

Aruba ClearPass and ExtremeControl compete in network access control, with Aruba ClearPass having an advantage in ease of use, attracting those who prioritize user-friendly implementation, while ExtremeControl attracts users looking for comprehensive security features.
Features: Aruba ClearPass provides guest access management and BYOD capabilities, enhancing security and integration with various third-party products. ExtremeControl is known for scalability, offering granular visibility and control of network access in large enterprises, with a feature set supporting complex policy enforcement.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba ClearPass is straightforward in deployment with comprehensive customer support, simplifying the process for networks of all sizes. ExtremeControl offers effective deployment models, requiring more technical knowledge, with robust support services.
Pricing and ROI: Aruba ClearPass is cost-effective with a strong ROI due to its user-friendly interface and setup, offering flexible pricing for small to medium enterprises. ExtremeControl, though having higher initial costs, delivers long-term value with its functionality, balancing pricing with its extensive feature offerings.
Using Aruba ClearPass has resulted in less engineering time compared to other products we've used.
The investment is huge for enterprise clients, but Aruba ClearPass makes processes easier.
Having good connectivity through Wi-Fi is essential for the entire business.
Portnox is one level up, as their customer support is outstanding.
We have faced delays in the resolution of production issues after raising tickets, which impacts productivity.
If Aruba ClearPass is not working, then the organization is not working because this is the access control in the organization.
If we are out of upgrades or there is a new upgrade, they sometimes require us to upgrade to provide support.
For technical support of ExtremeControl, I have no doubts that they cope with problems effectively.
I believe the scalability of ClearPass is rated as ten out of ten.
Everything will be handled when you add new users because all configurations are deployed from the beginning.
In our environment, ClearPass handles up to 100,000 users, which is better than some other NAC solutions like Fortinox that scale up to 25,000.
For scalability in larger environments, it can be rated a maximum of 10.
I have experienced more than three years without zero downtime with Aruba ClearPass.
There are issues with some versions, especially in integrating with AD and SSL configurations over port sixty-three.
However, there are disadvantages when it is not on-premises, as every NAC suffers from it if it is not on-premises.
The language and policy enforcement mechanisms are not clear, making it difficult to use the product effectively.
It is also better to improve threat intelligence for built-in threat detection and prevention.
A more streamlined menu of licensing options would be helpful.
We rely more on the cloud for analytics rather than on-premise, and some customers prefer relying on an on-premise solution rather than a cloud solution.
For their wired network, especially with third-party switching, this is where most of the features are lost.
There is also another product called UZTNA, which is said to have NAC in this solution, but it is not as advanced as our regular ExtremeControl.
Achieving the best price requires careful selection from a menu of licensing options.
We cannot mix in prices, and of course, prices are going higher.
Aruba ClearPass is a premium product with higher pricing, which seems unnecessary given its complexity.
Compared to other competitors, they have the best pricing.
The pricing of ExtremeControl is considerable; I would rate it at eight or nine.
For smaller ones, they need to consider that the price for less than 1,000 users is important, as this is the minimum number of users required for a license.
In Aruba ClearPass, you can have control of all authentication in the company.
The ClearPass solution has reduced the amount of engineering time compared to previous solutions, making it more efficient for our purposes.
The most effective feature for us is the OnGuard feature.
The biggest benefits for my customers from ExtremeControl include the ability to integrate third-party devices, integration with user databases like Microsoft Active Directory or other directory software, and it is easy to maintain by customers.
Integrating ExtremeControl with ExtremeConnect provides an additional layer of security and control over what devices are onboarding to the network, granting full visibility.
The most effective feature of ExtremeControl is that whenever any user is connected through the network, I can really dig down and check exactly what applications they have been using.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Aruba ClearPass | 18.5% |
| ExtremeControl | 2.5% |
| Other | 79.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 44 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 25 |
| Large Enterprise | 33 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
Aruba ClearPass provides robust authentication and policy enforcement with seamless integration capabilities, enhancing security for corporate networks. It handles guest access, BYOD management, and offers dynamic segmentation and extensive network visibility.
Aruba ClearPass supports diverse environments through integrated device profiling, enhancing network and user security. Its intuitive GUI simplifies management while dynamic segmentation offers tailored user experiences. Though highly functional, users seek improvements in interface intuitiveness and simplified configurations. Streamlined integration, better support, and clarity in licensing are also desired to enhance user experience. Deployed primarily for network access control and wireless management, Aruba ClearPass ensures secure corporate network access with identity authentication, policy enforcement, and detailed visibility.
What are the core features?In healthcare, Aruba ClearPass manages secure access for medical devices and personnel, ensuring compliance and confidentiality. Schools utilize it for managing student and guest network access, while enterprises integrate it for consistent security across corporate environments.
ExtremeControl delivers efficient end-user activity recognition and traffic monitoring, valued for its user-friendliness, flexibility, and strong third-party integration. It secures mobile environments reliably and consistently, aiding in detailed application monitoring and troubleshooting.
ExtremeControl provides seamless security integration, recognized for its capacity to seamlessly incorporate user databases and third-party devices, ensuring enhanced and reliable security. The comprehensive features, backed by straightforward documentation and implementation processes, support the detailed monitoring of application traffic, which assists in troubleshooting. It is not without areas for development, particularly in on-premises controllers that could benefit from more features and options. Additional control over network traffic and improved product integration, especially with certificate management and cloud analytics, are desirable enhancements.
What are the key features of ExtremeControl?ExtremeControl is commonly implemented in educational institutions and enterprises, managing user identities and network security, integrating Active Directory, and supporting BYOD policies. It enables custom device authentication, setting policies for internal network access and quarantining unauthorized devices. Organizations benefit from seamless third-party integration, supporting secure network environments.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.