

Appian and OutSystems are competitors in the low-code application development platform category. Appian has the upper hand in process automation and integration, while OutSystems excels in flexibility and visual modeling.
Features: Appian offers rapid application building, strong integration capabilities, and AI functionalities. It is ideal for internal process management with efficient data processing. OutSystems provides a user-friendly drag-and-drop environment with a visual design interface and excels in rapid application development.
Room for Improvement: Appian could improve UI customization, integration with other tools, and handling large data sets. OutSystems needs to address its pricing model and support responsiveness, while enhancing documentation and integration features for wider appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian provides on-premises and cloud deployment with consistent technical support, although some users wish for faster response times. OutSystems is praised for rapid deployment but criticized for variable support quality and pricing structures.
Pricing and ROI: Appian is costly but valuable due to comprehensive features, offering flexible licensing and significant ROI for enterprise implementations. OutSystems is seen as expensive, with calls for more accessible pricing for smaller enterprises and concerns over recurring costs.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
Appian is very efficient, allowing us to build a lot of applications within a financial year, making it cost-effective.
Developing that same project in OutSystems can be completed in around 40 to 50% less time, requiring only six resources.
Time efficiency. Your team can be deployed to work on different modules parallelly and you can really save time up to an enormous level.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
Many helpful videos and documentation are available on the OutSystems site, making it relatively easy to learn the platform.
They do have the customer support ticketing system where you can raise the ticket, decide the priority, and depending upon your priority and urgency, they are going to resolve your problem.
There have been no issues with support,
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
They can be deployed vertically and horizontally, supporting as many deployments as needed.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
If there is a very complex process that includes a lot of data transitioning and memory-centric processes, it consumes a lot of memory.
It is crucial to be aware of which module corresponds to which application in real-time projects, as there are multiple applications.
You have to design your architecture in a very magnificent and decent way so that how you process your data so that load can be easily balanced.
I would like to see more integration between the use of artificial intelligence to speed up the process delivery time.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
Subsequent users can be added at an additional cost per user; exact pricing details can be found on the OutSystems site.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
OutSystems offers a lot of reusable components and solutions that I can simply drag and drop and use, which has a significant impact on project delivery time.
We use integration extensively in OutSystems, which allows us to connect our own internal systems to our newly created system applications.
OutSystems has a very good learning curve for developers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OutSystems | 4.8% |
| Appian | 4.0% |
| Other | 91.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 31 |
Appian provides a low-code platform designed for rapid application development, allowing businesses to enhance their efficiency through automation and integration while offering scalable and mobile-friendly solutions.
Appian stands out with its capability to streamline business processes through its intuitive drag-and-drop functionality, robust process management, and AI integration. It supports rapid deployment, automation, and scalability, making it suitable for enterprise-wide applications. Its continuous updates ensure agile customization, while seamless integration with external systems enables efficient data management. Despite some challenges with UI customization and external integrations, particularly with Microsoft products, Appian remains a valuable tool for businesses across industries seeking improved workflow management and data integration.
What are Appian's key features?Appian is primarily used in industries like banking, telecom, and manufacturing, assisting companies in managing workflows and automating processes. From application creation to data integration, it aids in enterprise-wide initiatives including mobile application deployment, real-time data processing, and intelligent automation.
OutSystems is a low-code platform designed for accelerated application development, offering customizable UI with drag-and-drop features and integration options for efficient workflow management.
OutSystems supports rapid project delivery through visual modeling and reusable components, facilitating Agile development across platforms. It integrates seamlessly with databases and external services, offering native mobile capabilities and enterprise scalability. While known for handling complex demands with ease, users suggest enhancements in AI integration, support services, pricing, and documentation. Automation, version control, and learning resources are other areas highlighted for potential improvement. OutSystems is widely used for streamlining processes in banking, healthcare, and insurance industries, with integrations into SAP and ServiceNow, leveraging cloud capabilities on AWS and Azure.
What are the key features of OutSystems?In industries such as banking, healthcare, and insurance, OutSystems is employed to develop both web and mobile applications for streamlined processes and task automation. Companies use this platform for rapid application development, integrating with systems like SAP and ServiceNow, and employing cloud services from AWS and Azure for optimized deployment.
We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.