Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs GEP SMART comparison

Agiloft and GEP Worldwide are both solutions in the Contract Management Software category. Agiloft is ranked #4, while GEP Worldwide is ranked #8. Agiloft holds a 6.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to GEP Worldwide’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Agiloft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of GEP Worldwide users who would recommend it.

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

Read 4 Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) reviews

826 Views
818 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GEP SMART

Read 13 GEP SMART reviews

2,238 Views
627 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

GEP SMART

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) and GEP SMART based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Contract Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ...

Ranking in Contract Management Software

4th

Average Rating

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

GEP SMART

Ranking in Contract Management Software

8th

Average Rating

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Procurement Software (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Contract Management Software category, the mindshare of Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) is 6.2%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GEP SMART is 2.8%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Contract Management Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)	6.2%
GEP SMART	2.8%
Other	91.0%

Contract Management Software

Featured Reviews

it_user658929

Systems Analyst at a tech vendor

Email reminders notify relevant individuals and departments that contracts are due to be renewed or have expired.

Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow. The flexibility and relative ease of implementing functionality and modifications without programming has proven to be most striking. We were pleased by the functionality and smooth integration between Agiloft and DocuSign. The handoff of documents from Agiloft to DocuSign and back again to Agiloft is easy and seamless. The capability of being able to sign internal documents, as well as those requiring both internal and outside vendor signatures without necessitating a great deal of setup can help facilitate the contract completion process.

Read full review

ChristinaJones

Senior Product Manager at a university with 10,001+ employees

Doesn't require a background in analytics to run reports

SMART has been helpful for sourcing and public bids. For regulatory purposes, our university posts bids, depending on the scope of the bid. We get a lot of value out of SMART's ability to post to a public site and have suppliers see that information, register in the tool, and participate. SMART features for collecting information and its timeline capabilities are highly useful. Then on the contract side, the reporting capabilities are the most valuable. Our use case focuses primarily on post-execution and lifecycle management, so it's essential to be able to report accurately especially compliance-related reports. SMART is easy to use, especially when reporting. It isn't designed for a hardcore analyst. You don't need to have a background in analytics to run reports, which is huge. I realized I hadn't touched too much on the spending side, but we use SMART for all spending analytics, and any commodity manager procurement professional can go in and run a spending report. That was a business decision to restrict who can run reports since that data can be exported and used. But the reporting capabilities are incredibly easy to use.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Project HOME has easily recovered its initial capital outlay in the first year from simple centralization and automated approval tracking."

"Safe Horizon has successfully implemented the Agiloft Contract Management System as tailored to meet the specific needs of our organization’s contract approval and renewal workflow."

"We have been working with Agiloft Contract Management Suite for the past 6 months and have found it an extremely useful and user friendly solution to our contract management challenge."

"It is obvious to me that Agiloft can handle much more than contract management, as the specific requirements that were not part of Agiloft's initial configuration were implemented seamlessly."

"I have seen that the sourcing process in GEP SMART is easier than in Oracle, SAP, etc."

"SMART's source-to-pay feature has helped us undergo a digital transformation."

"One of the most valuable features is the opportunity-identification through the spend analytics. Another is around the RFX options to benchmark various pre-qualified vendors that are invited to participate."

"In summary, using this solution benefits our organization through cost savings, better efficiency, improved transparency, and having information archived."

"On the spend side, it's integrated with our accounting system and has bimonthly uploads of data. So we have pretty current spend information that we can access and build reports on."

"Their tool has become a much better tool over the years."

"Through using GEP, we've been able to gain respect; the other departments in our company have come to rely upon us even more, and we have become a more trusted department within the company, among our peers, because we can speak to their spend at greater depth."

"Among the most valuable features are the ability to send out purchase orders, create catalogs, and accept invoices through procurement. And the reporting function is robust."

More GEP SMART pros

Cons

"One area of improvement I would suggest Agiloft to focus on would be how users interact with attachments to records."

"If there is an area for improvement, it would be in the mobile aspect."

"One possible area of improvement would be reporting."

"We didn't like their dashboard initially, but they responded to that very well."

"GEP's goal, at least during our integration, is to get through it, not necessarily get it right."

"I want to see continued investment in analytics and reporting."

"The manuals, especially the ones for the suppliers, are currently available only in English. If these can also be translated into different languages, that would be excellent."

"If our organization could use it as a full-fledged solution, then it would be valuable and give a return on investment. However, since we are not currently using it as a full-fledged solution, even facing some bugs and problems with the synchronization with some of the internal software, we are not able to use it in a full-fledged manner."

"The loading of the contracts could be a little bit easier."

"While it captures all the fields and requirements, when any supplier updates or new supplier registration happens, then the supplier needs to update their bank details. Our IT team has made it so every half an hour the GEP SMART system will push the supplier to the Oracle Database. So, we have faced some problems, like bank details, etc. We addressed this issue with GEP. They are working on it to make bank details a mandatory field for any supplier and match our requirements. Their engineering team has taken up creating a customized process for us."

"Very recently, they implemented a customer success team to manage our expectations and communicate them to their technical team. That function is relatively new and some work needs to be done to build that connection so that it's a little more seamless."

More GEP SMART cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"My advice is to think wisely when it comes to estimating the number of licenses that you will require. If you settle on a number too early and you need additional ones, then the extra licenses might be quite expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Contract Management Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Energy/Utilities Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

Comparisons

Coupa Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 12% of the time

CobbleStone Systems Contract Insight vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 8% of the time

PeopleSoft Enterprise Supplier Contract Management vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 8% of the time

SirionLabs vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 8% of the time

Lexion vs Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM)

Compared 5% of the time

More Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) Competitors

SAP Ariba Procurement vs GEP SMART

Compared 27% of the time

Coupa Procure vs GEP SMART

Compared 12% of the time

Zycus Source to Pay Suite vs GEP SMART

Compared 11% of the time

JAGGAER Spend Director vs GEP SMART

Compared 8% of the time

ElectrifAi ProcurementAi vs GEP SMART

Compared 6% of the time

More GEP SMART Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

April 2026

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) report

Download Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) product report

Buyer's Guide

GEP SMART

May 2026

Download GEP SMART product report

Also Known As

Agiloft Contract Management Suite

SMART by GEP

Overview

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) is designed to streamline contract processes through automation and advanced features, offering a customizable solution for managing contracts efficiently.

Agiloft CLM helps organizations automate and manage contracts, reducing compliance risks and improving efficiency. With its intuitive design, users can create, approve, and manage contracts in a streamlined manner. The powerful workflow automation, detailed analytics, and robust security ensure that contract management is simplified. Integration capabilities with CRM and ERP systems allow for smooth data management across platforms.

What are the key features of Agiloft CLM?

Workflow Automation: Automatically routes contracts through pre-defined processes.
Customizable Templates: Easy-to-use templates for consistent contract creation.
Advanced Reporting: In-depth reporting tools for contract analytics.
Audit Trail: Comprehensive audit trail for increased transparency and compliance.
Seamless Integrations: Integrates with popular CRM and ERP systems.

What benefits can users expect from Agiloft CLM?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines contract processes, saving time and resources.
Risk Reduction: Reduces compliance risk with automated alerts and reminders.
Cost Savings: Lowers administrative costs through automation.
Improved Data Security: Ensures data security with robust access controls.

Agiloft CLM's adaptability makes it suitable for industries like healthcare, manufacturing, and financial services, allowing these sectors to manage contracts securely and efficiently. Its flexibility supports diverse compliance requirements, making it a versatile tool for contract management.

Agiloft

GEP SMART is a comprehensive procurement platform offering a centralized contract repository, intuitive spend analytics, and AI-driven opportunity identification.

GEP SMART provides a user-friendly interface that enhances procurement transparency and efficiency. It accommodates electronic signatures, supports streamlined project management, and enables effective regulatory compliance. Its flexibility and consistent advancements improve user experience, accessible to those without extensive IT expertise. While challenges exist in supplier management scope and search functions, improvements are needed in contract handling and data integrity.

What are GEP SMART's key features?

Centralized Contract Repository: Easy access and management of contracts.
Intuitive Spend Analytics: In-depth analysis for better decision-making.
User-friendly Interface: Simplified navigation with efficient reporting.
Electronic Signatures: Streamlined procurement processes with digital verification.
AI Tools: Assists in opportunity identification and data consolidation.

What benefits do users gain from GEP SMART?

Enhanced Transparency: Improved visibility across procurement activities.
Streamlined Procurement: Efficient handling of RFQs, RFPs, and RFIs.
Improved Compliance: Supports adherence to regulatory requirements.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces unnecessary data entry and streamlines system configurations.
Flexibility: Consistent updates and enhancements improve the overall experience.

Organizations across industries implement GEP SMART for procurement activities such as sourcing, contract management, and spend analysis. They utilize its SaaS capabilities to facilitate sourcing events and manage contract lifecycles without needing full P2P integration. The platform is used to report on spend, diversity, and savings, ensuring efficient procurement processes.

GEP Worldwide

Sample Customers

Contract Mgmt: WeWork, Chevron, CSFI, Retrophin, Roche Diagnostics, Genentech, Global Healthcare Exchange, Fitch Ratings, Safehorizon, American Greetings, Doosan, Family Impact Network, Peloton Therapeutics, San Mateo County, Insmed, Roman Catholic Diocese of Dallas, Kaiser Permanente

Exxon Chevron Macys

Buyer's Guide

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

April 2026

Free Report: Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART

Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Managment (CLM) vs. GEP SMART report.

See our list of best Contract Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Contract Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.