Apache Spark Streaming vs Qlik Talend Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Apache and Qlik are both solutions in the Streaming Analytics category. Apache is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.9, while Qlik is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8. Apache holds a 4.6% mindshare in SA, compared to Qlik’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Qlik users who would recommend it.

Apache Spark Streaming

Read 17 Apache Spark Streaming reviews

2,888 Views
2,888 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Qlik Talend Cloud

Read 56 Qlik Talend Cloud reviews

18,135 Views
1,632 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Apache Spark Streaming

Qlik Talend Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 22, 2026

Qlik Talend Cloud and Apache Spark Streaming are competing in the data integration and real-time analytics category. Apache Spark Streaming seems to have the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and robust real-time processing capabilities, which are well-suited for handling data streams.

Features: Qlik Talend Cloud provides a vast set of tools for data integration and real-time operations, supported by a central repository for metadata sharing. It offers a wide range of connectors that facilitate custom coding and integration with diverse data sources. Apache Spark Streaming, on the other hand, is known for its real-time analytics and low-latency processing, supporting multiple languages and offering seamless integration with other services for scalable operations.

Room for Improvement: Qlik Talend Cloud faces challenges with memory usage, installation difficulties, and high licensing costs, along with stability and performance inconsistencies. Apache Spark Streaming, while strong in real-time functionality, can improve its user interface and event handling capabilities, with the complexity of its initial setup being a notable concern.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Talend Cloud supports deployment across on-premises, hybrid, and cloud environments, though its installation process is complex. Its customer service is generally responsive, although support experiences can vary based on system familiarity. Apache Spark Streaming adapts well to both cloud and on-premises deployments but is noted for the complexity of its setup. Customer support feedback is mixed, with some users desiring more technical guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Qlik Talend Cloud is subscription-based and perceived as costly by some users, yet it delivers significant ROI by automating processes. Apache Spark Streaming, as an open-source solution, is highly praised for its cost-effectiveness and flexibility, offering excellent ROI through its ease of use and efficiency, although some users might require additional support services.

To learn more, read our detailed Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark Streaming

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qlik Talend Cloud

Ranking in Streaming Analytics

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (7th), Data Quality (2nd), Data Scrubbing Software (1st), Master Data Management (MDM) Software (3rd), Cloud Data Integration (6th), Data Governance (9th), Cloud Master Data Management (MDM) (3rd), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Apache Spark Streaming is 4.6%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qlik Talend Cloud is 3.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Streaming Analytics Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Qlik Talend Cloud	3.3%
Apache Spark Streaming	4.6%
Other	92.1%

Streaming Analytics

Featured Reviews

Khoa Dang Le

Principal AI Engineer at IMT Solutions

Have faced challenges with complex data handling and seek smoother integration for machine learning workflows

I find the fault tolerance feature beneficial because I use it for serving data from a landing area. I understand all of the structures we have for Spark SQL, Spark Streaming, and MLlib. The ability of Apache Spark Streaming to handle out-of-order data using watermarking and windowing is something we use in our pipeline. Nearly 50% of our usage is based on that because we use it for landing data, and we appreciate that we can work with it. The main benefits of Apache Spark Streaming include cost savings, time savings, and efficiency improvements about data storage. The fast storage capability is crucial because Apache Spark replaces Hadoop's MapReduce, allowing us to manage our data more efficiently.

Read full review

Herivao Jus Winny

IT Consultant at a tech services company with 201-500 employees

Has automated recurring data flows and improved accuracy in reporting

The best features of Talend Data Integration are its rich set of components that let you connect to almost any data design intuitive and its strong automation and scheduling capabilities. The TMap component is especially valuable because it allows flexible transformation, joins, and filtering in a single place. I also rely a lot on context variables to manage different environments like Dev, Test, and production, without changing the code. The error handling and logging tools are very helpful for monitoring and troubleshooting, which makes the workflow more reliable. Talend Data Integration has helped our company by automating and standardizing data processes. Before, many of these tasks were done manually, which took more time and often led to errors. With Talend Data Integration, we built automated pipelines that extract, clean, and load data consistently. This not only saves hours of manual effort, but also improves the accuracy and reliability of data. As a result, business teams had faster access to trustworthy information for reporting and decision making, which directly improved efficiency and productivity. Talend Data Integration has had a measurable impact on our organization. By automating daily data loading processes, we reduced manual effort by around three or four hours per day, which saved roughly 60 to 80 hours per month. We also improved data accuracy. Error rates dropped by more than 70% because validation rules were built into the jobs. In addition, reporting teams now receive fresh data at least 50% faster, which means they can make decisions earlier and with more confidence. Overall, Talend Data Integration has increased both efficiency and reliability in our data workflows.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"By integrating Apache Spark Streaming, the data freshness rate, and latency have significantly improved from 24-hour batch processing to less than one minute, facilitating faster communication to downstream systems, aiding marketing campaigns."

"Apache Spark Streaming has features like checkpointing and Streaming API that are useful."

"I appreciate Apache Spark Streaming's micro-batching capabilities; the watermarking functionality and related features are quite good."

"The solution is very stable and reliable."

"With Apache Spark Streaming, you can have multiple kinds of windows; depending on your use case, you can select either a tumbling window, a sliding window, or a static window to determine how much data you want to process at a single point of time."

"It's the fastest solution on the market with low latency data on data transformations."

"As an open-source solution, using it is basically free."

"Spark Streaming is critical, quite stable, full-featured, and scalable."

More Apache Spark Streaming pros

"The scheduling part of the solution is very good."

"We have used value frequency and patterns. We have been it impressed with these functions as they have helped us in making decisions in transformation work."

"If you are looking for something that is stable, cost-effective and has a great ROI, then Talend is a great choice."

"It lowers the amount of time in development from weeks to a day."

"We are still in the process of evaluating them, but I love the way things look in Talend, and I'm all for Talend."

"The solution is very user-friendly and easy to understand."

"Talend is a good product and I recommend it."

"The basic tools are easy to pick up and understand."

More Qlik Talend Cloud pros

Cons

"There could be an improvement in the area of the user configuration section, it should be less developer-focused and more business user-focused."

"The debugging aspect could use some improvement."

"The cost and load-related optimizations are areas where the tool lacks and needs improvement."

"The initial setup is quite complex."

"The service structure of Apache Spark Streaming can improve. There are a lot of issues with memory management and latency. There is no real-time analytics. We recommend it for the use cases where there is a five-second latency, but not for a millisecond, an IOT-based, or the detection anomaly-based. Flink as a service is much better."

"Monitoring is an area where they could definitely improve Apache Spark Streaming. When you have a streaming application, it generates numerous logs. After some time, the logs become meaningless because they're quite large and impossible to open."

"When dealing with various data types including COBOL, Excel, JSON, video, audio, and MPG files, challenges can arise with incomplete or missing values."

"The downside is when you have this the other way around in the columns, it becomes really hard to use."

More Apache Spark Streaming cons

"Once you get past the basic tools, it gets pretty complicated."

"The stability is good, but the performance is slower when I work on a huge amount of data."

"Lots of errors and system crashes during installation and IMHO we didn’t receive good enough technical support and guidance from Talend to solve the issues."

"Due to using the open-source version of Talend Data Integration, which lacks a scheduler, our current approach involves developing jobs in Talend, exporting them as Java packages, and utilizing an external scheduler, such as Windows Scheduler, to manage the scheduling process."

"The stability for Talend Data Quality can be rated around an 8; it is quite stable."

"Not enough material is available for beginners."

"The biggest challenge with Talend was its performance."

"First, We faced problems with stability of the products."

More Qlik Talend Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I was using the open-source community version, which was self-hosted."

"Spark is an affordable solution, especially considering its open-source nature."

"People pay for Apache Spark Streaming as a service."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, or not cost-effective, and ten is cheap, I rate the price a seven."

"The product pricing is considered very good, especially compared to other data integration tools in the market."

"I would advise to first take a look and at the Open Studio edition. Figure out what you need and purchase the appropriate license."

"License renewal is on a yearly basis."

"The pricing is a little higher than what I had expected, but it's comparable with I-PASS competitors."

"It's a subscription-based platform, we renew it every year."

"The licensing cost is about 40,000 Euros a year."

"The price of the Talend Data Management Platform is reasonable. The other competing solutions are priced high. Gartner Magic Quadrant identified other solutions, such as Informatica, that are far more expensive."

"The solution's pricing is very reasonable and half the cost of Informatica."

More Qlik Talend Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	21
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	20

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Apache Spark Streaming?

One of the improvements we need is in Spark SQL and the machine learning library. I don't think there is too much to work on, but the issue is when we want to use machine learning, we always need t...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Spark Streaming?

We work with Apache Spark Streaming for our project because we use that as one of the landing data sources, and we work with it to ensure we can get all of the data before it goes through our data ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Apache Spark Streaming?

One thing I would share with other organizations considering Apache Spark Streaming is the necessity of having effective data storage. We want to ensure we acquire and manage our data storage effec...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Talend Data Quality?

I don't use the automated rule management feature in Talend Data Quality that much, so I cannot provide much feedback. I may not know what Talend Data Quality can improve for data quality. I'm not ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Talend Data Quality?

It is for consistency, mainly; data consistency and data quality are our main use cases for the product. Data consistency is the primary purpose we use it for, as we have written rules in Talend Da...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Talend Data Quality?

Currently, I'm working with batch jobs and don't perform real-time data quality monitoring because of the large data volume. For real-time, we use a different product. I cannot provide details abou...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Stream Analytics vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 13% of the time

Confluent vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 11% of the time

Databricks vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Pulsar vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 7% of the time

Aiven Platform vs Apache Spark Streaming

Compared 3% of the time

More Apache Spark Streaming Competitors

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Qlik Talend Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Databricks vs Qlik Talend Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

Ataccama ONE Platform vs Qlik Talend Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

SSIS vs Qlik Talend Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

n8n vs Qlik Talend Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More Qlik Talend Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark Streaming

September 2026

Download Apache Spark Streaming product report

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Talend Cloud

September 2026

Download Qlik Talend Cloud product report

Also Known As

Spark Streaming

Talend Data Quality, Talend Data Management Platform, Talend MDM Platform, Talend Data Streams, Talend Data Integration, Talend Data Integrity and Data Governance

Overview

Apache Spark Streaming efficiently processes real-time data with features like micro-batching and native Python support. It's scalable and integrates with many services, ideal for reducing data latency and enabling real-time analytics across industries.

Apache Spark Streaming is a powerful tool for real-time data processing and analytics, offering support for multiple languages and robust integration capabilities. Its open-source nature, combined with features like checkpointing and watermarking, makes it a reliable choice for managing data streams with low latency. However, it faces challenges with Kubernetes deployments and requires improvements in memory management and latency. The installation process and handling of structured and unstructured data also present complexities. Despite these challenges, it's heavily utilized in building data pipelines and leveraging machine learning algorithms.

What are Apache Spark Streaming's key features?

Native Python Support: Efficient processing with Python language integration.
Micro-Batching: Handles streams in small batches for real-time processing.
Real-Time Analytics: Enables instant data insights.
Scalability: Adapts to varying data loads.
Low Latency: Processes data with minimal delays.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Efficiency: Streamlined real-time data processing.
Reliability: Consistent performance across tasks.
Integration: Seamless connection with other services.
Cost Optimization: Reduces processing expenses over time.

In industries like healthcare, telecommunications, and logistics, Apache Spark Streaming is implemented for real-time data processing and machine learning. It aids in predictive maintenance, anomaly detection, and fraud detection by reducing data latency with comprehensive analytics. Organizations frequently use it alongside Kafka and cloud storage solutions to enhance GIS, predictive analytics, and Customer 360 profiling.

Apache

Qlik Talend Cloud provides robust data integration tools tailored for efficient management of large volumes, offering real-time data access, Java integration, and custom code capabilities for developers.

Qlik Talend Cloud is known for its extensive connectivity options, enabling seamless integration across different platforms, such as S3, Redshift, Oracle, and SQL Server. The central repository facilitates consistent metadata access throughout organizations, enhancing collaboration. Despite its strengths in advanced monitoring, automation, and user-friendly drag-and-drop interfaces, users face challenges with installation stability, technical support, documentation inconsistencies, and complexities in learning. Performance concerns also include multitasking limitations and excessive memory usage. The platform's licensing costs can be prohibitive for smaller companies, while demands for improved data governance and intuitive code management continue. Its applications in healthcare data parsing, ETL task automation, and diverse data platform integration demonstrate its utility, although there's a constant demand for better scalability and efficient transformations.

What are the key features?

Seamless Real-Time Data Access: Ensures that users can access the latest information across systems without delays for better decision-making.
Java Integration: Facilitates smooth incorporation of Java components into workflows, broadening development options.
Custom Code Development: Offers flexibility to develop tailored solutions to meet specific integration scenarios.
Vast Connectors: Enhances connectivity between multiple platforms, supporting comprehensive data integration strategies.
Central Repository: Allows for uniform metadata access across departments, promoting cohesive data management practices.
Automation and Monitoring: Streamlines workflows with advanced automation and monitoring, reducing manual intervention and errors.

What benefits and ROI should users evaluate?

Improved Data Quality: Tools for data matching and error handling ensure high-quality, reliable data for analytics and reporting.
Efficient Workflow Streamlining: Drag-and-drop interfaces and automation features simplify complex workflows, enhancing operational efficiency.
Enhanced Business Insights: By integrating diverse data sources, businesses can derive deeper insights and ensure compliance through better data management.
Cost Management: Although some users find licensing expensive, comprehensive feature sets aimed at improving data processes can justify costs.
Community Support: Users benefit from active community forums that provide assistance, although technical support also necessitates enhancements.

In specialized industries like healthcare, users leverage Qlik Talend Cloud for data integration and transformation, aiding in compliance and analytics. Compatibility with cloud and on-premises systems ensures adaptability to complex data tasks, facilitating business application development. Organizations focus on enhanced data ingestion and quality checks for comprehensive solutions.

Qlik

Sample Customers

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, eBay Inc.

Aliaxis, Electrocomponents, M¾NCHENER VEREIN, The Sunset Group

Buyer's Guide

Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Apache Spark Streaming vs. Qlik Talend Cloud report.

See our list of best Streaming Analytics vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Streaming Analytics reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.