No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Airlock Digital Application Control vs VMware Carbon Black App Control comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Airlock Digital Application...
Ranking in Application Control
3rd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
VMware Carbon Black App Con...
Ranking in Application Control
7th
Average Rating
9.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Application Control category, the mindshare of Airlock Digital Application Control is 9.6%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Carbon Black App Control is 9.7%, down from 15.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Control Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Airlock Digital Application Control9.6%
VMware Carbon Black App Control9.7%
Other80.7%
Application Control
 

Featured Reviews

MB
Business Development Manager at Digitaltrack
Application allow listing has strengthened endpoint security and streamlines software approvals
Airlock Digital Application Control is a solid product, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently. While the initial deployment can be planned carefully, keeping policies current as vendors release new versions requires regular attention, and that can become time-consuming for IT teams managing a large number of endpoints. I would appreciate seeing more automation around approving trusted software updates and better integrations with common software deployment and vulnerability management tools to reduce manual effort. Reporting is another area that could be enhanced, particularly with more customizable dashboards and easier ways to generate compliance and operational reports for different audiences. From an administration perspective, some troubleshooting workflows could be more intuitive, especially when identifying why an application was blocked or determining the exact policy responsible for the decision. These limitations have not been significant enough to outweigh the benefits of the product, but addressing them would make day-to-day management more efficient, reduce administrative overhead, and improve the overall experience for security and endpoint management teams. One additional area for improvement is the overall user and administration experience. While the platform is functional, I think some of the management workflows could be simplified so that common tasks such as reviewing blocked applications, approving legitimate software, or tracing the reason behind a policy decision require fewer steps. For organizations with lean IT teams, a more intuitive interface and clearer guidance during policy creation would help reduce the learning curve for new administrators. I would appreciate seeing broader integrations with the endpoint management, SIEM, and IT service management platforms so application events, approval requests, and policy updates can fit more naturally into existing operational workflows. Better APIs and pre-built integrations would reduce manual work and make automation easier for larger environments. More flexible reporting and customizable dashboards would help different teams, whether security operations or compliance, quickly access the information that is most relevant to them without having to manually compile reports. Addressing these areas would improve efficiency and make the product easier to operate as organizations scale their endpoint environments.
AS
Security Administrator at EJADA
We can isolate problem machines and limit their access
We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access.  More than two years. I rate Carbon Black App Control 10 out of 10 for stability. I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability.…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I compare Airlock Digital Application Control very highly to other vendors like ThreatLocker, Microsoft, Ivanti, and Carbon Black."
"Airlock Digital Application Control is probably the easiest application control that I’ve come across; the product has a GUI-first, web interface-first approach to application control, and the way that it’s able to present exceptions or identify what those untrusted executions are is the best that I’ve seen in the field."
"Airlock Digital Application Control is reducing our man-effort by around 80%, and it is effectively reducing vulnerabilities, which is certainly a return on investment."
"Airlock Digital Application Control brings many main benefits to the table that help improve the way the organization functions."
"The impact of Airlock Digital Application Control has been positive for my organization, giving me better control over what applications can run on endpoints and helping reduce the risk of unauthorized software being executed while making endpoint security more manageable."
"Since implementing Airlock Digital Application Control, we have seen around a 50 to 60% reduction in unauthorized application incidents, 30 to 40% less time spent investigating endpoint security events, and lower malware remediation costs, resulting in measurable operational savings and improved IT efficiency."
"The best features of Airlock Digital Application Control are that it is easy to use, deploy, and manage."
"Airlock Digital Application Control has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce the risk of unapproved software running and making my demo systems more controlled and predictable."
"If any malicious activity, like VAT viruses, anything RNE, ZOD malware, or something similar, comes in we know that unless we approve it, it's going to be blocked."
"The visibility, reporting, and the ability to stop or prevent malicious or undesired applications from being installed are the most valuable features."
"The effectiveness of application whitelisting is very good."
"All the functions within VMware Carbon Black App Control are valuable."
"Carbon Black offers a total lockdown solution; it shows us the attacks that are being attempted against our infrastructure and how we are being protected."
"The visibility is valuable."
"We use App Control to scan the network for virtual machines that have unauthorized applications. We can isolate the problem VMs and control application access."
"The API integration is good."
 

Cons

"Airlock Digital Application Control can be improved, as its main use case is the ease of management and automation, yet managing policies, exceptions, and application changes can become more time consuming as the environment grows."
"In Airlock Digital Application Control, there are areas for improvement which, more specifically being a security tool, relate to the performance issues that end-user devices are experiencing because of the tool."
"To improve Airlock Digital Application Control, I would say making policy handling and app updates more predictable is a key area for improvement."
"At nine months in with Airlock Digital Application Control, I think we’re still not seeing a return on investment, and that’s partially because the need for application control was more important or timely than the processes were able to keep up with."
"Some of the vulnerabilities that are meant for CVEs specific to Airlock Digital Application Control need to be addressed in newer versions."
"Airlock Digital Application Control has room for improvement in detecting and setting a standard environment when updates for programs are released."
"The biggest challenge is the ongoing effort required to maintain allow listing policies in the environment where applications are updated frequently."
"For improvements, Airlock Digital Application Control could add patching advice or recommendations to improve the usage of their application."
"Carbon Black does not use the database for identifying the file, the fields, or malware."
"Its setup is very complex, and it requires guidance from the support team, but it is well worth the effort."
"The reporting is not good and needs to be improved."
"The initial setup is somewhat complex."
"I would like to see the addition of some more features that are in other, similar solutions."
"Its initial setup is very complex. We got help from their implementation team because if it is not set up properly, you can really hinder the operation of your environment and things won't execute or run."
"The solution should have overhead in keeping lists of applications that you want don't want to run."
"I rate App Control six out of 10 for scalability."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"We pay a fee for support, which is renewed annually."
"Its price is reasonable and what is expected for these types of products."
"The pricing for this product is competitive and our customers who told us that often, Carbon Back is the cheaper solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Control solutions are best for your needs.
913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
37%
Construction Company
8%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Financial Services Firm
19%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise4
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Airlock Digital Application Control?
Airlock Digital Application Control can be improved, as its main use case is the ease of management and automation, yet managing policies, exceptions, and application changes can become more time c...
What is your primary use case for Airlock Digital Application Control?
Airlock Digital Application Control is used primarily for whitelisting and endpoint security, controlling which applications are allowed to execute on endpoints, preventing unauthorized and potenti...
What advice do you have for others considering Airlock Digital Application Control?
Airlock Digital Application Control is highly recommended to others looking into using it. Airlock Digital Application Control is a very good application and it is performing great. I would rate th...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
CB Protection, Carbon Black CB Protection
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Kaas Tailored, Core-Mark, Indeed, Hologic, Landmark Credit Union, Project Worldwide
Find out what your peers are saying about Airlock Digital Application Control vs. VMware Carbon Black App Control and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
913,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.