Top 10 Appian Alternatives

Appian enables rapid app development focused on business process management. In comparison, Mendix emphasizes visual, model-driven development and quick prototyping. Appian offers robust BPM tools, while Mendix supports efficient integration and long-term cost savings with model-driven processes.

Appian is ideal for rapid low-code development and robust process modeling with strong integration capabilities. In comparison, APEX excels in creating data-driven web apps integrating seamlessly with Oracle databases, offering cost-effective solutions for Oracle environments, though with some rigidity in framework and workflow automation.

Appian offers strong business process management and rapid development capabilities, ideal for enterprises needing efficient workflows. In comparison, OutSystems focuses on visual modeling and mobile development, appealing to tech buyers valuing ease of deployment and integration flexibility.

Appian offers rapid app development and process efficiency with low-code solutions. In comparison, Salesforce provides CRM capabilities and extensive features, appealing to large enterprises. Appian suits users seeking agility, while Salesforce is ideal for managing customer relationships and business processes.

Appian excels with rapid app deployment and integrated case management, but faces customization and cost challenges. In comparison, Bizagi prioritizes user-friendly process modeling and adherence to BPMN 2.0, though it struggles with stability and lacks some integrations for large processes.

Appian supports rapid app development with strong case management, suitable for agile environments. In comparison, IBM BPM emphasizes integration with existing systems for complex enterprises. Appian offers cost-effective cloud solutions, while IBM BPM's higher costs cater to large-scale deployments.

Appian offers rapid development with low-code design, enhancing speed and adaptability. In comparison, ARIS BPA focuses on comprehensive process documentation and management. Appian suits buyers seeking fast application rollout, while ARIS BPA attracts those prioritizing detailed process modeling and analysis.

Appian offers a low-code platform ideal for rapid deployment and strong mobile features. In comparison, Apache Airflow excels in data orchestration with Python-based flexibility. Tech buyers choose Appian for business management or Airflow for cost-effective, open-source data solutions.

Appian excels in rapid application development with low-code ease, suitable for agile workflows and quick deployment. In comparison, Celonis focuses on process mining with advanced analytics for deep insights, ideal for organizations optimizing processes and seeking real-time analytics.

Appian is ideal for rapid application deployment with robust low-code features, while SnapLogic excels in seamless system integration with user-friendly interfaces. In comparison, SnapLogic offers more flexibility in data integration and ETL, whereas Appian focuses on business process management and mobile integration.

Appian excels in low-code development and process modeling, ideal for streamlined business processes. In comparison, GitHub CoPilot enhances developer productivity through AI-driven code suggestions. A tech buyer might choose Appian for rapid application deployment or GitHub CoPilot for its code generation efficiency.

Appian offers agility in business solutions with process design, integration, and low-code development. In comparison, Microsoft Azure App Service excels in scalability and seamless integration with Microsoft tools, catering to those reliant on Microsoft ecosystems for application development.

Appian offers rapid low-code development, ideal for quick ROI and efficient case management. In comparison, Bonita supports versatile deployment across Mac and Windows, with strong customization and process modeling, making it suitable for complex workflows requiring flexibility and extensive user customization.

Appian excels in rapid development and flexible deployment. In comparison, Hyland OnBase offers robust security and document control. Appian suits companies needing agile BPM, while Hyland OnBase is ideal for sectors requiring strict compliance, offering strong audit trails and integration flexibility.

Appian excels with rapid deployment and extensive automation, appealing to those seeking comprehensive business process management. In comparison, Nintex offers robust workflows and integration with SharePoint, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing ease of use and integration flexibility.

Appian excels in business process modeling and low-code development, ideal for rapid application creation and seamless case management. In comparison, AWS Step Functions offer strong cloud service integration and task parallelization within the AWS ecosystem, appealing to those prioritizing cloud adaptability and detailed workflow visualization.

Appian excels in rapid application development, integrating seamlessly with existing systems and providing strong automation capabilities. In comparison, ADONIS stands out with comprehensive modeling capabilities and strong analytics features. Appian offers faster deployment and responsive customer service, while ADONIS provides extensive training resources and structured deployment.

Appian excels in rapid low-code development with strong process design, ideal for BPM and case management. In comparison, ServiceNow focuses on IT service management, offering robust automation and AI, suitable for large enterprises needing scalable workflow integration and operational efficiency.

Appian's features capitalize on rapid development with low-code, while IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in integrating RPA for complex processes. In comparison, tech buyers benefit from Appian's cloud flexibility and affordability, whereas IBM's comprehensive functionality appeals to enterprises prioritizing extensive infrastructure.

Appian excels in rapid development and integration, making it suitable for enterprises needing robust process automation and real-time analytics. In comparison, QuickBase offers simplicity for non-programmers with quick app creation and customization, ideal for smaller businesses needing flexibility and ease of use.

Appian focuses on rapid low-code development and strong process modeling, ideal for agile enterprises. In comparison, ARIS Cloud enhances business process modeling and collaboration. Appian's competitive pricing offers fast ROI, while ARIS Cloud aligns with cloud cost savings due to reduced infrastructure expenses.

Appian automates business processes with low-code efficiency and robust integration, appealing to enterprises seeking rapid ROI. In comparison, Temporal's focus on developer-oriented features makes it ideal for managing complex workflows, beneficial for companies prioritizing fault tolerance in microservice environments.

Appian offers a low-code environment enhancing rapid deployment and flexible pricing. In comparison, Oracle BPM focuses on robust integration capabilities with established standards. Appian appeals to those seeking cost-effectiveness and speed, while Oracle BPM suits enterprises needing comprehensive features and integration strength.

Appian excels with its comprehensive tools and ease of use. In comparison, Oracle Visual Builder Cloud Service attracts those invested in Oracle's ecosystem with its integration capabilities. Appian targets rapid deployment in business processes, while Oracle suits clients needing seamless integration with Oracle applications.

Appian excels with its low-code rapid deployment and robust integration capabilities, making it ideal for customizable solutions. In comparison, Unqork's no-code approach with AI integration simplifies complex tasks, appealing to tech buyers seeking cost-effective, flexible development with modern UI components.

Appian offers an intuitive design and seamless integration, ideal for rapid application development. In comparison, BIC Platform is preferred for feature richness and robust process modeling. Appian's efficiency supports faster ROI, whereas BIC Platform's in-depth capabilities justify long-term strategic investment.

Appian excels with competitive pricing and powerful automation for quick returns. In comparison, iGrafx Process360 Live Platform offers advanced process insights and specialized support, appealing to those needing comprehensive analysis and governance, despite a higher initial investment.

Appian excels in rapid development with low-code capabilities and robust integration for complex workflows. In comparison, Studio Creatio offers a flexible platform for process automation with no-code options. Appian provides extensive deployment choices, while Studio Creatio stands out for flexibility and reasonable pricing.

Appian provides robust low-code development for complex processes with advanced workflow creation capabilities. In comparison, Zoho Creator offers flexibility in interactive report creation for simpler applications. Appian handles complex queries well, while Zoho Creator is more cost-effective for small to mid-sized businesses.

Appian provides rapid deployment and robust capabilities suited for enterprise-level use. In comparison, KiSSFLOW offers ease of use and quick setup, ideal for non-technical users. Appian's higher costs bring extensive features, while KiSSFLOW's affordability and simplicity attract smaller organizations.

Appian attracts tech buyers with its intuitive low-code platform, prioritizing ease of use and rapid deployment. In comparison, OpenText Operations Orchestration appeals to those requiring comprehensive automation, despite a more complex setup, offering depth for intricate processes and extensive orchestration needs.

Appian offers rapid development and robust process design, appealing for quick deployment. It excels in integration and mobility features. In comparison, BizTalk Server stands out for its strong integration capacity and ability to manage sophisticated business processes with long-running transactions.

Appian excels in integration, streamlining processes for businesses needing connectivity. In comparison, AgilePoint's adaptability and customization make it ideal for versatile solutions. AgilePoint emphasizes swift deployment with strong support, while Appian's automation may require longer setup but offers significant integration benefits.

Appian offers advanced workflow automation and rapid application development. In comparison, Newgen OmniFlow provides robust document management and integration capabilities. Appian is suitable for quick deployment needs, while Newgen excels with flexible, modular solutions. Appian focuses on comprehensive features, whereas Newgen emphasizes scalable customizability.

Appian excels in low-code development speed and ease of use, offering flexibility suitable for diverse business needs. In comparison, Boomi prioritizes integration flexibility, optimal for connecting multiple systems. Appian offers broader deployment options, while Boomi emphasizes cloud-based scalability for smaller businesses.

Appian enhances rapid development through low-code capabilities and BPMN 2.0 workflow automation. In comparison, Jitterbit Vinyl offers a no-code approach with strong data connectivity and easy deployment, attracting businesses needing swift application implementation across various platforms and IT infrastructures.

Appian offers a low-code platform for rapid application development and agile workflow management. In comparison, OpenText AppWorks emphasizes strong third-party integration and scalable workflow capabilities, making it suitable for complex business processes that require efficient process monitoring and system integration.

Appian appeals to those seeking cost-effective, rapid application development with strong customer support. In comparison, Adobe ColdFusion attracts users needing extensive server-side technology and flexible deployment, despite higher costs. Appian's simplicity contrasts Adobe ColdFusion's complexity, catering to different technical needs and budgets.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint excels in document management and SharePoint integration, making it ideal for secure workflows. In comparison, Appian's rapid low-code development and adaptability make it suitable for businesses seeking fast application deployment and efficient process modeling.