No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
ArcSight Logger Logo

Top 10 ArcSight Logger Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.8 out of 5
Leave a review

Top ArcSight Logger Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ArcSight Logger based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Splunk Enterprise Security, and Dynatrace. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ArcSight Logger surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled log management and analytics capabilities, lightning-fast searches, and seamless integration with existing systems, empowering organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats with increased accuracy and efficiency.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in scalability and detailed log management, ideal for large enterprises needing robust security solutions. In comparison, Wazuh offers a cost-effective open-source alternative, appealing to organizations seeking strong integration capabilities and flexible, budget-friendly security options.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Wazuh Report
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its enterprise-level features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller operations seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is typically higher, reflecting its enterprise-level features, while Wazuh offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to smaller operations seeking cost-effective solutions.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security excels in handling large data volumes with rapid search, real-time alerts, and broad integration. In comparison, ArcSight Logger offers robust log management and scalability but lacks extensive customizability and alerting features, appealing to those prioritizing reliable data correlation.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs due to its robust features, while ArcSight Logger offers a more economical initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security incurs higher setup costs due to its robust features, while ArcSight Logger offers a more economical initial setup, appealing to budget-conscious organizations.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger is favored for its cost-efficiency and robust log management, especially in scalable and secure environments. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced AI monitoring and tech integration, providing expansive features justifying its higher price, appealing to those valuing detailed performance insights.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Dynatrace Report
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar excels in comprehensive security and ease of data correlation with extensive third-party integration and hybrid deployment options. In comparison, ArcSight Logger offers structured data management and detailed analytics, focusing on in-depth event monitoring and long-term ROI.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar has a straightforward setup cost, while ArcSight Logger offers a more complex pricing structure with additional installation fees.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a straightforward setup cost, while ArcSight Logger offers a more complex pricing structure with additional installation fees.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Cribl
4.3 out of 5

Organizations use Cribl for migrating to Splunk Cloud and managing log collection. It forwards logs to Splunk Cloud, curates data, and replays events for cost efficiency. Cribl reduces licensing costs by segregating less critical logs and ensures smooth transitions between log management tools like Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, and Datadog.

Download ArcSight Logger vs. Cribl Report
I would not say it is a cheaply priced tool as it has been doing wonders in the market. The tool has been budget-friendly for organizations.
The product pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
I would not say it is a cheaply priced tool as it has been doing wonders in the market. The tool has been budget-friendly for organizations.
The product pricing is reasonable compared to other solutions.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in data management and log retrieval, appealing to those needing robust logging features. In comparison, Elastic Security offers real-time threat detection and scalability, drawing interest from those prioritizing flexibility. ArcSight offers straightforward deployment; Elastic provides advanced analytics and long-term value.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security Report
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers robust data ingestion and extensive compliance support, appealing to buyers focused on cost and support. In comparison, Grafana Loki excels with scalability and integration within Grafana, appealing to those seeking dynamic visualizations and alignment with modern cloud environments.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Grafana Loki Report
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing and excels in log management, while LogRhythm SIEM provides robust threat detection and advanced analytics features. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM offers comprehensive functions, and ArcSight Logger is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
ArcSight Logger is noted for its moderate setup costs, while LogRhythm SIEM often entails higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger is noted for its moderate setup costs, while LogRhythm SIEM often entails higher initial expenses.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Graylog Enterprise
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers scalability and integration strength, ideal for large deployments needing robust security integration. In comparison, Graylog Enterprise provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness through its open-source origin, appealing to organizations valuing user-friendly design and adaptable deployment options.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise Report
ArcSight Logger has a high initial setup cost, while Graylog Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has a high initial setup cost, while Graylog Enterprise offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Stack
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger supports secure environments with high customer satisfaction, offering robust security features. In comparison, Elastic Stack provides extensive feature flexibility and scalability, including advanced search and visualization tools ideal for large-scale analytics, appealing to tech buyers seeking resource efficiency.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Stack Report
ArcSight Logger may involve higher setup costs compared to Elastic Stack, which is often favored for its initial cost-efficiency and flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger may involve higher setup costs compared to Elastic Stack, which is often favored for its initial cost-efficiency and flexibility.
ArcSight Logger Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in high-volume event processing and advanced search capabilities, appealing to organizations focused on compliance and scalability. In comparison, USM Anywhere's asset discovery and threat intelligence make it ideal for those seeking integrated security solutions and proactive threat management.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. USM Anywhere Report
ArcSight Logger involves a higher setup cost compared to USM Anywhere, highlighting a significant cost difference for potential users.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger involves a higher setup cost compared to USM Anywhere, highlighting a significant cost difference for potential users.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Sumo Logic Security
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in pricing and customer support, making it a cost-effective option for businesses focused on affordability. In comparison, Sumo Logic Security's superior features and real-time analytics make it ideal for organizations requiring advanced threat detection, despite higher costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Sumo Logic Security Report
ArcSight Logger offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features, while Sumo Logic Security provides a more economical entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger offers a higher setup cost, reflecting its advanced features, while Sumo Logic Security provides a more economical entry point.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers powerful search capabilities ideal for organizations with complex data retention needs. In comparison, Devo delivers superior scalability and real-time analytics, making it attractive for companies seeking advanced features and quicker insights.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Devo Report
ArcSight Logger has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in data integration and search capabilities, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive data handling. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer appeals to users focusing on advanced analytics and reporting, catering to organizations seeking in-depth analysis and adaptable, feature-rich solutions.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Report
ArcSight Logger incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup.
ArcSight Logger Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
syslog-ng
4.5 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in integration and comprehensive log analysis, appealing to those prioritizing efficient deployment and robust support. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility with advanced filtering and scalability, suiting buyers valuing modular deployment and adaptability for complex environments, despite potential initial costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. syslog-ng Report
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
NetWitness Platform
3.7 out of 5
NetWitness Platform excels in real-time threat detection for large data environments. In comparison, ArcSight Logger focuses on log management and event correlation. Tech buyers might consider NetWitness for analytics depth or ArcSight Logger for integration prowess and cost-effectiveness.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. NetWitness Platform Report
NetWitness Platform typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to ArcSight Logger, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
NetWitness Platform typically incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to ArcSight Logger, which offers a more budget-friendly setup process.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Check Point Security Management
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger is valued for cost-effectiveness, efficient log management, scalability, and data analysis. In comparison, Check Point Security Management offers comprehensive threat prevention and policy management. ArcSight attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Check Point appeals to those needing advanced security features despite higher costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management Report
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in security and compliance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust protection. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers advanced analytics and seamless integration, attracting those needing comprehensive data analysis and visualization. ArcSight Logger is cost-effective; VMware Aria Operations delivers significant ROI.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. VMware Aria Operations for Logs Report
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Logs, which is priced more competitively.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Logs, which is priced more competitively.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
3.7 out of 5
ArcSight Logger is valued for its security integration and search capabilities, ideal for large enterprises seeking scalability. In comparison, ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers user-friendly analytics and comprehensive compliance reporting, appealing to businesses with a focus on real-time monitoring and cost-effective deployment.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer Report
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, whereas ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, whereas ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogLogic
3.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing with strong customer support and intuitive operations. In comparison, LogLogic provides advanced features and integration flexibility, appealing to those needing robust analytics despite a steeper learning curve and higher costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. LogLogic Report
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is higher upfront, offering robust features, while LogLogic provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is higher upfront, offering robust features, while LogLogic provides a more budget-friendly initial setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

Related categories

Log Management
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)