Akamai App and API Protector vs Cisco Secure Workload comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Akamai and Cisco are both solutions in the Cloud and Data Center Security category. Akamai is ranked #14 with an average rating of 7.0, while Cisco is ranked #10. Akamai holds a 2.3% mindshare in CDCS, compared to Cisco’s 8.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Cisco users who would recommend it.

Akamai App and API Protector

Read 29 Akamai App and API Protector reviews

9,118 Views
729 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cisco Secure Workload

Read 15 Cisco Secure Workload reviews

7,058 Views
3,882 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Akamai App and API Protector

Cisco Secure Workload

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 14, 2024

Cisco Secure Workload and Akamai App and API Protector compete in the field of cybersecurity. Akamai seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive threat intelligence and scalability, offering robust application-level security.

Features: Cisco Secure Workload provides network-level segmentation and helps safeguard internal threats. It includes policy discovery automation and micro-segmentation for enhanced control. Moreover, it offers application dependency mapping, saving time and offering high precision in security measures. Akamai App and API Protector is noted for application and API-level security, delivering extensive DDoS protection and precise traffic management. Its comprehensive security features include custom rule creation and a robust web application firewall (WAF) for thorough threat detection and mitigation.

Room for Improvement: Cisco Secure Workload could improve its deployment complexity, requiring extensive network configurations that may delay implementation. Enhancing user interface usability and reducing dependency on extensive manual policy adjustments would also be beneficial. Additionally, better automation of application dependency mapping could streamline its setup. Akamai App and API Protector could improve cost-effectiveness, as its pricing can be on the higher side. Simplifying granular control adjustments for less technical users could enhance user experience. Additionally, expanding its threat intelligence capabilities could provide even more comprehensive security insights.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai App and API Protector is known for its cloud-native deployment, offering seamless integration and responsive support, facilitating easier onboarding. In contrast, Cisco Secure Workload faces challenges with complex deployment processes that might require additional support interactions. Streamlining the deployment experience for Cisco could make it more competitive for users seeking quicker setup with less hassle.

Pricing and ROI: Cisco Secure Workload offers more budget-friendly initial pricing, ideal for organizations with cost constraints in network security. However, Akamai App and API Protector justifies its higher price with a higher ROI through comprehensive security measures and seamless integration. Its expansive capabilities provide significant value for businesses aiming to invest in broad security solutions, making the cost worthwhile despite the initial expense.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai App and API Protector

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

14th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Web Application Firewall (WAF) (23rd), Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection (7th)

Cisco Secure Workload

Ranking in Cloud and Data Center Security

10th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (23rd), Microsegmentation Software (5th), Cisco Security Portfolio (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Cloud and Data Center Security category, the mindshare of Akamai App and API Protector is 2.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Secure Workload is 8.5%, down from 12.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud and Data Center Security Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cisco Secure Workload	8.5%
Akamai App and API Protector	2.3%
Other	89.2%

Cloud and Data Center Security

Featured Reviews

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has provided strong protection against evolving threats but still needs support for configuration fine-tuning

The standout features of Akamai App and API Protector are rooted in it being the Web Application Firewall, where all traffic gets scanned, including the implementation of web firewall rules, and after this phase, traffic proceeds through the BMP, which is Bot Management. Akamai App and API Protector exceeds expectations in terms of AI capabilities, and it genuinely combines a plethora of advanced features. The area in which Akamai excels compared to other competitors with a WAF is in threat intelligence, as threats continually evolve, requiring ongoing updates to backend algorithms to effectively capture smart bots, and Akamai's commitment in that regard is backed by an excellent team, while other providers are still catching up.

Read full review

Raj Metkar

Director, Head of Networks at MUFG, EMEA

Discover internal application dependencies and create a dependency map

We actively seek improvements in integrating the Infoblox DDI platform with Cisco Secure Workload. This integration allows Cisco Secure Workload to learn about our networks and network tags, providing valuable insights into vulnerabilities related to the operating system and various applications installed on our servers. Recently, Cisco announced a new product called HyperShield, an AI-based autonomous micro-segmentation solution. While Cisco has not stated that HyperShield will replace Cisco Secure Workload, it represents a natural evolution for the company. HyperShield features dynamic policy discovery and enforcement; however, once policies are enforced, they do not change until a discovery occurs, requiring a re-enforcement process. This new platform operates autonomously, minimizing the need for user or security engineer intervention. I would have expected Cisco to incorporate more automatic discovery and enforcement features within the existing Cisco Secure Workload product. Instead of enhancing the current product, they have introduced a new solution. Cisco plans to honor existing Tetration licenses, allowing users to transition to HyperShield without additional costs, reflecting the investment enterprises have already made. From Cisco’s perspective, this represents a natural progression in their product line. While the product name changes, it seems more of a rebranding effort. The enhancements are greater autonomy, improved discovery, and automatic enforcement, which are now being introduced in HyperShield. Cisco Secure Workload offers automatic policy enforcement but cannot adjust policies dynamically as the application needs to change. Having used the platform for the past five years, the recent announcement has been reassuring. Cisco has confirmed that our investment in the platform will not go to waste. They will honor our existing licenses, providing a natural migration path to the new solution without any disruption

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the DDoS protection, which is the main reason we got it."

"Traffic filtering and WAF are valuable."

"Everything will be handled by Akamai's system before it reaches our infrastructure."

"It is scalable for DDoS, keeps our sites up through any size of attack, and has a good breadth of controls."

"Site Defender service helps prepare, respond, and optimize against modern-day web attacks."

"The most valuable feature is the custom rules feature. This is because many of our customers require a lot of custom rules. Because it's a very customized project for our customers, I think they have the best of everything already."

"I can attest to its benefits in terms of understanding and mitigating threats...The solution's technical support team seems to be pretty responsive."

"The features are powerful and better than F5."

More Akamai App and API Protector pros

"The most valuable feature of this solution is security."

"The only use case I can see that makes sense is micro-segmentation. I think there are other use cases for it. The main purpose of the product is to do micro-segmentation by collecting IP. That could be done by installing an agent, and then you have all the communication coming in and out. You could also use some flow sensors installed in the network that receive a copy of the traffic and then report that back to the system."

"The product provides multiple-device integration."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that we don't have to do packet captures on the network."

"Instead of proving that all the access control lists are in place and all the EPGs are correct, we can just point the auditor to a dashboard and point out that there aren't any escaped conversations. It saves an enormous, enormous amount of time."

"The solution offers 100% telemetry coverage; the telemetry you collect is not sampled, it's not intermittent, it's complete, and you see everything in it, including full visibility of all activities on your endpoints and in your network."

"The scalability of Cisco Tetration is very good."

"The most valuable feature is micro-segmentation, which is the most important with respect to visibility."

More Cisco Secure Workload pros

Cons

"One area where Akamai can improve is the captcha part. Cloudflare provides a captcha if there are a certain number of threats. For example, I can assign that if there are 10 requests within a second from a single IP, it should send a captcha to the user. The user should fill in the captcha, and only after that, the user should be able to access our website. This captcha feature should be built into Bot Manager. I love this captcha feature of Cloudflare."

"One thing I asked them is to integrate the API discovery product that they have and push that data into Akamai App and API Protector so that we do not have two types of reviews to identify the type of traffic. We already know the APIs that are frequently getting used, so analysis becomes easier. We can integrate both products and use them."

"The effectiveness of Akamai's bot management in reducing unauthorized access is quite good, although it does require a lot of fine-tuning and tweaking, which involves spending ample time with their support teams to tailor the configuration to our applications."

"It would be nice if Akamai Web Application Protector's price is lowered and made cheaper."

"The custom rules must be improved."

"The interface is a little bit clunky and can be improved."

"Customer support has room for improvement."

"They are already very flexible, but room for improvement is there. Reports generation could be better and should be improved."

More Akamai App and API Protector cons

"There was a controversy when Cisco reduced the amount of data they kept, and the solution became quite cost-intensive, which made its adoption challenging….Although they have modified it now, I preferred the previous version, and I wish all the functionality were back under the same product."

"The integration could be better, especially with different types of solutions."

"I would have expected Cisco to incorporate more automatic discovery and enforcement features within the existing Cisco Secure Workload product."

"The product must be integrated with the cloud."

"A feature that I was looking for was emailed alerts and notifications so we'd get them right away."

"The problem is that we can only deploy the particular solution where we have the hardware with Cisco."

"I'd like to see better documentation for advanced features. The documentation is fairly basic. I would also like to see better integration with other applications."

"Cisco Tetration needs more flags and system alerts that we should get with network capture."

More Cisco Secure Workload cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no license at all for Akamai. They are going to charge us only for the usage."

"Cost depends on the volume of traffic."

"The solution is expensive."

"One reason not all people use Akamai is that it is a little bit more expensive than some other providers."

"Its price is slightly high. Every company has a justification for the high price. Overall, it feels worth the money based on how the service has been structured, but we do negotiate it."

"The price they are offering is quite reasonable for premium customers, but it's very expensive if you're a small and medium-sized enterprises."

"It's more expensive than others, but the ROI is good for large-scale infrastructure."

"The solution is not expensive."

More Akamai App and API Protector pricing and cost advice

"It is not cheap and pricing may limit scalability."

"The price is outrageous. If you have money to throw at the product, then do it."

"The price is based on how many computers you're going to install it on."

"Pricing depends on the scope of the application and the features. Larger installations save more."

"The cost for the hardware is around 300k."

"Regarding price, Cisco Secure Workload can be expensive if you don't have a budget. If you're not doing micro-segmentation, every extra security measure or enforcement you're putting on top of your existing environment will be an extra cost. It's not a cheap solution at all. But from my point of view, if you need to do micro-segmentation, this is one of the best tools I've seen for it. I can't compare that to Microsoft's solution because I haven't looked into it. I've looked into VMware and Cisco. Those are the only two that I know of. I didn't know that Microsoft could do micro-segmentation at all. Maybe they can, but I haven't heard anything about it."

"The pricing is a bit higher than we anticipated."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud and Data Center Security solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai Web Application Protector?

There are no significant areas for improvement on the WAF side or for Akamai App and API Protector solution; they are comprehensive in their current state.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Web Application Protector?

The main use case for Akamai App and API Protector is serving as the WAF, Web Application Firewall.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai Web Application Protector?

The primary way Akamai App and API Protector helps manage evolving cyber threats is by considering the impact on revenue, with businesses evaluating if Akamai is worth the cost based on potential l...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

AWS Shield vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 9% of the time

AWS WAF vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Radware Cloud DDoS Protection Service vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 5% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Corero vs Akamai App and API Protector

Compared 4% of the time

More Akamai App and API Protector Competitors

Illumio Segmentation vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 12% of the time

Akamai Guardicore Segmentation vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 11% of the time

VMware NSX vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 7% of the time

BMC Helix Cloud Security vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Email Security (formerly Harmony Email & Collaboration) vs Cisco Secure Workload

Compared 6% of the time

More Cisco Secure Workload Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector

October 2026

Download Akamai App and API Protector product report

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Secure Workload

October 2026

Download Cisco Secure Workload product report

Also Known As

Akamai Web Application Protector, Akamai Kona Site Defender, Akamai Kona DDoS Defender

Cisco Tetration

Overview

Akamai App and API Protector provides website security by preventing DDoS attacks, acting as an application firewall, managing content delivery, and monitoring APIs. It adapts to threat profiles and is used for fast media delivery and identifying malicious activities.

Akamai App and API Protector offers strong protection, adaptable security features, and efficient traffic management. Its WAF blocks IP addresses and country-specific threats while preventing SQL injections. Companies utilize it for scalable CDN services and comprehensive traffic analysis. Known for its cost-effectiveness and user-friendly dashboard, this protector stands out for its customizable rules and technical support. Users also highlight the ease of integration and detailed attack insights available through its advanced dashboard.

What are the key features of Akamai App and API Protector?

DDoS Protection: Strong defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks.
Scalable CDN: Manages content delivery efficiently under high traffic loads.
WAF Capabilities: Blocks specific IPs and countries, prevents SQL injections.
Traffic Filtering: Analyzes and controls incoming requests to maintain security.
Adaptive Stream Delivery: Adjusts content delivery to meet bandwidth needs.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security tools at a competitive price.
Enhanced Security: Comprehensive protection against cyber threats.
Scalability: Easily handles increasing traffic and data loads.
Ease of Integration: Simple integration with existing systems.
Insightful Analytics: Offers data-driven insights into traffic and attack patterns.

In media, Akamai App and API Protector ensures smooth streaming by handling high bandwidth demands. E-commerce companies use it to guard against fraud and data breaches. Financial sectors rely on its ability to protect sensitive transactions. Implementations in healthcare focus on safeguarding patient data while maintaining compliance with regulations.

Akamai

Cisco Secure Workload offers advanced auditing, micro-segmentation, and network visibility, automating policy presentation for improved security. It enhances application dependency mapping and provides comprehensive telemetry with strategic policy enforcement.

Cisco Secure Workload specializes in automating micro-segmentation, data center management, and traffic analysis. Its capabilities facilitate application dependency mapping and enhance internal micro-segmentation, providing invaluable network visibility. Users find its automation in policy presentation and strategic enforcement beneficial, along with granular control and scalability, despite needing improvements in scalability and integration capabilities. Enhanced notification features, troubleshooting options, and an efficient interface are desired for seamless deployment, along with stronger multi-tenancy, redundancy, and monitoring functions. Broader platform support and integrated cloud connectivity are desired for unified management across tools.

What are the most important features?

Auditing: Provides in-depth network analysis and security auditing capabilities.
Micro-Segmentation: Enhances network security by automating segmentation at a granular level.
Application Dependency Mapping: Visualizes connections and interactions between applications.
Network Visibility: Delivers comprehensive insight into network activities and dynamics.
Policy Discovery: Streamlines policy creation through automation and reduces manual intervention.
Comprehensive Telemetry: Offers complete coverage and insights for better security assessment.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Enhanced Security Measures: Offers robust features for network security improvement.
Automated Processes: Reduces manual efforts through automation, increasing efficiency.
Scalability: Adapts to growing network demands with flexible scalability options.
Granular Control: Allows detailed control over network policies and enforcement.

Entities in finance, gas, and oil sectors utilize Cisco Secure Workload for networking site management and compliance maintenance. It integrates into extensive Cisco infrastructure, aiding routers, switches, and endpoints, thus supporting auditors in network synchronization and auditing needs.

Cisco

Sample Customers

Douglas Omaha Technology Commission, ZALORA, PrintPlanet

ADP, University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNCC)

Buyer's Guide

Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload

September 2026

Free Report: Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai App and API Protector vs. Cisco Secure Workload report.

See our list of best Cloud and Data Center Security vendors.

We monitor all Cloud and Data Center Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.