ArcSight Logger vs Devo comparison

Read 22 Devo reviews

1,864 Views
914 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ArcSight Logger and Devo are leading log management solutions, each targeting different market needs. Devo often appears to have the edge with its advanced features, despite a higher cost, making it a preferred choice for many users.

Features: ArcSight Logger provides comprehensive data analysis, seamless integration with security tools, and scalability. Devo offers advanced analytics, real-time insights, and ease of use. ArcSight focuses on security integration, while Devo emphasizes analytical capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could improve scalability, query speed, and flexibility. Devo users seek better documentation, enhanced processing, and more ingestion options. Both products need adjustments to meet their users' evolving needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is complex to deploy with mixed reviews on its support. Devo is noted for easy deployment and proactive service. ArcSight could streamline deployment, while Devo is strong in service delivery.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger is more affordable upfront, offering a reasonable ROI. Devo, though more expensive initially, justifies its cost through long-term value. ArcSight competes on cost, while Devo focuses on enhanced performance.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Devo Report (Updated: April 2025).

Download the complete report

ArcSight Logger vs. Devo

April 2025

Helped 851,604 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Devo

Ranking in Log Management

27th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (26th), IT Operations Analytics (6th), AIOps (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.8%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Devo is 0.6%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Nagendra Nekkala.

Senior Manager ICT & at Bangalore International Airport Limited

A scalable and stable solution that enables users to see all the event logs in one place

The technical support team is very slow. The support persons do not take prompt action. They take too much time to implement new changes. Even if we tell them that we are not able to get critical logs, they take almost three to four days to provide a resolution. The support is not good.

Read full review

Michael Wenn

CEO / Co-Founder at Aiops ltd

Has cloud-first architecture with SIEM technology to run security operations

When it comes to scale, they're architected quite well. They handle some of the biggest customers globally, with significant throughput on their platform, managing thousands of customers. One of the most impressive aspects of Devo is its customer community. A large majority, over 80 percent of their customers, actively participate on a Devo-specific community page. They're contributing to product development and support, events, and user group information, helping each other out. This high level of engagement is rare and demonstrates both the loyalty of their customer base and the quality of their product. They offer a range of small, medium, and large options to cater to everyone. I sold Devo products while working with them, focusing on enterprise solutions. However, as a small reseller, my customers were typically smaller businesses. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."

"We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist."

"The machine learning is a good feature."

"It is one of the best products available in the market."

"The log digestion features from threat intelligence platforms like Recorded Future or Talos are valuable."

"It's an efficient solution."

"The solution provides information about the risk factors."

"ArcSight provides the basic information that we want."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"Scalability is one of Devo's strengths."

"The most valuable feature is that it has native MSSP capabilities and maintains perfect data separation. It does all of that in a very easy-to-manage cloud-based solution."

"The thing that Devo does better than other solutions is to give me the ability to write queries that look at multiple data sources and run fast. Most SIEMs don't do that. And I can do that by creating entity-based queries. Let's say I have a table which has Okta, a table which has G Suite, a table which has endpoint telemetry, and I have a table which has DNS telemetry. I can write a query that says, 'Join all these things together on IP, and where the IP matches in all these tables, return to me that subset of data, within these time windows.' I can break it down that way."

"Those 400 days of hot data mean that people can look for trends and at what happened in the past. And they can not only do so from a security point of view, but even for operational use cases. In the past, our operational norm was to keep live data for only 30 days. Our users were constantly asking us for at least 90 days, and we really couldn't even do that. That's one reason that having 400 days of live data is pretty huge. As our users start to use it and adopt this system, we expect people to be able to do those long-term analytics."

"In traditional BI solutions, you need to wait a lot of time to have the ability to create visualizations with the data and to do searches. With this kind of platform, you have that information in real-time."

"The most valuable feature is definitely the ability that Devo has to ingest data. From the previous SIEM that I came from and helped my company administer, it really was the type of system where data was parsed on ingest. This meant that if you didn't build the parser efficiently or correctly, sometimes that would bring the system to its knees. You'd have a backlog of processing the logs as it was ingesting them."

"Devo helps us to unlock the full power of our data because they have more than 450 parsers, which means that we can ingest pretty much any type of log data."

"The querying and the log-retention capabilities are pretty powerful. Those provide some of the biggest value-add for us."

More Devo pros

Cons

"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."

"The solution should make it possible to integrate network analysis features."

"The solution could be improved in maintenance settings."

"The next release should have AI capabilities."

"ArcSight has been sold two or three times, and the quality has decreased."

"The platform is quite expensive. They should reduce its cost."

"It would be better if the product is cheaper."

"The initial setup was a little bit complex."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"Devo has a lot of cloud connectors, but they need to do a little bit of work there. They've got good integrations with the public cloud, but there are a lot of cloud SaaS systems that they still need to work with on integrations, such as Salesforce and other SaaS providers where we need to get access logs."

"The Activeboards feature is not as mature regarding the look and feel. Its functionality is mature, but the look and feel is not there. For example, if you have some data sets and are trying to get some graphics, you cannot change anything. There's just one format for the graphics. You cannot change the size of the font, the font itself, etc."

"We only use the core functionality and one of the reasons for this is that their security operation center needs improvement."

"There's always room to reduce the learning curve over how to deal with events and machine data. They could make the machine data simpler."

"Some of the documentation could be improved a little bit. A lot of times it doesn't go as deep into some of the critical issues you might run into. They've been really good to shore us up with support, but some of the documentation could be a little bit better."

"The biggest area with room for improvement in Devo is the Security Operations module that just isn't there yet. That goes back to building out how they're going to do content and larger correlation and aggregation of data across multiple things, as well as natively ingesting CTI to create rule sets."

"There is room for improvement in the ability to parse different log types. I would go as far as to say the product is deficient in its ability to parse multiple, different log types, including logs from major vendors that are supported by competitors. Additionally, the time that it takes to turn around a supported parser for customers and common log source types, which are generally accepted standards in the industry, is not acceptable. This has impacted customer onboarding and customer relationships for us on multiple fronts."

"Some third-parties don't have specific API connectors built, so we had to work with Devo to get the logs and parse the data using custom parsers, rather than an out-of-the-box solution."

More Devo cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"I like the pricing very much. They keep it simple. It is a single price based on data ingested, and they do it on an average. If you get a spike of data that flows in, they will not stick it to you or charge you for that. They are very fair about that."

"Devo was very cost-competitive... Devo did come with that 400 days of hot data, and that was not the case with other products."

"We have an OEM agreement with Devo. It is very similar to the standard licensing agreement because we are charged in the same way as any other customer, e.g., we use the backroom."

"The way Devo prices things is based on the amount of data, and I wish the tiers had more granularity. Maybe at this point they do, but when we first negotiated with them, there were only three or four tiers."

"Our licensing fees are billed annually and per terabyte."

"It's a per gigabyte cost for ingestion of data. For every gigabyte that you ingest, it's whatever you negotiated your price for. Compared to other contracts that we've had for cloud providers, it's significantly less."

"[Devo was] in the ballpark with at least a couple of the other front-runners that we were looking at. Devo is a good value and, given the quality of the product, I would expect to pay more."

"Devo is a hosted or subscription-based solution, whereas before, we purchased QRadar, so we owned it and just had to pay a maintenance fee. We've encountered this with some other products, too, where we went over to subscription-based. Our thought process is that with subscription based, the provider hosts and maintains the tool, and it's offsite. That comes with some additional fees, but we were able to convince our upper management it was worth the price. We used to pay under 10k a year for maintenance, and now we're paying ten times that. It was a relatively tough sell to our management, but I wonder if we have a choice anymore; this is where the market is."

More Devo pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

17%

Government

Educational Organization

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

Government

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?

We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?

The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

The solution has room for improvement. We're currently upgrading to the newer version, where they have something like Kafka, a hub for all solutions feeding information into Logger. However, I thin...

What do you like most about Devo?

Devo has a really good website for creating custom configurations.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Devo?

Compared to Splunk or SentinelOne, it is really expensive. I rate the product’s pricing a nine out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

What needs improvement with Devo?

They can improve their AI capabilities. If you look at some integrations like XDR or AI, which add to the platform to correlate situations in events, there are areas for enhancement. For instance, ...

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Comparisons

Compared 37% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 34% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 10% of the time

Wazuh vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 8% of the time

Grafana Loki vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 4% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

IBM Security QRadar vs Devo

Compared 17% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Devo

Compared 16% of the time

Microsoft Sentinel vs Devo

Compared 16% of the time

Wazuh vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs Devo

Compared 6% of the time

More Devo Competitors

Product Reports

Download ArcSight Logger product report

ArcSight Logger

May 2025

Download Devo product report

May 2025

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

No data available

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

OpenText

Devo is the only cloud-native logging and security analytics platform that releases the full potential of all your data to empower bold, confident action when it matters most. Only the Devo platform delivers the powerful combination of real-time visibility, high-performance analytics, scalability, multitenancy, and low TCO crucial for monitoring and securing business operations as enterprises accelerate their shift to the cloud.

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

United States Air Force, Rubrik, SentinelOne, Critical Start, NHL, Panda Security, Telefonica, CaixaBank, OpenText, IGT, OneMain Financial, SurveyMonkey, FanDuel, H&R Block, Ulta Beauty, Manulife, Moneylion, Chime Bank, Magna International, American Express Global Business Travel