ScienceLogic and Amazon CloudWatch are prominent competitors in the IT infrastructure monitoring category. ScienceLogic may hold an advantage in environments requiring extensive customization and multi-tenancy; however, Amazon CloudWatch's seamless integration within AWS is a compelling factor for those deeply embedded in the AWS ecosystem.
Features: ScienceLogic offers robust multi-tenant capabilities, extensive customization, and excels in infrastructure monitoring. It provides granular control and automation features, supporting integration with many third-party systems. Amazon CloudWatch is seamlessly integrated with AWS, providing essential monitoring and alert capabilities. It is particularly valuable for straightforward access to AWS-specific metrics, though it lacks ScienceLogic's depth in customization.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic's complexity can be challenging for new users, with room for improvement in reporting, API expansion, and interface simplification. Amazon CloudWatch faces high costs for certain functionalities, lack of advanced reporting features, and challenges in cross-platform integration. Log streaming performance and real-time data visualization are also noted as areas needing enhancement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic supports a flexible deployment approach and is renowned for its outstanding customer service and technical support. It is noted for responsiveness and personalized assistance. Amazon CloudWatch is well-integrated into AWS but may experience slower support response times, particularly in non-AWS platforms. Both solutions provide valuable support, with ScienceLogic often highlighted for exceptional customer care.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is perceived as a high-cost solution, particularly for large enterprises, but offers substantial ROI through reliable operations. Its flexible pricing model is often justified by its extensive features. Amazon CloudWatch offers a more affordable pay-as-you-go model, aligning costs with usage. Nonetheless, rising storage and usage needs can escalate costs, impacting ROI perceptions, especially concerning custom metrics costs.
Amazon CloudWatch offers cost-saving advantages by being an inbuilt solution that requires no separate setup or maintenance for monitoring tasks.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
While using their cloud and cloud resources, if you have an issue with CloudWatch, you must pay additional monthly fees to get time from dedicated tech support.
In recent years, due to business expansion, knowledge levels among support engineers seem to vary.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
Amazon CloudWatch's scalability is managed by AWS.
I sometimes notice slowness when Amazon CloudWatch agents are installed on machines with less capacity, causing me to use other monitoring tools.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
When using third-party dashboards such as Kibana or Grafana and other visualization tools, there should be a way to feed CloudWatch's data and logging capabilities into these visualization tools.
Amazon CloudWatch charges extra for custom metrics, which is a significant disadvantage.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Overall, the pricing of Amazon CloudWatch is very expensive.
Amazon CloudWatch charges more for custom metrics as well as for changes in the timeline.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
Being an inbuilt solution from AWS, it saves time on installation, setup, and maintenance.
The best features of Amazon CloudWatch need to improve visibility into the network because when using hundreds of network resources such as transit gateway, VPNs, routers, route tables, and firewalls, it does not give many details in a structured manner.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
It offers over 500 integrations with a wide range of device types, referred to as PowerPacks, which are prebuilt integrations for hundreds, if not thousands, of integration types.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.
Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.
What are the most important features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
