ArcSight Logger vs Graylog Enterprise comparison

OpenText and Graylog are both solutions in the Log Management category. OpenText is ranked #45 with an average rating of 6.8, while Graylog is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Graylog’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Graylog users who would recommend it.

ArcSight Logger

Read 32 ArcSight Logger reviews

1,584 Views
1,568 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

Graylog Enterprise

Read 24 Graylog Enterprise reviews

7,856 Views
7,856 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

ArcSight Logger

Graylog Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 14, 2025

ArcSight Logger and Graylog Enterprise compete in the log management and SIEM category. ArcSight Logger holds an edge due to its scalability, flexible log collecting options, and strong integration capabilities, making it preferred by users requiring a comprehensive SIEM solution.

Features: ArcSight Logger is beneficial for large enterprises due to its scalability and flexible log collecting options, providing robust security analytics and an extensive integration with ArcSight SIEM. Graylog Enterprise offers easy customization, efficient search capabilities, and beneficial alerting functionalities, with its open-source nature making it a cost-effective solution.

Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger could improve its threat analytics and simplify its interface for better usability. Connectivity with legacy and HP network devices presents challenges, and users need faster technical support and an updated interface. Graylog Enterprise could enhance alert flexibility and documentation quality, with room for improved integration and performance optimization to reduce infrastructure costs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger is applicable for on-premises deployment, while Graylog Enterprise offers flexibility with both on-premise and hybrid cloud options. ArcSight Logger's technical support has mixed reviews, with users noting slower response times, whereas Graylog Enterprise's community and documentation resources receive positive feedback for support effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger is considered costly due to complex licensing, but it delivers a positive ROI owing to its comprehensive features that support security compliance. Graylog Enterprise's open-source approach presents a cost-effective solution for smaller deployments, though the paid version can be expensive for larger needs. Nonetheless, its ease of use and feature set enhance ROI for its users.

To learn more, read our detailed ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArcSight Logger

Ranking in Log Management

45th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Graylog Enterprise

Ranking in Log Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ArcSight Logger is 0.9%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Graylog Enterprise is 4.4%, down from 6.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Graylog Enterprise	4.4%
ArcSight Logger	0.9%
Other	94.7%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Mohammed Shoaib Abdulla

Sr. Cybersecurity Consultant IT/OT at EJADA

Compliance and cost-effectiveness have improved while critical infrastructure security adapts to evolving needs

ArcSight Logger fulfills compliance requirements and passes audit requirements. It is one of the Aramco standards requirements and is recommended by Aramco for any implementation. Aramco, SABIC, water companies, and electricity companies are critical infrastructure with air-gapped networks. In an air-gapped network, there is no communication going out from that network area to the outside world, even to the corporate network. ArcSight Logger is installed on minimal resources with minimal requirements. There are not many upgrades or new features that come up frequently, though they do occur occasionally.

Read full review

NicolaeCIornii

Security Officer at JSC "Moldtelecom" S.A.

Log analysis has become clearer and faster but visualization and extensibility still need work

The problem was with the complexity and the cost to add extensions. We found this very expensive to buy another version with additional features. I think that Graylog Enterprise does not have customizable dashboards. I did not see them in Graylog Enterprise because most of the time we used the open source free version, which is limited. I think Graylog Enterprise should improve some things that they have in the paid version and perhaps provide users with a menu that gives examples of parsing logs and draws graphics so that people do not need to improve another system such as Grafana. This would be interesting. When it comes to functionalities, I found the log management in Graylog Enterprise acceptable. It is very simple to use and to collect logs. It has support for different protocols and different ports, and the sidecar is easy to use. However, in visualization, I think it needs to be much better.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I am impressed with the product's ability to pick up logs. It also has UEBA which has reduced the time to take charge of the events."

"We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist."

"It's a brilliant log collection tool, and it can handle hundreds of thousands of servers in a single shot to ingest the data."

"In our country we are a little bit private in terms of solutions, so we are just starting to use the basic data capture. Now some users can start to use additional features that come with Micro Focus ArcSight like user behavior analytics for investigating."

"The most valuable feature is the search capability, which is simple to use."

"We haven't had any crashes or bugs. It is stable."

"ArcSight Logger is very stable and useful for customers."

"The ability to customize the solution in great detail is its most valuable features. We can customize the use cases and also have the ability to do scripting. We can personalize our dashboard as well. The scalability the solution offers is quite impressive."

More ArcSight Logger pros

"Graylog Enterprise has positively impacted my organization by significantly minimizing our workload and making it easier to identify any issues in a service."

"The ability to write custom alerts is key to information security and compliance."

"Everything stands out as valuable, including the fact that I can quantify and qualify the logs, create pipelines and process the logs in any way I like, and create charts or data maps."

"One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview."

"I like the correlation and the alerting."

"Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default."

"It has data adapters and lookup tables that utilize HTTP calls to APIs."

"What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc."

More Graylog Enterprise pros

Cons

"I had some latency issues for two months. I had to increase our storage capacity significantly to reduce the latency."

"I think the ArcSight team should try to simplify legacy products for the customers, because that product is not easy to use or to work with. It needs more more competency or appeal to use. We hope Micro Focus is trying to resolve this."

"The initial setup was a little bit complex."

"I would rate the technical support only 5 out of 10. The technical support is not satisfactory."

"The integration with other systems could be improved."

"They are migrating to Splunk because ArcSight Logger doesn't have those features for user or customer behavior analysis."

"You have limited reporting capabilities and I wouldn't choose ArcSight Logger for this purpose."

"Using the ArcSight Logger dashboard is not particularly intuitive or efficient, so it is important to be trained in its use."

More ArcSight Logger cons

"I would like to see a date and time in the Graylog Grok patterns so that I can save time when searching for a log. I like how the streams and the search query work, but adding a date and time will allow me to pull out a log in a milli-second."

"I would like to see a default dashboard widget that shows the topology of the clusters defined for the graylog install."

"It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community."

"More complex visualizations and the ability to execute custom Elasticsearch queries would be great."

"With technical support, you are on your own without an enterprise license."

"There are many other applications in the market that influenced my rating reduction."

"I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and creating alerts. The initial setup is complex."

"Elasticsearch recommendations for tuning could be better. Graylog doesn't have direct support for running the system inside of Kubernetes, so it can be challenging to fill in the gaps and set up containers in a way that is both performant and stable."

More Graylog Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the product a seven out of ten since it's an enterprise product."

"We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee."

"It's not cheap at all as it's a big product and has been in the market for quite some time now."

"I rate the product’s pricing a seven out of ten, where one is inexpensive, and ten is expensive."

"The pricing is quite harsh."

"Pricing is reasonable compared to similar tools on the market. They offer perpetual licenses."

"ArcSight Logger is very expensive compared to their competitors, but when we talk to the customer and explain what the features are and how we can scale, they understand. Still, ArcSight is more expensive than the competition."

"ArcSight is an expensive solution."

"Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements."

"It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."

"There is an open source version and an enterprise version. I wouldn't recommend the enterprise version, but as an open source solution, it is solid and works really well."

"Graylog is a free open-source solution. The free version has a capacity limitation of 2 GB daily, if you want to go above this you have to purchase a license."

"I use the free version of Graylog."

"Having paid official support is wise for projects."

"You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."

"If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog."

More Graylog Enterprise pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Marketing Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	16

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ArcSight Logger?

We have a trigger. So, Logger automatically blocks these IP addresses. We could have Logger put them on a blacklist.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Logger?

The pricing isn't the problem. We have a lifetime license, so we don't pay a monthly fee.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ArcSight Logger?

This decision is made by higher management as they don't want to have multiple solutions for one solution. ArcSight Logger themselves don't provide good support, but companies such as ours provide ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Graylog?

I am not familiar with the pricing details of Graylog, as I was not responsible for that aspect. It was determined that we didn't need an enterprise plan, which is more suited for clients with less...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Graylog?

I do not have any specific examples or numbers, such as time saved or incidents to share. Currently, I have no suggestions for how Graylog Enterprise can be improved, as there are no pain points or...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Graylog?

Graylog Enterprise is the logging and management tool we initially used, but later we stopped using it and switched to Loki, Grafana Loki for the logs. Eventually, we moved back to Graylog Enterpri...

See all answers

Comparisons

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 22% of the time

IBM Security QRadar vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 19% of the time

Elastic Security vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 10% of the time

LogRhythm SIEM vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 7% of the time

LogLogic vs ArcSight Logger

Compared 5% of the time

More ArcSight Logger Competitors

Grafana Loki vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 22% of the time

Wazuh vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 17% of the time

syslog-ng vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 8% of the time

Security Onion vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Graylog Enterprise

Compared 3% of the time

More Graylog Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger

January 2026

Download ArcSight Logger product report

Buyer's Guide

Graylog Enterprise

January 2026

Download Graylog Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Arcsight Logger, HPE Arcsight Logger

Graylog2

Overview

HPE ArcSight Data Platform (ADP) offers a future-ready data solution that enriches data in real time and supports open standards for better threat detection. Using security data connectors, ADP collects data and enriches it in real-time to give analysts organized information that can be acted upon instantly.

OpenText

Graylog Enterprise, recognized for log collection, real-time search, and enriched data handling, offers an open-source framework that integrates seamlessly with Elasticsearch. Its user-centric interface streamlines data correlation and log aggregation, supporting both backend services and comprehensive monitoring needs.

Graylog Enterprise stands out for its stability and powerful log management capabilities, facilitating efficient log aggregation, real-time updates, and data analytics. Users benefit from its plugin-based alerting, user-friendly interface, and support for microservices, including Docker integration. The ability to search in detail, flexible API integration, and data enrichment features are highly valued. Challenges include collector application issues, desired visualization enhancements, and authentication integration improvements. Users seek advancements in UI customization, backup functions, and easier rule creation.

What are Graylog Enterprise's most important features?

Log Collection: Efficiently aggregates and handles diverse logs.
Real-Time Search: Provides immediate log data access.
Custom Alerts: Plugin-based alerting for tailored notifications.
Dashboard Enhancements: Improved visualization for data insights.
Data Enrichment: Adds value through detailed log analysis.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Audit Trail Support: Essential for compliance in financial sectors.
Security Event Correlation: Enables incident analysis and response.
Faster Issue Identification: Speeds up troubleshooting with detailed visualization.
API Flexibility: Seamless integration across systems and environments.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Centralized log management enhances oversight.

In industrial use, Graylog Enterprise is crucial for audit trailing in financial sectors, facilitating security event identification and error monitoring. Backend teams leverage real-time analytics for swift issue resolution, while developers appreciate the comprehensive log visualization enabled by Docker integration for microservice management.

Graylog

Sample Customers

China Merchants Bank, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa

Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur

Buyer's Guide

ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise

December 2025

Free Report: ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ArcSight Logger vs. Graylog Enterprise report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.