ARIS Architect and Designer vs No Magic MagicDraw comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Software AG and Dassault Systèmes are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. Software AG is ranked #14 with an average rating of 9.7, while Dassault Systèmes is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.5. Software AG holds a 1.9% mindshare in BPD, compared to Dassault Systèmes’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Software AG users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Dassault Systèmes users who would recommend it.

ARIS Architect and Designer

Read 11 ARIS Architect and Designer reviews

1,615 Views
1,599 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

No Magic MagicDraw

Read 19 No Magic MagicDraw reviews

2,772 Views
2,578 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ARIS Architect and Designer

No Magic MagicDraw

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

No Magic MagicDraw and ARIS Architect and Designer are competing in the realm of modeling tools. MagicDraw has an edge with its pricing and support, while ARIS excels in its feature set, justifying its cost.

Features: MagicDraw offers comprehensive modeling capabilities, flexibility in solutions and integrations, and a user-friendly interface. ARIS Architect and Designer provides strong process modeling features, extensive customization options, and a powerful framework for enterprise architecture.

Room for Improvement: MagicDraw could enhance its collaboration features, streamline complex systems management, and improve its documentation capabilities. ARIS may benefit from simplifying its user interface, reducing deployment complexity, and enhancing real-time collaboration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MagicDraw features a straightforward deployment model with responsive customer service, allowing for quick adaptation. ARIS, while more complex to deploy, offers extensive support resources and a skilled service team that compensates for its sophisticated implementation.

Pricing and ROI: MagicDraw presents competitive pricing with favorable ROI, making it a cost-effective choice. ARIS Architect and Designer, while requiring a higher initial investment, delivers substantial ROI through its comprehensive features, promising long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ARIS Architect and Designer

Ranking in Business Process Design

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

No Magic MagicDraw

Ranking in Business Process Design

15th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of ARIS Architect and Designer is 1.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of No Magic MagicDraw is 2.4%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ARIS Architect and Designer	1.9%
No Magic MagicDraw	2.4%
Other	95.7%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

BeenishMustafa

Consultant at KAFD DMC

Has raised concerns about pricing while expressing satisfaction with its contribution to optimizing internal processes

Considering the integration capability of the product, it contributes to data-driven decision-making in our case. We see some impact of reporting tools on performance tracking or strategic planning. We do different kinds of analysis in regard to due integration controls, risk, and how we can strengthen the processes and the activities. We use it for various purposes. Regarding the process visualization framework, it helps to improve communication and collaboration in the company in a positive way. Architect is managing all the library management and with regards to the filter management. It's always a positive side that if you want to use anything further, we know that we can reach out to the Architect to add those objects and those attributes. It's really good.

Read full review

reviewer2080611

System Engineer at a consultancy with 51-200 employees

Ease of use and real-time collaboration empower effective teamwork and streamlined development

For CAMEO, it's not only the ease of use, it's versatility, its communicability, but Rhapsody is the worst tool I've ever used. It is very difficult, not user-friendly, and very expensive. It works only with its IBM counterparts. SPARX Enterprise Architecture is very easy to use, but it's limited. It gives you an idea of how your model is developing, so this feature helps maintain integrity or correctness of system models. It's really a good feature to have. You've got to have the simulation toolkit installed to be able to do that, and that works really well. The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that. I would prefer that it come with the simulation toolkit.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Using the well defined architecture/metamodel, you can create complicated structures, but it's still easily trackable."

"Considering the integration capability of the product, it contributes to data-driven decision-making in our case."

"I would rate the solution overall a ten out of ten."

"Its user interface is highly regarded, especially when compared with Visual Paradigm."

"One of the standout features for me is its synchronization to a publication server. It makes sharing diagrams and links with non-users easy."

"One of the most valuable features is how user-friendly ARIS is, compared to other BPM tools."

"The user interface is easy to work with."

"It's really fast. It's much faster compared to Enterprise Architect."

More ARIS Architect and Designer pros

"No Magic MagicDraw provides a lot of good features on functionality."

"The beauty of MagicDraw is that it has a simulation part, so you can simulate your model to validate it. The simulation allows you to bring in code off of an external code that you can write to set up the simulation and execute the code."

"Offers good standards compliance and is user-friendly."

"I like the traceability feature. Whoever is working with the product would be sure of the things that could be affected if they decided to affect one of the other companies. For example, let's say that an engineer starts a new project optimization problem by adjusting the thickness of metal sheets. However, the engineers only see a reduced number of affections, but when we use the requirement traceability, they can see the whole picture. That's the main aspect that we were promoting with this tool."

"The initial setup was not straightforward."

"No Magic has the tools and capabilities to model a complete enterprise and all product lines."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool. You can use it for business architecture design. You can use it for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise. However, it was initially designed and developed for model-based systems engineering. That's the systems engineering required to either produce an IP system or product. It takes away the mounds of paper and puts it into a model. It enables you to generate significant savings by modeling that new product or that system before you ever start developing a prototype."

"When you look at it, No Magic is an all-encompassing tool; you can use it for business architecture design, for deploying an ERP system across your enterprise, for managing new product development from cradle to grave, and it enables you to generate a digital model of your product or service solution that can be run through simulations and tested before you spend a single penny on bending metal or configuring a new ERP software application, resulting in massive cost savings."

More No Magic MagicDraw pros

Cons

"Sometimes we feel that the designer needs more usability. I understand that the web module or the cloud version is much more user-friendly and easier to work on compared to the client that we download."

"I always tell people not to use the latest version of the ARIS product. They are just providing us with new changes that we don't want."

"Sometimes, it's not easy to convince customers to use this methodology because it's a bit rigid."

"You can have a collaboration feature, but it's necessary to have ARIS Connect which is a separate, costly product."

"The product is not flexible."

"We face problems when the product's capacity is increased."

"The support team takes a long time to respond to our queries."

"The licenses are very costly. I've seen many people who are hesitant or not able to use ARIS Suite just because of the license cost."

More ARIS Architect and Designer cons

"Larger models slow you down; committing, updating, merging of branches and comparing of models (diff) do not scale yet; issues will hopefully be solved with upcoming V19."

"When I am working with my Mac and I right-click to copy and paste, it doesn't work."

"The MagicDraw or CAMEO system is good on its own, but it should be integrated and should come out of the box with the simulation toolkit because there are some things you can't do without it, making it very difficult to have to look for another license to be able to do that."

"They don't really support code engineering, and that's why we have to move to Enterprise Architect. MagicDraw is stuck at C++03 standards, whereas most C++ programs today want to use the latest definition of the C++ standards. We were at C++11, and we wanted to do code engineering with C++11 or 17, but they didn't support it. That pushed us into a different tool, which is Sparx Enterprise Architect."

"Some of No Magic MagicDraw's most valuable features were its integration with other simulation tools, such as MATLAB, the seasonal plugin, and the Rangel simulation toolkit."

"For the next releases, I would like to have them import requirements from other sources. They could make it very easy to do that because there are a lot requirements management tools like DOORS, D-O-O-R-S, Dynamic Object Oriented Management. A lot of folks use DOORS to create a requirement. For those requirements you allocate them to a component in the architecture and a verification method for that requirement. It would be good if we could import those into MagicDraw as components so you don't have to manually do these things."

"One potential area for improvement is the recommendation feature. At times, we face challenges in locating specific features, and we have to reach out for assistance in finding the information we need."

"The price of the solution could be reduced."

More No Magic MagicDraw cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool is a little bit expensive."

"The licenses are very costly. I've seen many people who are hesitant or not able to use ARIS Suite just because of the license cost. Even though they like all the functionalities and understand the value of everything ARIS provides, they aren't able to implement it."

"The product is expensive."

"Many customers find the licensing configuration confusing. There are many different sub-details in the licensing, making it very difficult for us to understand what we are buying and what we are using with what."

"I would say licensing would be anywhere from $3,500 to $6,500 per person or per seat (it's a per seat style license)."

"I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. It is an expensive product compared to software for model-based system engineering."

"The price of No Magic MagicDraw could improve. The price of the solution is too expensive for smaller-sized companies. There should be a better pricing model."

"In addition to the initial cost, you have to pay annually for support in order to get the upgrades."

"The licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's expensive."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

21%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	3

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ARIS Architect and Designer?

Currently, we don't have any metrics to measure the success of ARIS Architect and Designer. We would appreciate it if you could share anything with us that we can do to find out the impact.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ARIS Architect and Designer?

We spoke with you about ARIS Architect and Designer. We already have two architect licenses, I think three architect licenses, and we have, I think, six or seven designer licenses. Architect is bas...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ARIS Architect and Designer?

The reviewer is a consultant at KAFD. We would give ARIS Architect and Designer an overall review rating of ten out of ten.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for No Magic MagicDraw?

Maybe the price is a little bit high for a small company to acquire this tool. However, they offer trial versions and trial licenses for members of INCOSE.

See all answers

What needs improvement with No Magic MagicDraw?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for No Magic MagicDraw?

I deal with DOD lifecycle acquisition sorts of things as some of the main use cases currently, and I expect to continue using it for more than 25 years.

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS Cloud vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 28% of the time

Camunda vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 10% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 8% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs ARIS Architect and Designer

Compared 3% of the time

More ARIS Architect and Designer Competitors

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 17% of the time

Visio vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 12% of the time

Visual Paradigm vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 8% of the time

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs No Magic MagicDraw

Compared 7% of the time

More No Magic MagicDraw Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ARIS Architect and Designer

September 2026

Download ARIS Architect and Designer product report

Buyer's Guide

No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Download No Magic MagicDraw product report

Also Known As

ARIS Architect & Designer, ARIS Architect, ARIS Designer

MagicDraw

Overview

ARIS Architect and Designer offers customizable process visualization and collaboration tools designed for efficient enterprise architecture management, emphasizing compliance, governance, and strategic planning.

Organizations use ARIS Architect and Designer for creating central repositories, process modeling, enterprise architecture, and business process design. Its strengths include extensive customization, process visualization, and robust model libraries. Users benefit from metadata definition, cross-notational alignment, and predefined workflows that support compliance and governance. The tool facilitates integration and synchronization for informed decision-making and enhances communication. Improvements are sought in licensing costs, support response, usability, and cloud reliability. Users desire more process mining features, built-in collaborative tools, better data export options, and simplified process modeling.

What are the key features?

User-friendliness: Easy navigation and setup for efficient workflow.
Customization: Tailor processes to specific business requirements.
Robust model library: Access to a wide range of templates and models.
Collaboration capabilities: Enable teamwork with integrated tools.
Process visualization: Enhance understanding of complex processes.
Metadata definition: Define and manage metadata effectively.
Integration and synchronization: Seamless communication across systems.
Compliance and governance: Use predefined workflows to ensure adherence.
Data analysis and reporting: Tools to track performance and aid strategic planning.

What benefits should users look for?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined process design and management.
Enhanced strategic planning: Data-driven tools for informed decisions.
Improved communication: Synchronization across departments.
Compliance support: Meeting regulatory requirements with ease.

ARIS Architect and Designer is primarily deployed on-premise for greater process control and is extensively used across industries for documenting reference models and serving as a knowledge hub. Organizations highlight its role in identifying process gaps, designing architecture diagrams, and generating job descriptions, with future enhancements planned for simulation and dashboard integration.

Software AG

No Magic MagicDraw is a powerful modeling tool recognized for its flexibility and integration capabilities, especially suited for enterprise modeling and systems engineering. Featuring a user-friendly interface, it supports diverse modeling architectures with tools for testing and simulation.

Renowned for its compliance with OMG standards, No Magic MagicDraw excels in offering comprehensive modeling options that support model-based systems engineering. Its rich feature set enables digital model creation aimed at testing and simulation, backed by a strong suite of integration tools. The tool facilitates program management integration with systems engineering, making it suitable for complex enterprise projects. However, suggestions for improvement include a redesign for a more intuitive interface and enhanced documentation. Licensing costs are higher compared to competitors, and integration requests include compatibility with SAP and modern C++ standards.

What are the most important features of No Magic MagicDraw?

Flexibility: Adapts to different modeling needs and architectures with ease.
User-friendly Interface: Simplifies access and usage for modeling tasks.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with tools like Doors.
Standard Compliance: Aligns with OMG standards.
Traceability: Maintains visibility across project changes.

What benefits and ROI should users expect from No Magic MagicDraw?

Comprehensive Support: Access to excellent technical support.
Enhanced Collaboration: Facilitates model-driven documentation and teamwork.
Strategic Efficiency: Streamlines processes, reducing time in business transformation projects.

No Magic MagicDraw is widely deployed for tasks including business transformation, system architecture modeling, and supporting defense programs, proving invaluable in enterprise and system modeling. It aids in strategy integration, process design, and offers extensive features like simulations and lifecycle engineering.

Dassault Systèmes

Sample Customers

Tesco, Weifu, Airbus, Siemens, Proximus, Alicorp, Sekerbank, Bancor, Philips,Sky, Emirates NBD, Dubai Municipality, Suva, U.S. Army, Australia Post, Westfalen Weser Energie - ARIS serves customers across all industries and of every size worldwide. Companies trust ARIS as the market leader for process excellence with more than 30 years of experience in the market, 10 million users worldwide, from 1 user companies to the Fortune 500.

Northrop Grumman, Labcorp, Deposco, ClearView Training, IT Services Promotion Agency, Intelligent Chaos, Metalithic Systems Inc., Sodifrance

Buyer's Guide

ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw

September 2026

Free Report: ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw

Find out what your peers are saying about ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ARIS Architect and Designer vs. No Magic MagicDraw report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.