Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs DocuSign CLM comparison

Agiloft and Docusign are both solutions in the Contract Management Software category. Agiloft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 6.0, while Docusign is ranked #4. Additionally, 92% of Agiloft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Docusign users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) and DocuSign CLM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Conga, Agiloft, Ironclad and others in Contract Management Software.

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Automation Anywhere

Featured Reviews

Venkat Sivaprakash

Management Consultant at Accenture

Has significantly improved document-driven workflows and reduced processing time across finance and HR functions

Automation Anywhere has evolved significantly and upgraded itself to provide agentic AI and AI-based automation solutions for document automation. The product has matured considerably over time. We can create workflows that can call an API. We can include prompts in particular workflows for ChatGPT-related functions, connecting to an LLM and RAG to perform tasks. For document automation, modern features are available to train documents, ensuring high accuracy and repeatability over time. The system is very easy to use. I recently completed a course in document automation, typically designed for people involved in coding and technical aspects. Though I understand coding comprehensively, I don't do actual coding. The course was very accessible. Currently, extensive coding isn't necessary due to the hybrid model incorporating GenAI aspects, low-code, no-code capabilities, APIs, and numerous pre-built objects in Automation Anywhere. The features include GenAI-driven prompting methods and workflow creation capabilities. In these workflows, we can create decision boxes and call APIs without coding. We simply pull objects, drop them, connect them, and add minimal coding when needed. The most crucial aspect isn't coding but rather sizing the automation and fleshing out the details. Automation Co-pilot takes notes and performs automated analysis. It can extract details from videos, summarize conversations, and provide detailed information. During calls, it identifies instructions and performs tasks such as preparing reports and reconciliation. Automation Anywhere can also connect with Microsoft Co-pilot. Through Co-pilot, real-time operations can be executed, allowing direct interaction between vendors and automation through this component.

Read full review

reviewer2884323

Manager Of Global Procurement at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Centralized contract repository has improved visibility and supports detailed spend analysis

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved in the area of catering more from a CLM perspective. Unlike vendors in this area like Ariba, Coupa, Icertis, and Ivalua, which also provide the sourcing side—RFX, RFP, RFI, auction—through the tool, that area within Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is lacking. I would be happy to see those modules well-placed and well-balanced based on how other competitors are catering to that requirement. I would also like to see various enhancements within the dashboard and customization based on client and customer requirements. That is something that I would like to see more within the dashboard and the tool. If I had to pick one area where Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved, it would be better slice-and-dice options within the dashboard. That is something that is very important and critical for me. I chose 8 out of 10 because there are certain areas where Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) would need to look at what their competitors are doing. CLM is a very hot area for procurement because it is used by direct and indirect procurement folks. Based on those requirements, use cases, and especially based on what clients need and how their competitors are performing, I think there is room for improvement on the enhancement side, improving the overall customer experience on the dashboard, having more layouts, and having the option to slice and dice the spend and the orders. It would also be good to have different charts and infographics based on the contracts that have been uploaded, which provides a picture to the procurement person. For example, when they are doing a renewal or want to work with the same vendor, it provides some sort of ammunition to make an informed decision and ensure that the data coming out of the tool represents factual insights. This will help drive savings, better outcomes with the supplier, and better stakeholder engagement. It is all linked to how the tool can be more efficient and effective.

Read full review

Jeanette Wayne

Senior Director, Chief of Staff & Program Management Office (PMO) at a transportation company with 501-1,000 employees

Our contracts are moving from draft to full authorization significantly faster now

* The redline function isn’t sufficiently robust. Our clients struggle with the tool during negotiation. * The search feature needs to be a bit more robust, to facilitate complex search functions. * Integration with our ERP system (and other systems) needs to be enabled. SpringCM reports that they are working on all of these items and that they are integrated into their roadmap.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"At the most granular level, automating people's daily tasks has been helpful by freeing them up to do higher value-add activities, which is definitely beneficial."

"We are making less mistakes and have more metrics available to understand what our problems are. Now, we can do root cause analysis and have less noise in the system during the process."

"The Capture command has been a lifesaver for me in each of my use cases and the advanced Excel functionalities like running macro, reading and manipulating data, etc. It allows the bot creator to leverage the inbuilt functionalities that AA2019 has to offer to a great extent."

"Tasks or activities that were taking almost six hours a day have been reduced drastically to 30 minutes, which saves time as well as business costs."

"Before switching to the cloud version of Automation Anywhere, I worked with v10 and v10, so I appreciate the core functionality and the fact that it's a low-code solution. That is one of the key elements that differentiates Automation Anywhere from other platforms and one of the reasons we have been able to achieve success."

"The features like IQ Bot and Metabot have helped our organization to gain business trust and provide a greater number of unique solutions to our clients for complex projects."

"We are using it to backfill a lot of our resources who are retiring, so we are hiring less people as we go."

"I like all of the features, especially the MetaBot, REST API, and SAP DLL."

More Automation Anywhere pros

"With Agiloft, everything is organized in one place, with data in tables and our own archival elsewhere in our cloud."

"Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow."

"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has helped us realize what we were lacking and helped us choose a replacement vendor that was better suited to our needs."

"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) has positively impacted my organization by improving the lifecycle of contract reviews and approvals, which may have saved some time for the legal team to do other work."

"Project HOME has easily recovered its initial capital outlay in the first year from simple centralization and automated approval tracking."

"It is obvious to me that Agiloft can handle much more than contract management, as the specific requirements that were not part of Agiloft's initial configuration were implemented seamlessly."

"When we launched Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM), it was a much-needed contract management system in my past role, solving a big problem for us in terms of contract intake, negotiation, management, as well as providing a centralized repository that we used as our source of truth for audit purposes, which had a huge impact on us in being compliant."

"We have been working with Agiloft Contract Management Suite for the past 6 months and have found it an extremely useful and user friendly solution to our contract management challenge."

More Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) pros

"Our contracts are moving through the process, from draft to full authorization, 340 percent faster than they did last year."

Cons

"The solution is costly and the licensing is very confusing."

"The current accuracy rate of 60% for document-based automations requires human intervention."

"The bot scaling process was painful, when you go beyond a few bots, and because we had stability issues. We had to work through the issues, and they took us a long time."

"The overall product in Automation Anywhere is good, but they need to improve a little bit on the overall architecture side."

"This solution saves us time but there are some things that make it clumsy for the end-users."

"In the control room, the manual bot update should be looked at."

"I feel the cost of licensing is very high for the A2019 version."

"Excel functionalities, the macro interface can be improved in the next release of RPA platform Automation Anywhere."

More Automation Anywhere cons

"Every software can improve, so better integration with the Oracle financial system and out-of-the-box integrations would certainly add a lot more value, particularly for procurement and sales contracts."

"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is very difficult to set rules and to follow based on contract type, as the mapping and the level of tech and coding that is needed for that requires developer skills."

"Requests were clunky. Once we got it into the system, the process did not work well for redlining and negotiations."

"Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) could be improved in the area of catering more from a CLM perspective."

"One possible area of improvement would be reporting."

"There are many improvement points for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM)."

"If there is an area for improvement, it would be in the mobile aspect."

"One area of improvement I would suggest Agiloft to focus on would be how users interact with attachments to records."

"The redline function isn’t sufficiently robust. Our clients struggle with the tool during negotiation."

"The redline function isn’t sufficiently robust. Our clients struggle with the tool during negotiation. Also, the search feature needs to be a bit more robust, to facilitate complex search functions. Finally, integration with our ERP system (and other systems) needs to be enabled. SpringCM reports that they are working on all of these items."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s pricing is reasonable."

"Based on what I've heard, it's costly, but I don't know much about its pricing."

"The licensing fees are approximately $10,000 USD for between five and ten users."

"I would rate the cost an eight out of ten, with ten being the highest cost."

"We have a three-year contract with Automation Anywhere."

"The current pricing for Automation Anywhere seems a little higher compared to competitors Power Automate or UiPath. Automation Anywhere is perceived as pricey due to the support model charges ranging from 20% to 30% based on the plans."

"It is reasonable, but it can always be a little bit cheaper."

"The price is a little bit high but the support is good."

More Automation Anywhere pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

University

10%

Wholesaler/Distributor

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	157
Midsize Enterprise	81
Large Enterprise	558

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It depends on your use case. Is it simply to automate a couple of processes? Is it to augment a human team? AA is ver...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

From my experience using AA tool, it depends on the applications that you want to automate, because there some applic...

See all answers

How good is Automation Anywhere for RPA processes?

It is a highly preferred RPA tool. You can check my Automation Anywhere Review to know more.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)?

My experience with Agiloft CLM regarding pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the cost has always been very com...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)?

One minor drawback that I can highlight with Agiloft CLM is that once an agreement reaches the start date, it often f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)?

My main use case for Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is that it helps streamline contract management. I a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

UiPath Platform vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 9% of the time

Blue Prism vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 6% of the time

AutomationEdge vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

WorkFusion vs Automation Anywhere

Compared 2% of the time

More Automation Anywhere Competitors

Coupa Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 11% of the time

CobbleStone Systems Contract Insight vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 9% of the time

PeopleSoft Enterprise Supplier Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 8% of the time

SirionLabs vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 8% of the time

Icertis Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 6% of the time

More Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) Competitors

Conga Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 10% of the time

Ironclad vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 7% of the time

Zycus iContract vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 7% of the time

Windward Core vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 7% of the time

SAP Ariba Contracts vs DocuSign CLM

Compared 6% of the time

More DocuSign CLM Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Automation Anywhere

August 2026

Download Automation Anywhere product report

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

August 2026

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) report

Download Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) product report

No data available

Also Known As

Automation Anywhere, Testing Anywhere, Automation Anywhere Enterprise, Agentic Process Automation System (Now Certified for WorkSpaces)

Agiloft Contract Management Suite

No data available

Interactive Demo

Automation Anywhere

Demo not available

Agiloft

Demo not available

Docusign

Overview

Automation Anywhere offers ease of use, robust system connectivity, and GenAI-driven document automation through a cloud-native platform, significantly enhancing productivity across multiple industries with advanced AI features.

Delivering a comprehensive suite of tools designed for easy integration and rapid deployment, Automation Anywhere drives efficiency by reducing costs and automating repetitive tasks. Its cloud-native platform supports broad industry adoption, including advanced AI features like process automation and Co-Pilot, streamlining complex workflows with minimal technical skills required. Users benefit from robust integration capabilities, which facilitate seamless interaction with multiple systems. However, there is room for improvement in areas such as user-friendliness for beginners, stability, flexible licensing, and enhanced OCR functionality. Organizations in sectors such as banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare gain from the improved operational efficiency and ROI Automation Anywhere offers.

What are the important features of Automation Anywhere?

Ease of Use: Simplifies automation tasks with a user-centric interface.
Robust Connectivity: Provides seamless integration with multiple systems.
GenAI-Driven Document Automation: Leverages AI to automate document management.
Process Automation & Co-Pilot: Enhances workflow automation with advanced AI.
Cloud-Native Platform: Enables rapid deployment and integration.

What benefits should be evaluated in reviews?

Time Savings: Automation drastically reduces manual processing time.
Cost Efficiency: Decreases overall operational costs by automating tasks.
Productivity Enhancement: Streamlines workflows with AI-driven tools.
Improved Integration: Enhances ability to work with multiple systems.
Scalability: Supports growth with a flexible cloud-native architecture.

In the insurance industry, Automation Anywhere is utilized for automating processes such as enrollment management and compliance checks. Its applications extend to supply chain management, financial transactions, and business performance monitoring across sectors like banking, finance, manufacturing, and healthcare, helping organizations to automate routine tasks, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

Automation Anywhere

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is designed to streamline contract processes through automation and advanced features, offering a customizable solution for managing contracts efficiently.

Agiloft CLM helps organizations automate and manage contracts, reducing compliance risks and improving efficiency. With its intuitive design, users can create, approve, and manage contracts in a streamlined manner. The powerful workflow automation, detailed analytics, and robust security ensure that contract management is simplified. Integration capabilities with CRM and ERP systems allow for smooth data management across platforms.

What are the key features of Agiloft CLM?

Workflow Automation: Automatically routes contracts through pre-defined processes.
Customizable Templates: Easy-to-use templates for consistent contract creation.
Advanced Reporting: In-depth reporting tools for contract analytics.
Audit Trail: Comprehensive audit trail for increased transparency and compliance.
Seamless Integrations: Integrates with popular CRM and ERP systems.

What benefits can users expect from Agiloft CLM?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines contract processes, saving time and resources.
Risk Reduction: Reduces compliance risk with automated alerts and reminders.
Cost Savings: Lowers administrative costs through automation.
Improved Data Security: Ensures data security with robust access controls.

Agiloft CLM's adaptability makes it suitable for industries like healthcare, manufacturing, and financial services, allowing these sectors to manage contracts securely and efficiently. Its flexibility supports diverse compliance requirements, making it a versatile tool for contract management.

Agiloft

DocuSign CLM offers comprehensive contract lifecycle management, streamlining contract creation, collaboration, and execution seamlessly. It is tailored for businesses that need efficient contract processing.

DocuSign CLM is designed to reduce the complexity of contract management by automating workflows and improving collaboration. With its robust integrations, organizations can manage contracts from start to finish effortlessly. Features like document generation and collaborative negotiation enhance efficiency. By using this tool, legal teams and businesses can focus on strategic tasks rather than manual administrative work, improving productivity significantly.

What are the key features of DocuSign CLM?

Automated Workflows: Streamlines tasks, reducing manual processes and saving time.
Document Generation: Automates the creation of documents based on pre-defined templates.
Collaboration Tools: Enhances team collaboration through shared access and real-time edits.
Approval Tracking: Monitors approval processes to ensure compliance and timely completion.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with CRM, ERP, and other systems for unified operations.

What benefits and ROI should users expect when reviewing?

Efficiency Gains: Minimizes administrative burden, allowing focus on strategic decision-making.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures processes adhere to industry standards and regulations.
Cost Savings: Reduces costs associated with manual contract management.
Improved Accuracy: Decreases errors with automated inputs and processes.

DocuSign CLM implementation varies by industry, especially evident in sectors like finance and healthcare where strict compliance and regulations necessitate precise contract management. In tech firms, it enhances agility and fast-paced contractual engagements. Across diverse fields, it tailors its functionalities to match industry-specific needs.

Docusign

Sample Customers

Google, Linkedin, Cisco, Juniper Networks, DellEMC, Comcast, Mastercard, Quest Diagnostics

Contract Mgmt: WeWork, Chevron, CSFI, Retrophin, Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Global Healthcare Exchange, Fitch Ratings, Safehorizon, American Greetings, Doosan, Family Impact Network, Peloton Therapeutics, San Mateo County, Insmed, Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Kaiser Permanente

Valvoline, Uber, Spotify, Popsugar, Facebook, NCR, USDA, US Department of Energy, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

June 2026

Free Report: Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Contract Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.