Amazon S3 Glacier vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while NetApp is ranked #25. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 11.5% mindshare in PCSS, compared to NetApp’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3 Glacier

Read 42 Amazon S3 Glacier reviews

2,956 Views
2,749 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 1 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS review

275 Views
102 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3 Glacier

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon S3 Glacier and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services.

To learn more, read our detailed Public Cloud Storage Services Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3 Glacier

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

25th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (42nd), Cloud Storage (34th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 Glacier is 11.5%, down from 17.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS is 0.6%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Amazon S3 Glacier	11.5%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS	0.6%
Other	87.9%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

ArunDhwaj

Technical Owner at Harman International

Versatile data storage improves security and supports increasing data volumes

Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust security features and practically infinite storage, where we can store all kinds of media swiftly. It supports various data types, including semi-structured and raw formats. These features facilitate log management and data dumping since the service is versatile enough to handle large volumes of data and provide necessary security.

Read full review

reviewer2039379

Solution Architect at a university with 10,001+ employees

Great migrations, useful integrations, and offers good data replication

The local libraries from NetApp to NetApp are good. This way, we don't have to put the middleman in between to do the transition or conversion. The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful. In terms of the integration with AWS native services, I did not configure it by myself. There was another team who did it. That said, I presume they didn't run into any issues, which is why we are using it. While the solution did not help us reduce the amount of storage, it allowed us to have data replicated across on-premises and in the cloud, so that we have a backup in DR. While it did not reduce the footprint, it helped DR expansion. It increased redundancy. Since deploying the product, we have not been affected by ransomware or other external threats.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the price. If you compare Glacier to others, the prices in terms of what you store beyond retention are much lower."

"Amazon S3 Glacier offers robust security features and practically infinite storage, where we can store all kinds of media swiftly."

"It is a very comprehensive tool."

"The most valuable feature of Glacier is its storage capability and cost benefit."

"The solution is great for storing data you don't usually need access to. It's also well-integrated with Amazon S3."

"We get free credits from Amazon, and we like the overall stability. We haven't had to rely heavily on their customer success teams, which is a good sign."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is scalable, flexible, easy to maintain and handle."

"I find Amazon S3 Glacier valuable for storing various documents like purchase orders, standard documents, and drawings."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pros

"The NetApp Cloud Volume Services for AWS has been helping migrate workloads onto the cloud. We did migrate a couple of native applications into AWS using this, and it was helpful."

Cons

"The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low."

"The tool could be made cheaper."

"The support could be improved by having specialized support staff. When we submit a question, it gets passed between multiple people before finding the right expert."

"However, improvement is needed in pricing and support systems."

"Billing issues can be a nightmare. It's tough reaching the right person to get them sorted out."

"The solution's dashboard is a bit complicated and could be improved."

"Pricing is my concern; this is the only concern so far."

"They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price."

More Amazon S3 Glacier cons

"We'd like the solution to be less expensive and offer lower latency."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price point at which the product is available is pretty good."

"The pricing must be improved."

"The product is very cheap."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee for Amazon S3 Glacier."

"The tool is too expensive."

"Customers prefer Amazon S3 Glacier because it is a cheap and pay-as-you-go solution."

"Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."

"I've operated with Amazon S3 Glacier in two modes. Firstly, there's the trial mode, where I experimented with the platform, learned its functionalities, and applied it to my work. Secondly, there's the corporate account mode, where my team handles the operations, and I receive billing reports."

More Amazon S3 Glacier pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Amazon's S3 Glacier or EBS (Elastic Block Store)?

Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Amazon's S3 Glacier, whi...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon S3 Glacier?

I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3 Glacier?

The support could be improved by having specialized support staff. When we submit a question, it gets passed between multiple people before finding the right expert. We typically see the case being...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 40% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 11% of the time

Wasabi vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 10% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3 Glacier

Compared 8% of the time

More Amazon S3 Glacier Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS

Compared 52% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 Glacier

January 2026

Download Amazon S3 Glacier product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Migration

January 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS product report

Also Known As

Amazon Glacier

Cloud Volumes Service for AWS, NetApp CVS for AWS, CVS for AWS

Overview

Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp Cloud Volume Service for AWS is available in a monthly or annual subscription, and is a fast, secure, simple to consume file service that delivers advanced, enterprise-class management to your cloud applications. Move your applications without re-architecting.

NetApp

Sample Customers

King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

January 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google, Microsoft and others in Public Cloud Storage Services. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.