

Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall and Aruba Orchestrator are competing products in the network security and management space. Customers are generally more satisfied with Forcepoint's pricing and ease of deployment, while Aruba Orchestrator is favored for its comprehensive features, despite the higher cost.
Features: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is known for its advanced threat protection, seamless unified policy management, and integrated multi-layer filtering. Aruba Orchestrator offers extensive network visibility, flexible control capabilities, and a robust REST API integration.
Room for Improvement: Forcepoint can enhance its user interface for clearer usability, streamline menu navigation, and improve cost-effectiveness. Aruba Orchestrator could offer simplified user configuration, improve support documentation, and optimize deployment time.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Forcepoint offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer support, providing detailed guidance and rapid problem resolution. Aruba Orchestrator's deployment is more complex but offers superior configurability with the aid of knowledgeable support to handle complexities.
Pricing and ROI: Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall typically offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, potentially resulting in a quicker ROI for cost-conscious companies. Aruba Orchestrator, while more expensive, delivers a strong ROI via its advanced feature set, leading to long-term network efficiencies.
I have seen a return on investment and financial benefit from using Aruba Orchestrator.
We don't see return on investment, but we love the technology, so we purchase because of the technology.
Cybersecurity ROI could be $1 or $100 million, depending on the risk of data behind it.
It is easy and offers different solutions for each solution type with small, mid, and large scale options available.
I did see a return on investment with Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall, as mentioned by the efficiency improvements and the metrics related to how much I cut investigation time, the number of incidents, and the ease of making changes or pushing new configurations.
The technical support of Aruba is very supportive and excellent.
I would rate my experience with technical support from Aruba as eight out of ten.
Unlike Fortinet where you can escalate an issue and quickly get responses from the development team, Forcepoint's process seems slow and challenging.
TAC engineers are very experienced and troubleshoot issues within the expected timeframe with no problems.
We have a point of contact from the account manager to the presales representative, and they connect with the technical support team, providing support in Indian time, so we do not have to worry about US or European time zones.
I can have one management node similar to Palo Alto Panorama, with multiple nodes covering different sites, data centers, or zones.
Even if you have some firewalls in the cluster, it is not necessary to have them on the same version.
In a country such as India with a large population, we often need to scale up or down depending on projects and requirements, and it is very much easy to do both ways.
We had Cisco infrastructure in the past before we replaced it with Aruba, and our experience is much better with Aruba compared to Cisco—far, far better.
It has many freezes for no reason.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall should make some improvements because there is some instability with their software.
The price should be improved as it is very high.
It would be great if they would have a fully multi-tenant solution on their Orchestrator.
Fast response and efficient handling of issues, similar to how Fortinet responds, would be great.
AI improvements could be beneficial, as having AI capabilities has become an important checkmark feature.
I recommend that additional features be included in a single license to avoid the need for extra licensing costs.
Regarding my experience with the pricing and setup costs, I find it expensive software compared to others.
The costs can be high since additional features require separate licenses.
In terms of price, I would say Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is not expensive.
In terms of pricing, I would place Forcepoint in the middle when compared to other firewalls like Fortinet and Palo Alto.
Integration capabilities with cloud and on-prem environments help my organization maintain a hybrid approach.
The security features of Aruba Orchestrator are really good; I don't think there is any issue with security.
It's really great that it connects today all the gateways and SD-WAN solution with the SASE and the zero trust network access.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has impacted my organization positively by making it very easy to work and offering a more competitive price compared to other vendors.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall has positively impacted my organization by providing always-on perimeter security.
Strong network segmentation is my favorite feature that Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall | 2.4% |
| Aruba Orchestrator | 1.5% |
| Other | 96.1% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 29 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
Aruba Orchestrator combines WAN optimization with SD-WAN for seamless management, reduced setup times, and enhanced internal visibility. It integrates REST API and offers a single pane of glass interface, valued for its analytics, optimization, and security features.
Aruba Orchestrator provides unified management for SD-WAN devices, optimizing connections across branches to lower WAN costs. It enhances application capabilities and data access globally, enabling reports, health monitoring, and efficient MPLS connectivity. While offering robust tools, pricing and menu complexity are areas for improvement. Expanding multi-tenant structures and cloud flexibility could better meet user needs. Integrating dynamic security features would enhance its offerings. Although deployment is quick, simplifying complexities and improving training resources are essential for improved efficiency and user-friendliness.
What are Aruba Orchestrator's most important features?In finance, Aruba Orchestrator helps manage SD-WAN for branch connectivity and cost savings. In healthcare, it optimizes connections for data access across multiple locations. Retailers use it to streamline their network's connectivity, while educational institutions benefit from enhanced application performance and reporting capabilities.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall offers robust network protection with features like URL filtering and advanced threat protection, ensuring comprehensive security and operational efficiency across various infrastructures.
Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall integrates URL filtering and advanced threat protection, including intrusion prevention and DDoS prevention. The centralized management console provides application awareness, strong network segmentation, and SD-WAN capabilities. Its graphical interface enhances user experience, while efficient technical support and seamless integration offer stability and scalability. Companies use it for perimeter security, VPNs, and threat prevention, optimizing performance in diverse sectors.
What are the key features of Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall?Forcepoint Next Generation Firewall is widely implemented in sectors including finance, education, and government, offering security for data centers and managing remote access with IPsec VPN tunnels, SSL VPNs, and site-to-site connectivity. Companies appreciate its use for Unified Threat Management and automatic optimization, ensuring data security and efficient network performance.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.