Airlock vs F5 Advanced WAF comparison

"Our customers are more than satisfied with the user experience provided by the product."

"F5 Advanced WAF offers features not available in other products."

"Overall, F5 Advanced WAF is a strong, dependable enterprise solution that works best when seen as a long-term security platform rather than a quick add-on; once properly designed, sized, and tuned, it runs quietly in the background and effectively does its job without constant attention."

"There is no need to worry about updating signatures because WAF will automatically update the signatures for you."

"I like all of the features, but the main one is the attack signatures."

"Web attack signatures are very important for detecting web attacks."

"Identification, ease of use, and ease of modifying it to most of our needs are valuable."

"It is also quite intuitive and user-friendly. They have several webinars that are actually like labs. You can use these webinars to learn about how to use all features of the product."

"The initial setup was was easy to install."

"The tool must be simplified."

"The reporting portion of F5 Advance WAF is not great. They need to work out something better, as it is very basic. You only see the top IPs, I think there is more they can offer."

"While F5 Advanced WAF does limit the number of partners in certain regions to ensure successful business transactions, they could also benefit from expanding their partnerships and making it easier for more people to learn about and become experts in F5 Advanced WAF. By doing so, they could increase the reach and exposure of their solution, similar to how Cisco has become widely recognized in the security industry."

"You have to buy another module with an extra license, to have the authentication feature."

"F5 Advanced WAF could improve on its funding for WAF features. There is a need to be more advanced WAF features."

"There is a gap in report management."

"For me, an area for improvement in F5 Advanced WAF is the reporting as it isn't so clear. The vendor needs to work on the reporting capability of the solution. What I'd like to see in the next release of F5 Advanced WAF is threat intelligence to protect your web application, particularly having that capability out-of-the-box, and not needing to pay extra for it, similar to what's offered in FortiWeb, for example, any request that originates from a malicious IP will be blocked automatically by FortiWeb. F5 Advanced WAF should have the intelligence for blocking malicious IPs, or automatically blocking threats included in the license, instead of making it an add-on feature that users have to pay for apart from the standard licensing fees."

"The solution should include RASP for another level of protection at the code itself."

"F5 Advanced WAF could improve resource usage, it is CPU intensive. Additionally, adding automated remediation would be a benefit. For example, an easy button alerts us of the events that are occurring, and what we want to do at the time. An automated approach where somebody could be alerted very quickly. Instead of going and reconfiguring everything, an automated approach is what I'm looking at."

"The tool is cheap."

"I don't have any issue with the pricing of this solution."

"There are various plans available for Fortinet FortiWeb Cloud WAF as a Service, including a trial version."

"There is an annual subscription for this solution."

"The pricing is too high."

"I think the price is very high."

"The pricing of F5 Advanced WAF is more expensive than other solutions like Radware and CD18, it is quite high."

"The solution is very expensive so should only be used in the right environment."

"I would rate the pricing as seven out of ten"