

Appian and Microsoft Power Automate are platforms competing in process automation. Appian seems to have the upper hand in terms of ROI, offering substantial cost and time savings with effective application building. Microsoft Power Automate is praised for its cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft ecosystem.
Features: Appian offers rapid development with low-code capabilities, facilitating quick application implementation. It provides comprehensive case management and integrates effortlessly within business workflows. Microsoft Power Automate offers integration with Office 365, ease of automation with a wide array of connectors, and powerful RPA capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance customizability of its user interfaces and streamline integration with non-standard systems. Its learning curve may be steep for non-developers. Microsoft Power Automate could improve handling premium component charges, enhance performance for complex workflows, and expand non-Microsoft integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian deployment is user-friendly with a cohesive architecture and offers robust customer support. Microsoft Power Automate benefits from being part of the Microsoft suite, simplifying deployment for existing users, with extensive online resources available for support.
Pricing and ROI: Appian may present a higher initial cost but offers substantial ROI through cost and time savings. Microsoft Power Automate is cost-effective, especially for users within the Microsoft ecosystem; it requires additional fees for certain premium features but is competitive due to low entry costs.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
On a daily basis, it saves about two to three hours.
It has helped us save time, and we've saved thousands of hours through automation.
There has been around 20% to 30% productivity improvement, which will definitely save money and costs.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Having experience with coding is essential to fully utilize Power Automate.
On a scale of one to ten, the technical support of Microsoft Power Automate rates as three within India, and eight or nine for support from outside India.
They offer 24-hour technical support that consistently answers inquiries.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Microsoft Power Automate is scalable enough for me and my customers.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
Developers should have discretion over which view they want to use, either the old designer view or the new designer view, as Microsoft is forcing the new designer view, which most developers don't prefer.
It would be better to make it a wizard more than requiring coding.
We haven't gone into depth to explore the integration with AI, so I am not really sure.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
The price of Microsoft Power Automate was affordable for our clients, who are small companies.
I don't remember paying anything excessively or overpriced.
Microsoft Power Automate is reasonably priced compared to others in the market.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
We have saved thousands of hours by automating tasks that would have been labor-intensive and error-prone if done manually.
If I want to fill something in Power Platform and need to fill another item in Salesforce, instead of doing the same task in different platforms, I can directly fill it in Power Platform and integrate it with Salesforce through API in Microsoft Power Automate, and my work is complete.
Microsoft Power Automate has positively impacted my organization as it has saved a lot of time and effort.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Power Automate | 16.4% |
| Appian | 5.3% |
| Other | 78.3% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 50 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 66 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
Microsoft Power Automate is a powerful tool that streamlines and automates tasks within an organization.
It is used for workflow automation, data integration, and creating automated notifications and approvals.
Power Automate connects different applications and services, such as SharePoint, Excel, and Outlook, to automate data transfer and synchronization.
We monitor all Process Mining reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.