfolios	2.8%
ADOIT	2.0%
Other	95.2%

Enterprise Architecture Management

Featured Reviews

reviewer1289670

Solution Architect at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees

A good tool that's great for modelling and building heat maps

During the first 18 months, for at least three months, we tried to get some training. We started working on the modeling part and we are still evolving in this tool. There are a few recommendations that have been put to the vendor, and we've gotten some answers and the team is evolving the tool in this space. I don't have anything to complain about right now, although there are a few things that we are discussing with the team who is connecting with the vendor to get that resolved. Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated. We need to know how the enterprise-level metadata and master data could be managed in this tool. There are multiple open questions.

Read full review

Monabi Kingsley

Project Manager at 3M

Centralized planning has improved resource visibility and supports data‑driven financial decisions

The best features Planview Portfolios offers are visibility enhancement, robust system performance, and comprehensive resource management. This enhanced visibility in Planview Portfolios ensures that all users can easily track progress, identify bottlenecks, and make informed decisions to optimize workflow efficiency. When discussing robust system performance, the system's robust performance in meeting our various work requirements effectively and efficiently stands out. It is very stable and reliable, contributing to a seamless user experience, which enables users to focus on their tasks without disruptions. I also love the financial breakdown, planning and prioritization, and attribute collection on projects in Planview Portfolios. Planview Portfolios has positively impacted my organization since I started using it. It has enabled me to gain insights into the full scope of work consuming resources. I am able to know where the resources are being consumed more, especially which resources are consuming the most. I have been able to leverage resources management and resource time reporting, which enabled the generation of $90 million in annual revenue through labor billing to customers.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This particular product would be really helpful to model the architecture at an enterprise level."

"The tool allows us to track the life cycle of products and resources. When the metadata is set up correctly, we can see where things are in their life cycle and how they fit into our processes. It helps us understand which core processes are active and whether any underlying elements need renewal. We can also keep tabs on the costs."

"The most valuable features are scheduling, resource management, and, from a project perspective, the functions like issues that change orders. They are valuable because, from a project management perspective, we use the workflows that we build for project management and do active risk management and issue management for the projects that we want for our agencies."

"Once you get a good grasp of the principles of Planview, it is a really powerful tool."

"Enterprise One improves our monthly portfolio and resource capacity planning and forecasting and improves the visibility of the resource capacity and the team's capacity to take on new work."

"The solution view into resource capacity and availability helps us to manage work."

"Enterprise One has improved my organization with the ability to look at the hours that people track, and as we grow within Enterprise One, we're able to pull reporting to see how much time it takes for each individual person or a team to perform a task to complete a project, so we can build estimation models that improve forecasting and reduce the amount of time project managers spend building project plans."

"We are able to see where everyone in the team is in terms of hours, where there is capacity, and where we can actually add them, e.g., other projects that they're not currently staffed to."

"We provided whatever feedback we had to the Planview team, and they went in and built those additional features that we requested. For example, they created a great way for our users to search for a specific resource, project, program, or role. We were not using some of the features, and we wanted them to not be visible, and they helped us with that. They also brought a feature to provide visibility into when a resource was never assigned to any task. There was no visibility to this before. This feature was really very good for visibility into the resource portfolio."

"We can view a project both at the top level and dig into the particularities. It's given us greater visibility into the work itself."

More Planview Portfolios pros

Cons

"Specifically, we need to understand how the data could be segregated."

"The tool's data lineage could be enhanced. It would be great to see the data flow and understand where it's going within the system."

"Its ability to create summary reports across multiple projects is very limited."

"Its support to legacy paying customers is something PlanView is not handling well. We were unable to implement due to lack of professional support by PlanView. "

"Its view into RCCP and availability does not at all help us to manage resources; it is one of the worst features of Enterprise One where everybody in our company hates the tool and are sort of forced to use it for RCCP, some teams have moved to use other tools for the same and use E1 as recording tool only."

"My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing reveals that the cost is a bit not affordable for a small organization, but for medium and large enterprises, I would say it is very cost-effective and affordable."

"Our version is definitely set up a bit more waterfall world. It would be better if some of the agile features were more in the standard product."

"Being the IT development manager who implements the upgrades for Planview, I would love to see more thorough testing of expenditures and more thorough testing in general. When we do an upgrade, we have to do quite a bit of testing because we can affect the bottom line."

"Recently, we have gotten on a newer version. We're currently on version 15. Some of the things that we've been running into roadblocks on, it looks like the solutions will be coming out in versions 17 or 18. So, we have to upgrade before somethings can get completed."

"Our challenge will be this tool is complex. It is not necessarily easy to start and learn from the beginning. How do you get people who are not professionals to adopt it, use it, and not be mean about it?"

More Planview Portfolios cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I use ADOIT's open-source version."

"We recently did a new bundle for all of Enterprise One. It includes some of the newer pieces, like Projectplace and LeanKit. It bundled our CTM in with it as well. I think the total came out to be about $900,000 a year. This is for unlimited licenses."

"Our licensing costs are about a quarter of a million dollars per year."

"We have unlimited licenses for all of our functionalities. Since we went global, we went with that model."

"We are on the Flex licenses."

"With the costs, they were very understanding. Knowing that we were an existing customer, they were very much willing to work with us to make sure that we were able to transition to Enterprise One from PPM Pro."

"Our licensing costs are probably $150,000 to $180,000 a year with 270 licenses total."

"The licensing part is a bit costly in comparison with the other available PPM tools."

"The cost of other pieces and integrating them in needs improvement."

More Planview Portfolios pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

17%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Planview Portfolios?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that Planview Portfolios is one of the best and a very cost-effective tool.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Planview Portfolios?

Planview Portfolios can be improved as the user interface defaults to the last opened portfolio, which can waste a lot of time loading a large portfolio if that is not what I need at that moment. J...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Planview Portfolios?

My main use case for Planview Portfolios is to ensure governance and decision auditability by incorporating embedded workflows, approval management, and key document retention supporting a single c...

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs ADOIT

Compared 18% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs ADOIT

Compared 16% of the time

Ardoq vs ADOIT

Compared 10% of the time

OrbusInfinity vs ADOIT

Compared 8% of the time

erwin Data Modeler vs ADOIT

Compared 6% of the time

More ADOIT Competitors

Broadcom Clarity vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Project Server vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 5% of the time

Planview PPM Pro vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs Planview Portfolios

Compared 3% of the time

More Planview Portfolios Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Architecture Management

October 2026

Download ADOIT product report

Buyer's Guide

Planview Portfolios

October 2026

Download Planview Portfolios product report

Also Known As

No data available

Planview Enterprise One, Troux

Overview

ADOIT provides a comprehensive framework for enterprise architecture management, supporting strategic optimization and IT asset planning. It assists organizations in aligning business goals with IT strategies, enhancing decision-making processes.

ADOIT stands out as a potent tool for enhancing enterprise architecture with its emphasis on structured collaboration, precise documentation, and thorough analysis. Users find it effective for streamlining communications across teams, ensuring a cohesive approach to managing resources. The platform offers an intuitive interface tailored for creating detailed architectural models, thus facilitating efficient data management and strategic planning. It supports system integrations, allowing for seamless information flow and enabling businesses to achieve their architecture goals efficiently.

What are the key features of ADOIT?

Collaborative Modeling: Enables team collaboration in creating and updating models to ensure consistency.
Performance Analytics: Offers tools for assessing system performance and operational efficiency.
Flexible Integration: Smooth integration with existing IT systems for seamless workflow.
Centralized Repository: Provides a central location for storing and managing architecture data.
Process Optimization: Tools assist in identifying and improving inefficiencies in business processes.

What benefits should you evaluate in ADOIT reviews?

Enhanced Strategic Planning: Insights and tools that support long-term business strategy formulation.
Cost Efficiency: Identifies areas to reduce costs and maximize resource use.
Improved Communication: Facilitates better communication within organizations.
Risk Management: Tools to foresee and manage potential business risks effectively.
Data-driven Decisions: Provides data analytics for informed decision-making.

In industries like finance and healthcare, ADOIT is used to integrate IT and business processes, improving efficiency. For example, banks employ ADOIT to align their IT infrastructure with regulatory requirements. In healthcare, it aids in digital transformation by optimizing IT resource allocation and management.

BOC Group

Planview Portfolios empowers executives, finance, and portfolio leaders by enhancing strategic investments, improving market responsiveness, and connecting strategy and execution for optimal visibility.

Planview Portfolios offers comprehensive strategic and project portfolio management to organizations. Automating and scaling these processes, it enhances speed-to-value, aligns strategic objectives with execution, and connects business and technology planning for optimal funding and resource capacity. Users gain end-to-end visibility, track progress, and improve decision-making by utilizing integrated financial and capacity planning.

What key features does Planview Portfolios offer?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns objectives and OKRs with execution to ensure strategic goals are met.
End-to-End Visibility: Tracks performance across the organization to support timely decision-making.
Dynamic Planning and Funding: Utilizes scenario modeling for flexible strategic investment funding.
Flexible Capacity Planning: Balances programs and staffing levels against available capacity.
Connected Technology Strategy: Aligns technology investments with strategic digital initiatives.
Adaptive Program Management: Manages dependencies, risk, and progress through integrated planning.

What benefits can users find in reviews of Planview Portfolios?

Workflow Efficiency: Enhances efficiency by minimizing bottlenecks and optimizing execution.
Improved Decision-Making: Provides comprehensive insights for better informed strategic decisions.
Financial Insights: Offers detailed financial tracking across projects for greater transparency.
Organizational Agility: Increases productivity and adaptability through a unified platform.

Planview Portfolios is implemented across projects in industries requiring strategic planning, resource allocation, and financial tracking. Organizations manage project lifecycle and integration with ERP systems on a centralized platform, utilizing customizable workflows and reporting tools to enhance efficiency and streamline team processes.

Planview

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: Volksbank Vienna, Austrian Ministry of Finance, Hilti

UPS, NatWest, Ingram Micro, Canadian Tire, Viessmann, Volvo, NASCO, UNESCO

Buyer's Guide

ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

November 2026

Free Report: ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios

Find out what your peers are saying about ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADOIT vs. Planview Portfolios report.

See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.