Arbor DDoS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection comparison

NETSCOUT and Nexusguard are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. NETSCOUT is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.3, while Nexusguard is ranked #24. NETSCOUT holds a 9.3% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Nexusguard’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NETSCOUT users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nexusguard users who would recommend it.

Arbor DDoS

Read 56 Arbor DDoS reviews

5,626 Views
5,288 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Read 5 Nexusguard DDoS Protection reviews

890 Views
890 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Arbor DDoS

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Arbor DDoS and Nexusguard DDoS Protection are products in the DDoS protection category. Arbor DDoS is favored for its flexible pricing and excellent customer support, while Nexusguard is valued for its advanced mitigation capabilities, suggesting a preference for Nexusguard due to its robust features.

Features: Arbor DDoS delivers comprehensive analytics and threat intelligence capabilities, offering extensive insight into network threats. Its solutions include both on-premise and cloud-based options, ensuring flexibility. It is enriched with real-time packet capture and traffic visualization features. Nexusguard DDoS Protection is designed with a cloud-native infrastructure and proactive threat mitigation, ideal for service providers and enterprises. It is tailored for seamless integration within current infrastructures, emphasizing scalability and advanced traffic filtering.

Room for Improvement: Arbor DDoS could enhance its scalability and user interface, focusing on simplifying the setup process for greater accessibility. It can also benefit from integrating more advanced cloud-native features. Nexusguard DDoS Protection might improve by refining its cost structure to appeal to budget-conscious users while enhancing its customer training programs. Further enrichment of its dashboard analytics for user-friendliness and enhanced detail could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nexusguard makes use of a simplified cloud-based deployment model that facilitates smooth scalability and system integration, combined with proactive customer support. Arbor DDoS offers both cloud and on-premise deployments, granting more control but requiring intricate initial setup. Its customer service is noted for being responsive. The distinction rests in Arbor’s deployment flexibility as opposed to Nexusguard’s scalability ease.

Pricing and ROI: Arbor DDoS provides competitive pricing while being customizable, making it cost-effective for budget-sensitive enterprises. Nexusguard’s premium pricing highlights its advanced features for high-demand environments, representing a considerable ROI despite its higher costs. The value for Arbor lies in price flexibility, whereas for Nexusguard it is in comprehensive defensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arbor DDoS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

24th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of Arbor DDoS is 9.3%, down from 13.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nexusguard DDoS Protection is 1.5%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Arbor DDoS	9.3%
Nexusguard DDoS Protection	1.5%
Other	89.2%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

Sanjin Zuhric

Team Lead Network Engineer at Artco Group d.o.o Sarajevo

Reliable protection ensures robust network defense and simplifies DDoS management

I am not sure if we plan to use additional features because we have many vendors and platforms that we support. We use the main function and that is it. The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high. A potential improvement could be establishing a contract with Cisco to sell via their channel. This could be beneficial because we work extensively with Cisco. If you are a Cisco partner, you can sell Arbor DDoS. That would be good for customers that are Cisco-based because many customers in Bosnia are Cisco-based customers. BH Telecom, our main customer, sells Arbor DDoS to other customers for protection. They buy Arbor and sell the product services to others via Internet links. They sell add-on DDoS protection via Arbor DDoS. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, Arbor DDoS is not present in many customers. Some customers try to sell it, but they sell other vendors such as F5. Arbor DDoS is mainly seen in telecom operators but not much in other customers.

Read full review

ShashikaKodikara

Head of Cybersecurity at Technovage Solution

A solution requiring straightforward maintenance while remaining cost-effective compared to its competitors in the market

I am not in a position to speak about the areas where the solution needed improvement because I resigned during the implementation phase. At that time, the implementation was ongoing, and everything seemed to be going well. Using the solution, our team managed to transfer a couple of routers through a few areas. However, I believe the migration is still ongoing. Nonetheless, the first phase of the implementation was successful before my departure. There was a certain level of performance degradation in the solution, which I don't know if it can be tuned. This is because I was working for a short period on the solution. In my experience, it is an area that can be improved while also considering the stability and scalability aspects of the solution. If one wants to scale up, then one needs to change their plan. However, the thing is, one can always go for the larger scale based on one's anticipation of future traffic.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution provides good protection against volumetric DDoS attacks."

"It is fully mitigating the attacks. We've dealt with other ones where we didn't necessarily see that. The detection is very good. It's also very simple to use. Arbor is a single pane of glass, whereas with other solutions you might have a detection pane of glass and then have to go to a separate interface to deal with the mitigation. That single pane of glass makes it much simpler."

"Using standard BGP, NetFlow and SNMP ensure wide compatibility. There are also peering traffic reports that can help identify upstream peering opportunities. The ATLAS aggregation service allows us to contribute to the global DDoS data and benefit from overall trends."

"We use it not only for DDoS detection and protection, but we also use it for traffic analysis and capacity planning as well. We've also been able to extend the use of it to other security measures within our company, the front-line defense, not only for DDoS, but for any kind of scanning malware that may be picked up. It's also used for outbound attacks, which has helped us mitigate those and lower our bandwidth costs..."

"The solution is flexible, easy to implement and has an efficient technical support team."

"The most valuable feature is mitigation, which can blackhole the IP."

"With real-time packet capture features, you can easily and quickly response."

"The product allows us to check real-time progress, including latency and network activities."

More Arbor DDoS pros

"The support team was helpful."

"Cloud Diversion is another good feature packaged with the whole solution. When attack traffic is detected, Cloud Diversion triggers to automatically route our prefix to Nexusguard’s scrubbing center, ensuring that all attack traffic is dropped in the shortest time possible."

"Based on the support received for implementation, I rate the solution's technical support a nine out of ten."

"The managed service allows us to confidently rely on Nexusguard’s professional team to take relevant actions as and when required to make sure DDoS attacks are successfully mitigated, ensuring 100% uptime of our service."

"Filters can be customized depending on the characteristics of the attack traffic. This feature has made it easier for Nexusguard's SOC team to further isolate any specific attack that can't be blocked by pre-configured mitigation."

Cons

"Support in Argentina is not so good. Although the team is good, they are not fast, and they lack the skills to manage dynamic attackers."

"There should be an automatic way to configure it to monitor traffic and decide which is an attack and which is not. In Arbor, you need to tweak and set all parameters manually, whereas in Check Point DDoS Protector, you can select the lowest parameters, and over the weeks, Check Point DDoS Protector will learn the traffic and you can then tighten some of the parameters to decide which traffic is regular and which is malicious."

"Sometimes it blocks legitimate traffic. If a legitimate user is trying to access the server continuously, the product suspects that this is a DoS traffic file. That is a case where it needs to improve. It needs machine-learning."

"Real-case scenarios that have taken too long to resolve or were escalated can be directly converted into articles."

"The solution's IT support needs improvement."

"A small improvement could be a better reporting system."

"The solution could be more granular to include logs per second and enhanced pipeline monitoring for router licenses."

"On the main page there are alerts that we are unable to clear, even though the issue has been resolved."

More Arbor DDoS cons

"One thing that we would like to improve from them is to provide more training to SOC team for them to have a deep understanding of the solution so that they would always be ready to answer anything without the need to escalate queries to senior personnel."

"One of the features that should be added to the next release is report generation. Currently, reports can be downloaded every month and are only available at the beginning of each month. It would be nice to generate the reports based on specific dates that we prefer and not have to wait until the next month for the current month’s report."

"The solution must provide features for the post-processing of the traffic type and the traffic quality."

"The mitigation scope of Origin Protection is not fully efficient as there could be delays in activating the countermeasures."

"There was a certain level of performance degradation in the solution, which I don't know if it can be tuned...In my experience, it is an area that can be improved while also considering the stability and scalability aspects of the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Arbor DDoS depends on many parameters. It depends on the physical capacity of the environment, and it is not a straight-line price. It's fairly competitive in the market on the price."

"The price of this solution is a little high in the African market, it should be lower."

"The solution is a bit costly if you're a small organization, but I think it's worth the price that they are charging."

"The price is a little high."

"As far as I know, they are the best in this sector, in DDoS protection. They know it, I know, because their service prices are too high. They provide cloud DDoS protection for ISPs, but that is also too expensive."

"I don't know about the pricing details as our company's service provider offers us the solution as an inbuilt feature within the internet bandwidth they provide us."

"The pricing of the solution is cheap."

"Regarding pricing, I would rate it as average. Arbor DDoS offers good value for money with our DDoS filter device. For higher protection needs, Arbor’s CloudMeter’s DDoS mitigation or hardware devices might be more expensive, but customers who need them are usually prepared for the cost and the additional resources required."

More Arbor DDoS pricing and cost advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one represents a cheap option, and ten represents an expensive option, I would rate the solution a seven in terms of cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

36%

Media Company

10%

Educational Organization

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	25
Midsize Enterprise	14
Large Enterprise	29

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

I would say if it’s an ISP that will build a scrubbing center, Netscout/Arbor is a good solution. In all other solutions, Imperva is a great choice.

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Arbor would be the best bid, apart from Arbor, Palo Alto and Fortinet have good solutions. As this is an ISP, I would prefer Arbor.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Arbor DDoS?

The prices for Arbor DDoS are expensive. The licensing is subscription-based. From our sales department, they discuss that prices are very high.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Radware DDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 13% of the time

Corero vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Arbor DDoS

Compared 6% of the time

More Arbor DDoS Competitors

Cloudflare vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 22% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 13% of the time

Radware DDoS vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 11% of the time

StormWall Website Anti-DDoS Protection vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 11% of the time

Imperva Application Security Platform vs Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Compared 10% of the time

More Nexusguard DDoS Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS

February 2026

Download Arbor DDoS product report

Buyer's Guide

Nexusguard DDoS Protection

January 2026

Download Nexusguard DDoS Protection product report

Also Known As

Arbor Networks SP, Arbor Networks TMS, Arbor Cloud for ENT

No data available

Overview

Arbor DDoS offers a comprehensive defense system against DDoS attacks, integrating a user-friendly GUI and advanced threat mitigation technologies for enhanced network protection.

Arbor DDoS is recognized for its ability to manage high-volume DDoS attacks efficiently, providing extensive protection through real-time traffic analysis and automated threat detection. It utilizes advanced techniques such as blackhole and BGP Flowspec for effective threat management. Arbor's cloud signaling allows users to handle and mitigate volumetric attacks while maintaining service availability. Though it provides robust security features, users note potential improvements in auto-mitigation, scalability, and AI integration. Challenges like an outdated graphical interface, hardware stability, and false positives need addressing to further enhance its usability and integration with third-party systems.

What are the key features of Arbor DDoS?

User-Friendly GUI: Provides an intuitive interface for ease of use.
Effective Mitigation: Combats high-volume DDoS attacks effectively.
Predefined Filters: Simplifies threat management with pre-configured settings.
Real-Time Traffic Analysis: Offers insights into traffic patterns and potential threats.
Automated Threat Detection: Identifies and mitigates threats without manual intervention.
Able to Handle High-Volume Attacks: Ensures extensive protection even under large-scale attacks.
Packet Capture and Integration: Facilitates comprehensive security analysis.
Cloud Signaling: Enhances attack traffic management through hybrid deployments.

What benefits should users expect from Arbor DDoS?

Enhanced Protection: Safeguards networks from diverse DDoS threats.
Improved Service Availability: Maintains business operations without disruptions.
Timely Reporting: Delivers detailed attack reports for proactive prevention.
AI Capabilities: Leverages AI for smarter threat mitigation strategies.
Comprehensive Security: Combines on-premise and cloud deployments for optimal defense.

Internet service providers and telecom companies commonly adopt Arbor DDoS to protect their networks and infrastructure from DDoS attacks. It is also implemented in financial and government sectors to ensure web application security and maintain high availability. Arbor DDoS supports a hybrid approach, utilizing both on-premise and cloud solutions to manage traffic efficiently and sustain service quality during attacks.

NETSCOUT

Founded in 2008, Nexusguard is the global leader in fighting malicious internet attacks. Nexusguard protects clients against a multitude of threats, including distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks, to ensure uninterrupted internet service. Nexusguard provides comprehensive, highly customized solutions for customers of all sizes, across a range of industries, and also enables turnkey anti-DDoS solutions for service providers. Nexusguard delivers on its promise to maximize peace of mind by minimizing threats.

Nexusguard’s purpose-built DDoS Protection platform is comprised of three pillars:

Application Protection
Nexusguard Application Protection mitigates all types of DDoS attacks and cyber threats, delivering maximum uptime to organizations with an online presence. Our solutions are secure, reliable, customizable, and backed by enterprise grade SLAs.

Origin Protection
Nexusguard Origin Protection secures all backend network elements, including the origin of applications, network infrastructure, and the backend IPs typically associated with proxy solutions. It is highly suitable for organizations that cannot afford any downtime of assets running their own network.

DNS Protection
Nexusguard DNS Protection protects mission-critical online services from DNS attacks. Our dedicated, fully redundant network of globally distributed proxy servers resolves every incoming DNS query quickly and reliably, ensuring your DNS server is protected from both internal and external attacks.

Visit www.nexusguard.com for more information.

Nexusguard

Sample Customers

Xtel Communications

21st Century Technologies, Netpluz, REDtone, SNOC, StarHub, aamra

Buyer's Guide

Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

February 2026

Free Report: Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Arbor DDoS vs. Nexusguard DDoS Protection report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.