

Anomali and Cortex XSIAM operate within the cybersecurity solutions market. Cortex XSIAM is often viewed as more feature-rich due to its advanced capabilities, making it a favored choice despite its higher cost compared to Anomali.
Features: Anomali provides crucial threat intelligence capabilities, credential monitoring, and adaptable API features for automation, streamlining the incident response process effectively. Cortex XSIAM excels with features like third-party integration, robust security automation, and sophisticated threat detection using machine learning, offering a more comprehensive security coverage.
Room for Improvement: Anomali could improve in expanding its data set, enhancing its integration options, and refining the user interface for better usability. Cortex XSIAM might benefit from simplifying its setup process, reducing alert volumes, and optimizing manual workflows to ensure a more user-friendly experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anomali offers a flexible deployment approach with accessible support, making it suitable for diverse environments. In contrast, Cortex XSIAM, while requiring a more structured deployment, provides dedicated support channels that cater to its robust feature set, offering a higher level of service involvement.
Pricing and ROI: Anomali presents a budget-friendly setup with faster ROI, appealing to organizations focused on cost-efficiency. Conversely, Cortex XSIAM, despite its higher initial expenses, offers significant long-term value through its extensive feature suite, making it a potentially lucrative investment over time.
Analyst productivity has improved significantly, with hours saved because of automation and AI-driven work that Anomali performs.
There is a return on investment concerning time and effort saved by 40% after implementing Anomali.
They have strong onboarding and deployment assistance, provide a dedicated technical account manager for large customers, and engage in regular product updates and customer interaction.
The technical support at Anomali is excellent.
It doesn't seem very professional how they're handling support anymore.
With premium support, core Palo Alto technical experts handle issues directly.
It is ineffective in terms of responding to basic queries and addressing future requirements.
I had a dedicated person allocated for supporting, and even with them, it was very good.
The scalability is massive, allowing us to store millions of indicators.
I believe Anomali's scalability is good; whether it is an organization for ten people or one hundred thousand people, the job a threat intel platform has to do will be the same.
Anomali's scalability is impressive as a mature platform capable of processing large amounts of threat intelligence and indicators of compromise data.
Without proper integration, scaling up with more servers is meaningless.
The SOC team is responsible for fully managing Cortex XSIAM.
Cortex XSIAM is highly scalable.
From a reliability perspective, Anomali consistently injects threat feeds, works on automation, performs reliable API integrations, and supports enterprise scale globally.
For example, while Microsoft allows ample time for users to adapt to deprecated features, Anomali only gave us three weeks before switching, so they need to be more cognizant of customer use cases from their engineering side.
The good thing is that they have a health check page, and if any issues arise, they notify us.
The product was easy to install and set up and worked right.
With continuous integration that the colleagues probably are doing, it is becoming better and better.
Overall, Cortex XSIAM is stable.
Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves.
Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials.
Anomali's ability to correlate and integrate different Threat Intel platforms, such as Mandiant and PolySwarm, is another valuable feature, removing duplicacy and enabling the application of specific IOCs across various security controls.
Obtaining validation for integrations from Palo Alto takes around eight months, which is quite long.
Cortex XSIAM needs improvements in terms of data onboarding, parsers, and third-party integration supports.
Cortex XSIAM is on the expensive side and requires substantial improvement in pricing.
Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side.
The first impression is that XSIAM would be more expensive than others we tried.
The product is very expensive.
Cortex XSIAM is pretty expensive, and the licensing process is not very comfortable.
Regarding integration, Anomali has capabilities to integrate with different downstream applications such as Palo Alto, allowing us to create playbooks to block domains, URLs, or IPs directly within the firewall.
Correlating IOCs with the telemetry data we are ingesting from our data sources allows us to pull monthly reports identifying how many assets and users interacted with malicious content, giving insight into whether communications failed or users accessed restricted content, providing complete visibility of the IOCs traveling throughout our environment.
It aggregates intelligence from hundreds of sources, automatically de-duplicates, applies risk scoring, applies context, and reduces much manual effort.
The advanced visualization capabilities of the product are important for understanding security trends in an organization.
To have Cortex XSIAM available is to basically have integration of all log sources, all alerting, and so on and so forth from firewalls and different tools, to get everything in one place, and afterwards to be able to build on the information that is coming.
One of the valued aspects of the product is its use of artificial intelligence to detect security vulnerabilities.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XSIAM | 1.7% |
| Anomali | 1.3% |
| Other | 97.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
Anomali delivers user-friendly cyber threat intelligence, offering concise insights with robust capabilities for evolving scenarios.
Anomali offers a powerful platform for cyber threat intelligence, allowing organizations to efficiently stream and analyze threat feeds. It excels in threat modeling, prioritizing intelligence, and supporting large-scale automation through its API, fostering a proactive security approach.
What are Anomali's Key Features?Anomali serves as a crucial tool for threat intelligence in industries ranging from finance to healthcare. Organizations stream threat feeds into Anomali to correlate and aggregate data, enhancing security measures and facilitating thorough threat investigations. Its adaptability makes it suitable across different sectors.
Cortex XSIAM acts as a critical element for SOC foundations, integrating SIEM and EDR capabilities, valued for threat detection and seamless security orchestration with Palo Alto Networks products.
Organizations find Cortex XSIAM beneficial for SOC foundations due to its capability to integrate SIEM and EDR tools, facilitating data collection, detection, and response. It connects with third-party data sources while reducing management effort and offering cost-effective alternatives to competitors like CrowdStrike and Trend Micro. Featuring automation and integration with Palo Alto Networks products, Cortex XSIAM enhances threat detection. Unified architecture allows a comprehensive view of attacks, further supported by machine learning and integration with existing vendor solutions, ensuring that users gain insights without significant manual log analysis.
What are Cortex XSIAM's key features?
What benefits are evident in Cortex XSIAM reviews?
Industries implement Cortex XSIAM mainly in technology-driven sectors where centralized endpoint protection and automation of forensic investigation are paramount. By integrating several third-party systems for incident response, companies in competitive markets leverage its attributes for heightened operational security efficiency. However, users note areas for improvement, such as Attack Surface Management and integration enhancements, to better suit tech-heavy industries needing extensive connectivity with cybersecurity solutions.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.