

Appian and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the business process management category. Based on feature versatility and user collaboration, SAP Signavio might have the upper hand in ease of use and process transparency.
Features: Appian offers a robust forms builder with low-code development for web and mobile platforms, strong integration capabilities, and adherence to BPMN 2.0. It supports comprehensive process modeling and case management. SAP Signavio Process Manager shines in process modeling and collaboration with its user-friendly Collaboration Hub, facilitating process transparency and engagement. It is appreciated for its visualization tools and simplicity in designing and managing processes.
Room for Improvement: Appian could benefit from enhanced interface customization, improved mobile integration, and better scalability options. Users suggest comprehensive documentation improvements. SAP Signavio Process Manager needs better integration with external systems, enhanced process governance, and more flexible analytics features. Users highlight the need for improved user experience and collaboration capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian and SAP Signavio both offer versatile deployment options, including cloud and on-premises setups. Appian is praised for its responsive customer service and technical support, with a focus on maintaining service quality. SAP Signavio provides competitive customer service but may require specialized support for large-scale deployments due to interface and scalability challenges.
Pricing and ROI: Appian offers perceived good value with rapid development leading to significant ROI, despite being costly compared to smaller solutions. Its flexible pricing models are also noted. SAP Signavio is considered a worthwhile investment given its process management features, with users acknowledging its high price, potential enterprise license negotiation, and accessibility challenges for smaller businesses.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
We can draw and document our processes, then analyze data within SAP Signavio Process Manager.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
I would rate their technical support a ten.
I have not encountered issues myself, but one of my colleagues found that support was provided quite late, resolving the problem in one or two days rather than instantly.
I think they must provide better solutions that are accessible for all of them.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
It should also integrate with non-SAP systems for better functionality.
I think the price of SAP Signavio Process Manager is a little bit high.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
The ability to perform queries is a feature unique to SAP Signavio Process Manager, and it proves to be very useful for our needs.
It has a tool that analyzes your data and shows you where the areas of change for improvement are.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| SAP Signavio Process Manager | 4.4% |
| Appian | 3.7% |
| Other | 91.9% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.
Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.
Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.