Arbor DDoS vs CDN77 comparison

NETSCOUT and CDN77.com are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. NETSCOUT is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3, while CDN77.com is ranked #29. NETSCOUT holds a 9.3% mindshare in DDOS, compared to CDN77.com’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of CDN77.com users who would recommend it.

Arbor DDoS

Read 56 Arbor DDoS reviews

5,626 Views
5,288 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

CDN77

Read 3 CDN77 reviews

483 Views
386 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

CDN77

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Arbor DDoS and CDN77 are competing in the network performance and security sector. Arbor DDoS has the upper hand in security due to its advanced threat analysis, while CDN77 is superior in speed and content delivery efficiency.

Features: Arbor DDoS provides high-level threat detection, traffic analysis, and tailored defense strategies. CDN77 enables fast data delivery, has multiple data centers worldwide, and offers easy website integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive deployment that may require more setup time, with customer service focusing on security issues. CDN77 has a quicker and seamless deployment process with an intuitive interface, and offers equally responsive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Arbor DDoS involves a higher initial setup cost due to its specialized security features but ensures high ROI through enhanced network protection. CDN77 presents competitive pricing models with efficient solutions, providing satisfactory ROI through fast content delivery and increased user satisfaction.

To learn more, read our detailed Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77 Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

CDN77

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

29th

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 9.3%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of CDN77 is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arbor DDoS	9.3%
CDN77	1.2%
Other	89.5%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Sanjin Zuhric

Team Lead Network Engineer at Artco Group d.o.o Sarajevo

Reliable protection ensures robust network defense and simplifies DDoS management

I am not sure if we plan to use additional features because we have many vendors and platforms that we support. We use the main function and that is it. The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high. A potential improvement could be establishing a contract with Cisco to sell via their channel. This could be beneficial because we work extensively with Cisco. If you are a Cisco partner, you can sell Arbor DDoS. That would be good for customers that are Cisco-based because many customers in Bosnia are Cisco-based customers. BH Telecom, our main customer, sells Arbor DDoS to other customers for protection. They buy Arbor and sell the product services to others via Internet links. They sell add-on DDoS protection via Arbor DDoS. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Arbor DDoS is not present in many customers. Some customers try to sell it, but they sell other vendors such as F5. Arbor DDoS is mainly seen in telecom operators but not much in other customers.

Read full review

it_user854160

Broadspectrum

Provides quick access to resources

We are a radio station who serves up music It has improved our organization by providing quick access to resources. CDN Speed Data center availability around the world This product satisfies our company needs. No additional features are required as far as we are concerned. More than five…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We also use it by serving our customers' cloud signaling services with on-premise APS devices."

"The stateless device format means that the box is very strong for preventing DDoS attacks."

"The product allows us to check real-time progress, including latency and network activities."

"The feature I find most valuable is the packet capture, which beautifully shows the communication between the client and the server, identifying potential malicious activity."

"The auto-mitigation, that signaling feature, where it automatically raises an alarm that a line is under attack, is important. The upstream service provider will then do something to reduce the load on our internet lines. The fact that it's automated means I don't have to sit and always be looking at threats coming through. It does it almost automatically, without any intervention by me."

"Arbor has a global ranking in reliability and credibility. They are very unique and can respond to a very wide scope of threats from their global deployment."

"Using standard BGP, NetFlow and SNMP ensure wide compatibility. There are also peering traffic reports that can help identify upstream peering opportunities. The ATLAS aggregation service allows us to contribute to the global DDoS data and benefit from overall trends."

"There are a number of valuable features in this product, like Cloud Signaling and Threat Intelligence feeds."

More Arbor DDoS pros

"I selected CDN77 because it has servers where our different target markets are (some are in Asia)."

"It has improved our organization by providing quick access to resources."

"The control panel is nicely laid out and I do not have to hunt for functionality."

"It has helped improve load speed on the site."

"It is extremely easy to set up and integrate with WordPress and purge files as needed through the control panel."

"Purge pages: It is a fast solution for updating my content from all datacenters."

Cons

"On the application layer, they could have a better distributed traffic flow. They could improve that a bit. For network data it is very effective, but the application layer can be improved."

"Based on my experience and feedback from colleagues, Arbor can make better use of the product because you have to spend a lot of time finding information in a huge number of papers."

"We need a SaaS model for the solution."

"There is some room for AI to take place."

"I would also like more visibility into their bad actor feeds, their fingerprint feeds. We try to be good stewards of the internet, so if there are attacks, or bad actors within our networks, if there were an easier way for us to find them, we could stop them from doing their malicious activity, and at the same time save money."

"Auto mitigation is a feature provided when DDoS is observed on any of link/customer (configured under auto mitigation). It automatically starts mitigation with default filters. In default filter mode, there could be an impact on the customer’s link,"

"On the main page there are alerts that we are unable to clear, even though the issue has been resolved."

"There should be an automatic way to configure it to monitor traffic and decide which is an attack and which is not. In Arbor, you need to tweak and set all parameters manually, whereas in Check Point DDoS Protector, you can select the lowest parameters, and over the weeks, Check Point DDoS Protector will learn the traffic and you can then tighten some of the parameters to decide which traffic is regular and which is malicious."

More Arbor DDoS cons

"If you are a low-use user and not used the minimum credit, it will be lost at end of year unless you upgrade, then you are left with more bandwidth than you can ever use."

"A year ago, I had to deal with SEO factors involving duplication of content."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a bit costly if you're a small organization, but I think it's worth the price that they are charging."

"Arbor DDoS is quite expensive, but all these solutions are expensive because they deal with confidential information."

"I believe that the price of Arbor DDoS falls under the bracket of medium to high price."

"Start with a small license. Measure your bandwidth requirements."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap."

"Because the solutions from competitors are very different, it's not easy to compare. However, the licensing from Arbor is clear and understandable and the pricing is reasonable when looking at the market, in general."

"I don't deal with the pricing, but it seems that you need to get basic support in order to upgrade the software and implement some patches."

"As far as I know, they are the best in this sector, in DDoS protection. They know it, I know, because their service prices are too high. They provide cloud DDoS protection for ISPs, but that is also too expensive."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

"Regarding the pricing, it is expensive. It may not suit others. I suggest a lower recharge level and also to remove the credit expiry time."

"For low-use users, it can be more expensive than it seems. It would be a disadvantage for a lot of hobby users."

"I would suggest low usage cases that there are other options available, such as WordPress's own CDN."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arbor DDoS?

The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 13% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 5% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Cloudflare vs CDN77

Compared 31% of the time

Fastly vs CDN77

Compared 21% of the time

Uplynk vs CDN77

Compared 15% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs CDN77

Compared 11% of the time

KeyCDN vs CDN77

Compared 11% of the time

More CDN77 Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

February 2026

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

February 2026

Download CDN77 product report

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

No data available

Overview

Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.

Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-Friendly GUI: Provides an intuitive interface for ease of use.
Effective Mitigation: Combats high-volume DDoS attacks effectively.
Predefined Filters: Simplifies threat management with pre-configured settings.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Offers insights into traffic patterns and potential threats.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats without manual intervention.
Able to Handle High-Volume Attacks: Ensures extensive protection even under large-scale attacks.
Packet Capture and Integration: Facilitates comprehensive security analysis.
Cloud Signaling: Enhances attack traffic management through hybrid deployments.

What benefits should users expect from Arbor DDoS?

Enhanced Protection: Safeguards networks from diverse DDoS threats.
Improved Service Availability: Maintains business operations without disruptions.
Timely Reporting: Delivers detailed attack reports for proactive prevention.
AI Capabilities: Leverages AI for smarter threat mitigation strategies.
Comprehensive Security: Combines on-premise and cloud deployments for optimal defense.

Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.

NETSCOUT

CDN77 is an innovation leading content delivery network provider with global coverage of 32+ PoPs on 5 continents.

CDN77 is a great solution for many use cases - website acceleration and security, live streaming, VOD, gaming, software distribution and private CDN.

Get a 14-day free trial with unlimited features and 24/7 live support. No credit card needed. Make your content delivery faster and more secure within 5 minutes.

CDN77.com

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications

Hubble Space Telescope & European Southern Observatory, Oracle, Scania, CentOS, bet-at-home.com, Playrix, Epom Ad Server

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77

February 2026

Free Report: Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77

Find out what your peers are saying about Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77 and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arbor DDoS vs. CDN77 report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.