Amazon Inspector vs AuditBoard comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and AuditBoard are both solutions in the IT Vendor Risk Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.6, while AuditBoard is ranked #11. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.6% mindshare in IVRM, compared to AuditBoard’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of AuditBoard users who would recommend it.

Amazon Inspector

Read 9 Amazon Inspector reviews

4,462 Views
580 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

AuditBoard

Read 12 AuditBoard reviews

4,663 Views
2,192 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon Inspector

AuditBoard

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024

Amazon Inspector and AuditBoard are tools in the digital landscape focusing on security and audit management, respectively. AuditBoard edges out as the preferred choice due to its comprehensive features that offer greater long-term value despite Amazon Inspector's competitive pricing and support.

Features: Amazon Inspector excels in vulnerability management with automated security assessments, efficient AWS integration, and comprehensive categorization of findings across various platforms. AuditBoard shines with robust risk management and compliance features, seamless workpaper editing, and integrated community tools for centralized communication.

Room for Improvement: Amazon Inspector could improve by offering custom compliance rule definition, expanding beyond AWS environments, and enhancing user interface intuitiveness. AuditBoard could benefit from refining its learning resources, improving data export options, and developing offline mobile capabilities to expand usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Inspector offers easy deployment for AWS sites with accessible customer support. AuditBoard provides cloud-based deployment for hassle-free integration and features superior service tailored to compliance needs.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Inspector is known for competitive setup costs and appealing ROI, ideal for cost-conscious businesses. AuditBoard may have higher initial expenses but delivers substantial ROI through its advanced compliance tools, making the cost worthwhile over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Inspector

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vulnerability Management (26th)

AuditBoard

Ranking in IT Vendor Risk Management

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

GRC (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the IT Vendor Risk Management category, the mindshare of Amazon Inspector is 1.6%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AuditBoard is 5.0%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Vendor Risk Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon Inspector	1.6%
AuditBoard	5.0%
Other	93.4%

IT Vendor Risk Management

Featured Reviews

John D'Arcy

Co-Founder, Professional AWS Cloud Architect at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Automated vulnerability assessments continuously enhance security

The most valuable features probably are the ability to do automated vulnerability assessments, which it does with Amazon Inspector version two. It operates continuously, so as soon as resources are created, it scans them for vulnerabilities. This allows me to pinpoint potential security vulnerabilities and provide actionable recommendations relatively quickly. Larger enterprises usually use Inspector to gather all the vulnerabilities, the CVEs, across all accounts in an AWS organization. The enterprises I work for typically have many accounts in their organization, such as thousands of accounts where I am at the moment. It is a way to gather the vulnerabilities that are present on EC2 instances, container images, and Lambda functions.

Read full review

reviewer2562750

Vice President at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Streamlined workflow and enhanced simplicity with an easy setup

I used AuditBoard primarily for risk assessment questionnaires in a very premature risk environment. I also have experience with IBM OpenPages, mostly for operational risk to track issues, to look at risks and controls The collaboration within my team had not yet significantly changed since…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Amazon Inspector is the categorization of findings, which filters vulnerabilities by instance, container image, container repository, and Lambda function."

"It operates continuously, so as soon as resources are created, it scans them for vulnerabilities."

"The integration of Amazon Inspector with other AWS services has enhanced our security. Security Hub is a major asset because it allows us to centralize data from various AWS services. We can integrate third-party tools as well. It is just a single-click option."

"My experience with AWS technical support is very good, I didn't face any specific challenges, and even the documentation of AWS is good for both Microsoft, which is Azure, and AWS."

"The scalability of the solution itself is unparalleled."

"I recommend Amazon Inspector because it allows the automation of processes and requires less manual monitoring."

"The automated vulnerability detection aspect is most valuable."

"It is scanning the whole repository for any sort of vulnerabilities, so it allows us to be more confident in our DevSecOps and not put a lot of folks or attention to it."

More Amazon Inspector pros

"For AuditBoard, the simple workflow made it very easy to code with the group."

"The most valuable feature is the well-documented instruction."

"There are lots of features."

"The most valuable feature is that everybody can use the same tool. You can give a person permission to use AuditBoard and define their access to the Audit Table. For example, we can allow external auditors or clients to review our completed tests. The clients are attached to specific tests that happen regularly, like inventory counts and asset counts. Debt compliance is only done once annually."

"I find the most significant elements of this solution are the out-of-the-box reporting, the ease of workflow, workflow management, and the ease of managing our audit process."

"In AuditBoard, there are all the audit steps, including documentation, archiving, and tracking the progress of audits."

"Its ability to share the data in real-time has helped us well."

"AuditBoard has several solutions for governance, internal audit, and other categories."

More AuditBoard pros

Cons

"One major area for improvement is remediation. My team works on remediating findings over time, likely using available patches. However, easier integration with Amazon's patching services would be very helpful."

"One area for improvement in Amazon Inspector is the automation aspect."

"The other point is that the reporting features of Inspector need improvement. For example, I am in an organization with millions of CVEs, and getting an overview of all this is challenging."

"There are challenges associated with the interdependencies in AWS services, like requiring an Active Directory for other services, resulting in additional charges."

"The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a little high, and it is not covering all different applications and scanning."

"It has automated vulnerability assessment, yet I seek more flexibility in defining custom vulnerability checks tailored to my needs, which is more difficult."

"The most challenging aspect I faced with Amazon Inspector during integration was automating the remediation process."

"There is room for improvement in the scanning capabilities. I'd like to see broader coverage in terms of the vulnerabilities detected."

More Amazon Inspector cons

"Some of that flexibility could be enhanced. When comparing Archer and TeamMate+, there is a little more open-ended in terms of certain of our audit processes and procedures. And there is significantly greater freedom in creating ad hoc audit processes and procedures, whereas AuditBoard is a little more limiting in this regard."

"It is not easy to analyze the results of a survey as a whole."

"AuditBoard has the potential for improvement in a few key areas. Firstly, I have experienced instances where the platform has experienced technical issues and ceased to function effectively. Additionally, the editing tools provided within the platform can be slow and laggy, particularly when trying to access and edit important documents. This can be a hindrance to my workflow and efficiency. To address these issues, they should begin by improving the speed and reliability of the platform, as well as enhancing the search engine to make it easier to find specific controls and documents within the platform."

"The initial setup is somewhat difficult because it has multiple pieces that need to be stitched together. You have to integrate it with the business unit you want to test if you want to go down from the corporate level to the operational level."

"A handful of things in the solution need to be improved. One of them is better communication of updates to the system or tool itself."

"AuditBoard could benefit from the addition of video capabilities, although it is not a necessity. Small companies that cannot afford licenses for Microsoft Teams or Zoom would benefit greatly from this feature, as it would enhance the communication process."

"The layout for the end user could be improved."

"After sending out a request to my network for documents, it would be great to have a receipt that shows who received the request and who did not."

More AuditBoard cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The lowest cost would be around $10 for a few small accounts, however, for thousands of accounts, it could be around $5000 to $6000 dollars per month."

"It's priced according to market standards for its services."

"It is scaled as you go. There are probably a certain number of scans per month, and there are tiers. If you're under a certain tier, it is free. The second level is pennies, and then all the way up to like a million. So, it has a tiered pricing program. They're pretty good with your initial scanning, and there is room to scale based on being affordable, but it is fairly cheap. There are no additional costs. They pretty much think about it as a pay-per-scan type model."

"The pricing is very transparent and clear."

"Pricing is variable, like with any technology, and is determined by how hard you wish to negotiate. You can get to a price you're willing to pay if you're willing to negotiate aggressively."

"I highly recommend this tool as the price is reasonable. However, consistent pricing is important, and having a loyalty program that rewards long-term customers with lower prices would be a great addition."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Vendor Risk Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

13%

Healthcare Company

Manufacturing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Inspector?

I am not honestly sure about the pricing side of Amazon Inspector, but that is taken care of by a separate team. I believe it's cheaper than the other third-party solutions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Inspector?

They might launch support for third-party environments in the next version regarding the best features in Amazon Inspector from my perspective. The false positive rate of Amazon Inspector is a litt...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Inspector?

I mostly use Amazon Inspector for vulnerability scanning on AWS native applications. For hybrid applications, we have different security scanners.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tenable Nessus vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

Tenable Vulnerability Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 9% of the time

Qualys CyberSecurity Asset Management vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 8% of the time

Rapid7 Metasploit vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Amazon Inspector

Compared 5% of the time

More Amazon Inspector Competitors

Scytale vs AuditBoard

Compared 10% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs AuditBoard

Compared 8% of the time

RSA Archer vs AuditBoard

Compared 7% of the time

ACL Analytics vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

MetricStream vs AuditBoard

Compared 6% of the time

More AuditBoard Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector

October 2026

Download Amazon Inspector product report

Buyer's Guide

AuditBoard

October 2026

Download AuditBoard product report

Overview

Amazon Inspector offers automated vulnerability detection, scanning AWS workloads and recommending remediation, ensuring enhanced security without constant supervision.

Amazon Inspector provides advanced automated vulnerability assessments, specifically designed for AWS environments. It scans EC2 instances, ECR, and container images for vulnerabilities, ranking them by priority. With capabilities like integration with CloudTrail and CloudWatch, adherence to compliance benchmarks, and a comprehensive view for diverse resources, it supports continuous detection and detailed reporting. Users can schedule regular scans, maintaining strong security oversight. Current feedback highlights a need for improved scanning of EBS, S3, and EFS, as well as expanded databases and better patch integration.

What features make Amazon Inspector stand out?

Automated Vulnerability Assessments: Detects and prioritizes vulnerabilities in AWS workloads.
Continuous Detection: Keeps an eye on EC2, ECR, and container images for ongoing risk management.
Integration Capabilities: Works with CloudTrail and CloudWatch to centralize oversight and alerts.
Compliance Adherence: Aligns with industry benchmarks for strengthened regulatory compliance.
Detailed Reporting: Provides comprehensive reports with findings and CVEs.

What benefits do users gain from Amazon Inspector?

Enhanced Security: Automates vulnerability detection, reducing manual efforts.
Efficiency: Identifies and prioritizes threats, streamlining resource allocation.
Comprehensive Oversight: Detailed reports improve understanding and response strategies.
Regulatory Compliance: Aligns with compliance standards, aiding legal adherence.

Amazon Inspector is utilized across industries, including finance, healthcare, and tech, assisting with robust security management in cloud-native environments. By integrating with services like Security Hub and SIEM, businesses maintain compliance and streamline alert management. This solution supports broader security frameworks, often paired with third-party tools to enhance protection strategies.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AuditBoard provides an intuitive platform for audit management, featuring advanced tools that enhance workflow efficiency and support SOX compliance and documentation management.

AuditBoard offers a comprehensive suite for managing audits, documentation, and compliance processes. Users benefit from cloud storage, customizable workflows, and an integrated communication platform that simplifies collaboration between reviewers and auditors. Real-time workpaper editing, efficient PBC requests, and a centralized audit trail enhance operational effectiveness. The platform is commonly utilized for SOX compliance, internal audits, and risk assessments, allowing users to transfer documents from Microsoft Excel and manage audit steps efficiently. Though it offers significant features, users suggest improvements in reporting capabilities, document comments, and communication features akin to Excel, alongside addressing technical issues like search lag and performance of editing tools. AuditBoard also aims to enhance document storage and incorporate video capabilities for improved user interaction.

What are some key features of AuditBoard?

Cloud Documentation Storage: Facilitates easy access and backup of documents.
Advanced User Interface: Enhances user interaction with intuitive design.
Customizable Workflows: Tailors processes to specific organizational needs.
Integrated Communication Platform: Supports seamless team collaboration.
Real-time Workpaper Editing: Allows for on-the-spot adjustments and edits.
Centralized Audit Trail: Ensures a traceable history of all audit actions.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Workflow Efficiency: Streamlined processes that save time and resources.
Scalable Functionality: Adaptable tools as the organization grows.
User-specific Permissions: Customized access enhancing security and collaboration.
Access to Historical Data: Reliable data retention for future reference.

AuditBoard is widely deployed in industries requiring robust compliance and audit procedures. It supports SOX compliance and works as a reliable repository for documentation and auditing, meeting ISO standards. Organizations utilize it for risk assessments, governance, and collaboration with external consultants through modules like SOXHub and OpsAudit.

AuditBoard

Sample Customers

betterment, caplinked, flatiron, university of nutri dame

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard

September 2026

Free Report: Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Inspector vs. AuditBoard report.

See our list of best IT Vendor Risk Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Vendor Risk Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.