Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon Kinesis vs Azure Stream Analytics comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 23, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon Kinesis offers significant cost savings, seamless integration, improved monitoring, and reduces data ingestion costs, enhancing ROI and architecture.
Sentiment score
7.4
Azure Stream Analytics offers quick solutions with a 10% ROI, ideal for simple setups without major upfront costs.
With Lambda, there is no need for data transfer charges, which is beneficial for less frequent workloads.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.1
Amazon Kinesis customer support is generally quick and effective, but experiences vary in technical guidance and response times.
Sentiment score
6.8
Azure Stream Analytics' support is responsive with effective resolution, but satisfaction varies due to SLA, language barriers, and demand.
We receive prompt support from AWS solution architects or TAMs.
There is a big communication gap due to lack of understanding of local scenarios and language barriers.
Any time I needed assistance, they were helpful.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.3
Amazon Kinesis is scalable for reliable streaming, but complex processing and costs may vary with implementation and data volumes.
Sentiment score
7.8
Azure Stream Analytics offers scalable, flexible, and affordable cloud solutions suitable for diverse organizational needs and varying workloads.
Amazon Kinesis provides auto-scaling with streams that handle large volumes well.
Maintenance requires a couple of people, however, it's not a full-time endeavor.
Azure Stream Analytics is scalable, and I would rate it seven out of ten.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Amazon Kinesis is praised for stability and fault tolerance, though some users report slowdowns and capacity issues.
Sentiment score
6.7
Azure Stream Analytics is generally stable with minor glitches; users report improvements and effective support for complex issues.
They require significant effort and fine-tuning to function effectively.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon Kinesis requires improvements in throughput, automation, setup complexity, data retention, machine learning features, and user-friendly interfaces.
Azure Stream Analytics users face high costs, limited integration, inadequate support, and issues with connectivity, customization, and scalability.
Amazon Kinesis could improve its pricing to be more competitive, especially for large volumes.
A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward.
There is a lack of technical support from Microsoft's local office, particularly in Taiwan.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon Kinesis is cost-effective compared to self-managed solutions, but prices can increase with high data usage and features.
Azure Stream Analytics pricing is competitive but complex, with pay-as-you-go options and varying views on cost-effectiveness.
Amazon Kinesis and Lambda pricing is competitive, but we noticed that scaling and large volumes could potentially increase costs significantly.
The Azure solution is better now, and competitors, even within Microsoft, may offer solutions that could make it cheaper.
We sell the data analytics value and operational value to customers, focusing on productivity and efficiency from the cloud.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon Kinesis offers easy configuration, real-time analytics, and robust AWS integration, ideal for managing large, complex data workflows.
Azure Stream Analytics provides seamless real-time analytics, integration with Microsoft tools, scalability, and ease of use for real-time decision-making.
Lambda's scalability, seamless integration with other AWS services, and support for multiple programming languages are very beneficial.
Clients can choose and subscribe to the service items they need, making it more flexible than IBM solutions, especially in data analytics or data governance.
The native connectors and integration with other Microsoft products.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Kinesis
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Azure Stream Analytics
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Amazon Kinesis is 8.3%, down from 13.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Stream Analytics is 9.8%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Rajni Kumar Jha - PeerSpot reviewer
Used for media streaming and live-streaming data
It is not compulsory to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use the data streaming, you can use just the Kinesis data firehose. Using the Kinesis data firehose is compulsory because we can't store all chats and recordings in Amazon S3 without it. When a call comes in the Amazon Kinesis instance, it will go to Data Streams if we use it. Otherwise, it will go to the Kinesis data firehose, where we need to define the S3 bucket path, and it will go to Amazon S3. So, without the Kinesis data firehose, we can't store all the chats and recordings in Amazon S3. Using Amazon Kinesis totally depends upon the user's requirements. If you want to use live streaming for the data lake or data analyst team, you need to use Amazon Kinesis. If you don't want to use it, you can directly use the Kinesis data firehose, which will be stored in Amazon S3. Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.
SantiagoCordero - PeerSpot reviewer
Native connectors and integration simplify tasks but portfolio complexity needs addressing
There are too many products in the Azure landscape, which sometimes leads to overlap between them. Microsoft continuously releases new products or solutions, which can be frustrating when determining the appropriate features from one solution over another. A cost comparison between products is also not straightforward. They should simplify their portfolio. The Microsoft licensing system is confusing and not easy to understand, and this is something they should address. In the future, I may stop using Stream Analytics and move to other solutions. I discussed Palantir earlier, which is something I want to explore in depth because it allows me to accomplish more efficiently compared to solely using Azure. Additionally, the vendors should make the solution more user-friendly, incorporating low-code and no-code features. This is something I wish to explore further.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
5%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis's main purpose is to provide near real-time data streaming at a consistent 2Mbps rate, which is really impressive.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Kinesis?
Amazon Kinesis is moderately priced. In comparison with other competitors, it is fairly priced, however, if they reduced the price a little, it could add more value to customers.
What needs improvement with Amazon Kinesis?
I do not see any scope for improvement as it does what it is supposed to do. No changes are required. Since it's predominantly a back-end service, any end-user isn't going to interact with it direc...
Which would you choose - Databricks or Azure Stream Analytics?
Databricks is an easy-to-set-up and versatile tool for data management, analysis, and business analytics. For analytics teams that have to interpret data to further the business goals of their orga...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Stream Analytics?
I have no problem with pricing. We sell the data analytics value and operational value to customers, focusing on productivity and efficiency from the cloud, rather than just the infrastructure or p...
What needs improvement with Azure Stream Analytics?
There is a lack of technical support from Microsoft's local office, particularly in Taiwan. We often have to learn online, and language can be a communication barrier since not many IT staff can sp...
 

Also Known As

Amazon AWS Kinesis, AWS Kinesis, Kinesis
ASA
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Zillow, Netflix, Sonos
Rockwell Automation, Milliman, Honeywell Building Solutions, Arcoflex Automation Solutions, Real Madrid C.F., Aerocrine, Ziosk, Tacoma Public Schools, P97 Networks
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Kinesis vs. Azure Stream Analytics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,491 professionals have used our research since 2012.