Anaplan vs Red Hat Lightspeed comparison

Anaplan and Red Hat are both solutions in the Predictive Analytics category. Anaplan is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Red Hat is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.5. Anaplan holds a 5.4% mindshare in PA, compared to Red Hat’s 6.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Anaplan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.

Anaplan

Read 36 Anaplan reviews

6,083 Views
1,095 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Red Hat Lightspeed

Read 12 Red Hat Lightspeed reviews

2,701 Views
2,701 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Anaplan

Red Hat Lightspeed

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 7, 2026

Anaplan and Red Hat Lightspeed compete in the enterprise software market. Anaplan has the upper hand in collaborative planning for complex models, while Red Hat Lightspeed leads in stability and security in enterprise environments.

Features: Anaplan shines with collaborative planning, cloud-native capabilities, and integration for data modeling. It offers real-time calculations ideal for multi-user environments. Red Hat Lightspeed is known for its robust security, reliable enterprise governance, and lifecycle management, making it suitable for compliance and server management.

Room for Improvement: Anaplan's areas for improvement include its expensive pricing, model size limitations, and dashboard graphical representation. Red Hat Lightspeed could enhance its admin interface, reduce complexity for less-experienced users, and improve subscription management and automation.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anaplan supports private, public, and hybrid cloud deployments and is praised for its community support, though complex models may require time for issue resolution. Red Hat Lightspeed excels in hybrid and on-premises deployments and is noted for efficient and responsive support in enterprise settings.

Pricing and ROI: Anaplan is seen as expensive, driven by user count and storage needs, but offers ROI through operational efficiency. Red Hat Lightspeed's pricing is high with robust support, offering a stable long-term value proposition. Anaplan follows a yearly subscription model, while Red Hat uses perpetual licensing with annual support, contrasting their value perceptions based on organizational needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 904,748 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Anaplan

Ranking in Predictive Analytics

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Performance Management (1st), Production Planning (2nd)

Red Hat Lightspeed

Ranking in Predictive Analytics

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

3.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Predictive Analytics category, the mindshare of Anaplan is 5.4%, down from 17.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Lightspeed is 6.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Predictive Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Lightspeed	6.1%
Anaplan	5.4%
Other	88.5%

Predictive Analytics

Featured Reviews

Segun Oladele

Associate Manager, Accounting at BIC

Reporting and forecasting have become more automated through intuitive data organization and flexible number calendarization

I do not have any improvements from my own end at this time.There are some specific features or functionality that I would like to see included in Anaplan in the future. From what we have been using, I do not think there is any specific one because we import and export numbers. Importing and exporting with CSV files is already available in Anaplan. I do not have any special requests from Anaplan. I still decided to give Anaplan an eight because I have not seen a specific dashboard on Anaplan. Anaplan could have a dashboard where you can see the flow of your numbers displayed on pictorials rather than just saying this is the number. Simple dashboards should be implemented.

Read full review

VishalSingh15

Head of Business at Variyas Labs Pvt Ltd

Have found limited automation capabilities while configuration has remained complex despite reliable monitoring features

In terms of configuration, Red Hat Insights could use some improvement. When I deploy Red Hat, the installation means a pure vanilla installation where you run and install a product out of the box, but deployment involves configuration plus all necessary tooling to run that product, which requires human input to complete the installation, configurations, and integration. Red Hat Insights has very limited automation; it only detects anomalies and triggers corrective actions for compliance issues, something which I found lacking when compared to other tools I've used.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution works very well for budgeting."

"Anaplan paid for itself with what it saved on new hires."

"Since we began using Anaplan, our firm has been very organized, and we have been gradually moving up in the market."

"Anaplan's strongest feature is that its GUI is very modern and user-friendly."

"Anaplan has eased a major pain point in mapping multidimensional data by combining all the necessary dimensions into a single tool, making it much easier for managers to understand the data coming in from their reps."

"You don't need to have a programming language to use Anaplan."

"The multidimensionality helps significantly with scenario planning, allowing me to run various scenarios and check the outcomes, which suits my needs well."

"I believe Anaplan is a new cloud tool, and from time to time, there's a lot of improvement that the Anaplan company deploys with the system. So, with that improvement, we need to really adapt and know the new system trends."

More Anaplan pros

"The tool is simple and easy to use. It has good support and doesn't have many outages due to the OS."

"RHEL enables us to deploy applications and emerging workloads across bare-metal and virtualized environments and I find those workloads to be extremely reliable. The reliability is so good that I rarely find myself calling Red Hat support any longer. Support is the first benefit of using RHEL, but the second thing is that the platform is so stable that the need to use support is negligible."

"RHEL is the most reliable Linux flavor in terms of enterprise governance. I prefer it for its code stability, support, and integration. The lifecycle management features help us maintain compliance and keep the components updated."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat Insights that I have found is the proactive information on issues that you don't see but are possibly going to happen in the environment."

"It identifies bugs and security vulnerabilities."

"Overall, I think that this is a good product."

"The product is optimized for resource utilization."

"The most valuable features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux are the mobile applications and getting real-time notifications."

More Red Hat Lightspeed pros

Cons

"I still decided to give Anaplan an eight because I have not seen a specific dashboard on Anaplan. Anaplan could have a dashboard where you can see the flow of your numbers displayed on pictorials rather than just saying this is the number."

"The integration technique should be a little bit easier."

"The tool needs to work on its integration with MS Excel and MS Word. The tool does not allow data analysis in spreadsheets which is possible on other platforms. I want the solution to be more collaborative to facilitate decision-making in organizations."

"Right now, we haven't seen any ROI from using Anaplan."

"The dashboard could be better. Because within a dashboard or report, you have to do a lot of scrolling. You need to scroll down because the table doesn't fit in a single view. That's why even the users aren't happy with that kind of user experience. They need to scroll to see all the data, and it could be better if it fits in just one page. That way, you can see everything. In the next release, I want automation that's connected to Anaplan. For example, to load master data from SAP to Anaplan. I don't know if this already exists, but a log where you can see the progress and see if there's an error will also help. It would be better to give you the error message, for example, if there is an error within the automated process importing to Anaplan."

"Space and integration are a problem."

"There is a chance of improvement for the history. In Anaplan back-end model, if there is any change, it is captured in the history, however, on the front-end UX page, if there are any changes on the UX page, there is no history captured."

"One improvement that could be added to Anaplan is to stabilize the models when data complexity increases, allowing us to manage our time and space well."

More Anaplan cons

"All resources should be available on the website."

"Sometimes, the product has outages that affect the site's ability."

"The cockpit server doesn't work and is useless. I don't like the images shown in GCP. I prefer the ones in AWS. It seems like the solution is in tune with what we deploy on the private cloud."

"Red Hat Insights has very limited automation; it only detects anomalies and triggers corrective actions for compliance issues, something which I found lacking when compared to other tools I've used."

"The improvements, in my opinion, have to be done in the infrastructure of the Red Hat Satellite, it is very complex."

"What could be improved dramatically is the ability to have it used by an enterprise, which means to interlock with Ansible Automation Platform first."

"I also want the co-pilot to provide more granular control and more features in the GUI, so we can have one configuration from the GUI itself. It would be helpful to have a feature similar to the one in Windows where we can manage all the net flows from one console in a single pane of glass and install it on-premises like an admin center. It would be great if Red Hat had some kind of admin center to manage all the RHEL boxes without using an additional product like Satellite or something, we could use the co-pilot on all the systems to monitor the dashboard."

"I would like to see improvements made to the subscriptions and management of them."

More Red Hat Lightspeed cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a yearly subscription. So a customer initially buys a workspace and specifies how much GB they want. The minimum starts at around 30 GB. You can buy multiple workspaces."

"Anaplan is a bit pricier compared to its competitors - the license costs about $4,000 per user annually."

"The cost of Anaplan is a challenge for clients, especially if they don't have an ongoing long-term use case for it. It's a $50,000 licensing fee just to get started. Clients need a strong business case to switch from Excel to Anaplan. But if clients have used something similar in the past, such as Hyperion or other solutions, that's not a factor because they know what to expect."

"A value-for-money product and a very reasonable price compared to competitors like SAP or IBM."

"The license is a yearly subscription. There are three licensing tiers: the model builder, planner, and the reporting."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"This is an expensive product and if the price were reduced then it would attract more customers."

"We are currently using a free workspace license for 90 days. We are satisfied with the price of the solution. There are additional costs if you want more storage, the default limit is 250 GB."

More Anaplan pricing and cost advice

"Regarding the prices, the new changes are actually not bad as it works for enterprise solutions."

"The prices are comparable, and good for what is being provided."

"RHEL is expensive. We have changed the cloud provider's subscription to a pay-as-you-go model."

"If you have a subscription to Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Red Hat Insights is free."

"This is not a cheap solution but it gets you the support if you ever need it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Predictive Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Construction Company

12%

Retailer

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What are your main use cases for Anaplan?

Anaplan is an industry-leading cloud-based corporate performance management (CPM) platform that combines business planning and analytics in a single solution. It is designed to assist organizations...

See all answers

Is Board better than Anaplan as a Business Intelligence (BI) solution?

We've had several FP&A departments include Anaplan in their analytics discussions, and while BI information IS generated, the focus is generally on compiling input from various sources and simu...

See all answers

Is Anaplan better than SAP ERP?

There are different aspects of both Anaplan and SAP ERP that I like and dislike. Anaplan improves forecast accuracy and drives up the quality of analytics. Rather than spending all of their time co...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Insights?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat Insights?

I did not purchase the product through AWS Marketplace; AWS was primarily used as the platform for workloads. We use basic services within AWS, but I did not use anything from the marketplace becau...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Insights?

In terms of optimizing risk identification, I would rate Red Hat Insights around five to six on a scale of 1 to 10. I would give Red Hat Insights an overall rating of six on a scale from 1 to 10. I...

See all answers

Comparisons

Board vs Anaplan

Compared 11% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Anaplan

Compared 8% of the time

SAP ERP vs Anaplan

Compared 5% of the time

Longview Analytics vs Anaplan

Compared 5% of the time

CCH Tagetik vs Anaplan

Compared 4% of the time

More Anaplan Competitors

BrightFunnel vs Red Hat Lightspeed

Compared 16% of the time

Alteryx vs Red Hat Lightspeed

Compared 15% of the time

ibi WebFOCUS vs Red Hat Lightspeed

Compared 15% of the time

PredicSis vs Red Hat Lightspeed

Compared 14% of the time

SAP Business Data Cloud vs Red Hat Lightspeed

Compared 3% of the time

More Red Hat Lightspeed Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Anaplan

July 2026

Download Anaplan product report

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Lightspeed

June 2026

Download Red Hat Lightspeed product report

Also Known As

No data available

Red Hat Insights

Overview

Anaplan delivers a comprehensive cloud platform designed for three-dimensional data analysis, visualization, and planning. Known for real-time integration with systems such as Salesforce, it enables efficient budgeting, reporting, and modeling without extensive coding knowledge.

The Anaplan platform enhances operational efficiency with its flexible and scalable capabilities, supporting financial planning, supply chain management, and sales operations among others. Users benefit from features like an advanced in-memory calculation engine, quick updates, and ease of integration with systems like SAP. While Anaplan offers a robust toolset, enhancements in dashboard capabilities and integration processes are needed, with improvements requested in visualization tools, more flexible graphs, and better API integration. Additional desires include machine learning features and streamlined data import processes to reduce latency.

What are the key features of Anaplan?

Three-dimensional Planning: Provides robust data analysis and visualization.
Real-time Integration: Seamlessly integrates with systems like Salesforce and SAP.
Advanced Calculation Engine: Enables quick updates across platforms.
Model Map: Aids easy model navigation and management.
Scalability: Adapts to companies of all sizes with ease.

What benefits should users consider?

Operational Efficiency: Enhances planning and execution processes.
Ease of Use: Reduces the need for extensive coding knowledge.
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse business needs and industries.
Cost-effectiveness: Offers potential ROI by optimizing planning efficiencies.

In industries like financial planning, supply chain management, and sales operations, Anaplan facilitates scenario-based analysis, demand forecasting, and business execution. It is employed in marketing, commercial real estate planning, and integrates easily with existing systems. Users in these sectors find it valuable for improving planning accuracy and responsiveness.

Anaplan

Red Hat Lightspeed is designed for seamless enterprise workload management. With user-friendly operations and robust security through OSCAP profiles, it ensures reliable lifecycle management and strong support.

Red Hat Lightspeed is engineered to enhance performance with automation capabilities like Ansible, proactive monitoring via Insights, and flexible infrastructure adaptability. Its features geared towards smart management using Satellite and comprehensive application deployment enhance stability. An intuitive dashboard streamlines real-time issue identification, promoting resource efficiency and reliability in governance. Improvements are needed in cockpit server functionality, GUI, and OSCAP profile integration, indicating a need for enriched documentation and better ease of use. Users suggest adding a status page due to site outages and prioritizing the enhancement of Ansible integration, as well as security compliance.

What are the key features of Red Hat Lightspeed?

Ease of Use: Simplified operations and management tasks.
Built-in Security: Enhanced security with OSCAP profiles.
Automation with Ansible: Streamlines repetitive tasks.
Insights Monitoring: Proactive system health checks.
Smart Management: Facilitates stability with Satellite.
Real-time Dashboard: Quick issue identification.

How does Red Hat Lightspeed deliver ROI?

Performance Enhancement: Boosts operational efficiency.
Security Assurance: Strong compliance measures.
Infrastructure Flexibility: Adapts to on-premises and cloud.
Patching Efficiency: Maintains system integrity.

Industries leverage Red Hat Lightspeed for running robust applications and databases, efficiently handling transaction servers and virtualization tasks. It supports both on-premises and cloud deployments, with common applications like Oracle databases and SAP solutions. By facilitating automation and security assessments, it aids in patch management and is instrumental for companies in executing cloud migrations, enabling predictive analytics, and ensuring system health to proactively tackle vulnerabilities.

Red Hat

Sample Customers

HP, ForeScout, DocuSign, EAT, Pandora, Aviva, Intel Security, Zalora

Cerner, Government of Nova Scotia

Buyer's Guide

Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed

June 2026

Free Report: Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed

Find out what your peers are saying about Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

904,748 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Anaplan vs. Red Hat Lightspeed report.

See our list of best Predictive Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Predictive Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.