

Anomali and Tines compete in the cybersecurity market. Tines appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features and integration capabilities.
Features: Anomali provides comprehensive threat intelligence, real-time threat analysis, and robust reporting tools. Tines offers advanced workflow automation, seamless integration with various platforms, and powerful incident management. The main difference is Anomali's focus on intelligence gathering while Tines emphasizes automation and integrations.
Room for Improvement: Anomali could enhance its user interface and reporting flexibility and expand its integration options with third-party tools. For Tines, improvements could be made in offering more detailed documentation, expanding support for non-technical users, and reducing the complexity of its automation setup for beginners.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anomali has a straightforward deployment process with dedicated support, enhancing implementation. Tines is known for its innovative, user-centric deployment model, focusing on simplicity and rapid integration, which provides an edge in terms of user experience.
Pricing and ROI: Anomali's setup costs are competitive, offering a strong ROI linked to its threat intelligence capabilities. Tines, though initially more expensive, provides significant ROI through reduced operational overhead and efficiency gains due to automation. Its pricing justifies operational benefits and long-term efficiencies.
Analyst productivity has improved significantly, with hours saved because of automation and AI-driven work that Anomali performs.
There is a return on investment concerning time and effort saved by 40% after implementing Anomali.
I can speak for fewer employees needed because we used to require many analysts to deal with all the alerts that we were generating, but now we have about 90 to 95% of the alerts already automated through Tines, which requires tremendous time saved and a ton of reduction in the number of analysts required.
In some domains, we were in a position to actually let go of people, meaning at least two people have been reduced from one team, which saves a lot of cost for the organization.
We did not see proper value in it, whereas other platforms would have given much higher value for us.
They have strong onboarding and deployment assistance, provide a dedicated technical account manager for large customers, and engage in regular product updates and customer interaction.
The technical support at Anomali is excellent.
It doesn't seem very professional how they're handling support anymore.
Whenever we hit roadblocks or issues with the platform or story, even if it was our mistake, the people from the most senior engineering team of Tines immediately were willing to get on call with us.
I would rate the customer support a ten on a scale of one to ten.
The support and engineering team is quick to resolve bugs and respond promptly.
The scalability is massive, allowing us to store millions of indicators.
I believe Anomali's scalability is good; whether it is an organization for ten people or one hundred thousand people, the job a threat intel platform has to do will be the same.
Anomali's scalability is impressive as a mature platform capable of processing large amounts of threat intelligence and indicators of compromise data.
It is built for growing teams and has more complex automation capacity.
Whenever this became insufficient, we could easily reach out to the Tines team where they immediately gave us a remedy or fixed the issue.
From the workloads we have, it can scale for different workflows and add more workflows.
From a reliability perspective, Anomali consistently injects threat feeds, works on automation, performs reliable API integrations, and supports enterprise scale globally.
For example, while Microsoft allows ample time for users to adapt to deprecated features, Anomali only gave us three weeks before switching, so they need to be more cognizant of customer use cases from their engineering side.
The good thing is that they have a health check page, and if any issues arise, they notify us.
The tool is stable up to ninety-nine point nine percent.
Tines is very stable.
Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves.
Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials.
Anomali's ability to correlate and integrate different Threat Intel platforms, such as Mandiant and PolySwarm, is another valuable feature, removing duplicacy and enabling the application of specific IOCs across various security controls.
Reporting and dashboards could be more advanced for deeper analysis.
The issue with the Implode action is that once we get a certain number of events into the Implode action, we lose context of all the events except the last one that came in, so it is a bit difficult to send data back once it goes through the Implode action.
I think they need to add more intelligence to the workflow layer because, depending upon what they have right now, it could be possible for Claude or Copilot or ChatGPT to have that feature quickly.
Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side.
Tines required no setup cost since we just used their cloud tier and built everything with internal engineering resources.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is very good.
I did not handle the purchasing side, so I did not actually know the exact pricing or the licensing details.
Regarding integration, Anomali has capabilities to integrate with different downstream applications such as Palo Alto, allowing us to create playbooks to block domains, URLs, or IPs directly within the firewall.
Correlating IOCs with the telemetry data we are ingesting from our data sources allows us to pull monthly reports identifying how many assets and users interacted with malicious content, giving insight into whether communications failed or users accessed restricted content, providing complete visibility of the IOCs traveling throughout our environment.
It aggregates intelligence from hundreds of sources, automatically de-duplicates, applies risk scoring, applies context, and reduces much manual effort.
It helps in streamlining our security operations effectively and efficiently without requiring coding knowledge.
What stands out mostly about Tines's features is the integrations. It connects easily with tools such as Slack, emails, and spreadsheets, and it makes data moves automatically without much work.
Tines caught the failure and queued them automatically. We did not lose a single student log.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Anomali | 3.7% |
| Tines | 1.0% |
| Other | 95.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Anomali delivers user-friendly cyber threat intelligence, offering concise insights with robust capabilities for evolving scenarios.
Anomali offers a powerful platform for cyber threat intelligence, allowing organizations to efficiently stream and analyze threat feeds. It excels in threat modeling, prioritizing intelligence, and supporting large-scale automation through its API, fostering a proactive security approach.
What are Anomali's Key Features?Anomali serves as a crucial tool for threat intelligence in industries ranging from finance to healthcare. Organizations stream threat feeds into Anomali to correlate and aggregate data, enhancing security measures and facilitating thorough threat investigations. Its adaptability makes it suitable across different sectors.
Tines offers no-code and low-code automation for users to automate tasks without coding expertise, integrating seamlessly with APIs to enhance incident management and security operations.
Known for a vendor-neutral approach, Tines provides detailed documentation and live chat support, allowing for effective integration with other tools, scheduling capabilities, and streamlined processes that save time and effort. Users find it intuitive for efficient task handling, making manual intervention unnecessary. Challenges include the need for more comprehensive documentation and instructional videos, as well as improvements in AI integration and reporting aesthetics. Pricing is also noted as higher compared to alternatives.
What are the most important features of Tines?Tines primarily serves organizations in the security sector, automating security operations such as alert detection and managed detection and response. It's utilized extensively in security operation centers for tasks like phishing email processing, ticket creation, IOC investigations, and ticket assignments within enterprise security frameworks, with multiple teams delivering Tines services to enhance task handling efficiency.
We monitor all Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.