

Appian and Nintex Process Platform compete in the process management solutions category. Appian has the upper hand due to its rapid deployment, low-code platform, and flexible pricing, leading to faster ROI.
Features: Appian offers rapid development with low-code, enabling quick app implementation. Its case management and data handling provide efficient support for complex processes. Nintex excels with extensive workflow automation and integration, particularly with Microsoft platforms, and includes features like LazyApproval and mobile access.
Room for Improvement: Appian could enhance customization options, particularly in UI elements and mobile integration, and improve DevOps support and error reporting. Nintex may benefit from richer customization capabilities and a more flexible architecture, along with advancements in AI integration and error reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appian's flexible deployment options span across various cloud and on-premises settings, offering scalability. Users praise its responsive customer service, though capacity is slightly challenged as growth continues. Nintex primarily favors on-premises environments within Microsoft ecosystems but is viewed as resource-intensive. Customer service for Nintex receives mixed reviews, with some users experiencing high costs and slower responses, despite knowledgeable technical support.
Pricing and ROI: Appian is competitively priced with flexible licensing models, often resulting in quicker ROI due to its low-code development. Nintex's pricing structure, based on workflow consumption, can be costly for extensive use, yet it delivers noticeable returns through process efficiencies.
Using Appian is saving us five full-time employees, which is significant since we currently have only four team members.
They see return on investment in terms of cost savings, time savings, more efficient processes, and more efficient employees.
The Return on Investment is significant.
I would give Appian's customer support 10 out of 10 due to their next-level support.
Their customer service is responsive, and the team is very prompt for support.
The technical support for Appian rates as 10 out of 10 because they have a great support team.
I found the support to be excellent with immediate responses whenever I open a ticket.
On a scale of one to 10, Appian rates as a nine for scalability.
Our volume has increased by 20% in the two years since using Appian, and it can handle the increased volume effectively.
Initially, without much coding, I can easily handle five thousand records.
Performance issues arise if we have multiple joins within the actions, which definitely reduces the performance.
We have tested Appian during peak usage and off-peak times, and we have not experienced any issues such as lagging or system disruptions.
It depends on how it has been designed and how it has been configured.
The stability of Appian would rate as nine, as it's a stable environment.
Performance issues arise if we have multiple joins within the actions, which definitely reduces the performance.
It has room to improve for use cases where the users are public facing, where anonymous users could come to a site and run a business workflow or interact with some data.
Appian can be improved by adding a geo-location tagging feature, which would be really helpful for identifying remitter addresses.
It also suggests the best automation process that can be configured within Appian.
If we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
Appian provides value for money, is easy to use, has a straightforward setup procedure, and offers great support from the Appian team.
On the pricier side, both Appian and Pega are enterprise-level solutions, placing them on the slightly higher side.
The pricing of Appian is based on the number of users and generally ranges from 70 to 100 USD per user per month.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
The zero-code integration feature is remarkable, allowing for ease of data transfer and workflow enhancement.
Appian is aiding in leveraging AI technologies in multiple ways: one way is for developers, as they make development efficient and quick by enabling developer co-pilots across various phases of the application, which helps design Appian quickly and provides suggestions along the way.
After switching to Appian, it can extract data from MT103, eliminating the need for manual data entry.
We use Nintex Process Platform for process automation.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Appian | 3.7% |
| Nintex Process Platform | 1.6% |
| Other | 94.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 44 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 6 |
| Large Enterprise | 25 |
Appian is a unified low-code platform and solution used by businesses to build enterprise applications and workflows. This product adapts to the needs of clients and the technologies they are already using to combine their data in a single workflow and maximize resources. The platform has four main components through which it transforms the work process for companies of various sizes. They are:
Appian is utilized across a diverse set of industries, including automotive and manufacturing, energy and utilities, education, financial services, telecom and media, transportation, retail, insurance, healthcare, and life sciences. The most frequent use cases of Appian are customer journey, governance, risk and compliance, operational efficiency, supply chain, distributed order management, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) management.
Appian Features
Appian has various features that allow users to create solutions for their businesses. These features can be separated into a few groups according to function, including automation, low-code application development, and integrations and data. Some of the most frequently used features of Appian include:
Appian Benefits
The benefits of using Appian include:
Reviews from Real Users
A practice leader - digital process automation at a computer software company values Appian highly because the product is easy to develop, low-code, and has a good user interface.
Alan G., an advisory board member at Codecon VR, Appian offers a clear application life cycle, easy to learn documentation, and comes with a fundamentals course.
Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.
Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.
What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.