Apache Flink vs Apache Spark Streaming comparison

Apache Flink and Apache Spark Streaming are both solutions in the Streaming Analytics category. Apache Flink is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apache Spark Streaming is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.8. Apache Flink holds a 10.9% mindshare in SA, compared to Apache Spark Streaming’s 3.9% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Apache Flink users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of Apache Spark Streaming users who would recommend it.

Apache Flink

Read 19 Apache Flink reviews

3,771 Views
3,771 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Apache Spark Streaming

Read 17 Apache Spark Streaming reviews

1,361 Views
1,361 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Apache Flink

Apache Spark Streaming

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Apache Flink and Apache Spark Streaming are competing in the stream processing category. Flink has the upper hand in real-time analytics with its low-latency performance and complex event processing features, whereas Spark Streaming excels in versatility and ecosystem support, easing the integration process with existing infrastructures.

Features: Apache Flink offers real-time data processing with stateful transformations, support for both streaming and batch data, and a checkpointing mechanism for fault tolerance. Spark Streaming provides robust integration with the Spark ecosystem, a unified API for batch and streaming, and excellent scalability for large data processing tasks.

Room for Improvement: Apache Flink can benefit from improved ease of deployment and more comprehensive community support. Its complexity may require a steeper learning curve and additional resource allocation for optimal performance. Spark Streaming could improve in handling extremely low latency tasks and offering advanced stateful stream processing features. Its dependency on existing Spark infrastructure might limit standalone deployments, and additional support for complex event processing could be valuable.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Apache Flink offers flexibility in deployment but can be complex, often requiring in-depth expertise. Its community-driven support might pose challenges for less technical users. Apache Spark Streaming seamlessly integrates within Spark infrastructures, simplifying deployment. With robust community and commercial support options, it offers more accessible user resources.

Pricing and ROI: Apache Flink may involve higher initial costs because of its complexity but can deliver significant ROI with its low-latency applications. Apache Spark Streaming stands out in cost-efficiency due to its smooth integration capabilities, potentially yielding quicker ROI through reduced implementation time and leveraging existing resources.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,797 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Flink

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

4th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Apache Spark Streaming

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Apache Flink is 10.9%, down from 12.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Apache Spark Streaming is 3.9%, up from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Flink	10.9%
Apache Spark Streaming	3.9%
Other	85.2%

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

Aswini Atibudhi

Distinguished AI Leader at Walmart Global Tech at Walmart

Enables robust real-time data processing but documentation needs refinement

Apache Flink is very powerful, but it can be challenging for beginners because it requires prior experience with similar tools and technologies, such as Kafka and batch processing. It's essential to have a clear foundation; hence, it can be tough for beginners. However, once they grasp the concepts and have examples or references, it becomes easier. Intermediate users who are integrating with Kafka or other sources may find it smoother. After setting up and understanding the concepts, it becomes quite stable and scalable, allowing for customization of jobs. Every software, including Apache Flink, has room for improvement as it evolves. One key area for enhancement is user-friendliness and the developer experience; improving documentation and API specifications is essential, as they can currently be verbose and complex. Debugging and local testing pose challenges for newcomers, particularly when learning about concepts such as time semantics and state handling. Although the APIs exist, they aren't intuitive enough. We also need to simplify operational procedures, such as developing tools and tuning Flink clusters, as these processes can be quite complex. Additionally, implementing one-click rollback for failures and improving state management during dynamic scaling while retaining the last states is vital, as the current large states pose scaling challenges.

Read full review

Himansu Jena

Sr Project Manager at Raj Subhatech

Efficient real-time data management and analysis with advanced features

There are various ways we can improve Apache Spark Streaming through best practices. The initial part requires attention to batch interval tuning, which helps small intervals in micro batches based on latency requirements and helps prevent back pressure. We can use data formats such as Parquet or ORC for storage that needs faster reads and leveraging feature predicate push-down optimizations. We can implement serialization which helps with any Kyro in terms of .NET or Java. We have boxing and unboxing serialization for XML and JSON for converting key-pair values stored in browser. We can also implement caching mechanisms for storing and recomputing multiple operations. We can use specified joins which help with smaller databases, and distributed joins can minimize users. We can implement project optimization memory for CPU efficiency, known as Tungsten. Additionally, load balancing, checkpointing, and schema evaluation are areas to consider based on performance and bottlenecks. We can use Bugzilla tools for tracking and Splunk to monitor the performance of process systems, utilization, and performance based on data frames or data sets.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of usage, even for complex tasks, stands out."

"The event processing function is the most useful or the most used function. The filter function and the mapping function are also very useful because we have a lot of data to transform. For example, we store a lot of information about a person, and when we want to retrieve this person's details, we need all the details. In the map function, we can actually map all persons based on their age group. That's why the mapping function is very useful. We can really get a lot of events, and then we keep on doing what we need to do."

"Apache Flink offers a range of powerful configurations and experiences for development teams. Its strength lies in its development experience and capabilities."

"Apache Flink allows you to reduce latency and process data in real-time, making it ideal for such scenarios."

"Allows us to process batch data, stream to real-time and build pipelines."

"What I appreciate best about Apache Flink is that it's open source and geared towards a distributed stream processing framework."

"The setup was not too difficult."

"Apache Flink provides faster and low-cost investment for me; I find it to have low hardware requirements, and it's faster with low code, meaning it's easy to understand for moving the streaming data."

More Apache Flink pros

"Spark Streaming is critical, quite stable, full-featured, and scalable."

"As an open-source solution, using it is basically free."

"With Apache Spark Streaming, you can have multiple kinds of windows; depending on your use case, you can select either a tumbling window, a sliding window, or a static window to determine how much data you want to process at a single point of time."

"Apache Spark Streaming is versatile. You can use it for competitive intelligence, gathering data from competitors, or for internal tasks like monitoring workflows."

"With Apache Spark Streaming's integration with Anaconda and Miniconda with Python, I interact with databases using data frames or data sets in micro versions and create solutions based on business expectations for decision-making, logistic regression, linear regression, or machine learning which provides image or voice record and graphical data for improved accuracy."

"The solution is better than average and some of the valuable features include efficiency and stability."

"By integrating Apache Spark Streaming, the data freshness rate, and latency have significantly improved from 24-hour batch processing to less than one minute, facilitating faster communication to downstream systems, aiding marketing campaigns."

"Apache Spark's capabilities for machine learning are quite extensive and can be used in a low-code way."

More Apache Spark Streaming pros

Cons

"There is room for improvement in the initial setup process."

"Apache Flink's documentation should be available in more languages."

"In a future release, they could improve on making the error descriptions more clear."

"The machine learning library is not very flexible."

"In terms of stability with Flink, it is something that you have to deal with every time. Stability is the number one problem that we have seen with Flink, and it really depends on the kind of problem that you're trying to solve."

"Apache should provide more examples and sample code related to streaming to help me better adapt and utilize the tool."

"One way to improve Flink would be to enhance integration between different ecosystems. For example, there could be more integration with other big data vendors and platforms similar in scope to how Apache Flink works with Cloudera. Apache Flink is a part of the same ecosystem as Cloudera, and for batch processing it's actually very useful but for real-time processing there could be more development with regards to the big data capabilities amongst the various ecosystems out there."

"The state maintains checkpoints and they use RocksDB or S3. They are good but sometimes the performance is affected when you use RocksDB for checkpointing."

More Apache Flink cons

"The problem is we need to use it in a certain manner. After that, we need to apply another pipeline for the machine learning processes, and that's what we work on."

"It was resource-intensive, even for small-scale applications."

"Integrating event-level streaming capabilities could be beneficial."

"There could be an improvement in the area of the user configuration section, it should be less developer-focused and more business user-focused."

"We would like to have the ability to do arbitrary stateful functions in Python."

"The service structure of Apache Spark Streaming can improve. There are a lot of issues with memory management and latency. There is no real-time analytics. We recommend it for the use cases where there is a five-second latency, but not for a millisecond, an IOT-based, or the detection anomaly-based. Flink as a service is much better."

"One improvement I would expect is real-time processing instead of micro-batch or near real-time."

"The debugging aspect could use some improvement."

More Apache Spark Streaming cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is open-source, which is free."

"This is an open-source platform that can be used free of charge."

"It's an open-source solution."

"It's an open source."

"Apache Flink is open source so we pay no licensing for the use of the software."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, or not cost-effective, and ten is cheap, I rate the price a seven."

"I was using the open-source community version, which was self-hosted."

"People pay for Apache Spark Streaming as a service."

"Spark is an affordable solution, especially considering its open-source nature."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

19%

Retailer

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Marketing Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	12

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Flink?

The solution is expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Flink?

Apache could improve Apache Flink by providing more functionality, as they need to fully support data integration. The connectors are still very few for Apache Flink. There is a lack of functionali...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Flink?

I am working with Apache Flink, which is the tool we use for data integration. Apache Flink is for data, and we are working on the data integration project, not big data, using Apache Flink and Apa...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Spark Streaming?

One of the improvements we need is in Spark SQL and the machine learning library. I don't think there is too much to work on, but the issue is when we want to use machine learning, we always need t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Spark Streaming?

We work with Apache Spark Streaming for our project because we use that as one of the landing data sources, and we work with it to ensure we can get all of the data before it goes through our data ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apache Spark Streaming?

One thing I would share with other organizations considering Apache Spark Streaming is the necessity of having effective data storage. We want to ensure we acquire and manage our data storage effec...

See all answers

Comparisons

Spring Cloud Data Flow vs Apache Flink

Compared 11% of the time

Databricks vs Apache Flink

Compared 9% of the time

Confluent vs Apache Flink

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Apache Flink

Compared 9% of the time

WSO2 Stream Processor vs Apache Flink

Compared 4% of the time

More Apache Flink Competitors

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 14% of the time

Confluent vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Pulsar vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 8% of the time

Qlik Talend Cloud vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon Kinesis vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 7% of the time

More Apache Spark Streaming Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Flink

March 2026

Download Apache Flink product report

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark Streaming

March 2026

Download Apache Spark Streaming product report

Also Known As

Flink

Spark Streaming

Overview

Apache Flink is an open-source batch and stream data processing engine. It can be used for batch, micro-batch, and real-time processing. Flink is a programming model that combines the benefits of batch processing and streaming analytics by providing a unified programming interface for both data sources, allowing users to write programs that seamlessly switch between the two modes. It can also be used for interactive queries.

Flink can be used as an alternative to MapReduce for executing iterative algorithms on large datasets in parallel. It was developed specifically for large to extremely large data sets that require complex iterative algorithms.

Flink is a fast and reliable framework developed in Java, Scala, and Python. It runs on the cluster that consists of data nodes and managers. It has a rich set of features that can be used out of the box in order to build sophisticated applications.

Flink has a robust API and is ready to be used with Hadoop, Cassandra, Hive, Impala, Kafka, MySQL/MariaDB, Neo4j, as well as any other NoSQL database.

Apache Flink Features

Distributed execution of streaming programs on clusters of computers
Support for multiple data sources and sinks: this includes Hadoop file systems, databases, and other data sources
Streaming SQL query engine with support for windowing functions
Low latency query execution in milliseconds
Runs in a distributed fashion: it can be deployed on multiple machines or nodes to increase performance and reliability of data processing pipelines.
Powerful API that supports both batch and streaming applications
Runs on clusters of commodity hardware with minimal configuration
Can be integrated with other technologies, such as Apache Spark for complex data mining

Apache Flink Benefits

Ease of use: Flink has an intuitive API and provides high-level abstractions for handling data streams. Even beginners in the field can work with the platform with ease.

Fault tolerance: Flink can automatically detect and recover from failures in the system.

Scalability: Flink scales to thousands of nodes. It can run on clusters of any size and the user does not have to worry about managing the cluster.

Reviews from Real Users

Apache Flink stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its low latency and its user-friendly interface. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

The head of data and analytics at a computer software company notes, “The top feature of Apache Flink is its low latency for fast, real-time data. Another great feature is the real-time indicators and alerts which make a big difference when it comes to data processing and analysis.”

Ertugrul A., manager at a computer software company, writes, “It's usable and affordable. It is user-friendly and the reporting is good.”

Apache

Spark Streaming makes it easy to build scalable fault-tolerant streaming applications.

Apache

Sample Customers

LogRhythm, Inc., Inter-American Development Bank, Scientific Technologies Corporation, LotLinx, Inc., Benevity, Inc.

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, eBay Inc.

Buyer's Guide

Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming

March 2026

Free Report: Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,797 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Flink vs. Apache Spark Streaming report.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.