No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.8
Celonis improves efficiency and reduces costs by up to 80%, with ROI seen in 9 to 11 months.
Sentiment score
5.7
SAP Signavio Process Manager enhances efficiency, saves costs, reduces onboarding time, and improves collaboration, offering indirect time-saving benefits.
In the first couple of years, I would not expect a return on investment because the initial setup will take more than a year if the process requires significant customization.
Senior Business Intelligence Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
In my opinion, there's a positive return on investment.
Head of Commercial Excellence at Sartorius AG
I have seen a return on investment, especially in time saved for my clients; in the incident management process, the average cycle time for handling tickets was over ninety-eight hours, but after identifying root causes, such as tickets being held due to wrong group allocation, the cycle time reduced to approximately thirty-eight hours.
Process Mining Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
We can draw and document our processes, then analyze data within SAP Signavio Process Manager.
process and methods manager at Altitude Infrastructure
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.7
Celonis support is praised for responsiveness but criticized for inconsistencies and slower responses, especially for smaller contracts.
Sentiment score
6.7
SAP Signavio Process Manager support is efficient and responsive, offering timely assistance with room for consistent quality improvement.
It took more than two weeks to receive a response.
Senior Business Intelligence Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Celonis customer support is really good; they investigate concerns thoroughly and provide solutions or troubleshooting steps, which I find helpful.
Process Mining Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Other times I do not get much clarity on the support from the team.
Data Engineer at a pharma/biotech company with 10,001+ employees
I would rate their technical support a ten.
process and methods manager at Altitude Infrastructure
We had countless connects with the product team to resolve issues related to LeanIX integration.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
I have not encountered issues myself, but one of my colleagues found that support was provided quite late, resolving the problem in one or two days rather than instantly.
data analyst at dbs global university
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Celonis provides scalable solutions with seamless integration, accommodating enterprise roles and data needs while managing deployment and cost considerations.
Sentiment score
7.2
SAP Signavio Process Manager excels in scalability, enhancing user growth and adaptability with seamless deployments and collaborative support.
I recall that when we started using Celonis, we had a space of five terabytes and around one thousand users, and Celonis managed all of that easily.
Senior Business Intelligence Analyst at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
I recommend focusing on recent data or perhaps five years of historical data along with live data for better visibility and stability in the process.
Process Mining Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
At the moment, I'd rate scalability six or seven out of ten.
Senior Development Manager at Lutech
Almost all customers would buy into this because it is offering a benchmark, enabling them to see what they are investing in and its value.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Celonis is stable with minor issues, reliable performance, effective task handling, and stability ratings generally between eight and ten.
Sentiment score
7.5
SAP Signavio Process Manager is highly stable, with occasional minor issues usually attributed to external factors and quickly resolved.
It's super stable.
Head of Commercial Excellence at Sartorius AG
Celonis is stable.
Management Data Engineer & Governance Senior Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The multiple channels it offers in terms of transparency allow many people to share and communicate without needing external channels, which makes it very reliable.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
 

Room For Improvement

Celonis needs improvements in integration, usability, automation, visualization, pricing, and support, including better documentation and data handling.
SAP Signavio Process Manager needs improved collaboration, integration, customization, and performance, with enhanced analytics and more flexible pricing.
Ultimately, I need niche expertise, combining strong SAP knowledge with Celonis competency.
Head of Commercial Excellence at Sartorius AG
It is essential for the Celonis solution to have their services and solution models integrated with GenAI.
Senior Development Manager at Lutech
The most important area for improvement is the automation part.
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
It should also integrate with non-SAP systems for better functionality.
data analyst at dbs global university
I think the price of SAP Signavio Process Manager is a little bit high.
Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
 

Setup Cost

Celonis pricing is costly for SMEs, with variable costs based on data usage, making it a significant investment.
SAP Signavio Process Manager offers flexible pricing, with costs ranging from $150,000 to $800,000 annually, depending on needs.
I think it's relatively expensive, but it's also good.
Head of Commercial Excellence at Sartorius AG
Based on client feedback, I have heard that the pricing for Celonis is considered high.
Senior Application Developer at Fujitsu
creating a data model for one process will differ in cost if you add more data models for additional processes.
Process Mining Consultant at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford.
process and methods manager at Altitude Infrastructure
From an India INR standpoint, it felt pricey initially. But at the same time, I think the value it brought to the organization was much greater than what we paid for.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
 

Valuable Features

Celonis excels in process mining and automation with intuitive dashboards, seamless integration, and user-friendly UI for data-driven decisions.
SAP Signavio excels in usability, collaboration, and optimization, facilitating transparent process management and strategic alignment through intuitive tools and data analysis.
Celonis is also beneficial for its built-in apps that streamline tasks from legacy applications, facilitating daily operations and improving efficiency.
Senior Application Developer at Fujitsu
It provides a visualization of the process itself, giving a very good synthesis of performance and helping me find improvements.
Head of Commercial Excellence at Sartorius AG
It's the first solution that combines business competence and capabilities with technological capabilities.
Senior Development Manager at Lutech
The ability to perform queries is a feature unique to SAP Signavio Process Manager, and it proves to be very useful for our needs.
process and methods manager at Altitude Infrastructure
It has a tool that analyzes your data and shows you where the areas of change for improvement are.
Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The third most important feature from a process excellence standpoint is the repository that is provided. There is a dictionary feature that avoids duplication and allows processes to be standardized across regardless of which teams build the process maps.
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
 

Categories and Ranking

Celonis
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
60
Ranking in other categories
Process Mining (2nd), AI Data Analysis (7th)
SAP Signavio Process Manager
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
63
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Design (4th), Business Process Management (BPM) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Process, Business Automation, and Digital Transformation solutions, they serve different purposes. Celonis is designed for Process Mining and holds a mindshare of 14.4%, down 20.5% compared to last year.
SAP Signavio Process Manager, on the other hand, focuses on Business Process Design, holds 6.8% mindshare, down 9.2% since last year.
Process Mining Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Celonis14.4%
Microsoft Power Automate11.8%
Automation Anywhere9.9%
Other63.9%
Process Mining
Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager6.8%
Bizagi8.4%
Camunda8.0%
Other76.8%
Business Process Design
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Content Manager at PeerSpot
Oct 31, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

EA
Data Engineer at Baker Hughes
Process mining has delivered major savings and now needs better automation and task mining
Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as strong as SaaS support. The most important area for improvement is the automation part. End-to-end automation capabilities are desired. Currently, workflows are being used, but actions should be able to go via email, task, APIs, and ultimately write back to the source. Adding RPA capability that can interact with required systems and write back to the source would greatly enhance Celonis. Task mining capabilities also require improvement. UiPath Process Mining and Microsoft Process Mining have better task mining capabilities compared to Celonis. Usability and support from Celonis need improvement. They should help clients find more value in the product. Cost is another significant concern, as Celonis is very expensive compared to other process mining tools. The license cost should be reduced. Celonis should establish partnerships with clients to find more use cases and maximize the value gained from Celonis.
Sravani Bodanapu - PeerSpot reviewer
Intelligent Ops Journey Expert at ANZ Banking Group
Process modeling has standardized complex banking workflows and drives data‑driven automation decisions
I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be able to access it via collaborative features, and as well be able to communicate, making it less people dependent and more process dependent. A small gap of one is only because if the map has to be shared or if somebody has to work together on a map, similar to how we have Google Forms where more than two people can make changes simultaneously, the map does not allow that. One has to close it, and the next partner can only access the map after I close it. The existing changes are lost if they click on ignore or if they close the diagram. This is one feature which is sometimes bothersome. The gap of one is something that is personal feedback from my end. If someone is a newbie and they are building a map for the first time, they definitely go through a training module. But if somebody is jumping right in to build a map for the first time, which I did more than a couple of years ago, I felt that given the extent to which we have artificial intelligence capabilities right now, it would be nice if whenever you are saving a diagram and if I build it incorrectly in terms of adhering to BPMN 2.0, errors are shown, which is really nice. There are errors and warnings that need to be corrected to adhere to the standards. It is great that it allows me to save, but in order to correct the errors, if I do not understand what the error is trying to tell me. For example, sometimes it says that the element is named wrong. I understand that; it is a verb and noun that is a requirement. But sometimes it says the edge folding is not clear, and despite trying several times, I still do not get it. SAP could consider having AI capabilities to suggest how it can be done immediately on the screen itself, perhaps in the form of a virtual assistant or something. Today, for larger errors, I go to Google to check it and try to understand. If an assistant tells me that I think the arrow may be placed wrong, I think that would help me. It would save time and help me from looking up multiple dictionaries to understand what it is trying to say. At the moment, we are not integrating SAP Signavio Process Manager with existing ERP systems because internally I think we are using multiple enterprise resource planning tools. Because of that, there is a restraint to connect it with SAP Signavio Process Manager, and there is a lot of concern in terms of how data could be used because we work in a banking environment. We are not leveraging, and we have SAP S/4HANA. It would be great if there is a data lake that connects to the process, but at the moment, we do not do that. Every time we build a process, it is picked up by a different team, and they try to connect it with the data lake. It is a great feature which I think can be leveraged, but with the range of legacy systems that the company is using today, there is not much I can comment about how the ERP can be leveraged internally.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Mining solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business9
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise44
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business17
Midsize Enterprise6
Large Enterprise45
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?
SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Celonis?
I am not heavily involved in that particular aspect, but I have heard that Celonis is somewhat expensive.
What needs improvement with Celonis?
Collaboration with ERPs should be improved. Compared to SAP Signavio, Celonis is less competitive for BPMN modeling. Deployment flexibility needs enhancement, as on-premises support is not as stron...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?
I am not aware of the pricing and licensing of SAP Signavio Process Manager in the current firm I am working for. However, in my last company, Fidelity International, I was introduced to SAP Signav...
What advice do you have for others considering Signavio Process Manager?
I do use the collaborative workspace feature of SAP Signavio Process Manager. Our stakeholders who are outside of SAP Signavio Process Manager environment do use the collaborative feature because t...
What needs improvement with SAP Signavio Process Manager?
I would assess the impact of process modeling features on operational transparency as a four. I give it a four because of how well the platform could be utilized if one has a license or would be ab...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Signavio Process Editor
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Anheuser-Busch InBev, AXA, Bayer, Cisco, Deloitte, Deutsche Telekom, Hitachi, Kellogg's, Lufthansa, and Whirlpool
DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten
Find out what your peers are saying about Automation Anywhere, Celonis, Microsoft and others in Process Mining. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.