Amazon Neptune vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and MongoDB are both solutions in the Managed NoSQL Databases category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3, while MongoDB is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 7.0% mindshare in MND, compared to MongoDB’s 11.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Amazon Neptune

Read 4 Amazon Neptune reviews

817 Views
817 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Read 82 MongoDB Enterprise Advanced reviews

5,473 Views
821 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Amazon Neptune

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and Amazon Neptune are solutions in the database market. MongoDB holds an advantage with its flexibility and adaptability for various applications.

Features: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced provides horizontal scalability, a flexible schema design, and supports both unstructured and semi-structured data. It also includes advanced security and integration options. Amazon Neptune is tailored for graph queries with efficient processing for large-scale datasets, offering native support for Gremlin and SPARQL, which is ideal for applications needing complex relationship querying.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Neptune's fully managed service makes deployment and scaling straightforward, offering seamless integration with AWS services, high availability, and automated backups. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced provides strong documentation and community support but may require more manual setup for achieving optimal performance. Both offer extensive customer support, though Amazon Neptune benefits from the AWS ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: MongoDB Enterprise Advanced operates on a subscription model with transparent pricing, accommodating predictable costs and long-term investment. It aids ROI by adapting to evolving project demands. Amazon Neptune's pay-as-you-go pricing fits cloud-native approaches, potentially lowering initial setup costs and offering scalability. MongoDB's clear pricing appeals to those prioritizing budget certainty.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Neptune

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

4.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Ranking in Managed NoSQL Databases

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (6th), NoSQL Databases (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Managed NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Amazon Neptune is 7.0%, down from 14.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is 11.0%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed NoSQL Databases Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MongoDB Enterprise Advanced	11.0%
Amazon Neptune	7.0%
Other	82.0%

Managed NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Reviewer3028812

Back End Developer at Zeta

Multiple graph models and languages support lead to efficient use, yet community growth brings challenges

The onboarding part and documentation where we could ideally use Amazon Neptune is excellent. Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph. It also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher. It is very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta. Amazon Neptune's best features include its multiple servers, each supporting different languages such as OpenCypher, SparkQL, and RDF. For the same RDF graph or property graph, we could use multiple languages to query on different servers. This is exceptional because we have one graph DB with two endpoints exposed where we could interact with different languages on the same graph. Additionally, Amazon has a Sagemaker Jupyter Notebook which interacts with the Amazon Neptune database itself, providing a clean UI for representing nodes since the Jupyter Notebook has predefined graph representation capabilities through queries.

Read full review

Fabien GOUINEAU

Architecte Cloud at Visiativ SA

Offers reliable engine for legacy needs but requires enhanced cost management and AI features

While MongoDB is a good product, it is also an expensive product for support, and its scalability is acceptable, but the big problem with MongoDB is the cost. For security in MongoDB, we work with encrypted databases by default, but we have not contracted the security options in our contract because it is too expensive, so we only implement encrypted databases without the security pack, which is very expensive for us; in security, we are at the first steps, just using encrypted databases. I think additional features needed in MongoDB include perhaps vector databases, as I think they are not supported right now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Relational databases are never good at identifying patterns in graphs or other similar relationships, whereas Amazon Neptune is."

"The initial setup is actually simple."

"Amazon Neptune as a product by AWS is exceptional because it supports multiple graph models such as RDF and property graph, and it also has support for multiple querying languages such as Gremlin, SparkQL, and OpenCypher, making it very comprehensive in supporting every requirement we had at Zetta."

"MongoDB is a NoSQL tool that gives us much freedom to manipulate how the data works."

"It is very easy to create a MongoDB cluster. You can deploy three nodes in one hour. You can do small configurations to enable routing. It is easy to implement."

"The installation is very easy to do and understand."

"It can handle a lot of files quickly."

"It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven."

"MongoDB is flexible and it allows other applications to be added."

"The integration capabilities of MongoDB are fine for the solutions that we use in our company."

"In our case, it is most important to have redundancy."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pros

Cons

"We had a strict time constraint, and it took many sleepless nights to find information in the documentation."

"Amazon Neptune could improve by spreading more awareness for others to have an understanding of the solution because the technology is fairly new. The developer community and larger community do not understand it yet."

"In my scenario, the integration wasn't easy because ................in Java."

"It has certain limitations when it comes to handling hierarchical data, enforcing relationships, and performing complex joins, which should be taken into account when designing databases for applications with intricate data requirements."

"Some of the solution's transaction capabilities can be improved."

"More stable indexes would be helpful in a future release. That's been an issue for some time. I don't know if it's been fixed now but we transitioned to it because we needed a search index to be able to search for things and if that goes or starts disappearing, we have to move away from that solution. I don't know if they fixed it, last time I had this issue was three years ago so they might have solved it."

"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."

"It isn't easy to recognize entities with MongoDB."

"It is important to note that MongoDB has limitations since it can only be used for specific use cases. For example, for master data, I would want to pick keys using an RDBMS, but for attachments, I would choose MongoDB."

"There are some problems with bugs appearing in sharding when the data is too high."

"People coming from RDBMS should have the flexibility to write queries in SQL that can be converted into JSON queries."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Microsoft Azure and Amazon AWS are on par for pricing and Google has been raising its prices."

"The solution is open source so is free."

"I'm using the free version of MongoDB."

"The pricing is normal. Price-wise, the product is not too much expensive."

"MongoDB is not expensive."

"MongoDB is an open-source solution."

"I believe that MongoDB is free."

"This is an open-source solution."

"MongoDB is an open-source product."

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

13%

University

13%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	35
Midsize Enterprise	13
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon Neptune?

The cost aspects were managed by our SRE team who provisioned the instances. The pricing structure is similar to how EC2 instance pricing varies. I was informed that it was somewhat expensive, thou...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Neptune?

The main issue was the limited community of Amazon Neptune users, which meant everything needed to be explored independently. Although this was adventurous, it required more time investment in the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon Neptune?

We managed traffic at Zetta, and traffic would be moving between multiple services in our microservice architecture. Because of this setup, we were using Amazon Neptune to understand how many reque...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

For a small company, the cost of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is reasonable, but for heavy data usage, we see a little bit of cost pressure but it's acceptable. I will not be able to elaborate on th...

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

The integration between data warehouse could be improved. Nowadays, a lot of data is getting generated, so certain ETL flexible scripts with backend database integrations would be an improvement I ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Neo4j AuraDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 28% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 21% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 16% of the time

Amazon DynamoDB vs Amazon Neptune

Compared 11% of the time

More Amazon Neptune Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Azure Cosmos DB vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Couchbase Enterprise vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

MongoDB Atlas vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Enterprise Advanced Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune

February 2026

Download Amazon Neptune product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

January 2026

Download MongoDB Enterprise Advanced product report

Overview

Amazon Neptune is a fast, reliable, fully managed graph database service that makes it easy to build and run applications that work with highly connected datasets. The core of Amazon Neptune is a purpose-built, high-performance graph database engine optimized for storing billions of relationships and querying the graph with milliseconds latency. Amazon Neptune supports popular graph models Property Graph and W3C's RDF, and their respective query languages Apache TinkerPop Gremlin and SPARQL, allowing you to easily build queries that efficiently navigate highly connected datasets. Neptune powers graph use cases such as recommendation engines, fraud detection, knowledge graphs, drug discovery, and network security.

Amazon Neptune is highly available, with read replicas, point-in-time recovery, continuous backup to Amazon S3, and replication across Availability Zones. Neptune is secure with support for HTTPS encrypted client connections and encryption at rest. Neptune is fully managed, so you no longer need to worry about database management tasks such as hardware provisioning, software patching, setup, configuration, or backups.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

MongoDB Enterprise Advanced is a comprehensive platform renowned for its scalability, user-friendliness, and high performance, underpinned by its flexible document-based storage and open-source model. JSON compatibility, clustering, and security elevate its standing among professionals.

The platform facilitates efficient data management through developer-friendly tools and a strong aggregation framework. MongoDB’s no-schema requirement, supported by community expertise, underlines its adaptability. While its sharding capabilities and affordably support large data volumes, there are aspects such as security enhancement and enterprise tool integration that need attention. Indexing and query optimization pose challenges, alongside high costs. Improvements in analytics and UI could advance its infrastructure further.

What are the key features of MongoDB Enterprise Advanced?

Scalability: Dynamic adjustments to workloads with ease.
JSON Compatibility: Seamless data structuring with JSON support.
Clustering: Enhanced data management through robust clustering.
Security Integration: Built-in security measures for data protection.
Sharding: Efficient distribution of large datasets.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Document-Based Storage: Flexibility in managing varied data types.
Open-Source: Access to a broad community and resources.
Low-Cost Implementation: Economic efficiency in deployment.
Scalability: Supports the growth of data without sacrificing performance.

Industries leverage MongoDB Enterprise Advanced for significant roles in data storage within IoT platforms, healthcare apps, public service monitoring, and big data analytics. Companies in logistics and telecommunications find it instrumental for business process management and video content management, benefiting from its seamless integration and unstructured data support.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

Intuit, Pearson, Samsung, Ignition One, Lifeomic, Blackfynn, Paysense

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

December 2025

Free Report: Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Neptune vs. MongoDB Enterprise Advanced report.

See our list of best Managed NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all Managed NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.