AgilePoint offers rapid app development through automation and digitization with a low-code, no-code approach, integrating seamlessly into business processes.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AgilePoint | 1.5% |
| Camunda | 7.2% |
| IBM BPM | 4.0% |
| Other | 87.3% |
AgilePoint efficiently automates business workflows, transforming traditional document-based processes into digital applications. With integrations like Dynamics 365 and SharePoint, users automate approvals and workflows involving multiple stakeholders. AgilePoint's intuitive design enables the rapid crafting of workflows, allowing teams to develop forms, reports, and custom portals suitable for complex environments. Its strengths lie in process management, application integration, and ease of use, enabling efficient data management and access through anonymous forms.
What are AgilePoint's key features?In industries like corporate enterprises, AgilePoint is leveraged to automate workflows, creating form-based applications that streamline tasks such as idea submission and file management. Its robust functionality meets complex process needs, ensuring efficient data handling across departments.
Caja Laboral, Elbit Systems, Daisy Brand
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Technology Officer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees | 4.5 | I use AgilePoint for business process automation, appreciating its intuitive interface and low-code solutions for quick application development. However, it struggles with complex applications, and marketing should clarify its limitations. I've also explored Microsoft Power Platform Power Apps. |
| Automation Developer at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 3.5 | We use AgilePoint for idea submission, benefiting from its process management and integration capabilities. However, it lacks a knowledge base and wider integration options like Python. Previously, we used Power Apps, which offered more customization and information. |
| Senior Technical Developer at Naseej AAS | 4.5 | Working in one of the world's largest companies, I use AgilePoint for creating forms, workflows, and custom portals despite its challenging process. We integrate it with Dynamics 365 and SharePoint, though improvements in design, AI, and UX are needed. |
| Partner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I find AgilePoint easy to use with good design and integration, and support is efficient. Though I wish it were more flexible, it's stable, scalable, and setup was effortless. I rate it an eight out of ten. |
| Knowledge Management & BPM Department Manager at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I find AgilePoint excellent for its rapid workflow design and forms, with a straightforward setup. However, its UI and client portal need improvement, support is slow, and it lacks Docker support for enhanced scalability. |
| Implementation Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | I use AgilePoint for easy web forms, which improved our organization. I'm confident in its stability and scalability, but desire more IDM connectors and training. Despite initial vendor issues, I rate it 8/10. |
Positive
We use AgilePoint for an idea submission application for our business processes. It allows managers to review and update the approved idea on the dashboard.
AgilePoint's most valuable feature is process management. We can integrate it with many applications including Microsoft, UiPath, and other development tools. We can host it anonymously. It allows us to give the application access to outside users using an anonymous form.
There could be a knowledge base or a learning network included in the product. They should add more information about functionality. Additionally, it needs more integration with tools like Python apart from JavaScript.
We have been using AgilePoint for one and a half years.
The platform is relatively stable. There are times when it runs slowly. It is time-consuming to load.
The platform is relatively scalable and depends on the number of licenses. If you are using an enterprise license, it allows 1000 users to log on simultaneously. They offer various licensing options which you can use across your organization.
The technical support team replies to the queries within a day.
Neutral
We have been utilizing Power Apps. It is a comparatively more customizable, easier build process and provides more information than AgilePoint.
For maintenance, our application support team refreshes the server to incorporate changes. The process is faster.
I rate AgilePoint a seven out of ten.
I use AgilePoint in one of the world's largest companies where I currently work. My team and I worked together and created forms, workflows, reports, emails, and a custom portal, which was a very difficult process. Sometimes, we use Dynamics 365 with Logic Apps and AgilePoint for some of our use cases. In AgilePoint, I have worked with SharePoint.
I use everything in the solution, but there are still difficult situations and processes to handle in my company. We use a lot of business processes and business models along with a lot of integrations in our IT environment.
Some issues with AgilePoint's design, AI and UX are some of the major problems we deal with when handling our company's business models or processes. The aforementioned area can be considered for improvement and to make the product more efficient.
I have been using AgilePoint for two years. I use the solution's latest version. My company has a partnership with AgilePoint.
AgilePoint is a stable solution. I rate the product's stability a seven out of ten.
I rate the product's scalability a seven out of ten.
The initial setup of AgilePoint was very easy.
Price-wise, AgilePoint is a cheap tool and a standard application for running analytics in an IT environment.
I would tell those planning to use the solution that there are certain limitations in the product, considering how difficult it is to do a few things in the database.
I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten.
I like the design and the integration capacity. It's also easy to use.
It could be more flexible, but it's already a good solution for the designer.
It would be better if we could reuse cards and forms. But I think they plan to factorize it to work with common components between the different projects to reuse cards and forms.
We have been using AgilePoint for about one year.
AgilePoint is a stable solution.
AgilePoint is scalable, and about 25 people use it in our company. Sometimes it's more, depending on the project.
Technical support is very reactive and efficient.
We used Nintex 12 years ago. I switched to AgilePoint when I started working for a different company. We used Nintex for SharePoint and educated people about the application. Each time there were some external components that we used to get SharePoint. I still use Nintex for one project, but not much.
The initial setup and installation are effortless. It takes us about two hours to install the software. Then we decide the process, and configuration and that may take some time. It also depends on the cloud.
I think the price is reasonable.
I would tell new users that it's easy to use, but they need to think about data management and data evolution. It should be their main focus.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give AgilePoint an eight.
Anytime companies need any solution with workflow, they can base it on AgilePoint, because AgilePoint allows companies to design and implement workflows very fast using the system's interface.
The solution's workflows are its most useful feature.
The solution has very good forms.
The user interface and the client portal need to be improved in order to make the solution much better. I would like to see customer portals that are more open. Currently, it's very, very closed. You can't change anything or customize it for your customers. You can't change the web files that you see there, for example.
The solution should be able to support Docker. This would help make scalability easier.
Technical support is very slow to respond and they need to be quicker in getting back to clients when problems arise.
I've been using the solution for about half a year or so.
It's a very stable system in every way except in terms of the communication with other products. There sometimes are issues with the Active Directory connectivity and things like that. However, overall, it's a very stable system.
The scalability is okay, however, it doesn't support Docker. It's okay, but it could be improved.
We have been in contact with our local support team, and they have been okay. As far as I know, the main support team of the product itself is okay as well. However, they have a long response time. Typically it takes a couple of days for anyone to get back to us. It's an issue.
I was involved in the solution from the start of the project and then worked as a solution architect. From designing the project up until the end of the deployment and the delivery of the project, I was involved.
The solution's initial setup is very straightforward. It's quite simple.
Installation and the total deployment took about a week or two. The workflows, however, could take some time. It's something that changes and it depends on the design of the document.
On each project, about five people were used to implement the solution, including an infrastructure expert.
We only need one person for maintenance on each project.
I believe the pricing has changed recently. We had purchased one license per server, and it was about $2,000. It was a one-time payment. It's possible that they have recently implemented a new cost structure and now have yearly subscriptions.
In the past, for each module, for example, the forms module, companies needed to pay more.
Our clients are typically enterprise-level organizations and governments.
I'd advise other companies to ask for a trial version and play with it in the cloud before purchasing the solution.
The solution takes the relation to the workflow very seriously. For any standards of workflow processes, they have it built-in. Everything is very, very logical, and very smart. It's a great solution.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. Overall, it's a great product.
AgilePoint has improved our organization by making form implementation easier and to plan for future growth.
For now, the most valuable feature for us is the ability to build web forms. The interface is very easy to use.
While the platform is good and it has a lot of options, I would like to see more alternative features in future versions such as connectors to IDM. Currently, they have only ADFS and Okta.
It would also be good to have more user information, such as:
In all, we are confident enough with the stability of the product to move ahead with it for future planning and implementation.
While we have not been using the product for a long time and have only implemented smaller projects, we're planning to build a bigger portal for forms that will be used by all the users. So we are confident at this point in the scalability of the solution.
We were getting support through the local vendor we hired, but we weren't satisfied with them. So we get our support now from AgilePoint e-mail. It seems sufficient for our current needs.
AgilePoint is the first true BPM (Business Process Management) system we have used.
We had another platform that was more of an orchestration of components. The solution was very powerful but it was not exactly what we needed for the future.
Because we are a closed environment with many restrictions, it made deployment more difficult. So, while we had some issues at the beginning with the installation and the environment, it was more our needs that got in the way than issues with the product itself. In addition, the vendor we chose to do the installation was not experienced with the product.
The installation was done by a vendor representative in Israel. We experienced professional issues. He made a few mistakes so deployment took a few weeks. Had we selected another vendor who was more knowledgeable, the installation might have taken half a day.
We tested only two environments before deciding on AgilePoint. K2 by SourceCode Technology was the other product. They are really very similar products.
Before deciding to implement any BPM solution, start designing the processes. Knowing what functions you want to manage is important for choosing and implementing the solution.
I would rate it an eight out ten.
