Amazon AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and SAP are both solutions in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 14.3% mindshare in ISI, compared to SAP’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Amazon AWS

Read 260 Amazon AWS reviews

39,609 Views
24,954 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Read 25 SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud reviews

2,871 Views
2,670 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Amazon AWS

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 16, 2024

Amazon AWS and SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud both compete in the cloud services category, catering to different market segments. Amazon AWS has an advantage due to its scalability and flexibility, which provides significant value to a wide range of businesses.

Features: Amazon AWS offers a comprehensive cloud platform that includes a global data center network and extensive security measures. It provides services such as EC2, S3, and RDS, enabling robust scalability and flexibility. In contrast, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is tailored for larger enterprises, offering seamless integration, rapid processing, and enterprise-grade capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Amazon AWS can improve its pricing structure to make it less complex and enhance integration with certain technologies. It could also address its steep learning curve for startups. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud should focus on reducing costs and increasing flexibility in updates and configurations, enhancing customer education, and providing better customization.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon AWS excels with public cloud deployment, praised for its excellent flexibility, scalability, and customer support. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers both public and private cloud models but can be more complex for larger enterprises. Nevertheless, it provides strong customer service through comprehensive support agreements.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon AWS uses a pay-as-you-go model that can be cost-effective but it is often seen as complex. Its scalability and flexibility provide a potentially high ROI. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, while more expensive, offers enterprise-focused features and direct SAP support. This can offer high value for large enterprises through long-term contracts and additional integration support options.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon AWS

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

260

Ranking in other categories

PaaS Clouds (2nd)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Ranking in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) category, the mindshare of Amazon AWS is 14.3%, down from 15.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is 1.2%, down from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon AWS	14.3%
SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud	1.2%
Other	84.5%

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)

Featured Reviews

Asif Meem

Senior Machine Learning Engineer at sportsbet

Managed cloud services have helped accelerate experiments with flexible configuration options

Sometimes the costs associated with spinning up a service, especially managed services, have implications. For example, if I create a Glue job, that will create S3 buckets and other resources that have cost implications, but once I clean up a Glue job, it does not delete the other accessory resources. Sometimes, I have to go hunting for what resources Amazon AWS might have provisioned and how it is costing behind the scenes. It can be complex depending on your level of expertise. It is not as easy to get started, especially when it comes to secure practices. Amazon AWS is more hands-on than other platforms.

Read full review

Salman Mukhtar Baig

SAP Technical Manager at VS Furniture Middle East

Cloud access has improved reporting and sales operations across global locations

I cannot say anything about what areas of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud could be improved or enhanced because so far, we are happy with this implementation. We are not facing any problem, or I cannot say that this can be improved. Although SAP keeps improving themselves day by day, we cannot say that SAP needs to improve anything. One thing which we face, not as a problem, is the pricing. SAP pricing is a bit higher day by day. Before, it was not too much higher, but I don't know why they are increasing their price. They should see this thing, so other customers, such as SMBs customers or small and mid-sized customers, can also avail this thing. Otherwise, we don't have any problem. First, there is the limitation. If you are a SAP user, you don't feel any problem with the limitation because if you know how to use the product, you can easily implement this thing. Otherwise, if you don't know the business process or how to integrate and implement, it could be a problem. We have a limitation, but we developed some add-ons for this. So we fulfilled these requirements.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like AWS for its scalability, reliability, and availability, and it's much more mature and user-friendly compared to some other cloud providers. The learning curve and time for deployment are also shorter."

"I especially like the flexibility and scalability of the solution."

"For those who are looking for a way to streamline replicating data (e.g. objects) from an AWS bucket in one region with a bucket in a different region you now have a new option."

"AWS is stable and has provided a reliable infrastructure for my organization."

"This solution is magnificent."

"The pricing model of Amazon AWS is very good because there is an option to pay for what you use only, you do not have to give any money upfront to use it."

"The flexibility of the solution is excellent."

"It is stable. For the cloud version, we require some installation platforms and we don't have a server with us right now. We require it from Amazon AWS. We can just plan and get the AWS server."

More Amazon AWS pros

"The real-time data processing and the ability to track all leasing processes and contracts are particularly valuable."

"Now, with the cloud, we can move anywhere in the world and we can easily access it from SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, and even the client can also see the stock availability which they need to order."

"The scalability is good because we have some cloud resources to support the ERP."

"The solution does provide quite a lot of support, upgrades, automated batch updates, etc."

"The BTP module is important for digital transformations."

"Fiori is the most valuable feature, as well as the the integration between S/4 and another solution as an extension."

"It has significantly streamlined our operations."

"The stability is good."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pros

Cons

"What is hard with the public cloud service like AWS, is ensuring you maintain a good budget."

"Amazon needs to develop better tools for troubleshooting network traffic, application insights, performance, and even some aspects of integration mapping. I'm hoping AWS implements something like Azure's Network Watcher and a log analytics solution where a can pull logs from various services and present them in a single dashboard. I want to summarize the performance and usage of every service and application."

"The user interface (UI) needs improvement. Right now, it's not the best."

"The product would be better if it was more secure."

"The cost of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"Some services that are not used often have poor quality and need to be improved."

"I think the price can be improved. The price is high now, and Amazon's web portal can be improved."

"The networking models used in AWS, while functional, do have room for improvement. This is especially the fact, considering that they are built/presented from a systems perspective."

More Amazon AWS cons

"The price is expensive compared to the competition."

"The SAP products are complicated to deploy anywhere."

"Our data centers are in Europe and come under GDPR regulations, and this doesn't apply to the Middle East yet. It causes a lot of confusion."

"I would rate the stability a four out of ten. It's an area that could use improvement"

"Customers need to be better educated about using the solution's cloud for digital transformation."

"The main thing is that SAP needs to give better response times for support tickets."

"One thing which we face, not as a problem, is the pricing. SAP pricing is a bit higher day by day."

"SAP should adopt more rapid changes in market processes and customer needs to deliver solutions that meet new industry requirements swiftly."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for Amazon AWS annually."

"There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."

"For our infrastructure, the cost is approximately $25 per device, and you have to include the other tools that we have in the cloud, for a total of approximately $200,000 per year."

"This is not an expensive product but it would be an improvement if the price were cheaper."

"It's paid on a monthly basis and you have to pay for the resources that you use."

"We are happy with the pricing."

"The solution is on a subscription-based model, and it is pay-as-you-go. The price could be cheaper."

"There are many variables involved in pricing service in AWS and overall the pricing is a bit on the higher side."

More Amazon AWS pricing and cost advice

"It's very, very expensive."

"If you choose the minimum, it will probably cost around $1,000 USD per month if you take a contract for a year or two."

"The price is expensive compared to the competition."

"The licensing of the solution is on a yearly basis. The normal price of the solution is quite high, but I received a special discount by making a purchase near the end of the year."

"The price is on little bit higher. For SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud, we see roughly five crores per annum."

"The product itself is relatively expensive."

"Our pricing is based on a yearly contract."

"The solution's cost is reasonable."

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	131
Midsize Enterprise	48
Large Enterprise	120

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	17

Questions from the Community

How does OpenShift compare with Amazon AWS?

Open Shift makes managing infrastructure easy because of self-healing and automatic scaling. There is also a wonderful dashboard mechanism to alert us in case the application is over-committing or ...

See all answers

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS?

How is SAP Cloud Platform different than Amazon AWS? Amazon AWS offers options both in terms of upgrading and expanding capabilities as well as acquiring greater storage space. These upgrades can ...

See all answers

Looking to compare Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, and Microsoft Azure

We like Google Firebase hosting and authentication and also the excellent cloud functionality. Our team found the flexibility of handling and dealing with the database through EDL to be very useful...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

SAP HANA Cloud can be quite costly compared to other solutions. The high licensing costs make it an expensive option, particularly for smaller customers. However, they offer solutions for mid-sized...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

The usual use cases for SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud that I work with include many tools. At the time of the integration, SAP made it very easy for the integration. The key point is that now we have a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Akamai Connected Cloud (Linode) vs Amazon AWS

Compared 21% of the time

Dell ObjectScale vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

SAP Business Technology Platform vs Amazon AWS

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs Amazon AWS

Compared 4% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Amazon AWS

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon AWS Competitors

Microsoft Azure vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

SAP S4HANA on AWS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Media Temple IaaS Cloud vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

BT IaaS vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS

August 2026

Download Amazon AWS product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

July 2026

Download SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud product report

Also Known As

Amazon Web Services, AWS

No data available

Overview

Amazon AWS offers cloud services known for ease of use, scalability, and diverse services such as EC2, S3, and Lambda. Its pay-as-you-go pricing and robust security features make it a preferred choice for businesses managing growing demands efficiently.

Amazon AWS provides a comprehensive ecosystem with services like EC2 for computing, S3 for storage, and Lambda for serverless computing. It emphasizes scalability and quick resource provisioning, allowing businesses to handle IT workloads, host websites, and manage analytics seamlessly. AWS integrates a wide range of services, enhancing flexibility and reliability while offering robust security and automated management to streamline operations.

What are the most important features of Amazon AWS?

EC2: Offers scalable computing capacity in the cloud to manage business applications efficiently.
S3: Provides highly secure, durable, and scalable cloud storage solutions for data archiving and backup.
Lambda: Enables running code without provisioning or managing servers, improving application deployment.
Pricing: Employs a pay-as-you-go model, allowing cost-effective resource usage.
Security: Implements comprehensive security protocols to ensure data protection across services.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Supports business growth by easily scaling resources according to demand.
Integration: Offers seamless integration capabilities with numerous services, enhancing operational flexibility.
Performance: Provides stable and reliable performance for critical IT workloads and applications.
Management: Features automated management tools that reduce overhead and improve deployment efficiency.

Amazon AWS is widely implemented across industries for cloud computing, infrastructure hosting, and data storage. Businesses in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors leverage AWS for running applications, hosting analytics databases, and deploying scalable solutions. By utilizing tools like EC2, S3, and Lambda, they ensure flexibility and security in infrastructure management and data applications, meeting diverse operational needs effectively.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud offers robust integration and real-time data processing for digital transformation, supporting diverse industries through flexible, efficient, and scalable cloud solutions tailored to enhance performance and decision-making.

SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is designed for businesses aiming to migrate their SAP ERP systems to the cloud, facilitating digital transformation across sectors such as manufacturing and sales. With seamless integration, real-time data processing, and minimal downtime, it supports improved IT infrastructure management and strategic decision-making. Known for its superior performance in C-level reporting and finance solutions, its in-memory capabilities allow rapid access to precise reports. Global accessibility enhances efficiency, offering users flexible, personalized services and effective data integration in a cost-efficient infrastructure.

What are the key features of SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud?

Robust BTP Modules: Supports digital transformation with seamless integration.
In-Memory Capabilities: Enables rapid, accurate data access and processing.
Quarterly Upgrades: Ensures the platform remains state-of-the-art with automated updates.
Virtual Modeling: Facilitates intuitive finance solutions and strategic planning.
Monitoring Services: Provides enhanced operational insights for IT management.

What benefits should users expect in reviews?

Cost-Efficient Management: Reduces costs with streamlined resource utilization.
Enhanced Performance: Elevates data-driven decision-making with real-time analysis.
Global Accessibility: Improves efficiency with easy access to cloud-hosted operations.
Flexible Infrastructure: Adapts to diverse industry needs with personalized services.
Seamless Data Integration: Simplifies processes through effective data handling.

In industries like manufacturing, sales, and logistics, SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud is implemented for cloud-hosted operations that streamline order-to-cash processes and enhance real-time data analysis. Companies benefit from reduced costs and efficient server management while facilitating enterprise resource planning. The solution's proficiency in improving IT infrastructure accessibility and strategic data handling makes it a preferred choice for businesses aiming for digital transformation.

SAP

Sample Customers

Pinterest, General Electric, Pfizer, Netflix, and Nasdaq.

FC Bayern Munich, Reuters News Agency, MEMEBOX

Buyer's Guide

Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon AWS vs. SAP HANA Enterprise Cloud report.

See our list of best Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) vendors.

We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.