Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Apache Spark Streaming vs SAS Event Stream Processing comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Apache Spark Streaming
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
11th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SAS Event Stream Processing
Ranking in Streaming Analytics
26th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Streaming Analytics category, the mindshare of Apache Spark Streaming is 3.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAS Event Stream Processing is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Streaming Analytics
 

Featured Reviews

Venkata Phaneendra Reddy Janga - PeerSpot reviewer
Improved data latency and integration with diverse data sources enables robust real-time processing
The best feature of Apache Spark Streaming is that it's built upon the Spark SQL engine. This is easy for someone coming from a SQL background to work with real-time data, even if they are new to real-time processing. They can quickly get started using the Spark SQL engine. Another valuable feature is that we can control many aspects such as the configuration of the engine, memory management, and have a checkpointing mechanism that allows us to manually start or restart jobs from a specific point. This is particularly useful for restoring messages of a Kafka topic from a specific date and time using the checkpointing mechanism. The integration with Spark's ecosystems such as MLlib and GraphX has significant potential, although I have not worked on that part as we focus mainly on data engineering. We can handle late-arriving data with Apache Spark Streaming. Sometimes aggregation results might be missed if data arrives out of order, but features such as windowing allow us to manage out-of-order data by specifying a watermark time. Recently released mechanisms to query the state make it easier to handle data programmatically.
Roi Jason Buela - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution with useful windowing features and great for operations and marketing
The persistence could be better. Although ESP is designed for in-memory processing, it would be better if the solution is enhanced or improved on the persistence of the data that is kept in the memory. For example, if one server goes down and the information is stored in the memory, it is lost. Therefore, the persistence needs to be improved so that if there are more cases where the server is down, the information and data can still be intact.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's the fastest solution on the market with low latency data on data transformations."
"The solution is better than average and some of the valuable features include efficiency and stability."
"Apache Spark Streaming has features like checkpointing and Streaming API that are useful."
"Apache Spark Streaming's most valuable feature is near real-time analytics. The developers can build APIs easily for a code-steaming pipeline. The solutions have an ecosystem of integration with other stock services."
"Apache Spark Streaming was straightforward in terms of maintenance. It was actively developed, and migrating from an older to a newer version was quite simple."
"As an open-source solution, using it is basically free."
"Apache Spark's capabilities for machine learning are quite extensive and can be used in a low-code way."
"By integrating Apache Spark Streaming, the data freshness rate, and latency have significantly improved from 24-hour batch processing to less than one minute, facilitating faster communication to downstream systems, aiding marketing campaigns."
"The solution is beneficial on an enterprise level."
 

Cons

"The service structure of Apache Spark Streaming can improve. There are a lot of issues with memory management and latency. There is no real-time analytics. We recommend it for the use cases where there is a five-second latency, but not for a millisecond, an IOT-based, or the detection anomaly-based. Flink as a service is much better."
"We would like to have the ability to do arbitrary stateful functions in Python."
"One improvement I would expect is real-time processing instead of micro-batch or near real-time."
"Integrating event-level streaming capabilities could be beneficial."
"The solution itself could be easier to use."
"It was resource-intensive, even for small-scale applications."
"The cost and load-related optimizations are areas where the tool lacks and needs improvement."
"One improvement I would expect is real-time processing instead of micro-batch or near real-time."
"The persistence could be better."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"People pay for Apache Spark Streaming as a service."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is expensive, or not cost-effective, and ten is cheap, I rate the price a seven."
"Spark is an affordable solution, especially considering its open-source nature."
"I was using the open-source community version, which was self-hosted."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Streaming Analytics solutions are best for your needs.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
21%
University
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Apache Spark Streaming?
Apache Spark Streaming is versatile. You can use it for competitive intelligence, gathering data from competitors, or for internal tasks like monitoring workflows.
What needs improvement with Apache Spark Streaming?
We don't have enough experience to be judgmental about its flaws, as we've only used stable features like batch micro-batch. Integration poses no problem; however, I don't use some features and can...
What is your primary use case for Apache Spark Streaming?
We use Spark Streaming in a micro-batch region. It's not a full real-time system, but it offers high performance and low latency.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

Spark Streaming
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

UC Berkeley AMPLab, Amazon, Alibaba Taobao, Kenshoo, eBay Inc.
Honda, HSBC, Lufthansa, Nestle, 89Degrees.
Find out what your peers are saying about Databricks, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Confluent and others in Streaming Analytics. Updated: August 2025.
865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.