Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ArcSight Logger Logo

Top 10 ArcSight Logger Alternatives

Vendor: OpenText
3.9 out of 5
680 followers
Start review

Top ArcSight Logger Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ArcSight Logger based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Wazuh, Dynatrace, and Splunk Enterprise Security. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ArcSight Logger surpasses its competitors by offering unparalleled log management and analytics capabilities, lightning-fast searches, and seamless integration with existing systems, empowering organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats with increased accuracy and efficiency.

OpenText Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with OpenText, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Wazuh
3.7 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in comprehensive log management and integration, appealing to those prioritizing these features. In comparison, Wazuh stands out for its open-source flexibility and scalability, offering valuable adaptability for diverse security needs and a cost-effective pricing strategy.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Wazuh Report
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has a substantial initial setup cost, while Wazuh is known for its minimal or nonexistent setup expenses, highlighting a significant difference in installation affordability.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger is favored for its cost-efficiency and robust log management, especially in scalable and secure environments. In comparison, Dynatrace offers advanced AI monitoring and tech integration, providing expansive features justifying its higher price, appealing to those valuing detailed performance insights.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Dynatrace Report
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger offers a straightforward setup at a competitive cost, while Dynatrace involves higher initial expenses due to its advanced capabilities.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Enterprise Security offers rapid search and flexibility, making it ideal for complex environments. In comparison, ArcSight Logger ensures robust log management with scalability. Splunk's varied deployment suits diverse needs, while ArcSight's integration aids existing systems. Both products offer distinct value propositions for tech buyers.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Splunk Enterprise Security Report
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk Enterprise Security often involves higher setup costs, making it suitable for larger enterprises, while ArcSight Logger typically offers a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to organizations with tighter financial constraints.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
IBM Security QRadar
4.0 out of 5
IBM Security QRadar offers standout AI integration and deployment flexibility for enterprises, providing substantial ROI despite its higher costs. In comparison, ArcSight Logger focuses on robust log management but requires improved ease of use and affordability for smaller organizations.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. IBM Security QRadar Report
IBM Security QRadar has a higher initial setup cost, while ArcSight Logger offers a more affordable startup option.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM Security QRadar has a higher initial setup cost, while ArcSight Logger offers a more affordable startup option.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in data management and log retrieval, appealing to those needing robust logging features. In comparison, Elastic Security offers real-time threat detection and scalability, drawing interest from those prioritizing flexibility. ArcSight offers straightforward deployment; Elastic provides advanced analytics and long-term value.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Elastic Security Report
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has a higher setup cost, offering advanced security analytics, while Elastic Security is more cost-effective with flexible deployment options.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Grafana Loki
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers robust data ingestion and extensive compliance support, appealing to buyers focused on cost and support. In comparison, Grafana Loki excels with scalability and integration within Grafana, appealing to those seeking dynamic visualizations and alignment with modern cloud environments.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Grafana Loki Report
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger involves significant setup costs, reflecting its extensive features, whereas Grafana Loki offers a more cost-effective setup with a focus on simplicity.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Graylog
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers robust compliance and security features, ideal for enterprises focused on security needs. In comparison, Graylog is favored for its user-friendly interface and configurability, making it appealing to those seeking flexibility and cost-effective log management solutions.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Report
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs, while Graylog offers a more cost-effective setup, making them distinct in initial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs, while Graylog offers a more cost-effective setup, making them distinct in initial investment requirements.
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
LogRhythm SIEM
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers competitive pricing and excels in log management, while LogRhythm SIEM provides robust threat detection and advanced analytics features. In comparison, LogRhythm SIEM offers comprehensive functions, and ArcSight Logger is known for straightforward deployment and reliable customer service.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. LogRhythm SIEM Report
ArcSight Logger is noted for its moderate setup costs, while LogRhythm SIEM often entails higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger is noted for its moderate setup costs, while LogRhythm SIEM often entails higher initial expenses.
ArcSight Logger Logo
syslog-ng
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
syslog-ng
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in integration and comprehensive log analysis, appealing to those prioritizing efficient deployment and robust support. In comparison, syslog-ng offers flexibility with advanced filtering and scalability, suiting buyers valuing modular deployment and adaptability for complex environments, despite potential initial costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. syslog-ng Report
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger's setup cost is significantly higher, while syslog-ng offers a more budget-friendly setup option. Users seeking cost efficiency may prefer syslog-ng, while those valuing robust capabilities might consider the investment in ArcSight Logger.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
4.0 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in data integration and search capabilities, attracting those prioritizing comprehensive data handling. In comparison, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer appeals to users focusing on advanced analytics and reporting, catering to organizations seeking in-depth analysis and adaptable, feature-rich solutions.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer Report
ArcSight Logger incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger incurs a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a more budget-friendly setup.
ArcSight Logger Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger Logo
Devo
4.2 out of 5
ArcSight Logger offers powerful search capabilities ideal for organizations with complex data retention needs. In comparison, Devo delivers superior scalability and real-time analytics, making it attractive for companies seeking advanced features and quicker insights.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Devo Report
ArcSight Logger has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger has higher setup costs compared to Devo, which offers a more cost-effective implementation.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
4.1 out of 5
ArcSight Logger excels in security and compliance, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing robust protection. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Logs offers advanced analytics and seamless integration, attracting those needing comprehensive data analysis and visualization. ArcSight Logger is cost-effective; VMware Aria Operations delivers significant ROI.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. VMware Aria Operations for Logs Report
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Logs, which is priced more competitively.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger incurs higher setup costs compared to VMware Aria Operations for Logs, which is priced more competitively.
ArcSight Logger Logo
ArcSight Logger Logo
Check Point Security Management
4.4 out of 5
ArcSight Logger is valued for cost-effectiveness, efficient log management, scalability, and data analysis. In comparison, Check Point Security Management offers comprehensive threat prevention and policy management. ArcSight attracts budget-conscious buyers, while Check Point appeals to those needing advanced security features despite higher costs.
Download ArcSight Logger vs. Check Point Security Management Report
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ArcSight Logger features a high initial setup cost, whereas Check Point Security Management offers more affordable setup pricing, emphasizing a clear cost difference between the two solutions.

Related categories

Log Management
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Extended Detection and Response (XDR)