ARIS Architect and Designer vs No Magic MagicDraw comparison

ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ARIS Architect and Designer

Ranking in Business Process Design

10th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of ARIS Architect and Designer is 1.7%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.5%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ARIS Architect and Designer	1.7%
No Magic MagicDraw	2.5%
Other	95.8%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

BeenishMustafa

Consultant at KAFD DMC

Has raised concerns about pricing while expressing satisfaction with its contribution to optimizing internal processes

Considering the integration capability of the product, it contributes to data-driven decision-making in our case. We see some impact of reporting tools on performance tracking or strategic planning. We do different kinds of analysis in regard to due integration controls, risk, and how we can strengthen the processes and the activities. We use it for various purposes. Regarding the process visualization framework, it helps to improve communication and collaboration in the company in a positive way. Architect is managing all the library management and with regards to the filter management. It's always a positive side that if you want to use anything further, we know that we can reach out to the Architect to add those objects and those attributes. It's really good.

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most important feature is ARIS's ability to turn a process design into data to analyze anything you want. For example, we have some analysis reports in ARIS that can guide us when we want to change a system. It shows us how this change will affect all of the organization's processes."

"The support team is very responsive."

"It's really fast. It's much faster compared to Enterprise Architect."

"Its user interface is highly regarded, especially when compared with Visual Paradigm."

"It is suitable for banks, insurance companies, public administration, etc. The method is very adaptable and can be applied independently of the business."

"We use the product for modeling, conducting process checks, doing process flow, running, and analyzing the report."

"One of the most valuable features is how user-friendly ARIS is, compared to other BPM tools."

"The user interface is easy to work with."

More ARIS Architect and Designer pros

"I like the traceability feature. Whoever is working with the product would be sure of the things that could be affected if they decided to affect one of the other companies. For example, let's say that an engineer starts a new project optimization problem by adjusting the thickness of metal sheets. However, the engineers only see a reduced number of affections, but when we use the requirement traceability, they can see the whole picture. That's the main aspect that we were promoting with this tool."

"I think one of the key things is the plugins for integration with requirements management tools like Doors"

"The MBFC capability of MagicDraw is higher than the other competitors."

"Offers good standards compliance and is user-friendly."

"We are getting away from the old ways of writing a lot of papers and requirements documents, architecture documents, technical solution documents, interface documents - those days are gone."

"The most valuable features with No Magic MagicDraw are its ease of use; you can put this in front of a 12-year-old and they would know what to do right away."

"The technical support is very good."

"There is a lot of documentation available on the Internet to understand its functionality."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"Sometimes, it's not easy to convince customers to use this methodology because it's a bit rigid."

"The simulation part still has some way to go. It's a good feature, and it's something that other vendors don't have right now, but it can still be improved. Some features are needed in ARIS Architect, so advanced users can do things through drag-and-drop functionality."

"The product is not flexible."

"You can have a collaboration feature, but it's necessary to have ARIS Connect which is a separate, costly product."

"Even with a formal modeling language, users can still draw freely and make a bit of a mess in your repository. It should also improve usability."

"The support team takes a long time to respond to our queries."

"The licenses are very costly. I've seen many people who are hesitant or not able to use ARIS Suite just because of the license cost."

"I always tell people not to use the latest version of the ARIS product. They are just providing us with new changes that we don't want."

More ARIS Architect and Designer cons

"There could be a trial version for students."

"The software is a little more challenging if you haven't been trained on how to use it."

"It would be better if the User Interface were updated. At the moment, it's a classic environment. It reminds me of the old Windows interface, for example, Windows 95. It would be better to make it more user-friendly. It would also be better if it could integrate with SAP solutions. It isn't easy to find experts in the field. It's hard to find people around the globe that have the necessary skills and expertise to manage this solution. For example, in our case, we needed someone with refrigeration knowledge that also knew how to use the tool, and that was a challenge. We also had issues relating to erasing. Sometimes, it kept it in the background and didn't erase it at all. We had to review the entire list to ensure that the item was deleted."

"The licenses are expensive compared to similar tools. At the moment, the user is open to using MagicDraw if it's 15% more than other solutions. If it were to cost any more, they wouldn't use it."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"There's lots of documentation. They process multiples of guides. They've got all kinds of guides and documentation out there, but it's kind of hard to find. There are a lot of videos. You can go to YouTube and find videos on how it's been used in different ways, but it just kind of scratches the surface."

"Larger models slow you down; committing, updating, merging of branches and comparing of models (diff) do not scale yet; issues will hopefully be solved with upcoming V19."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Many customers find the licensing configuration confusing. There are many different sub-details in the licensing, making it very difficult for us to understand what we are buying and what we are using with what."

"The licenses are very costly. I've seen many people who are hesitant or not able to use ARIS Suite just because of the license cost. Even though they like all the functionalities and understand the value of everything ARIS provides, they aren't able to implement it."

"The product is expensive."

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Manufacturing Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

10%

Aerospace/Defense Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ARIS Architect and Designer?

Currently, we don't have any metrics to measure the success of ARIS Architect and Designer. We would appreciate it if you could share anything with us that we can do to find out the impact.

What is your primary use case for ARIS Architect and Designer?

We spoke with you about ARIS Architect and Designer. We already have two architect licenses, I think three architect licenses, and we have, I think, six or seven designer licenses. Architect is bas...

What advice do you have for others considering ARIS Architect and Designer?

The reviewer is a consultant at KAFD. We would give ARIS Architect and Designer an overall review rating of ten out of ten.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

ARIS Cloud vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 11% of the time

Camunda vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 11% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 9% of the time

BIC Platform vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 3% of the time

More ARIS Architect and Designer Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 20% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 13% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 8% of the time

Lucidchart vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

ARIS Architect and Designer

Download ARIS Architect and Designer product report

No Magic MagicDraw

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

ARIS Architect & Designer, ARIS Architect, ARIS Designer

MagicDraw

Overview

ARIS Architect and Designer offers customizable process visualization and collaboration tools designed for efficient enterprise architecture management, emphasizing compliance, governance, and strategic planning.

Organizations use ARIS Architect and Designer for creating central repositories, process modeling, enterprise architecture, and business process design. Its strengths include extensive customization, process visualization, and robust model libraries. Users benefit from metadata definition, cross-notational alignment, and predefined workflows that support compliance and governance. The tool facilitates integration and synchronization for informed decision-making and enhances communication. Improvements are sought in licensing costs, support response, usability, and cloud reliability. Users desire more process mining features, built-in collaborative tools, better data export options, and simplified process modeling.

What are the key features?

User-friendliness: Easy navigation and setup for efficient workflow.
Customization: Tailor processes to specific business requirements.
Robust model library: Access to a wide range of templates and models.
Collaboration capabilities: Enable teamwork with integrated tools.
Process visualization: Enhance understanding of complex processes.
Metadata definition: Define and manage metadata effectively.
Integration and synchronization: Seamless communication across systems.
Compliance and governance: Use predefined workflows to ensure adherence.
Data analysis and reporting: Tools to track performance and aid strategic planning.

What benefits should users look for?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined process design and management.
Enhanced strategic planning: Data-driven tools for informed decisions.
Improved communication: Synchronization across departments.
Compliance support: Meeting regulatory requirements with ease.

ARIS Architect and Designer is primarily deployed on-premise for greater process control and is extensively used across industries for documenting reference models and serving as a knowledge hub. Organizations highlight its role in identifying process gaps, designing architecture diagrams, and generating job descriptions, with future enhancements planned for simulation and dashboard integration.

Software AG

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Tesco, Weifu, Airbus, Siemens, Proximus, Alicorp, Sekerbank, Bancor, Philips,Sky, Emirates NBD, Dubai Municipality, Suva, U.S. Army, Australia Post, Westfalen Weser Energie - ARIS serves customers across all industries and of every size worldwide. Companies trust ARIS as the market leader for process excellence with more than 30 years of experience in the market, 10 million users worldwide, from 1 user companies to the Fortune 500.

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw