

Anaconda Business and IBM Watson Studio are key players in the data science platform market. Anaconda Business is favored for its affordability and community support, while IBM Watson Studio stands out for its advanced features and AI integration, making it particularly appealing for enterprise-level solutions.
Features: Anaconda Business supports extensive package repositories, seamless integration with tools like Jupyter Notebook, and facilitates Python and R environments, promoting efficient package dependency management. In comparison, IBM Watson Studio offers advanced AI functionalities with integrated tools for predictive modeling and supports complex AI and ML tasks, focusing heavily on automation.
Room for Improvement: Anaconda Business could improve by refining its user interface, expanding package support, enhancing workload processing, and providing better documentation for on-premises setups. Conversely, IBM Watson Studio needs to enhance user-friendliness and interface navigation, especially for smaller enterprises, while simplifying deployment processes to widen its user base.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anaconda Business provides strong on-premises deployment and private cloud options, with primary reliance on community support, though formal technical support experiences vary. IBM Watson Studio offers both on-premises and cloud solutions with extensive IBM support, though there are calls for more responsive technical assistance in complex setups.
Pricing and ROI: Anaconda Business benefits from being open-source, reducing costs significantly and delivering ROI through time savings, appealing to smaller tasks and budgets. IBM Watson Studio, while relatively costly, is considered valuable for its comprehensive features and robust support for complex workflows, providing substantial ROI in enterprise environments.
Everyone being able to work smoothly without unnecessary delays.
I have seen a return on investment; specifically, when we talk about efficiency, it's both time-saving and money-saving.
I have seen a return on investment with time saved by 50% and less downtime, allowing the team to deliver projects faster with fewer errors.
The product offers a significant return on investment through its scalability and integration capabilities.
My customers have seen returns on investment through increased efficiency, automated calculations, improved accuracy in pricing, and reduced staffing needs due to the automation.
Anaconda Business customer support is very active with a quick response time.
Overall, support was reliable when we needed it, just not super-fast every single time.
The customer support for Anaconda Business provides a better approach.
The support quality depends on the SLA or the contract terms.
The community access is weak, which limits the ability to engage in discussions and find documentation and examples of similar cases effectively.
I would rate the technical support of IBM Watson Studio a solid ten out of ten.
As more environments or users get added, it still runs smoothly without major slowdowns.
Anaconda Business scales very well because it is built around centralized environment and package management.
Anaconda does not have scalability restrictions as it depends on the type of machine running it.
Watson Studio is very scalable.
I have had a chance to communicate with the technical support of IBM Watson Studio, which has been responsive and helpful.
I rate IBM Watson Studio seven out of ten for scalability because while it scales, it requires significant resources to do so, making it expensive compared to some competitors.
Earlier, setting up or troubleshooting conflicts could take anywhere from thirty minutes to an hour, but now most setups just work.
Anaconda Business is stable to an extent, but it sometimes crashes on systems with insufficient RAM.
Expertise in optimization is necessary to manage such issues effectively.
I find IBM Watson Studio to be quite robust, with minimal downtime and great support regarding stability and reliability.
It would also be nice to have clearer error messages when something fails, so it is easier to understand what went wrong without digging too much.
They should enhance the security point of view; it's good, but it needs some more advanced features.
The pricing should be a little lower for a single person to use, as it might be affordable for an organization, but for my single use, it is difficult.
The platform is associated with a complicated setup process and demands heavy hardware, making it expensive to scale.
One area that could be improved is the backup and restoration of the database and the overall database configuration.
I wish learning IBM Watson Studio could be easier and more gradual, as it is a complex task.
Anaconda is an open-source tool, so I do not pay anything for it.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is a little costly, but it is useful.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing indicates that it is a bit costly, but it is useful.
IBM Watson Studio is considered rather expensive, with a rating of six or seven.
Anaconda Business has positively impacted my organization because, when discussing the security point of view, it's exceptional; when comparing it to other solutions, Anaconda Business is superior.
We find the advanced security, governance, and collaborative features for organizations using Python and R particularly useful.
Anaconda Business positively impacts our organization by protecting us from compliance and security risks while keeping the environment consistent, allowing our team to focus on insight and innovation instead of worrying about setups, security, and software issues.
This capability saves a significant amount of time by automating processes that typically involve manual work, such as data cleaning, feature engineering, and predictive analytics.
I believe the AutoAI features of IBM Watson Studio have significantly helped in my data projects by automating model selection and hyperparameter tuning.
It integrates well with other platforms and offers good scalability.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Anaconda Business | 2.4% |
| IBM Watson Studio | 2.3% |
| Other | 95.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Anaconda Business provides a comprehensive platform for data science applications, integrating extensive libraries and seamless Python and R compatibility, enhancing developer productivity.
Anaconda Business offers data science professionals a platform combining extensive library support with pre-built models and seamless integration of Python and R environments. With features like a user-friendly interface and integrated Jupyter Notebook, it facilitates real-time code execution and debugging. Environmental management is simplified via Conda, while cloud-based access and package management enhance user experience. Community support and integration with applications like RStudio and Jupyter aid in data science and deep learning tasks.
What are the key features of Anaconda Business?Anaconda Business is widely used in industries like machine learning and data analysis, where it's employed for tasks such as predictive modeling and data visualization. Organizations utilize its compatibility with tools like Scikit-learn and TensorFlow for creating statistical models, supporting applications in fields such as analytics, education, subrogation, and warehouse management.
IBM Watson Studio provides tools for data scientists, application developers and subject matter experts to collaboratively and easily work with data to build and train models at scale. It gives you the flexibility to build models where your data resides and deploy anywhere in a hybrid environment so you can operationalize data science faster.
We monitor all Data Science Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.