Amazon QuickSight vs Looker comparison

The compared Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Google solutions aren't in the same category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #3 in BIT , with an average rating of 7.9, and holds a 3.7% mindshare in the category. Google is ranked #10 in EBT , and holds a 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 68% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Google users who would recommend it.

Amazon QuickSight

Read 34 Amazon QuickSight reviews

6,622 Views
4,900 Comparison Views

68% willing to recommend

Looker

Read 19 Looker reviews

2,532 Views
1,013 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Amazon QuickSight

Looker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon QuickSight and Looker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools.

To learn more, read our detailed BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon QuickSight

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (3rd)

Looker

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Embedded BI (10th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Business Intelligence solutions, they serve different purposes. Amazon QuickSight is designed for BI (Business Intelligence) Tools and holds a mindshare of 3.7%, down 7.1% compared to last year.
Looker, on the other hand, focuses on Embedded BI, holds 6.4% mindshare, down 9.0% since last year.

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon QuickSight	3.7%
Microsoft Power BI	9.3%
Tableau Enterprise	6.7%
Other	80.3%

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

Embedded BI Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Looker	6.4%
Tableau Enterprise	17.6%
Qlik Sense	8.6%
Other	67.4%

Embedded BI

Featured Reviews

Samuel Ndip Takou

IT Infrastructure Support Specialist at Olam Agri

Can always access reports through intuitive dashboards that support diverse data connections

I can't specifically say how Amazon QuickSight could be improved since I focus more on using it and leveraging its functionalities. However, I could invest additional time to explore possible feedback from customers regarding their challenges. As cloud engineers, our capacity to improve is limited since AWS manages the services, but I would be open to feedback. I'm aware there are minor details that AWS could enhance, such as optimizing costs for beginners or small startups, which can be steep when trying to take Amazon QuickSight into production. Many have noticed that AWS services greatly benefit well-established companies, while startups struggle with costs as they transition data out of AWS. Understanding how AWS charges for Amazon QuickSight usage is critical for all users wanting to visualize their data effectively.

Read full review

Kishore Jhunjhunwala

Sr Analytics Consultant at a outsourcing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A cloud solution for operational reporting but is expensive

Some basic feature that is available in other reporting tools is missing. Looker has the ability to show more than 5,000 rows for operational reporting. Some reporting tools allow users to scroll down to see more than 5,000 rows, but in Looker, you have to download the entire dataset. Looker should consider adding a scroll-down option to allow users to view large datasets on screen without downloading them. Looker has some options for granting users access as viewers. However, viewers cannot download the entire dataset. Only superusers can download the whole dataset on the Explore screen. This is a big limitation, as you cannot give any user viewer access. You can give access to superuser access, which is a cost to the company.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Interactive dashboards do help with data analysis."

"The solution is very quick to turn around and integrate."

"QuickSight makes it easy to provision, create, and publish dashboards."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is the user interface."

"The graph charts, pie charts, and box plots are valuable."

"The best part about Amazon QuickSight is the filtration capability."

"It is fine for basic reporting."

"Efficiency has definitely improved, and the speed of developing analytics and insights has increased by at least twenty percent."

More Amazon QuickSight pros

"It is easier and quicker to find things in the database."

"The most valuable features are the ability to create visualizations for non-technical employees, as well as the ability to provide ways to dynamically slice the data."

"From a developer's perspective, the way the functionality's being handled is great."

"Looker is an extremely valuable product that can really transform your company's ability to use data to answer challenging questions."

"In the past, adding a new dashboard to our product was a multi-week development effort, now our nontechnical product management and client success teams can create, launch, and maintain high quality dashboards with no interruption to the development team."

"I would rate the stability a ten out of ten. I didn't face any issues with stability."

"We can centralize all our data models."

"The stability of Looker has been good since I have been using it. However, it depends on what components are being used."

More Looker pros

Cons

"There should be better connectors for different data sets."

"The cost of queries is very high."

"An area for improvement in Amazon QuickSight is storage. Data cleanup also needs improvement because I'm experiencing errors when cleaning the data. Amazon QuickSight needs video tutorials showing its different functions and purposes."

"QuickSight needs to add more visuals similar to what Power BI offers."

"Amazon QuickSight's visualization could be improved."

"There is room for improvement in terms of the number of visualizations and dashboards that are available."

"It should support integration with Python or R."

"Compared to Power BI, I felt QuickSight lacks some features, like delayed drill-downs. Drill-downs were the main area where we found QuickSight lacking."

More Amazon QuickSight cons

"Stability needs improvement."

"The product does not have documented material."

"The main area of concern in Looker is probably related to blending the data from the different sources, including the data present internally in the company and on the cloud."

"It needs to be more user-friendly."

"The integration with different databases must be improved."

"There have a been a few minor bugs, including a security bug that did not affect us."

"The pricing model makes sense, but can be very expensive, potentially prohibitively so for smaller companies."

"Features related to visualization should continue to be improved."

More Looker cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product pricing is better than other vendors."

"It's affordable compared to other long-term contractor business tools available in the market."

"The standard edition is free to use for exploration purposes while the enterprise edition needs to be paid for. The pricing for this solution is very reasonable."

"It is simpler and cheaper than other solutions."

"A highly affordable cost structure with fixed membership and timeframe basis options."

"I'm using a paid version of Amazon QuickSight, paying about $22 monthly. As I have yet to learn about the pricing for other tools, such as Power BI, I won't be able to compare."

"The solution is not affordable."

"The solution's pricing is cheaper than the other products in the market."

More Amazon QuickSight pricing and cost advice

"Looker is expensive and could be made better by reducing it."

"It is cheap."

"It's not cheap, but it's not expensive for big companies."

"The price of Looker usually depends on the solution's provider, but it is usually cheaper than the other products in the market. Looker is offered at different prices for different companies."

"I do not have to make any payments to use the solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which BI (Business Intelligence) Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Amazon QuickSight?

The integration is very seamless. We stored our result CSV files in S3 and connected directly from there.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon QuickSight?

Amazon QuickSight charges $250 per user, which becomes expensive when managing multiple departments. However, this cost is offset by the advantages it provides.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon QuickSight?

I don't want to hypothetically say about the effectiveness of Amazon QuickSight in terms of machine learning, so I need to pass on that. At the moment, on the cloud perspective, we have Amazon majo...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Power BI vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 53% of the time

Tableau Enterprise vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 7% of the time

Looker Studio vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 7% of the time

QlikView vs Amazon QuickSight

Compared 3% of the time

More Amazon QuickSight Competitors

Tableau Enterprise vs Looker

Compared 13% of the time

Microsoft Power BI vs Looker

Compared 12% of the time

Databricks vs Looker

Compared 8% of the time

MicroStrategy vs Looker

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle OBIEE vs Looker

Compared 4% of the time

More Looker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon QuickSight

March 2026

Download Amazon QuickSight product report

Buyer's Guide

Looker

March 2026

Download Looker product report

Also Known As

QuickSight

No data available

Overview

Amazon QuickSight is a fast, cloud-powered business analytics service that makes it easy to build visualizations, perform ad-hoc analysis, and quickly get business insights from your data. Using our cloud-based service you can easily connect to your data, perform advanced analysis, and create stunning visualizations and rich dashboards that can be accessed from any browser or mobile device.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Looker is a powerful data analytics platform that empowers businesses to explore and analyze their data in real time.

With its intuitive interface and robust features, Looker enables users to easily create and share interactive dashboards, reports, and visualizations.

The product's advanced data modeling capabilities and seamless integration with popular data sources make it a top choice for organizations looking to gain valuable insights from their data.

Google

Sample Customers

MLB Advanced Media, Infor, HotelBeds, Gemini, Jivochat, Edmunds.com

Yahoo!, Etsy, Kohler, Hipcamp, Hubspot, Kickstarter, Venmo, Dollar Shave Club, 600+ customer

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Salesforce, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in BI (Business Intelligence) Tools. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all BI (Business Intelligence) Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.